This is one of the strangest political alignments ever: George W. Bush put annual testing into federal law, a practice unknown in the high-performing nations of the world. And Democrats–including President Obama, Secretary Duncan, and Washington State Senator Patti Murray–are fighting to keep George W. Bush’s policy in place. In the case of Senator Murray, her role is especially puzzling because Washington State has been a stronghold of opposition to high-stakes testing–from the Garfield High School teachers’ refusal to give the MAP test to the Legislature’s refusal to evaluate teachers by test scores, which led to Duncan withdrawing the state’s waiver from NCLB. Now, in accordance with NCLB, every public school in the state of Washington is a “failing” school, having not reached the goal of 100% proficiency on state tests of math and reading. But Senator Murray blithely defends the obnoxious annual testing policy that has so infuriated educators in her home state.
Here is the latest from Politico.com:
GLIMMER OF HOPE FOR NCLB?: No Child Left Behind’s spectacular sputter in the House last week overshadowed headway being made in the Senate: HELP Committee aides working to craft a bipartisan NCLB bill have been inching closer to an agreement on Title I, according to several aides and lobbyists. An announcement could come as soon as today. What will the compromise deal look like? Tough to say. But HELP Committee Ranking Member Patty Murray has been firm about keeping statewide annual tests and getting rid of the bill’s Title I portability provisions, so it’ll be interesting to see what the Washington Democrat is ready to give up to strike a deal.
– Of course, getting a bill through both chambers won’t be easy. Take last week’s House debate. Members approved an amendment from Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) that would allow local assessment systems but chose not to take a recorded vote. It signaled that Democrats and Republicans expected the amendment to pass easily, and potentially with ample Democratic support. And it’s a sign that even if the Senate preserves annual statewide testing, the House may rebel and demand more flexibility for local districts.
– One more testing note: Political advocacy group Education Reform Now, a partner of Democrats for Education Reform, is calling out the National Education Association for a video [http://bit.ly/1BQeiZF] aimed at persuading lawmakers to scrap the annual testing mandate. ERN’s own video [http://bit.ly/1zBwyyA] tries to “fact check” the NEA ad – and warns the union’s stance “could cost you your child’s future.”

Washington State Senator Patty Murray works for the 1%. Washington State- with Patty Murray’s help- provided Boeing with the biggest tax-break in history- $8.7B. The deal was done behind closed doors and was completed within 3 days.
Boeing wanted a two part deal that included tax breaks and machinists giving-up their pensions. Senator Patty Murray was amongst those that called for machinists to give-up their pensions.
I”m not at all surprised to see Patty Murray’s actions.
LikeLike
Patty the Pre-school teacher is a big disappointment. How long until she can collect her Federal pension?
LikeLike
“Make no mistake: Eroding pensions for future hires makes it all but inevitable that pensions will go extinct eventually. As older workers retire and are replaced by new hires operating under the new rules, defending the pension becomes less urgent. That’s why federal union leaders labeled Murray’s deal “outrageous and totally unacceptable.”
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/boeing-machinists-solution-found-of-all-places-in-washington-dc/
Google: Senator Patty Murray, Boeing, Machinists and Pensions, and you will find plenty more on the subject.
LikeLike
Follow the money.
LikeLike
Looks like constituent-in-chief Bill Gates has a lot of clout with Senator Murray. Shame.
LikeLike
I’m betting DFER is also involved. The GOP, like Alexander, can make noise but they’ll go along with annual testing – no lobby money needed.
So the lobbiests only have to push the Dems to follow Duncan. Pure shenanigans.
LikeLike
“George W. Bush put annual testing into federal law…” Not quite. Recall that the president does not put things into the law, but rather the Congress does. When NCLB was passed it had large bipartisan support on Capitol Hill, including from liberal icons of the chamber such as Senator Ted Kennedy and Representative George Miller. Bush certainly made a huge push for testing, but without allies across the aisle in Congress, the testing regime would not have passed. It’s easy for critics to call NCLB “Bush’s law” but the reality and the law’s history are more complicated than that.
LikeLike
Paul Manna, I wrote a chapter in a book about NCLB. George W. Bush proposed annual testing; he said it was the cause of the “Texas Miracle” (which turned out not to be a miracle at all). Congress passed his law in the fall of 2001, and the President signed it into law on January 8, 2002. NCLB will forever be George W. Bush’s law.No matter who voted for it, it was George W. Bush and his team who put annual testing into federal law.
LikeLike
Re: Paul Manna – Succinct and to the point Diane. Bravo!
LikeLike
I’ve written a book about NCLB, too. I’d encourage you to check it out (http://pmanna.people.wm.edu/). You’re right about what Bush said and his enthusiasm for proposing annual testing. It’s simply inaccurate to suggest that it was single-handedly his (or his White House team’s) initiative. You can disagree with the law itself, which is fine. I have many problems with it, too. But that doesn’t change the political circumstances of its origins. Those historical details are important.
LikeLike
Paul Manna,
I know the historical origins of NCLB. I was there. I know the vote in the Congress. I know that it was bipartisan. I don’t know what your point is.
NCLB will always be known as George W. Bush’s law. I read his original 27-page proposal. The centerpiece was annual testing. And that is what Democrats today are defending: George W. Bush’s annual testing. Testing has now become a “civil rights issue,” even though children of color and children of poverty are always concentrated in the bottom half of the normal curve.
