I was invited to write an article for the notable publication EdSource in California about the reauthorization of NCLB.
I have no illusions that anyone in Congress is paying attention, but this is what I believe needs to be done to end the madness of high-stakes testing and the use of federal law to expand choice instead of equity.
My article was a response to Secretary Duncan, who had written a piece called “How Not to Fix NCLB.”
I wrote:
Instead of talking about “how not to fix NCLB,” here are a few ideas for how genuinely to fix NCLB:
Restore the original purpose of the ESEA: equity for poor children and the schools they attend. These schools need more money for smaller classes, social workers, nurses, and librarians, not more testing.
Designate federal aid for reducing class size, for intensive tutoring by certified teachers and for other interventions that are known to be effective.
Raise standards for those entering teaching.
Eliminate the testing and accountability portions of the law and leave decisions about when and how often to test to states and districts.
Rely on the federal testing program – the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) – to provide an audit of every state’s progress. NAEP data are disaggregated by race, gender, ethnicity, language and disability status. NAEP tracks achievement gaps between blacks and whites and Hispanics and whites. Anyone who wishes to compare Missouri and California can easily do so with NAEP data that measures performance in reading and math in 4th and 8th grade every two years.
Testing every child every year in grades 3-8 and 11 is an enormous waste of money and instructional time. Testing samples of students, as the NAEP does, tells us whatever we need to know. Teachers should write their own tests; they know what they taught and what their students should have learned. Use normed standardized tests only for diagnostic purposes, to help students, not to reward or punish them and not to reward or punish their teachers or close their schools.

So true! Thanks. Maybe this should be the seed for a Student Bill of Rights. Common Core and PARCC testing is an affront to freedom and liberty. So much so, we see a budding security apparatus forming to monitor students, teachers, and parents. We already criminalize copyright law out of the civil realm. Only a matter of time until the FBI is asked by Pearson to track down 15 year olds for chatting about test questions.
LikeLike
Why is common sense so controversial.
Diane, your plans to “simplify” the system should leave every reader nodding their heads saying, “yes, of course!”
Unfortunately, the students’ welfare is not the decision maker’s top concern – it’s how to make the most money off the back of the education system.
There’s gold in dem dair hills.
Ellen T Klock
LikeLike
It is unfortunate that your reasonable, logical suggestions will be ignored. Big money interests will never allow those funds to reach the students that need it the most. Too many members of Congress are morally bankrupt.
LikeLike
You cover all of the important points in the argument ‘to save public-education’ so easily and eloquently in this interview.
Arnie Duncan will be listening, but only because he knows that you have a big voice that parents, students and teachers are listening to. Since we are not the constituency that he represents, you are definitely a force on the other side to be reckoned with.
LikeLike
And give teachers time to teach….the way it is now, they want you to test more than teach, which is ridiculous. I will continue to refuse.
LikeLike
Well and simply said. It somehow makes me think how letting politicians run education is like letting stock brokers run an auto repair shop. Neither really understands what they are doing.
LikeLike
This posting—
A most excellent way to move the discussion forward!
Thank you very much.
😎
LikeLike
There is nothing as uncommon as common sense.
I found some of the commentaries and posts that appeared in the sidebar next to your article rather disconcerting.
“Common Core standards emphasize ‘math that matters most’”;
“New standards and tests are worth the effort”;
“Hand scorers sought for online Common Core tests”.
But not to worry. As of Feb 19, ETS has recruited 6,294 people to work as hand scorers, pending their passing certification. Of those, 3,777 have passed certification, according to the California Department of Education. 241 of them are current California teachers.
That certainly boosts my confidence in the reliability and validity of the results.
LikeLike
I forgot to mention that the hand scorers will be paid $13 per hour.
LikeLike
GE2L2R,
The teachers will not see how their sfudents answered questions, what they got wrong. This makes the test pointless.
LikeLike
In Utah, the “hand scorers” aren’t even paid. English teachers were required to go to a central location to read essays. Most of my school’s English department was gone on and off for two weeks, with substitutes for their classes. THAT was their pay–that their sub was paid for.
LikeLike
In NC they are trying to change the law to make the State Superintendent’s role (currently elected) into a position appointed by the Governor, with the State Board of Ed appointed by the Governor (of course NC voters would have to approve this because it would be a Constitution change). The Republican defending it uses as the rationale the fact that too many positions are trying to run the schools. And he’s right. Which is why our General Assembly and Governor should let those whose job it is to make policy decisions do so.
I will never understand the notion of legislating achievement. To me, it is akin to legislating how much a person can weigh by a certain age.
