In this excellent article in the New York Times about the plight of community colleges, Ginia Bellafante shows the dramatic disparity in fund-raising between community colleges and other sectors of American education. The wealthiest benefactors and philanthropists shower millions on their alma mater, such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, but the alumni of community colleges are unlikely to be billionaires. The hedge funders shower millions on charter schools, but ignore community colleges, which serve twice as many students but are not as chic as charter schools.
And yet which institution is there for the least affluent members of our society? Which institutions offer a ladder into the middle class for children of poverty?
Bellafante’s article begins:
Last year at its annual gala, LaGuardia Community College, arguably the most ethnically diverse college in the country, honored Marilyn Skony Stamm, the chief executive of a global heating and air-conditioning business. A child of the South Side of Chicago who had gone to Northwestern on scholarship, Ms. Stamm maintained a committed interest in education and joined LaGuardia’s foundation board six years ago, proving herself a skilled networker for an institution with minimal capacity for soliciting money.
Occupying four buildings overlooking the elevated tracks for the No. 7 train in Long Island City, Queens, LaGuardia serves 50,000 students annually, many of them immigrants and more than two-thirds coming from families that earn $25,000 a year or less.
One of the first things you notice when you visit is the number of students pushing strollers or carrying babies. At the gala, Ms. Stamm was introduced by a woman whose story was dramatic in its particulars but familiar in its deprivations. Cast out of her house by drug-addicted parents, she had a son at 16, endured dialysis and a kidney transplant and was able to remain at LaGuardia — and eventually transfer to Smith — only because of a scholarship the foundation had provided.
In recognition of the evening, Ms. Stamm’s husband, Arthur Stamm, made a gift of $100,000. At the time, it was the largest gift the college had received from a single donor in its 42-year history.
Since January alone, by contrast, Duke University, which educates 14,850 students on its 8,709-acre campus, has received gifts and pledges of $1 million or more on the average of every six or seven weeks. In those gifts alone, the university has already raised about $49 million this year. And yet, according to the latest ranking, its endowment of close to $6 billion in 2012 did not earn it a place among the country’s 10 richest schools, a list led by Harvard, Princeton and Yale.
Educational institutions and services remain the second biggest beneficiaries of philanthropy in the country, after religious organizations, but little of the money flows to community colleges, the mostly public institutions that now enroll 45 percent of the country’s undergraduates, most of them poor or working-class and many of them requiring extensive remedial learning.
LaGuardia’s biggest challenge is the fact that it does not have a rich alumni base. Its graduates are working-class and middle-class.
The plight of community colleges has not captured the interest of the wealthy donor class, where the narrative of the young child plucked from poverty and channeled through a system that will get him to Princeton and repackage him in the image of his benefactors has proved to be so mythically compelling. In 2012, more than twice as much money — $297 million — was awarded to charter schools from the country’s largest foundations as was given to community colleges, even though two-year colleges educate nearly four times as many students.
“When I talk about community college to my friends, I see a blank look on their faces,” one of LaGuardia’s major donors, Lisa Selz, said. “It is so removed from the experience of so many people who don’t see that success can mean becoming a physician’s assistant.”
Recently, foundations like Gates and Lumina have directed some giving to community colleges, but it is only a small fraction of what they give to higher education.
The story recounts the donors who were attracted to LaGuardia’s mission of serving the neediest students and the strategies they devised to jumpstart fund-raising.
As I read this story, I was reminded of something I heard in Finland, where all higher education is tuition-free. “Even graduate school?” I asked. My friend and guide, Pasi Sahlberg answered, “Education is a basic human right. We Finns don’t believe that people should have to pay for a basic human right.”
Reblogged this on Kmareka.com and commented:
Wow, really great food for thought. We need to do more to support community colleges.
Reblogged this on logging entries in my life.
With the extremely high cost of going to college, we will find that many students choose community colleges instead. We need to look to funding them more consistently and “adequately”, as they say.
Especially since they are frequently staffed by highly qualified adjunct educators who may be trying to piece together a teaching career on several different campuses.
Unlike the for profit two year schools that feed on grants given to poor people and former service men and women, often leading to no employment, community colleges actually perform a service to train or retrain people to enter the workplace to pursue viable careers. While Texas often comes up short in education, they offer some of the best career training in their community colleges. They even offer a two year program to learn how to build wind turbines.
Reformers have changed the narrative of community colleges. They used to be viewed as a low- to no-cost option for low-income students. Now, they use CCs to justify P-12 privatization using questionable remedial rates. During this time, they have built a strong lobbying presence to push for-profit, online schools such as the University of Phoenix which has coincided with the reduction of federal funding for CCs. Of course, the NYT totally neglects to mention this power play by the 0.01%; these online schools have low graduation rates and leaves students in debt.
