We live in a time that reeks with what the late child psychiatrist Elisabeth Young-Bruehl called “Childism: Prejudice Against Young Children.” In a book with that title, she identified NCLB high stakes testing as an example of “Childism.”
Thomas Scarice, Superintendent of Schools in Madison, Connecticut, makes a plea to restore innocence to children.
Scarice writes:
“Over the past decade, schools have deteriorated into data factories, reducing children to mere numbers, with a perverted ranking and sorting of winners and losers in high stakes testing schemes. And now, a new test promising to revolutionize education will produce yet more meaningless data for adults starving to exploit children for self-gain, selfish career aspirations, blind ideological ploys, or for the purposes of establishing high property values on the backs of children, all the while sorting out which 8 year olds are on track to be “college and career ready”.
“Even at the classroom level, children suffer from the unintended consequences of well-meaning adults unaware of the ways that children naturally develop and grow. Frivolous homework policies invade private family time and rob children of necessary unstructured time to develop executive functioning.
“Play, the natural way children learn, is reduced to filler, barely acknowledged for the critical role it fulfills in child development. No one questions why the caged bird flies as soon as the cage door opens, nor should they question why children naturally play at a moment’s notice.
“Even perhaps the most fundamental function of schools, the teaching of reading, has succumbed to the ignorance of this era. New standards and tests with a myopic focus on text without regard for the reader (i.e. the child actually doing the reading), without regard for their interests, knowledge, and passions, will serve to further disengage children from the splendor of reading and give students more reasons to see school, and reading, as irrelevant.
“With unprecedented childhood poverty rates, an explosion in the identification of attention deficit disorder, recent reports of soaring teenage suicide rates, one thing is clear: the violation of childhood knows no boundaries.”
We are the adults, Scarice says. It is our responsibility to protect children, not to use them to satisfy our will or ideology.

What difference does it make if it ruins children? Someone makes a pile of money and money is the bottom line, not people, not the future of our country.
LikeLike
Does anyone else remember watching a child “wash the dishes” in absolute bliss? I was reminded of the joy children take in simple tasks as I watched my 2 and a half year old granddaughter wash the dishes standing on a chair at the kitchen sink. It brought back memories of her father and his siblings engaged in the same work helping mommy. All those daily tasks were exciting new games to them. As they reached school age, they were lucky to have kindergarten experiences that honored their natural curiosity. Now, we are turning growing up into drudgery. There was a time when artists depicted children as little adults right down to their physical proportions. Now, in this country, where we are lucky enough to be able to let children have a childhood, we had better fight to keep it and claim it for all children.
LikeLike
Thomas Scarice writes about events as if they “just happened” and are not the direct result of the actions of policy makers who have surplus funds to to entice “good people in education” to comply with absurd and damaging rules, thereby making educators who know better part of the problem.
At least Thomas Scarice is speaking up, and you are helping amplify his voice.
I am still dumbfounded by the absence of outrage from faculty in higher education and the leadership of the American Educational Research Association. Too much navel gazing or perhaps too much big money from foundations contributing to this.
The American Statistical Association was about a decade and a half late in issuing a statement against the use of VAM to rate individual teachers. Perhaps that was because reputations had been built on selling and tweaking algorithms.
LikeLike
Please let him know we are looking for a new Superintendent in FULLERTON, California. We have some of the finest schools in the country, but we need a progressive educator to help us remain focused on student learning and NOT ON TESTING AND TEST PREP.
LikeLike
Nicely stated.
LikeLike
Thank you Dr. Ravitch for bringing this wonderful piece to my attention. I think Dr. Montessori would have approved.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on biochemlife.
LikeLike
Three points, made by Scarice, resonated with me: (1) homework invading family time, (2)play in the classroom, and (3) reading that excites. I am a TK teacher in CA and I feel the pressure to teach rigor, CCS, and all the workshop models that my district has adopted, at the cost of excluding what should be considered important to the development of young five year olds.
(1) Teaching at a low-socio economic school, I fear that if I do not assign some type of review homework my children will sit in front of the TV or play video games for the majority of their time at home before bedtime. This year my team and I have included a monthly calendar that gives the children and their parents multiple opportunities to play outside, have a family game night, cook, etc. (2) With regards to play, my children have ten minutes of free exploration time (developmental centers) and 20 minutes of work station time (more academic/standard based). (3) After reading this article I have been inspired to change up our big buddy activity time to include ten minutes of having the 5th graders read the library book that my little scholars have checked out.
I am often overwhelmed by all the pressure that conflicts with doing what is emotionally and developmentally appropriate for our young students.
LikeLike