LikeLike
I was there, too, Diane, and I read all of the original documents as well. If you go back to those documents and press releases of that era, you’d remember that Democrats were defending annual testing in 2001, too. You asked about my point. It’s this: If one wants to understand the political dynamics that orbit the law today (which was the original topic of your post) it is important to understand how the law was developed and passed. Maybe one reason why Patty Murray still supports these things is because she voted for them back in 2001 when she voted to support NCLB. If you dug into the history more, the alignments we see today would not seem particularly strange.
LikeLike
They’re not Democrats. They’re DINOs. A big difference!
LikeLike
I was there, too, and read all of the original documents as well. If you go back to those documents and press releases of that era, you’d remember that Democrats were defending annual testing in 2001, too. You asked about my point. It’s this: If one wants to understand the political dynamics that orbit the law today (which was the original topic of your post) it is important to understand how the law was developed and passed. Maybe one reason why Patty Murray still supports these things is because she voted for them back in 2001 when she voted to support NCLB. If you dug into the history more, the alignments we see today would not seem particularly strange.
LikeLike
Bet they do a voice vote.
LikeLike
Do DC Democrats have anything to offer on K-12 public education besides testing and charter schools?
Oh, well. Hopefully they can show some restraint and limit the unfunded mandates/sanctions on public schools this time around. It’s too much to ask for anything that actually benefits existing public schools. I suppose the best we can beg for is they don’t actively harm our public schools.
Are they aware that 30 states have cut funding to public schools? Our schools aren’t doing so hot under ed reform leadership.
LikeLike
I am afraid they are in a severe need of leadership with a populist view of the world.
LikeLike
I am working with a colleague to expose the two current parties as the corporate shills they are, especially in our home state of Illinois. We believe our state and nation are ripe for a viable, moderate, common-sense third party that represents the people. Children and hard-working people would be the center-piece. The dismantling of public education and the attacks on the middle class while trying to pit members of the middle-class against each other using pensions as a wedge issue must stop. What say you on the idea of a third party?
LikeLike
Scott,
It is the same story in NJ.
LikeLike
Should be fun to see what they trade away for testing. Why do I think the unfashionable public sector schools are going to take yet another hit in DC?
LikeLike
Cross posted
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Politico-Reports-Democrat-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Controversy_Fight_Politico_Testing-150303-298.html#comment535643
LikeLike
Time to recall Patty Murray and bring in Slade Gorton off the bench.
LikeLike
I personally, as a lifelong “good government” Democrat, am going to vote Republican the next go-round (hoping I don’t have to vote for Jeb Bush, in which case maybe I will stay home)….
What the Democrats have done and are doing to public education is so shameless and so damaging that we might as well have vouchers and charters….maybe good public schools can turn themselves into charters and get out of some of the rules put in place by the Democrats that are killing us (while we are still serving ALL comers) — who’s ready to start a TRUE not-for-profit charter ? One that offers “what public education USED to be, before the Democrats ruined it with RttT, waivers and the policies attached to them” ?
LikeLike
I am. Old School Charter. “Teaching and learning the way it used to be.” Seriously.
LikeLike
Vote green or just stay home both parties are both recycled trash!
LikeLike
Please see my comment a couple of threads above regarding the need for a viable 3rd party. I like the Green party, but seems too narrowly focused. We hope to learn from their successes and failures.
LikeLike
Is anyone looking at how much these politicians are getting from Pearson, Bill Gates and related lobbyists? It’s all about the money. We should be public shaming them.
LikeLike
Well, the last Congressional debate was another stern, scolding lecture to public schools, so I look forward to more advice fromThe Best and The Brightest.
Maybe they can lecture the masses on how we lack “grit” again. Coming from people who are 7 years late re-authorizing this lawthat should be well-taken.
LikeLike
I have followed the evolution of “school reform”. I believed naively that once Obama recognized that the reform movement was a scam to make money by selling tests, technology, curriculum, privatizing education and breaking unions that Democrats would take steps to protect public education. Sadly, Obama’s public support for TFA, Arne Duncan, Michelle Rhee, and Rahm Emmanuel clearly underscore that public education has been traded or sold and is being dismantled in stages. The destruction of public education is as great a travesty as the devastation of the environment and the corruption of our judicial system that ignores the crimes of the 1%. Yet, most citizens lack an awareness that the basis of a viable democracy is disappearing.
LikeLike
NCLB should be giving extra funding to specific low scoring, ESL, and special ed students. Instead, they are taking money away from schools who enroll these students.
NCLB needs to shift from a school directed funding model to a specific student directed funding model.
LikeLike
“NCLB needs to shift from a school directed funding model to a specific student directed funding model.
In other words “vouchers”, eh?!?!?!
Why are you afraid to call a spade a spade?
LikeLike
TC, you seem to be suggesting that the Title I money follow the student. That is precisely a version of what the Republicans want to put in the bill–a federal voucher with parents/ guardians free to find their educational services of choice, from any provider, anywhere. Online services are ready to “provide” as are other who look at students and see only “money.”
LikeLike
Murray is a HUGE THORN in my side. Follow the $$$$$. Had to deal with her lame ideas before. Vote 3rd Party.
LikeLike
DLC, DINOs, Third-wayers need primary challenges. Incumbents hate primary challenges. I support the Progressive Democrats of America- they finance progressive policy & have been shaking up the Democratic party & the political status-quo.
http://www.pdamerica.org/
LikeLike
Thought they were called the “new way democrats” brought to you by the Clinton team.
LikeLike