Recently the Education Justice Center named Nevada as one of the states where funding was most inequitable and inadequate. Teacher Angie Sullivan in Nevada sends out the following news:
Just to be clear . . .
There were one billion in cuts to education under Democratic leadership and the Governor of Reno. We have not restored that money.
Our schools are starving.
No one has the guts to fund public schools in Nevada. Our scores have declined as our funding has declined.
Our schools are starving.
Now the state is going to participate in wholesale union-busting which affects how many under-funded schools? And how many under-supplied professionals? Take Over?
Our schools are starving.
Nice to see some failing charters that further siphon tax payer money on the list too – but what did you think would happen without regulation and oversight. Twice the cost and not able to produce.
Our schools are starving.
The state is going to “take us over”. Who is that? The state will love my at risk students more than I do?
Our schools are starving.
Does that mean sell us to a corporation – like Edison? Remember that Edison Corpirate experiment on kids? $10 million later there was no improvement. What a failure – sad to think we might do that again.
Our schools are starving.
This state can blame teachers who are on the front line all it wants. Go on a witch-hunt again. Waste time and money without addressing the community issues of poverty and racism and disenfranchisement.
Our schools are starving.
You get what you pay for and you wanted to starve the schools – and look what happened.
Our schools are starving.
Tell me this is not union-busting plain and simple. Tell me this is not about punishing women who teach kids to read. Tell me it’s not the already impoverished schools with at-risk populations that will be sold to the highest bidder.
Our schools are starving.
If you keep looking for solutions from a CEO who refuses to acknowledge the real issues – you will continue to fail. Public schools are not about return on investment – they are investment in community, democracy, and opportunity.
Our schools are starving.
O God hold your children in your hand. Where will kids go to school if they privatize them all. Please do not allow experiments without research to kill our schools and hurt our most vulnerable children.
Angie
http://m.reviewjournal.com/news/education/nevada-mulling-dramatic-crackdown-low-performing-schools
NEVADA MULLING DRAMATIC CRACKDOWN ON LOW-PERFORMING SCHOOLS
By TREVON MILLIARD
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Nevada’s underperforming public schools are about to feel the squeeze from state education officials who have long identified the chronic strugglers but have done little more than watch them.
Plans are in the works at the Nevada Department of Education in Carson City to tighten the state’s grip on struggling schools that receive extra support, taking action if they fail to improve, say state Deputy Superintendent for Student Achievement Steve Canavero and members of the State Board of Education.
“We would all like to make nice, and we would all like to have the grownups get along,” President Elaine Wynn told her fellow state board members Nov. 6. “But I would remind you of the mood we had at our last meeting, when we were horrified at the results.”
Those results: 51 public schools labeled low-performers, with few making substantial improvements often requiring urgent and disruptive changes instead of the small, incremental steps commonly seen in Nevada education, Canavero said.
Of the 51 low performers, 29 schools are in Clark County.
The state has identified nine “priority schools” on the 51-school list. All but one shared in $34 million in federal School Improvement Grants over the past three years, but none improved their standing in the state’s one-to-five-star accountability system ratings.
“We obviously can’t go back and fix the past,” said board member Allison Serafin, calling for an accounting of how the grant money was spent and any effect it had.
Wynn asked the board to “send a very clear signal” that it won’t passively accept the status quo.
“We’re here not to have meetings once every six weeks. We’re here to make a difference in how our kids learn and achieve,” said Wynn. “What is the evolving role of the state board?”
The state department and board have never used their power to regularly monitor underperforming schools and mandate improvement plans, which can include choosing principals and other school leaders and prescribing curriculum.
Canavero said he doesn’t see the state choosing a curriculum for schools, which harkens to the concern of board member Alexis Gonzales-Black. She said the state needs to be careful to not micromanage schools.
The state also can turn chronically underperforming schools over to management organizations, which usually run charter schools, or close them and send students elsewhere.
That far-reaching power came to the state board in 2012, when the federal government offered states a chance to opt out of certain provisions of No Child Left Behind, the federal accountability system implemented under the George W. Bush administration in 2002.
The state submitted an alternative accountability plan to the U.S. Department of Education, creating the school star-rating system and granting more autonomy to high-performing schools while setting in place more state power over underperforming schools.
In that waiver from No Child Left Behind, Nevada defined low-performing as schools that fit in one of three designations: focus, priority and those schools earning one star.
Focus schools are those with the largest achievement gaps for certain groups of students, such as poor or minority students who lag far behind their peers.
Priority schools are the bottom 5 percent in terms of student achievement, as determined by annual state test scores.
But an impending extension to the three-year waiver may increase that number from nine to about 38 priority schools, due largely to the inclusion of high schools with graduation rates below 60 percent, Canavero said.
“I think we have plenty of accountability,” said Canavero, referencing the powers granted by the waiver. “What we have yet to do is build the system to exercise that accountability.”
He advocated a more prescriptive process for spending, especially at priority schools. That would entail a memorandum of understanding between the state and local schools laying out improvement needed to be removed from the underperformers list, as well as what the state will do if nothing changes.
