Myra Blackmon, a regular contributor to OnlineAthens (Georgia), here writes about the state’s devotion to failed education policies. If it isn’t working, do more of it:
Blackmon writes:
The clichéd definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly but expecting different results. That may be true in some instances, but when it comes to education in Georgia, we have our own special crazy.
While education “reform” is an issue as old as the republic, Georgia’s approaches to it are crazier than any patchwork quilt. We bounce around from one quick fix to the next. We routinely ignore research about what works, and use ideas that have never been tested.
Our legislature tries to micromanage our schools, the governor controls the policy-making state school board and we elect the state school superintendent, who is not required to know anything about education policy or the business of running schools.
We passed a new school funding formula in 1985, adjusted it several times, but never actually appropriated enough money to actually implement it. After 15 or so years of that, our elected representatives decided that there was too much “fat” in the education budget and proceeded to whack away at it.
While piling on new requirements each year, the legislature has slashed some $7.5 billion from a budget that was never fully funded in the first place. We’ve had additional, often severe cuts at the local level triggered by falling property taxes. At the same time, our public school enrollment has grown by more than 246,000 students.
As our student population has grown, we have lost or cut teaching positions. In its 2013 report “Cutting Class to Make Ends Meet,” the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute found Georgia had lost at least 9,000 teachers in four years. And in 2014, we have 2,500 fewer teachers than we had for the 2011-12 school year. The budget cuts have resulted in more than 100 districts with school years shorter than the mandated 180 days. The cumulative reduction in instructional time from budget cuts alone is significant and can produce only a negative impact on student achievement. There are also fewer courses available, thus narrowing opportunities for student growth.
What has been our response to this crisis? First, there was the great outcry about “failing schools,” based on the scores from poorly constructed, invalid tests. From there, we moved on to teacher-bashing, with a loud determination to rid our schools of the mythical hosts of bad teachers. Multitudes of experienced teachers have left the profession and today more than half of new teachers leave the field within their first five years. Surely the bad ones are about gone….
That’s right, we cut money for a decade, complaining all the while about low test scores and then decide to make it all even harder.
The “reformers” are telling us that the solution to our children’s lack of educational achievement is to make it more difficult. Test them more! Then make it harder next year again! Friends, we are buying this snake oil by the gallon. It’s just plain nuts.
Students in grades 3-5 will spend about 30 hours just taking state-mandated tests this year. And that doesn’t include all the practice tests and test preparation time that further reduces their actual learning time. That adds up to several weeks of learning time that could be put to much better use….
.
And while our schools are limping along on life support, we insist on substituting testing for learning, swapping test prep time for projects and enrichment, and setting expectations so high the failure rate is bound to go up. That is what crazy looks like in Georgia. We could stop it if we wanted to.
Myra Blackmon, a local Banner-Herald columnist, works as a freelance writer, consultant and instructional designer.

They are getting the results they want.
Anything that undermines public education is considered a plus.
☞ What Ariadne Said To Theseus
LikeLike
It’s only crazy if you take the so-called reformers at their word when they claim to want to improve the lives of children, rather than monetize and train them for compliance with the drab, authoritarian, structurally unequal society that awaits them, and which the patrons of so-called reform fatten off of.
LikeLike
Really good piece in Politico questioning whether the US Department of Education should be presenting the “skills gap” as fact when it is actually disputed, and whether corporations and donors are managing what they’re telling students:
http://www.politico.com/morningeducation/1214/morningeducation16383.html
Do you think the US government should present both sides of the “skills gap” debate to students? I do. The fact is the “skills gap” is not undisputed fact. A lot of economists believe the tech industry exaggerates the skills gap to lobby government on trade and immigration and drive down wages.
