As a nation, we worry far too much about PISA scores, which rank and rate students according to standardized tests. Many nations have higher average scores than we do, yet we are the most powerful nation on earth–economically, technologically, and militarily. What do the PISA scores mean? In his new book, “Who’s Afraid of the Big, Bad Dragon? Why China Has the Best (and the Worst) Education in the World,” Yong Zhao says that the East Asian nations have the top scores because they do heavy-duty test prep. One thing is clear: the PISA scores do not predict the future of our economy. They never have. Our students have never had high scores on international tests, not since the first international test of math was administered in 1964, and our seniors scored last among 12 nations. We went on over the half-century since then to outcompete the other 11 nations with higher test scores.
Let’s look at some other international measures, those that reflect the well-being of children. According to a UNICEF survey (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/04/15/map-how-35-countries-compare-on-child-poverty-the-u-s-is-ranked-34th/), we lead the industrialized nations of the world in child poverty. (Actually, UNICEF finds that Romania has even higher child poverty than we do, but anyone who has been to that nation would not rank the mighty, rich, and powerful U.S. in the same league with Romania, still struggling to overcome 50 years of Communist misrule and impoverishment). When it comes to child poverty, we are number 1.
While we obsess over test scores, we ignore other important indicators, for example, the proportion of children who are enrolled in a quality preschool program. The Economist magazine published an international survey of 45 nations, in relation to quality and availability, and the United States ranked 24th, tied with the United Arab Emirates. The Nordic countries led the survey with near universal high-quality preschool.
Another number reflects our government’s failure to invest in what works. The March of Dimes in partnership with other organizations conducted an international survey of the availability of good prenatal care programs for pregnant women. Preterm births are the leading cause of death among newborns; it is also a significant cause of cognitive and developmental disabilities. Of 184 nations surveyed, we ranked 131, tied with Thailand, Turkey, and Somalia.This problem could easily be solved by just a few of our billionaire philanthropists.
So what do you think matters most? The test scores of 15-year-old students or the health and well-being of our young children? Might there be a connection?
Standardized tests are an accurate predictor of family income and education. Reduce poverty, and scores will rise. Scores on the SAT college admission test, for example, mirror students’ family background. Students from the poorest families score the lowest, and students from the richest families score the highest. The gap between those at the bottom and those at the top is 400 points. As one Wall Street Journal blogger put it, the SAT might just as well be known as the Student Affluence Test.
Our policymakers’ obsession with test scores is unhealthy and counter-productive. They think the way to raise scores is to make the standards and curriculum harder and test more. Today, little children are taking 8 or 9 hours of tests, and as the standards grow “harder,” the failure rate goes higher. We are the most over-tested nation in the world, and the benefits accrue to testing corporations like Pearson and McGraw-Hill, not to children. The tests themselves are a dubious measure. There are better ways to know whether children are learning than standardized tests. Why else would our elites send their children to schools that seldom use them? What’s good enough for the children of Bill Gates and Barack Obama should be good enough for other people’s children.
We should stop obsessing about test scores and start obsessing about the health and well-being of children and their families. The gains would be far more valuable than a few points on a standardized test. That is the only way we will assure children a good start in life and a fair chance to succeed in our society.
We have as many pre-term births as Somalia, which has not had a functional government in more than 20 years, is ruled by warlords, and is considered one of only two “failed states” in the world? That statistic alone should terrify everyone. But it doesn’t terrify the billionaires or their stooges in all levels of government. It’s horrible and depressing.
We have too many preterm births in the US, but you have to use preterm birth rates to make meaningful comparisons.
Actually, I see that it is the US preterm birth rate is comparable with Somalia’s, although the survival rate is dramatically higher in the US. In raw numbers, the US has more than 10 times the number of preterm births than Somalia.
Somalia is a free market, libertarian’s dream state. No government, lasse-faire economy, every man, woman, and warlord for themselves. Elect Rand Paul.
Of course survival rates are better here. I had a pre-term baby, so I know how babies are cared for here. Pre-term children sometimes struggle later in life with attention issues and other major problems. The question is: WHY does the wealthiest nation in the world have so many pre-term births?
“As a nation, we worry far too much ”
So who’s doing the wording?
I’m not sure who the “we” is, but I’m pretty sure it’s not the common folks, the vast majority of us. How many parents, teachers, students go to school and think about PISA.
I think this points out the great gulf between the policy debaters and those thinking about actual teaching and learning in our own kids’ schools.
Peter Smyth, Michelle Rhee created a national organization built on those test scores. Echoed endlessly by reformers. Matching the PISA scores of Shanghai is obsessive and nutty. It is called Race to the Top.
I guess that answers my question below.
“The tests themselves are a dubious measure.”
NO! They are not a “dubious” measure as they are not “measurements” at all because the teaching and learning process cannot be “measured”. It can be described, assessed, discussed, found to be better or worse etc. . . but it cannot be “measured”. Standards and tests are in a long line of educational malpractices of false “measures”, lies, prevarications and falsehoods that permeate America’s (sic) education system.
said the Nightingale to the inch worm, “measure my song. . .” and he measured. . .and inch by inch, he squirmed away from the predator. If only we could figure out how to be so clever as the inch worm.
Ah, Señor Swacker, this is absolutely one of your best comments ever.
