At some point during his first term as Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo was called “Governor 1%,” because so many of his policies seemed geared to helping Wall Street and the 1%.
In this post, high school teacher Arthur Goldstein points out that Governor Cuomo designated himself the lobbyist for students. But not, says Goldstein, for all students. Not for the student who arrived from another country last week. Not for the student with severe disabilities. Governor Cuomo became the lobbyist and cheerleader for the charter schools, which enroll 3% of the students in New York state. The strong affinity between hedge fund managers and charter schools makes it appear that charter students are a huge sector, but they are not. Just 3%. So Goldstein adds the 1% and the 3% of students in charters and determines that Cuomo is actually Governor 4%.
Goldstein writes:
Lately, there’s a lot of negative talk about Andrew Cuomo, what with his juvenile efforts to penalize teachers for not having supported his re-election. And let’s face it, most of us took that position simply because he hates us and everything we stand for. Cuomo seems to think think we should look past that and support him anyway.
A lot of people call Andrew Cuomo Governor 1%, because he represents the economic interests of only the very wealthy. But the governor has cast himself as a student lobbyist, and in that sense, he may also represent the 3% of NY students who attend charter schools.
Sure, you say, he doesn’t represent your students. He doesn’t represent your children. And the way he advocates for his own kids is by sending them to private schools. You don’t think Andrew Cuomo would send his kids to a Moskowitz school, do you? Who really wants their kids subject to endless test prep?…..
A friend who works in a building with a colocated Moskowitz Academy told me she saw a kid admonished for coughing. The teacher asked if the kid was dying, and said if he wasn’t, to just get back in line. This is an incredibly callous way to speak to a child, and any teacher who spoke to my kid like this would not welcome my reaction. In fact, Chancellor’s Regulation A-421 protects schoolchildren from verbal abuse. Of course, such protections don’t apply to charter school kids, who can be made to wear orange shirts, veritable dunce caps, for unwelcome behavior. There are no excuses, and basic human functions, like coughing, simply cannot be tolerated.
Moskowitz had a hotline to Joel Klein, and she clearly saw her needs as more important than those of public schools. Friends of mine tell me that attitude trickles down to even the students, who have no problem ridiculing the public school kids, even for their handicaps, and whose teachers may even look on as they do so. There is clearly a separate and unequal environment, and it’s bolstered by folks like Andrew Cuomo, who has no qualms about taking millions in contributions from charter supporters. They’re certainly getting their money’s worth.

Certainly, someone is going to rebut this by stating that Cuomo sent his kids to pubic school, but here is a quote from the NY Times published in 2012: “He sends two of his children to an elite boarding school in Massachusetts.”
That’s all I want to write about him; I can’t stand how he treats those he feels to be beneath him, and his teacher bashing is obscene.
LikeLike
The curious thing about Cuomo is his obsession with standardized testing. Apparently, he failed the bar exam four times before he finally passed on his fifth attempt. Did that make him an admirer of testing?
LikeLike
Perhaps it gave him an especially passionate contempt, even greater than the open contempt he shows for everyone who can’t do something for him, for his teachers.
The man has shown himself incapable of accepting responsibility for his mistakes and offenses against others, so it would make sense that he’d project his failure onto his teachers.
LikeLike
If Mr. Monster gets his way with charters, he will become the governor of the 50 plus percent . . . .
LikeLike
My greatest hope is that his slimy little fingers get caught in the cookie jar along with all of his compadres in the state legislature. I can hope, can’t I?
LikeLike
“Stay tuned” – Preet Bahara
LikeLike
I continue to believe that the charter schools which manage to look respectable in test scores, and absence of obvious corruption, are far more dangerous than those which are exposed for their shortcomings. Public education is dealing with an inherently stacked deck……..The St. Louis Post dispatch carried a mixture of news and cheerleading today…..and it is very hard to rebut simplistic things like “Choice is a wonderful thing” I tried “It is if you are one of those doing the choosing. If it is just a word used to obfuscate the reality that some people’s choices leave others with very little choice….no problem, That can be talked around by some very talented talkers.” which generated another simplistic retort: “Every parent in city has choices. Some are just to lazy to look.” That is both false and very marketable. http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/boom-time-for-st-louis-charter-schools/article_74e12b12-41d9-5c49-acd1-fec06a36c018.html?mode=comments
SLPS is run by a state appointed board…The president of the elected board of education is not interviewed by the PD reporters….so she chimes in like the rest of us in the comments section after articles (the Post Dispatch now bans comments after their editorials) Katie Wessling makes a point which more people should hear: “What would be a wonderful thing is if SLPS had its act together enough that every child was getting a great education and no one felt they had to look elsewhere. All we are doing here is forming haves and have-nots.”