Anyway, I appreciate this concise list and recommendation for how to fix NCLB. Thank you Dr. Ravitch.
LikeLike
policy decisions regarding education, that is.
https://www.ednc.org/2015/03/13/lawmaker-to-atkinson-out-you-go/
LikeLike
“From your mouth to God’s ears” is the cliche, but if only your words were herd by those who make the policy. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the people of this nation rose with one voice to support such an authentic agenda. As alway, your voice is the real one.
LikeLike
I would add one thing:
We know that it is not good to place all poor, minority children in one school. Children have a right to be integrated into the general population. In order to alleviate this problem, all public schools should we required to take a certain percentage of poor students from other districts. These schools would get money for these children and would have some latitude in accepting these students.
Another way to achieve this same purpose would be to reinforce the laws for low-income housing in ALL communities.
LikeLike
I take some of offense to your comment. I teach “poor” students, we are a great school. We could be even better if Cuomo would give us the foundation aid we are entitled to. The districts around us are getting a much higher percentage of their foundation aid because they are wealthier districts. The poor don’t need to be dispersed to get a high quality education. They need equitable funding that all children deserve.
LikeLike
I can see where my comment might sound offensive. However, the research shows that low-income children achieve at higher levels when they are integrated into middle income schools. While I agree that “the poor don’t need to be dispersed to get a high quality education”, they usually do better when they can go to more affluent schools. I also agree that more equitable funds are needed for schools in low-income areas.
That said, what most of us want for our own children is probably best for all children. It would be great if we all thought of the best possible school for our own child and then advocated for that kind of quality for everyone’s child.
LikeLike
I am advocating for my students what I want for my own child. Luckily my child does not hear nightly gun fire, watch people being killed in the streets, has food to eat, lights and heat, and access to dental and medical services. I don’t see how dispersing poor children to wealthier districts is going to solve any of those problems unless you also suggest shipping off the families to these other districts as well. My district is working very hard to provide families with the tools they need to help their children succeed. Simply closing down an entire district is not the solution.
LikeLike
Many more people agree with you than with me. Even teachers who want the best for their students would not want to see these students admitted to affluent schools. Why do you think this is?
LikeLike
I see many families who love their children and want the best for them. They are willing to come school for family events, conferences, classroom activites, and parent workshops. They seem to want for their children what the wealthier districts do not have to fight for. All I am saying is that everyone deserves a high quality education and it should not be based on your zip code. There are many factors that can lead to a community’s downfall. Look a cities that prosper when businesses flourish. What happens when these businesses are gone? I saw it when I was a kid. IBM was a major employer in my city. Then they tanked and closed up shop. Wealthier families left the area and the economy sank further and further. Do we throw away these communities or do we fight to save them? What happens when the economic crisis spreads? Do we keep closing districts and bus children further and further away from home?
LikeLike
Thank-you for all your excellent ideas. I fully support all but one. “Raise standards for those entering teaching.” makes me nervous. I don’t want us to fall into the trap of telling institutions of higher learning what to do any more than I want government telling teachers how to teach. It seems to me that if a student can be accepted by a college, can complete all course requirements, and have a successful student teaching experience, then they should be allowed to teach. I would even go so far as to expect NYS to get rid of the edTPA. My student teachers spend so much time on it, their student teaching experience is not as rich as it used to be — meaning, in trying to jump through all the government hoops, they are less prepared to teach than before all this nonsense. Thanks for “listening”.
LikeLike
Janice, i dont consider edTPA to be an example of raising standards. It is an effort to standardize.
LikeLike
Granted. But we have now seen what happens when the government sets standards for education in k-12. Why would we want to give them an opening to jump in and/or continue down their destructive path? Perhaps you could rephrase it to read, “Encourage colleges and universities to utilize high standards in selecting students for their education programs.” Just something to think about. Thanks.
LikeLike
You describe a slippery slope, but the truth is not very kind. The colleges have created a fad degree for ed majors, and all too many are graduating with very little grasp of how learning is acquired, or what the real issues a teacher will be facing.
There are superb colleges, too, and there are people who are so talented and so intuitive that they are born to teach what they know, but there has to be genuine objectives for teachers, and courses that offer teachers support for learning.
Bill Keller did a piece on this subject.
LikeLike
Hi Susan, I followed your link and read the article. It reminds me of the nonsense published on our “failing” schools that justified the creation of the Common Core and all its ensuing angst. I can tell you that here in NYS public universities (I have worked for three of them) do a serious, excellent job at preparing students to teach. And, yes, we always strive to improve. The only thing preventing us from doing better still is time being wasted on having to jump through the latest government-created hoops. They need to back off and let us teach! Heard that anywhere else lately?