“It’s a very thick, muddy place that we’re in,” said Wynn, re-emphasizing her question to the state board. “Are we ready to assume more responsibility for what’s happening in our state’s schools? I am very supportive of putting the pieces in place.”
Canavero and department staff have continued to draft the tighter controls and is expected to detail its next step later this month.
Contact Trevon Milliard attmilliard@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0279. Find him on Twitter: @TrevonMilliard.
UNDERPERFORMING SCHOOLS
(* Clark County schools)
NEVADA PRIORITY SCHOOLS
Canyon Springs High School*
Chaparral High School*
Del Sol High School*
Desert Pines High School*
Mojave High School*
Valley High School*
Western High School*
Amargosa Valley Elementary School
Washoe Innovations Academy High School
NEVADA FOCUS SCHOOLS
Numa Elementary School
Craig Elementary School*
Diaz Elementary School*
Fitzgerald Elementary School*
Kelly Elementary School*
Lowman Elementary School*
One Hundred Academy*
Paradise Elementary School*
Petersen Elementary School*
Reed Elementary School*
Roundy Elementary School*
Squires Elementary School*
West Preparatory Academy Secondary*
Tom Williams Elementary School*
Owyhee Elementary School
Owyhee Middle School
McDermitt Elementary School
Caliente Elementary School
Lovelock Elementary School
Pershing Middle School
Corbett Elementary School
Hug High School
Robert Mitchell Elementary School
McGill Elementary School

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
Sorry to interrupt, but breaking news out of Rochester. According to the Democrat & Chronicle, Greater Works Charter School is history!
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2014/12/01/scrutinized-charter-school-withdraws-application/19745855/
Kudos to the reporter, Justin Murphy, and the edu-bloggers who brought this fraud of a charter to light!
LikeLike
It’s scary that bloggers are the only people who looked at the guy’s credentials.
One would think his claim of running a religious org when he was ten years old would have been a bit of a red flag 🙂
NY charter authorizers are lucky. They should be grateful someone caught this. It could have been an actual disaster. They were ready to give him 100 kids to care for.
LikeLike
“Dear Drs. King and Tisch:
We agreed to serve on the Board on the assumption that Ted was going to handle all the details. Now Ted’s gone, and it turns out that nobody on the board knows how to open or run a school, which frankly sounds like a real pain in the butt. So if we could just withdraw our application, that’d be great.
Thanks in advance,
The Board of Trustees, Greater Works Charter School”
LikeLike
I’m trying to understand this post better by googling around. I find that Clark County (southern tip if state) is 99% urban, ethnic distrib roughly 50%white-25%hispanic-25% evenly divided among blacks & asians, &– perhaps most importantly– the home of Las Vegas, & the great majority of residents employed by casinos & related hotels, restaurants etc.
Trying to figure comparative county per-pupil expenditures was impossible due to Nevada’s messy data. The state is 49th out of 50 in this stat (ave just under 6k)–but I was swiftly led to an article claiming to show that Clark County & its sister gaming community, Washoe County (home to Reno) actually spend 11-12k per-pupil– more than private sch 10k ave w/half the grad rate (per its opinionated author, clearly a candidate for privatization).
What I’m wondering is, why aren’t these casino communities swimming in cash, able to spend 20k per pupil if need be? Doesn’t the house always win– & meanwhile need to pay its multitude of Clark County employees a scant $12-14/hr for their lowly services? Why the state crackdown?
Naive questions no doubt. Perhaps the state fears educating the children of the grunt workers (who pull in most of the state’s cash) beyond the level required to keep the low-paid labor pool in the county… In fact per the post perhaps they figure they don’t need to educate them at all.
LikeLike
The money is spent on tests and consultants. Our last superintendent had 30 consultants and more contracts than you could shake a stick at. The consultants are all about charters and choice. The public schools are being starved. My school consists of moldy portable modular buildings over 20 years old, the district refuses to build a school. You are correct, they believe only the elite need an education, they are trying to crush all unions in Nevada. The culinary union fights with them, but the picture is grim. Nevada was born in the gilded age, and our history has not changed, the oligarchs still own us. Violent strikes and unions in the late 1800’s bloody our history and are the only way workers got ahead. We are reliving history here in Nevada.
LikeLike
Sadly schools like McDermitt Elementary are the center of small rural communities. McDermitt serves a community built next to a Native American Reservation. The state is going to take over this tiny elementary school which serves poor disenfranchised Native American children? What will happen to that community?
LikeLike
Something similar will happen to the rural schools in Lovelock, Pershing County, Round Mountain . . . the schools are the center of towns. Ranchers and miners bus their kids for hours to bring them into the schools. The State will take them over and do what with them? Fire the teachers and start over? Bring in Eli Broad to fix them up? This is so crazy – I can’t even begin to understand what the hell people are thinking.
LikeLike
There are some crazy charter schools listed too. What a waste of time and money. I have no idea why anyone thinks all these fly by night failing charters are a good idea. Do they not google these crazy corporations or people to see what crimes they have committed other places?
Just insane. INSANE!
LikeLike