LikeLike
Well, sure, but they only went to “choice!” in Ohio after charter schools didn’t perform any better on standardized tests than public schools do.
It’s pretty easy to meet your goal if you shift the goalposts from “excellence!” to “parents should choose any school they want”.
“Choice” is the backup they pull out after “great schools!” doesn’t pan out. If you say “but parents are choosing schools in Ohio that have worse test scores than the public schools” the response is”how dare you question the judgment of parents!”
They have every base covered. If excellence fails they go to choice.
LikeLike
I am sickened every time I read about the shaming and bullying culture that passes for discipline at charter schools. It sickens me even more to hear that charter school students and teachers might be openly ridiculing public school students, especially those with disabilities. How sad it will take lawsuits to end such abuse, even as our public schools are held more and more accountable for ending bullying and harassment.
LikeLike
When is ridiculing handicapped students a sign of “grit?”
LikeLike
I have described the leading edge of the charterite/privatizer movement as having “a business plan that masquerades as an education model.” Teasing that out a bit, and remembering that worst business/management practices are the rheephorm norm among the heavy hitters, that means that they are NOT “the rising tide that lifts all boats.” They believe and act like they believe, that all life is a win-lose situation, so when it comes to the “competition” with public schools they are out to beat/displace/replace/destroy them.
You don’t build brand loyalty and increase your customer base by playing nice. So when Arthur Goldstein writes: “Moskowitz had a hotline to Joel Klein, and she clearly saw her needs as more important than those of public schools. Friends of mine tell me that attitude trickles down to even the students, who have no problem ridiculing the public school kids, even for their handicaps, and whose teachers may even look on as they do so. There is clearly a separate and unequal environment…”—
That’s a feature, not a bug, of the leaders of the self-proclaimed “education reform” movement. Divide communities and conquer. Promote the ideal of the worthy few and the unworthy many. Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing. They’re in it to win—even when they promote a moral education [see Arthur Goldstein’s penultimate paragraph] that attempts to instill in youngsters the toxic ideal that those in charge have the right to be abusive to those over whom they have control.
Yet how shameless can these cage busters be? They can’t live up to their own standards. Their own most sacred metrics.
From a piece by Diane Ravitch that appeared in THE NATION, 9-24-2014:
[start quote]
Of the thirty-two eighth graders to finish at Success Academy, twenty-seven took the competitive exam to enter one of New York City’s prestigious specialized high schools. Despite their excellent scores on the state test, not one of these students gained admission to a specialized school like Stuyvesant or Bronx Science.
[end quote]
Link: http://www.thenation.com/article/181752/secret-eva-moskowitzs-success#
😱
This from Eva Moskowitz, so proud to produce “little test-taking machines”—that can’t pass the test! [see this blog, 3-2-2014, “Secrets of Test Success at Success Academy,” numerous inks in the posting; also read the thread]
Will they stop? Will they self-correct? When $tudent $ucce$$ is involved, a Roman will have to do in place of a Greek:
“For greed all nature is too little.” [Lucius Annaeus Seneca]
And strangely, for once, Michelle Rhee[-Johnson] did not retort with:
“I reject that mind-set.”
Why am I not surprised?
😎
LikeLike
😀 Great post KrazyTA. That mindset is indeed backwards and yes, rejecting it is the only option. Choice or charter schools are being BRANDED and championed by those who profit the most by this scam.
LikeLike
It’s not just Cuomo. It’s nationwide. Democrats in the Senate have moved on from testing public school students to using those scores to rank their teachers.
This is the sum total of the Democratic agenda on public schools: testing. They got nothing other than testing. Why don’t they have any ideas on improving existing public schools other than this grim, sanctioning approach? I guess the plan is to just completely adopt the GOP agenda with the addition of testing.
LikeLike
what do you do first…..start pressing all democrats to make education a major issue in 2016……or accept the consensus that the democrats are almost certain to nominate Hilary, and start pressuring her to at least start talking about it?
LikeLike
I wish I had an answer but I don’t.
I HAVE noticed that the one ed reform policy that actually impacts every public school kid in the country, standardized testing, is also the one ed reform policy where advocates have been most effective at pushing politicians to (finally) respond. I think there’s a lesson in that. The vast majority of kids attend public schools. Ed reformers are most vulnerable when their policies affect PUBLIC SCHOOLS negatively, simply because public schools involve many, many, more parents and voters.
To me, the most effective pushback to ed reform is not talking about charter schools. It’s talking about how ed reform negatively affects public schools. I think the effective advocacy around testing shows that to be true.