LikeLike
I hear that everywhere from my friends who are college professors. But that is the mantra of teachers in lower ed.
When I read Joe Shatzky’s manuscript, I remember thinking, “Oh my god, they have been so successful in taking over lower ed, that they are moving on to the colleges…this country is OVER! Education IS the key to a society’s success. I tis the key to the success of dictators, too. the Saudis know that, so do the Russian Oligharchs and the Chinese and North Koreans.
Thanks for writing. Feel free to message me at OEN http://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
I fyou want t correspond with me privately on issues about education or photography ( aim a photographer, but only share my work in email.
LikeLike
I would also like to put in a plug for a diverse teaching force, racially and ethnically and a careful analysis of what raising standards means so that they reflect the insights of all stakeholders. While I loved my students and they came to respect and accept me, I cannot stress the importance of my Afro-American parapro’s guidance and support enough. She helped me earn my stripes.
LikeLike
To all readers:
Here is a beautiful soul from a 5 year-old prodigy who has trust and faith in God’s love. Please enjoy her piano talent through her blind sight, BUT very sharp sight in God’s love. Back2basic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfgZGm3nOOs
Blind 5 year old plays piano (makes you cry)
LikeLike
Dear Dr. Ravitch:
Here is what I express in EdSource.
To all parents and educators who concern for civility in America:
The ultimate goal in public Education is that educators will cultivate the civil rights, the civilization in humanity, and the responsibility of being civilized citizens in the most powerful country like America in early 20th century (1914-1945).
Throughout all historical cultures in the world, we must recognize that the peak of harmonious time in any powerful nation happens in the period when people (= general public), young and old are happy at work and at school. All tests and competitions should not impose on people whether at work or at school because these unwanted events put pressures and stresses on people. As a result, people become frustrated and sick.
Therefore, the rich bribes the power in order to create chaos to people, so that the rich can make profit from selling the stresses and medication. Most of all, the rich aims to create many modern slaves or a generation of “YES” men and “YES” women who follow rules and regulation without knowing how to reason or debate.
If all parents and all educators love children, please unite to join OP OUT movement in order to cultivate children how to exercise their civil rights by example and action. It is right time to cultivate children how to protect their civility and democracy by practicing their country’s constitution.
Whoever loves testing scheme; please remember that children will take up any challenge whenever they are ready. Could you realize that immigrants overcome the language barrier to achieve many high status quo positions in wherever they settle? There is a simple reason that immigrants ask for their dignity award, NOT punishment.
In conclusion, there are so many cheating scandals for a monetary reward, BUT only hard-work, effort, and CONSCIENCE in contributing to the well-being of humankind will be awarded with Nobel Prize. Please DO NOT impose any stresses on people, young or old. Everyone has his/her own pace to progress. We need to learn how to care and share by helping one to another, BUT not by bullying. Back2basic
LikeLike
If only they really cared about helping children, instead of hurting public education.
LikeLike
Dearest Susan:
I completely agree with your sharp recognition and analysis of today teaching program. I would love to repeat your wisdom as follows:
“The colleges have created a fad degree for ed majors, and all too many are graduating with very little grasp of how learning is acquired, or what the real issues a teacher will be facing.
There are superb colleges, too, and there are people who are so talented and so intuitive that they are born to teach what they know, but there has to be genuine objectives for teachers, and courses that offer teachers support for learning.” May.
LikeLike
Thank you May, for responding.
You have found the 2 things I said, and both of them are absolutely the observable reality, my definition (and Bloom’s) of truth!
Sometimes, I think I am talking to myself, but I was born in 1941, have been a teacher since 1963, have 2 degrees, and the equivalent of 2 more, have taught full-time in 7 schools, and subbed for 12 years in 14 more, and I know a thing or two about what works and what does not.
The snow is melting here, and the crows & blackbirds have arrived.
Be all
Susan
LikeLike
Interesting conversation. I got my NYS teaching certification in kind of a roundabout way. I had a BA, MA and all coursework for the PhD in French when I decided to get certified to teach 7-12 French. So, I only had 1 course in education (an elective I happened to take). I got certification by taking a battery of tests for which I studied very little. These included EdPsy, early childhood learning, etc. Again, I studied VERY LITTLE for these tests. Then I took the “teacher exams” required by NYS. I never did student teaching in the traditional sense. My MA and PhD work included a teaching assistantship where I taught college level beginning and intermediate French. I had a great supervisor. I also taught Spanish at a private school for a year and this counted as “student teaching.” So, I actually had many years of teaching before I began in high school. I am seeing young teachers with ED degrees who make so many errors in their content (French, for example) because they haven’t had enough coursework. I even know some young teachers who can’t pass the Content Specialty Test in French (required by NYS) because they don’t have the grasp of the subject. I really think being well-educated in the subject you are going to teach is the key. I’m not saying that methods courses don’t have their place – they do. But one has to be extremely knowledgeable in one’s field to teach well. This is something that private schools understand. Those schools usually want people who are expert in their field and who have had a wide range of experiences on which to draw. They don’t necessarily want someone who is certified by the state.