LikeLike
There was an article published 20+ years ago from UC Berkeley, a professor whose name I forgot, warning about the impact of H1bs on the tech industry. Gradually, tech jobs have been given to H1bs or sent overseas. If you are over 40 and are American, look out. Your job is at risk no matter how excellent you are in technology. I showed this article at the time to colleagues, but they laughed and dismissed it. Years later, I met one of them, out of work at 45, who said “you were right”.
Roll forward to now and we see Republicans trying to remove the H1b limits based on the myth of a skills gap. We have American PhDs working for minimum wage as adjuncts or Masters mixing lattes at Starbucks.
The same approach will be used to solve the manufactured problem of a teacher shortage. As teachers leave or are forced out, states will, and are, backfilling positions with H1bs. I understand Arizonia is already taking this route. So much for “free markets”.
LikeLike
Chiara, what you write was amply proven during the lawsuit (since settled, but like to re-emerge) that unearthed emails between the tech industry’s big shots, agreeing to suppress the wages of engineers.
The sainted Steve Jobs was a driving force in this effort, but was far from alone.
I’m writing this on an I-Pad, so I don’t have the web address to supply a link, but if you Google, “”The Tectopus: How Silicon Valley’s Most Celebrated CEOs Conspired to Drive Down Tech Engineers Wages,” you’ll find it.
The article appeared in the 1/23/14 edition of Pando Daily, which is an excellent source for stories on the bad behavior of many in the industry.
Next time you hear Silicon Valley execs bemoaning their inability to get the “talent” they’re looking for, rest assured the real purpose is containing wages, by any means necessary.
LikeLike
Can’t find described article at this link?
But here’s one I like by Krugman: http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/26296-missing-a-massive-skills-gap
LikeLike
We in Nevada have tanker trucks of the same oil rolling in here. Nothing is too good for the public schools so that is what we get. Our legislature is prepared this year with a parent trigger law, cuts in funding for your school if test scores are too low, and, best of all, the state take over of low performing schools so management firms can efficiently run the schools. They are also drafting a bill to retain third graders that do not pass a reading test at grade level. And the fun never ends here…….
LikeLike
Alternative copy and paste Tweet—-the link leads back to this post.
Georgia’s Crazy Approach to Education Reform
If it FAILS
As long as it is profitable
Do more of it
http://wp.me/p2odLa-9b7 via @DianeRavitch
LikeLike
Georgia should serve a warning to other states on the same unrealistic, destructive path. It is a template for what not to do in education. Unless our country invests in public education and reverses the test obsessed culture and the reckless race to privatize, the prognosis for American education is poor. As Lloyd so aptly pointed out yesterday, no other nations, certainly not the high achieving ones, are playing Russian roulette with the education of their children. While many nations have a system of standardized testing, the approach is more moderate, and none of them uses the results as a weapon against teachers. We have lost our way in education and gone seriously off the rails. We need honest leadership that cannot be bought and sold!
LikeLike
To retired teacher;
“We have lost our way in education and gone seriously off the rails.”
“We need honest leadership that cannot be bought and sold!”
The biggest question is HOW the mass lets the 1% to manage to do whatever the 1% please or enjoy doing as shown in your above outcry?
Would you agree with the expression of some bloggers, as follows? If not, please present your argument or solution.
1) From NoBrick
December 5, 2014 at 11:21 am
“If the Government can make you, it can ALSO break you.”
I would like to know in American Democracy, who is the so called “the GOVERNMENT”? Is it the 1% or the mass? Who can make or break “WHOM”? Is it the 1% or the mass? Who is “YOU” in that sentence? Is it the 1% or the mass?
2) From Duane Swacker
December 4, 2014 at 6:25 pm
Foucault did not limit his studies to just (yes, just in the sense of simply or barely enough) economics. It is a lot more complete, thorough and complex way of viewing not only
“”how PEOPLE “produce” society but also how SOCIETY “produces” the individual.””
I would like to know the implication of the context in “PEOPLE” and “SOCIETY” in the above sentence. Is it the 1% or the mass regarding leadership in education field or business field?