What’s true for testing (affects all public schools) is also true for funding. If we want to reach public school parents the way to do that is to talk about the schools their children attend- 90% in my state attend public schools. That’s where ed reform politicians are vulnerable- not on promoting charter and private schools but instead on their lack of support for (or actual damage to) public schools.
LikeLike
Hillary is a nightmare. Be careful what you ask for.
LikeLike
I wish I had an answer but I don’t……..yes…it is difficult….My nephew and his wife Sarah did a study…..charter supporters have it so easy….”we can hire non-union teachers”. charter opponents, have more difficult to explain complaints…..the use of the word privatization does not ring many bells, but Sarah offered this…. “it’s harder to track the process of how a charter school gets opened, who’s making those decisions, who operates the school and who closes a charter school if it is performing badly.
“All this is happening in ways that are much less transparent than with a public school and a local school board,” I am not sure why this husband and wife team decided to look at this particular part of the issue……communicating support and opposition…..but their analysis might be helpful to someone, somewhere. http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2015/01/michigan_state_study_finds_cha.html
LikeLike
Privatization is a tool that the wealthy are using to take over essential services for everyone else. While we can see the disadvantages to our neediest students including special education, ELLs and emotionally troubled. Cuomo is an arm of this misguided movement that forwards the agenda of the wealthy using testing as a weapon to starve and shut down public schools.
I just read an article in “The Pennsylvania Gazette” (my husband has an MBA from Wharton, but he’s a progressive) that discusses negative impact of privatization. The article discusses the work of John DiIulio who’s a professor of Politics, Religion and Civil Society. Privatization generally costs more than allowing the government to do the job for most services. He calls it “Leviathan by Proxy.” The government function does not disappear when the services goes to a privatizer; and the cost is often less efficient, effective and more costly. More than 500 billion has been spent on privatized services. He cites that the poor response to Hurricane Katrina was due a freeze on FEMA hiring, and the improved response to Hurricane Sandy was due to hiring 4,800 full-time FEMA employees. He explains that billionaires are behind downsizing the IRS in order to reduce the number of investigators so the rich can hoard more money. This means the government loses a lot of money that, of course, will have to come from the middle class. The other point he makes is that “When we really care about something, we are less likely to contract it out. Services for the poor are more likely to be contracted out.” This, I believe, defines the the role Cuomo plays. He doesn’t care about tests or public schools. He cares about money. Follow the money, and we will see where his interests are.
http://thepenngazette.com/champion-of-the-bureaucrats/
LikeLike
There’s no eliminating government; we can choose between public government, where there is at least a nominal right to equity, fairness and transparency, or private government, where there is none and barely a pretense is made to say otherwise.
LikeLike
What people should try to understand is that privatization benefits the rich while it is to the detriment of the middle class. With privatization the money stays at the top, and the bottom workers are paid subsistence wages. The privatized services are often more expensive due to bloated executive salaries and profit. With public education, in addition to some degree of fairness and transparency, the local community loses some degree of local control of the schools its children attend while some corporation is in charge of the children.
LikeLike
I have wondered does Cuomo have issues with public school teachers because he is Roman Catholic and wishes all teachers were nuns.
????
LikeLike
That would make him the kind of priest who gets covered up for his sins and passed around from parish to parish, diocese to diocese . . .
Let’s hope more gets uncovered about him and his conveniently timed Moreland Commission.
This fallen angel is so not Christ-like.
I have not been Catholic for more than 17 years. But my remembrances of it tell me that Andrew Cuomo is a sort of anti-Christ, if ever there were one.
Such a hateful and hated little man . . .
If he were in a class with the nuns, my vision is to have them smack his hands hard with a ruler . . . . .
LikeLike
I have little to no experience with the Roman Catholic church, being a WASP and all. (I did go to a mass once in Virginia just to experience it, and I have had some very wonderful Roman Catholic friends). I’m just trying to gather insight on his viewpoint. . .I do that. I try to understand people with differing viewpoints than me so that I can rise above feeling anger and try to find solutions (both a strength and a fault of mine). But it surely must play into his motivation, even if he doesn’t realize it (anger at an institution that doesn’t fit into his framework for understanding society from within his family experience). Same with Jeb, anymore—he converted.
LikeLike
that institution he is angry at being public school
LikeLike
Sexist? Religionist?
LikeLike
Bingo!
LikeLike
Catholics are taught that God is love,that kindness and compassion are the highest human virtues and that we are as nothing without community. I understand that Cuomo is nominally a Catholic but is clearly one that has either never integrated or has outright rejected all Catholic teaching on social justice.
LikeLike