LikeLike
Somehow I seriously doubt that class management is much of a problem at most private schools. The codes of conduct tend to be strict and there is no negotiation. Parents and students are expected to understand and abide by the code. I know I am overgeneralizing, but comparing teaching in public vs private schools is comparing apples to oranges.
LikeLike
I agree. I was just making a comment on the difference between what public schools and private schools are looking for in a teacher. Many private school teachers do not have Education degrees. They have higher degrees in their chosen field.
LikeLike
the 4 Principles of learning, out of 8, that apply to the classroom.
There must be
:1- CLEAR EXPECTATIONS,
2- REWARDS FOR LEARNING.
3- AUTHENTIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND
4-GENUINE EVALUATION AND A TEACHER WHO KNOWS HER CONTENT MATERIAL THOROUGHLY, WITH A THOROUGH GRASP OF AGE APPROPRIATE TEACHING METHODS .
# 4 IS ESSENTIAL.
These were four out of 8 principles that were the PEW RESEARCHED NATIONAL STANDARDS, for which I was the NYC cohort.
IF you ask how come you never heard of this Harvard research of Dr Lauren Resnik’s theory which cost zillions and covered 12 major districts in this nation, and was conducted by the LRDC of the University of Pittsburgh… my answer is. EXACTLY.
Poof! Gone! If I hadn’t been the cohort for 2 years, I would think it never existed.
Replaced by the NCLB non -researched mandates about teaching, so that the professional, experienced educators could evaluated right out of the schools.
LikeLike
This comment is not directed at you, Susan, since I know you know what you are doing and, I think, would echo what I am going to say about rewards. Be careful with rewards for learning. We want rewards to be intrinsic as they are naturally for little kids. No one has to give a child anything to get them to keep trying to walk. If nothing else we want children to know the satisfaction of a job well done. It’s always nice to celebrate successes but not so the hoopla becomes an expectation. Too many positive behavior programs devolve into “What do I get if I do this?” I like the word “recognition” rather than reward even if it is as small as a head nod to a thoughtful comment. There are natural, accepted ways of recognizing someone’s efforts that do not involve a tangible token. Then again, we don’t want children to go unnoticed or only get noticed for disruptive behavior. That is where some careful positive reinforcement comes in: catch them doing something good.
LikeLike
I appreciate your heads up about ‘rewards. I agree completely about intrinsic rewards, and are constantly shocked by the popular culture’s need to give achievement certificates and trophies to everyone, for just showing up. The ‘esteem’ culture is ironically producing the opposite result… children who expect to get something for doing what i expected of them.
The eight principles of learning, being third level research by Harvard and the Univ of Pittsburgh’s LRDC, was VERY specific by what they meant by rewards.
In each cohort that was observed, they looked for indicators for the intrinsic rewards that motivated young emergent minds to pursue hard work. The theory wasALL ABOUT DOING WORK or what they called EFFORT-BASED LEARNING. I believe that there were 21 indicators for the Principle governing rewards/motivations
As an example: I did not give grades for most of the year, on the writing my students did.
I gave each student a skills sheet that accompanied the returned ‘reader’s letter’, my weekly writing assessment tool. It was very specific, and had to be signed by a parent. I explained clearly what skills needed improvement.
But, on the returned letter itself, I often wrote a long comment, always identifying what was interesting or important in the writing. Often, I wrote a personal note, explaining what I loved about a book, or recommending another book, or even a personal anecdote.
My classroom was limed often , over the 2 years, and the researchers noted that on the day that the letter folders were returned, the kids read my comments to each other, and the letters with long comments delighted the children. In one clip, a child asked, out loud, how come she only wrote a few words to me. Hearing this, I called him over and said:
“You do know that it is the only assignment I give, and you have a week to meet the criteria for a ‘best work.” Is this, indeed YOUR best work?”
“You get what you give in these letters.”
“If you write an interesting letter that meets the criteria, then, when I am reading it , maybe at 1 am, as the last of 35 letters, I may feel that it deserves a long response, so I will put it aside, and write one the next day.”
