Denny Taylor is Professor Emerita of Literacy Studies at Hofstra University. She has won many awards for her writing about literacy and literature. She is also the founder and CEO of Garn Press, which published the book I am reviewing (and also published Anthony Cody’s The Educator and the Oligarch).
Save Our Children, Save Our School, Pearson Broke the Golden Rule is a political satire about the current education “reform” movement. It takes place in an imaginary “Cafe Griensteidl” in New York City, at 72nd Street and Broadway, where the author and a friend meet for coffee. In this comedy, the leading players in the “reform” movement appear at the cafe and get into discussion or debate with the author. Nine powerful men happen to be in the cafe, including Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, Joel Klein, and Michael Barber (of Pearson). They banter with the author and her friend. She makes clear that these nine powerful men know nothing about education yet are taking control of the American public school system.
The men leave, and in the last “Act” of the book, twelve eminent female scholars (living and dead) talk about what is happening and the need to resist. The chapter is headed by this statement: “In which twelve venerable women scholars with more than 500 years of teaching experience refuse to capitulate to the demands made by nine rich men who have no teaching qualifications or teaching experience.” Hannah Arendt, Virginia Woolf, Simone Weil, Adrienne Rich, Yetta Goodman, Toni Morrison, and more are there. As the wise women speak, people come into the cafe and make YouTube videos, Tweet, or just listen. Yetta begins to rap. Horns honk. Traffic jams form at the corner of 72nd Street and Broadway. The women at the table clap along with Yetta’s rapping. The women talk about how to stop the corporate takeover of U.S. education.
Denny Taylor, sitting at the table with the great women, says, “Children have a right to a free and public education. For the pursuit of human knowledge and understanding that is free of corporate greed.”
“We should not have to ask permission for teachers to teach in developmentally appropriate ways that inspire and excite, and enhance our children’s incredible capacity to learn–
“–for the sheer joyfulness of their lives and for their lightness of being.”
The great women agree: We are and always will be defenders of every child’s right to a childhood free of despots and demons, except those they imagine when playing with friends….”
The author says, “Dump Pearson….Barber and Pearson are taking our children in the wrong direction,” she says. “His Whole System of Global Education Revolution is a global social catastrophe, a total system failure.”
Others ask how to stop this recklessness. The author responds, “The madness will stop if we refuse to participate. The struggle for democracy is always ground up….Make it a crime for oligarchs to interfere with democratic social systems. It’s vote tampering on a national scale.” She adds, referring to Bill Gates, “He’s violating the rights of fifty million children, jeopardizing their future. Send him to jail.”
“Tell Gates we choose decency and democracy and not the indecency of his oligarchy. He does not have the power to dictate how our children are taught in public schools.
“Tell him we refuse to participate in his Common Core experiments. Ban the use of galvanic skin devices in affective computing trials that he’s funded.
“Tell him to stop wasting his money. To spend it for the Common Good. Build new public schools. Create parks in poor urban neighborhoods. Make sure there are health centers. Medical care for everyone in the community.
“Tell him to put his money into Earth-friendly low-income housing.
“Libraries. Media centers.
“Work with local leaders. Make sure they’re not exploited…
“Pearson could too. Tell Barber we take back our independence. That US public schools are no longer under Pearson’s colonial rule.”
The book is funny, learned, and zany. If you want to order it, go to http://www.garnpress.com.

sounds pretty sexist. I tried to survive in the literacy doctoral program at Hofstra. There are plenty of female horrors supporting bad education, too. I would not give up my video ethnographic documentary, that I did in the schools of Guatemala, despite purging all offended. In balance, the program was excellent and Denny had good insights.
LikeLike
Sure, we’re all aware that female ‘reformers’ like Wendy Kopp, Michelle Rhee, Campbell Brown, and Eva Moskowitz exist. After all, Dr. Ravitch and many other female proponents of public education criticize them regularly.
However, we must keep in mind that the vast majority of teachers (approximately 75%) are women, so it’s certainly not ridiculous to highlight this aspect of the broader education reform struggle. Correct me if I am wrong, but wealthy men via the foundations they run/control are the primary financial backers of the charter school and school accountability movements. Thus, I believe Professor Taylor’s choice to feature only famous female scholars is completely reasonable.
That being said, I have not read the book or interacted with Professor Taylor (as you apparently have), so my interpretation may be somewhat flawed.
LikeLike
Not sure if this is the exact research Gates is funding. The galvactivator skin sensor computer interface. This Orwellian computerized engagement mind reading sensor is creepy. I can see this being the perfect device for big data reformers to evaluate teachers with. Read the last sentence in the paragraph of this link and imagine a classroom full of them. No pressure! http://affect.media.mit.edu/projects.php?id=254
LikeLike
Matt, you make some excellent points, I have the greatest admiration for the work that Denny has done, particularly her book “Spin Doctors of Science”. My personal concerns were not so much about Denny, but the entourage that existed at Hofstra. She was working with one of the greatest geniuses, Ken Goodman, the Father of Whole Language, who laid the groundwork, with his wife Yetta, to expose the remarkable way children read to create meaning, his seminal work was “On Reading”. His ideas were trashed by the publishers, since his theories would have trashed the materials that they provide, I believe. This exercise is not to denigrate, but share my experience as one of the few males in the program, when my career there was ended after being told to hand over my school video materials to them, that were authorized by both the Nassau Reading Council and the Guatemalan government. I just feel that Denny is falling into a narrow feminist perspective of the women coming out of the Univ of Arizona, where Ken originated his work. After completing the course work I dropped out, despite being asked to return by the Provost, feeling like Macbeth before the Cauldron. This male believed that he did not have the support needed to do the dissertation. We need to be inclusive to fight this battle, not tilting at feminist windmills.
LikeLike
Oh you SO get it, how can we help others?
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Thank you, Denny Taylor.
LikeLike