I am too sick and tired to figure out the KARMA of these traits (and its opposites), such as honesty, integrity, compassion, freedom, and most of all, DEMOCRACY (versus to: malignity, villainy, misanthropy, tyranny, and totalitarianism)
In conclusion, it makes sense to ask my own conscience in the same thought which is expressed by economist Gordon Lafer in the interview with EduShyster, as follows:
…””To say *I want to cut the minimum wage, I want to prevent cities from passing laws raising wages or requiring sick time, I want to cut food stamps, I want to cut the earned income tax credit, I want to cut home heating assistance.
Oh but, by the way, I’m really concerned about the quality of education that poor kids are getting*—it’s just NOT CREDIBLE.””
Please cultivate the mass that GREED, and HOPE IN VAIN will be a deadly trap because if all EMPTY PROMISES are too good to be true, they are NOT CREDIBLE.
Just examine the lifestyle, the behavior, the action, and the background of any candidate in order to compare and to contrast to their bullsh*t, none-sense, and NOT CREDIBLE
promises/researches/plans. Back2basic.
LikeLike
m4potw,
“I would like to know the implication of the context in “PEOPLE” and “SOCIETY” in the above sentence. Is it the 1% or the mass regarding leadership in education field or business field?”
I’m not sure I understand your question but let me take a stab at it. The “PEOPLE” are each individual of a given community and its accompanying culture which then is the “SOCIETY”. I’m not sure Foucault would necessarily agree with the 1%/the mass dichotomy (but we’ll never know his thoughts on it) and would prefer to look at the dynamics of the whole.
It seems to me that the “accident of birth” largely determines each individuals “being” as they move through time (age) and space (family, school, town, etc. . . ) as no one can “control” that “movement/being” until one has been in that time/space flow (Bergson’s concept of flow).
Perhaps the implication is that no one, a 1% or a member of the “masses” has much control over what one becomes/is.
LikeLike
We keep saying the 1% but the actual number of billionaires involved in the destruction of the successful, democratic public schools is closer to 0.000004%, and probably less, and then there are a few thousand who work directly for the oligarchs spinning propaganda, in addition to the millions of fools who swallow their propaganda like a fish swallows the hook leading to the fish being consumed.
That means there are probably 315,999,695 who are not funding the war on public education and democracy.
Oh, I forgot, the thousands of elected representatives, who have accepted the bribes of the 0.000004% to stab the almost 316 million in the back.
What we have is a war: the few oligarchs versus the working class and their dependents, who would be better off with a progressive democracy that represents the best interests of everyone.
LikeLike
My criticism extends to both the billionaires with twisted agendas and the politicians that serve them as they are complicit. The billionaires, though small in number, have very deep pockets. Their unbridled influence is a detriment to a democracy. I consider public education a cornerstone of democracy, and I am insulted and frustrated by how so many in government, including our president, are so willing to sell it off to the highest bidder.
LikeLike
Cheap whores all of them.
LikeLike
Thank you Duane.
I just restore this thread after it is disappeared due to my typing skills.
You are a philosopher in both modern and traditional senses.
You write “that the “ACCIDENT OF BIRTH” largely determines each individuals “being” as they move through time (age) and space (family, school, town, etc. . . ) as no one can “control” that “movement/being” until one has been in that time/space flow (Bergson’s concept of flow)”.
Would you agree with Bergson’s concept, or you may have some doubt about Buddha’s concept of KARMA?
And you conclude that “Perhaps the implication is that no one, a 1% or a member of the “masses” has much control over what one becomes/is.”
I tend to agree with your conclusion because I have lived a half of my life in VN, and the rest of my life so far in Canada in order to witness many untold stories through Capitalism with invisible corruption, then Communism, and back to Capitalism with obvious corruption.
My big YES to your conclusion regarding to the UNKNOWN CAUSE that controls over what one becomes/is. (I am convinced that KARMA may be the unknown cause, hahaha). Back2basic
LikeLike