“you gave be a summary of the book? There were no personal reflections. You did not tell me what you ‘took away’ from the book. You did not show me that you noticed the writers craft, which we discuss in all that we read. Were there any beautiful lyrical sentences, or descriptions that you loved.? Did the characters show any behaviors that revealed their personality or intentions? Were there metaphors or similes, or interesting telling details… all the things we talk about in this room?”
” How come you didn’t even bother to punctuate or spell correctly, making it hard for me to read. There were no paragraphs. YOU know that step 3 is ‘getting it ready of the reader… ME!
“This is the same kind of letter you like the letters you handed in 3 months ago in September. Look at your folder.”
I offered him the chance to talk to another student about his book or to me, each week, so he could get some ideas to create a more interesting letter. Mind you, we always have an ‘exchange’ period, each week, where the kids read each others letters and pick out the things that made them laugh, or were interesting, such as where a character did something surprising, or where the author created a mood, etc. And the most interesting letters were copied and put into the class loose-leaf folder, so everyone could see what classmates were writing. (in fact, it was that book which brought the research to my practice, because it showed that LEARNING was going on, and in a very unique way.
The LRDC said that my response to their writing WAS the reward.
PS. One kid who came in writing 50 words in September, wrote in June (at the top of his last letter, “I can’t believe I wrote 3010 words!”
From the letters, came ideas for their stories and essays. I posted the best of them in the hallway. They stopped visitors in their tracks, and often I heard someone say, “How old are these kids,” because some of their letters were rich in literary analysis, and could have been written for the book section of the NY Times. I admit, 50% of my students were in the 90th %ile in reading. It is a hoot to read a 13 year old’s opinion of Gatsby, or of Hemingway.”
LikeLike
I have watched students’ academic performance decline over the years since we in Massachusetts started using the MCAS test that tests every student at different grade levels through 10th grade. Passing the test is a requirement for graduation. Because the consequences of failing the test are so dire for students and schools we have no choice but to do all we can to get students ready for this test. My school has consistently met its targets and according to the test scores our students should be performing better than they were ten years and more ago. But the fact is that high school basically starts at the 11th grade, because too much of ninth and tenth grade are devoted to preparing students for these tests. And it is unconscionable to not do what can be done to get those students a high school diploma because life after high school would be so much more difficult for them without it. Because the PARCC test is given in the 11th grade, I worry that high school will not begin until the 12th grade. But what I do know now is that 11th grade students entering my American Literature course cannot do what students could do not that many years ago. And this is not a generational thing or differences we all see from year to year, there are things that have to be taught for the first time in 11th grade that had prior to the test been covered in 9th and 10th grade.
In addition, in Massachusetts there are Vocational schools that were originally set up for students that couldn’t thrive in a traditional academic environment and whose interests and future goals were more “vocational” than “academic.” But because Vocational schools were subject to the same “MCAS rules” as every other school and because they had a larger percentage of students that could not do well on these state tests, they no longer accept students whose grade point averages suggest they cannot do well on these state tests. In addition they recruit students that ought to be in an academic and not a “vocational” environment because these students will bring up their test scores.
Aristotle believed that human beings delighted in education, in learning things. Plato said the “mind will not retain what it has been coerced to learn.” We have made education into something that has the potential to provide delight as it provides instruction into something resembling a vocabulary test. They will learn what they need to learn to pass the test, but I am not sure that much of what has been learned stays with them. There was little joy in the getting of this knowledge and little attention paid to the reasons for learning these things in the first place because no matter what I say, the students are motivated not by learning but by the need to pass a test. To a certain degree this has always been true, some students have always remembered what they have learned and others have not. But generally speaking students take less delight in learning than they did a few years ago. This is a subjective observation and may just be the view of an aging teacher looking back to a “golden age” (that probably never existed) but I do not think so.
I spoke with a reporter from “Education Week” about the Common Core Standards a few years ago and what they were doing to my school. She wanted to talk about the footnote (I was always instructed in school not to put something important in a footnote, but only tangential types of things, but that is another issue) on page 5 that said English teachers did not have to devote 80% of their instruction to informational texts. I tried to point out that in spite of the footnote English teachers in my school were told to give up the “literature we loved” and teach informational things instead. That whatever the Common Core said in fact the Literature was being compromised, especially poetry. The reporter did not want to talk about this, but only about the footnote on page 5 that said that shouldn’t happen. It may be that Common Core does permit the teaching of literature (I think it does as I understand it and it is more the implantation of it and the testing than the standards themselves that bother me) but that is not how it is being implemented where I teach.