…”…which institution is there for the least affluent members of our society”… curiously enough, in my corner of the world these institutions actually are there *as well* for the more affluent members of our society, providing academic enrichment to “better-prepared”, advanced, high schoolers who may take CC classes concurrently with HS classes. …. if they can get into one.
But surely no one remembers these institutions in their wills, supplanted as they are, by the higher echelon of higher education.
Note in their defense, the explicit setup of these schools has been in some cases to supplant the learning in the lower schools. The master plan of CA’s higher education intended community colleges as “feeder” schools:
http://www.ucop.edu/acadinit/mastplan/mpsummary.htm ~
…”…The transfer function is an essential component of the commitment to access…”
I think they don’t give to community colleges because they don’t control community colleges.
They want control and influence in return for the “gift”. They get that control in ed reform.
That’s why I don’t consider the “new philanthropy” gifts. I think they’re transactions.
If charter schools went off in a different direction, would the donations continue? That’s the measure of a “gift”, to me anyway. What strings does it come with?
Exactly. ROI is the new philanthropy.
There are so many issues that the public can’t even get information on with the community colleges. For example, my local college is shrouded in secrecy, overcrowded, almost lost their accreditation recently, and those who want to teach in them usually have to teach at 3 or 4 different ones as adjuncts, even though they have Master’s Degrees. If we don’t fix some of these problems ourselves, then perhaps the reformers will start looking at them.
Anyone else here tired of hearing the canard that our public schools are failing because a high percentage of the local Community College students require remedial coursework?
It’s misleading, especially when officials “forget” to use the word “Community” in the statement — as RI’s own Eva Mancuso (head of the school board) did when she questioned Diane about the phenomenon during the Q&A section of her talk at URI last year (I’m still sorry I interrupted her, Diane, but I was sick of hearing that misleading omission THEN).
I have spent 20 years in higher ed fundraising. What have I found as the CHIEF problem regarding community colleges raising private support? They don’t do it! Trustees, Presidents and Chancellors do NOT make securing private support their top priority. It’s NOT a top priority for trustees therefore it’s not for academic leaders in terms of a performance metric. But it IS for private college Presidents and land grant state university Presidents. Once trustees make cultivating, soliciting and stewarding suspects and prospects a top performance metric for the institution’s leader, the money will come because the leader will HAVE to professionalize the staff and actually DO THE WORK. Plenty of people in local communities are looking for a reason to support their community college. The money is there, the ability to create new friends and secure funds is there…the work is simply NOT a priority.
PNW,
I beg to differ. I have been an adjunct at a community college for twenty years. There is zero prestige in donating to my college. The Feds have been sticking their tentacles into my community college through their control over financial aid. There are currently more than four times more adjunct faculty than full time faculty. Due to Obamacare, adjuncts are only allowed to teach six credits per semester rather than the previous nine credits. The adjunct predicament is a national disgrace.
NJ Teacher,
PNW can correct me if I am wrong, but I think that PNW’s point is that prestige is something that is created by the institution, gratitude is something that is earned. I know the folks involved in “development” (a term of art in higher ed fundraising) work very hard to convince a donor that he/she in involved in something important, something that will have a lasting impact on the institution.
I am reminded of a story I read recently about an alum of Haverford. At least one regular poster here might already know the story. Howard Lutnick lost his mother while in high school, and lost his father his first week at Haverford College. When the College learned of his loss, the president called Howard and told him that Haverford would pay for the cost of his education. This was in sharp contrast to what the state school told his older sister.
Fast forward to September 11, 2001 and Howard Lutnick is taking his son to the first day of kindergarten rather than going to work at Canter Fitzgerald. Howard’s brother and his best friend from Haverford, both also employees of Canter Fitzgerald, died that day because it was not the first day of kindergarten for their children. Every years since, Howard has given a donation to Haverford College. He has given a total of $65 million so far. Donations are extra, they are what comes form going above and beyond.
Right TE! Harvard creates its own prestige. My community college is full to the brim of poorly prepared students and boasts a low graduation rate. If the college were to take your advice, you and everybody else would be writing a check as we speak and including the college in your estate plans.
NJ Teacher,
I would try and leverage the story of the students that that attend your school. How much of an effort does your institution devote to fundraising?
Problem with your answer is that community colleges are often competing for donors in the same donor pool as universities and many other non-profits in a “community.” There are also costs involved in fundraising, staff, other resources. Fundraising services are available, but their fees are outrageous. Leadership turnover is also a problem, and precisely because of deeply embedded notions of lesser prestige for these institutions than others. If you want a great book on the power of community colleges and the real meaning of “value added” to lives of individuals by really dedicated teachers in a community college, read Mike Rose’s, little book, Why School?