I have been maintaining an “Educational Devils Dictionary” (inspired by Ambrose Bierce’s more generic Devils Dictionary. I define Public School Teachers as “People who document in great detail what they would do if they had time to teach.” Literacy as “The process by which a little learning becomes a dangerous thing.” And Charter Schools as “What the British call a public school.” The last, Charter Schools, refers to those English schools that have trained the most elite students in that nation that are called public because, like our Charter Schools, anyone can apply (but not necessarily get in) regardless of race, religion, or ethnicity (or class), though the English have been a bit more successful with their schools than we have with our charter schools.
Though it is hackneyed and silly in places I have added the whole dictionary for those that are interested.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
The Educational Devil’s Dictionary
These definitions do not reflect what these terms actually mean, but rather, what they have come to mean in certain academic environments, especially the one in which I teach.
Assessments – Material of which cudgels are made.
Background Material – Information essential to the proper understanding of a literary text that must not be passed along to students for fear it might produce an improper understanding of the work. Knowing what happened in Birmingham and its jail during the Civil Rights movement or at Gettysburg during the Civil War might prejudice a young readers interpretation of works like “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” or the “Gettysburg Address.” Fourscore and seven years ago does not mean today what it meant in 1863, just as an ad in a Birmingham newspaper 100 years later, in 1963, is unimportant today. Students need to live in the present, not, for example, in 1863 or 1963.
Charter School – What the British call a public school.
Close Reading – Reading that is done in close proximity to other students.
Core Curriculum – What everyone must know who has successfully completed a specific course of study. The heart of the curriculum. What public schools often substitute for an education.
Critical Thinking – The process by which students are encouraged to accept without question what is patently false as if it were patently true.
Data – 1.) Random facts that defy interpretation.
2.) A cudgel used to beat teachers.
Differentiated Instruction – The process by which difficult, but meaningful concepts are made innocuous.
Essential Questions – Questions teachers cannot answer for students and students will not answer for teachers. Those questions whose answer is always 42, but no one knows why they were asked.
Faulty Reasoning – The unwillingness to employ the conclusions produced by Critical Thinking.
Grades – Cudgels used to beat students.
Holistic Scoring – Grading system relying heavily on donuts and bagels.
Informational Texts – Texts that are chock full of information. They offer much that needs to be remembered without telling us why what they offer is worth remembering.
Literacy – The process by which a little learning becomes a dangerous thing.
Public Education – An oxymoron that identifies a publically funded institution dedicated to universal illiteracy.
Public School – Where young people congregate to listen to public service announcements.
Public School Teachers – People who document in great detail what they would do if they had time to teach.
Reform – The process by which an institution is transformed into something that is antithetical to its original purpose.
Rigor – That branch of educational forensics that defines the vacuity of instruction. Similar to rigor mortis in medical forensics.
Rubrics – A step-by-step articulation of the expectations a student is required to meet in order to succeed at an assignment that is written in a language no rational creature can understand.
Standardized Tests – Test that offer easy answers to difficult questions. A kind of coloring inside the lines. Perhaps what Mencken had in mind when he said, “For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”
LikeLike
I look forward to the next edition of your dictionary.
LikeLike
I look at this as a communal dictionary to which all should feel free to make their own contributions as we all deal daily with this perversion of language.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLike
Okay, people. Tweak this for Chris’ dictionary:
Fidelity-robotic compliance with scripted (or corporate?) product protocols
I must admit that teaching “with fidelity” came as a total surprise to me as I was lucky enough to train during a time when we were expected to use our professional judgement. As a special ed teacher, I never did figure out how I was supposed to individualize instruction to meet the needs of my students and yet still deliver a canned program according to the corporate script.
LikeLike
Wonderful satire, but it leaves me so sad. In 1998, when I did what did (see earlier comment on this page) I saw change was in the air.
I cannot believe that only in the 14 years since I retired the profession has been so thoroughly subverted from the top-down.
LikeLike
As long as the only reason to get an education is to become employable, education will suffer. Being employable is important and an education should result in that, but if students are to be, as so many so often say, lifelong learners they have to see some intrinsic value in the learning itself, it has to be “delightful, its pursuit has to be its own reward.
Henry Fielding said once, “I find it is much easier to make a good man wise, than it is to make a bad man good. I think the idea of wisdom, or if that sounds somehow inappropriate for public education, the idea of maturity has gotten lost. One thing the Literature I try to teach models is wisdom (or maturity) it gives students a sense of what it looks like and why it is a worthy aspiration. If we read solely for information, if we learn solely to find a job, we never come to see some of the deeper more profound aspects of our humanity that live beneath the surface of our being. We do not learn just to please the boss, we learn also to find out who we are. This is being removed from modern day “literacy” and it is why it is becoming the little knowledge that is a dangerous thing.
I think part of the ed-reform agenda is to undermine our confidence and our judgment. I do not think myself infinitely wise or knowledgeable. I find myself questioning what I do on a regular basis, I think of myself as a reflective teacher. But when I listen to what “good teaching” is supposed to be, as defined by those shaping the profession, ed-reformers (and those doing much of the Professional Development these days), I wonder if I am in the right profession, if belong in the classroom anymore. There are so many trends to fight it gets exhausting.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLike
Dear J.d. Wilson or Christoper North… I loved you response. Many educators here write to me at my email address, which I give out if you contact me at Oped News,message center where I write.
http://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
You can click on message –a the top of the page, and if you wish you can read my articles. But if you wish to read my comments on the 1200 quick links I post to wonderful articles, then click on the buttons which send you there.
I love intelligent conversations, and I thank you for taking th time to respond so thoughtfully to what I wrote.
PS you might really enjoy being a member of OEN< a progressive site with brilliant people both reading and writing.
LikeLike
I am Scottish and Christopher North was a Scottish writer best known for his observation that “Laws were made to be broken.” His real name, though, was John Wilson, and as I am John Wilson, Jr. am Scottish, enjoy what he said about laws, I have adopted Christopher North Jr as a kind of pseudonym. Its the name I use for blogging (http://christophernorthjr.edublogs.org/). My blog is called The Gypsy Scholar (I stole that from Matthew Arnold, though he reversed the order, Scholar Gypsy). I am a terrible blogger, though, too long winded (like the 18th and 19th century writers I admire( and I only post every two or three months. But it keeps writing a bit real so that I am reminded of what I am asking my students to do when I assign a longer essay.
I will check out your link.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLike
Pleased to meet you, sir. It is a pleasure to write at this blog, where I have met so many interesting people. I, too , am long-winded, and cutting down my posts at ON are always a problem. In my classroom practice, I always had a clear objective for each lesson, and learned to stay on target.
Where do or did you teach?
LikeLike
I am still teaching. I teach in at Wareham a small town in Massachusetts.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLike
I have only once, worked in a small system, Oradell NJ, where one sup’t made big bucks to over see one elementary school, one middle school and one high school. The parents pulled the strings, and the teachers had very little support. Iloved the kids, and small classes, but left becasue my NYC lisence was about to expire, and I needed to return because I ws vested there.
I let them appoint me to a Bronx elementary, where the window panes were missing glass, there were hole is the walls, the plaster fell from the ceilings, and Ihad to go around the school to find enough desk and chairs for my second grade. All had been held over, and could not read at 8 years of age, I had no books or material… and I supplied everything.
But, they left me to my own devices, except for one who AP insisted that Ii use the basil readers (yup) each day at 9. I locked my door, and did it my way for ten months, as the principal never bothered to visit, after he had hired me.
IN June, all my kids could read, and many went to the top third grade classes. (yeah in thsoe days there was a 2-1 and 2-7… I ‘taught’ 2-7.)
At the end of the year the principal harassed me because the Ap complained I did not comply with her demands, so I accepted a position at a new magnet school on Manhattan’s East Side, where parents did not wait outside with baseball bats and no one drove their cars up the sidewalk.
I wrote the entire seventh grade curricula (and, naturally, supplied all the materials and books. The school rose tot he top of NYC in 2 years as my kids aced every reading test, and were tenth in the state on the brandnew ELA writing test , which 3/4 of NY city kids failed. I was in Who’s Who four times, and was the NYSEC Educator of Excellence, the year they allgeged corporal punishment, and when I filed a lawsuit, charged me with incompetence.
Gosh… I love teaching.
bye
LikeLike
Why not replace it with the real National Standards for LEARNING… THE 3RD LEVEL (it must work everywhere) RESEARCH out of Harvard, of Lauren Resnicks thesis paid for by Pew in the nineties. Why invent the wheel.
Why not contact Vicki Bill at the LRDC at the Univ of Pittsburgh… because unless I imagined the 2 years that she (as the ‘tools’ person at the LRDC) she will remember this research of 20,000 teachers to match them to the RUBRIC… A REAL ONE… which offers the ingredients that MUST BE PRESENT for learning to occur. 4 of th principles BTW are for the ADMINISTRATION to support the classroom practitioner.
vbill@pitt.edu
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
At the EdSource site, a reader asked “How can we get your ideas to be the law? I suggest that we can encourage everyone to send a copy of Dr Ravitch’s article to our Senators and Representatives.—at least the section “how genuinely to fix NCLB” and sourced to the original publication. Like Dr Ravitch, I have no illusions that anyone in Congress is paying attention, but if enough people do that, perhaps some in Congress will read it. Alternatively, or additionally, everyone can write to Secretary Duncan with a copy, telling him that (1)we agree with Dr Ravitch and (2) ask him to respond specifically and point-by-point to her ideas. (e.g. no “mushy platitudes”)
LikeLike
Hi, just wanted you to know that I made the same exact arguments in New Mexico when I met with our local news folks. I think you expressed it more clearly however. I am glad these ideas are out there. I work with many teachers and school districts as head of a STEM research and outreach group at New Mexico State University. I am also a professor of Learning Design and Technology and an active mathematics education researcher. I work with districts where we are closing the mathematics opportunity gap in New Mexico.
Karin Wiburg, Ed.D., Distinguished Professor, New Mexico State University ________________________________
LikeLike
It is important to re-produce teacher’s heartfelt call for an action. here it is:
Lucianna’s Call to Action Speech
Hello Everyone and Good Evening. My name is Lucianna Sanson and I am a public high school teacher in Franklin County TN. As many of you may recall, two years ago, Kevin Huffman and the State Board of Education began talking about tying our teaching license to test scores. When I heard that- it was the straw that broke the Came’l back for me.
I decided that I had had enough. Ironically, that same week, or perhaps even that same day, I found a grassroots association of fellow teachers on FB called the BadAss Teachers Association. Well, I knew that I was a BadAss and I realized that I had found a group of people as dedicated and fed up with ed reform as I was. Soon after finding the National group, I connected with the local TN state group and became an active participant and volunteer for the group. I added my teacher voice to the others that were speaking up for public education in my state. The following words are a call to action to you, fellow teachers, parents, and citizens. Join with me and speak up about ed reform. Together we can make a difference and be heard.
Tennessee,
We must stand up and be strong-
We must stand up and speak truth-
We must stand up,
and use our teacher voices to protect our children and our profession.
We must stand tall and proud, like the TREE,
We must be fierce and protective of our children, like the Momma Bear,
We must be brave and bold like the Bat, swooping down on those that threaten our public schools, our profession, and our students.
We must protect our children and our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness- a happiness that can not be found in Tennessee- unless we are free to learn, free to prosper, and free to work together without the yoke of national or corporate education reform inflicted upon us. If we can’t work together to educate our children, how can we work together to make a great nation?
We must protect our freedom.
We must protect our children.
We must protect them at all costs.
Our public schools are the last strongholds of our democracy.
Endless bubble tests do not train our students to be citizens in a democracy.
Endless bubble tests do not promote critical thinking and creativity!
Tennesseans,
We must be fearless warriors for truth.
We must speak truth to power.
We must be, in the infamous words of Dr. Mark Naison, the founder of the National BadAss teachers Association,
We must be BadAss!
Tennesseans, please join TREE, Momma BEARs, and TNBATs in the fight to save our schools. Our students deserve our support. Our children deserve our support. If we don’t stand up for our children no one else will.
If you would like more information on Momma Bears, TREE, and TNBATs, please follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
https://www.facebook.com/TNBATs @Lucianna_Sanson
https://www.facebook.com/mommabears4edu @MommaBears4edu
https://www.facebook.com/TNExcellence @TNExcellence
LikeLike
If parents stand up, then things will change, but parents are ordinary people and do not know what learning looks like, and can be fooled by word walls, and snake-oil salesmen with magic elixirs.
The profession is under attack and the only way that the charlatans were able to take control was because the unions abrogated their duty to uphold the ONE THING THAT TENURE ACTUALLY CONFERS… the right to due process. THAT was the ingredient of collective bargaining that differentiated a professional pedagogue who had given excellent service, from an ’employee a twill,’ a civil servant who could be fired without due process rights… for any reason!
This article in Citywatch is so important, because there ei s a clear explanation of this tactic — ensuring due process was NOT followed– let LAUSD allege incompetence and morals charges, without due process– and TEN THOUSAND TEACHERS were charged and then FIRED!
http://citywatchla.com/8box-left/6666-lausd-and-utla-complicity-kills-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-la-s-teachers
LikeLike
Dearest Susan:
My reply to your 3 photos was bounced back with a message that is like:
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
Technical details of temporary failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was REJECTED by the server for the recipient domain mac.com by mx6.mail.icloud.com. [17.172.34.71].
The error that the other server returned was:
451 4.5.3 Too MANY REJRCTIONS; try again later.
In case that you don’t know why you did not receive people’s feedback from your email. Love. May.
LikeLike
Thank you May. No one else seems to be having that problem, but I will call apple and explain what you said.
LikeLike