TAGO!
😄
And as for putting a number on quality, I will channel a little Banesh Hoffman (THE TYRANNY OF TESTING, 2003 edition of the 1964 republication of the 1962 original):
[start quote]
People who put their trust in correlations would do well to heed Aesop’s fable. “The Lioness and the Fox”: “A lioness who was being belittled by a fox for always bearing just one cub said, ‘Yes, but it’s a lion.’” …
The most important thing to understand about reliance on statistics in a field such as testing is that such reliance warps perspective. The person who holds that subjective judgment and opinion are suspect and decides that only statistics can provide the objectivity and relative certainty that he seeks, begins by unconsciously ignoring, and ends by consciously denying, whatever can not be given a numerical measure or label. His sense of values becomes distorted. He comes to believe that whatever is non-numerical is inconsequential. He can not serve two masters. If he worships statistics he will simplify, fractionalize, distort, and cheapen in order to force things into a numerical mold.
[end quote]
“Vain” and “illusory” would fit in well with the thrust of the above, dontcha think?
😎
Wonderful Diane. Thank you for making it perfectly clear what our focus for our children and our future should be.
I keep looking for a metaphor that compares how the perspective of the corporate / political / philanthropic deformers differs from those expressed in this blog.
Digitally, the corporate / political / philanthropic deformers seem to be looking at a very few individual pixels of a very complex picture. When “zoomed in” to this extent, it is impossible to ascertain what the complete image was / is / will be. It is only when one “zooms out” that this pixilation disappears and it becomes possible for the larger picture to come into focus.
More classically, it is like trying to comprehend an artist’s masterpiece in a museum by standing close to the work and analyzing individual brush strokes. Very often, it is only when viewed from a distance that the beauty and complexity of the work becomes evident.
oh I do love metaphors. You are speaking my language now.
Also, this is the classic elephant metaphor. . .it feels very different when describing the trunk, than the ears or the tail or the bulk of the elephant’s body.
Yours are good ones, except I would say that I think reformers are not interested in beauty or complexity of a work. They want measurable results, industrial efficiency, homogeneity and very little expense. Furthermore, many don’t want to threat of secular thinking. It’s not art to them.
I have found that it requires many metaphors to grasp the corporate education reform movement. And furthermore, it’s healthy to ponder metaphors on our education system even without the influence of corporate education. What was our metaphor before NCLB? What was it after? What would it be now without NCLB?
I like garden analogies. What kind of garden did we have? What kind do we have now?
I too love the garden analogies. We are moving from a healthy, colorful, diverse and vibrant wild-flower garden to a carefully groomed, uniform, predictably boring as well as vulnerable mono-culture of the putting green on a golf course.
The Reformers want paint by numbers. They haven’t even stepped foot in the art gallery. da Vinci would be jailed because of suspicious erasures, van Gogh kicked out for mental illness, Pollock told he was not confirming to state standards, Rivera for ignoring no-excuses rules and painting on walls, and Picasso suspended for being one of those eeeviiil, Marxist, big gubbermint types.
“Paint by numbered pixels”
Paint by numbered pixels
MS Paint’s the norm
Bill Gates and his fixels
Education reform
I have a question I hope someone will answer.
NC’s 2008 “Blue Ribbon Commission Study” indicates that they recommended that TIMMS and PISA serve “as models and benchmarks against which to evaluate its curriculum.” That sounds like a healthy and balanced acknowledgement of paying attention to them, but not bowing before them. So would it be safe to assume, then, that upon accepting Race to the Top money we automatically gave TIMMS and PISA a higher level of influence? (I’m asking because I simply don’t really know what the relationship between PISA, TIMMS and RttT is)—-would love to have someone explain it.
In other words, by accepting RttT, did NC ignore its own advice and resolutions?
Diane,
Could multiple interpretations of PISA results be valid? That is: (1) We should be paying more attention to measures of family well-being and support and less to international comparison tables; (2) International test scores may not predict national economic competitiveness, nor the degree to which national wealth is equitably distributed; (3) US results on PISA, which measures students’ abilities relative to application of knowledge and critical thinking may reveal gaps in our education. Ironically, these gaps have been exacerbated by consequential assessments.
I wrote about this in more detail here: http://www.arthurcamins.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/PISA-Results-A-Chicken-Little-Moment-.pdf.
and proposed a shift in assessment emphasis from high-stakes test to daily formative assessment here:
Click to access What-if-we-approached-testing-this-way_-_-The-Answer-Sheet.pdf
Arthur
http://www.arthurcamins.com
“Looking for anchovies on pepperoni PISA”
The key to our success
Is not on PISA test
So looking there
Will never bare
The answer to the quest
This piece by Zhou asks the right question.
oops, misspelled his name: should be “Zhao”
Sorry.
National charter management group to board members- “let them eat cake”
“Board members of a North Side charter school asked their out-of-state management company last night to reduce a complicated, high-cost building lease so they can increase teacher salaries, hire a nurse and buy reading materials for students.
An official with Imagine Schools Inc. suggested that the board “celebrate” teachers in other ways, such as having cake for them at the next board meeting, and promised to evaluate student needs.”
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/10/16/charter-board-high-priced-lease-disservice-to-school.html?utm_content=bufferd59af&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
The reformers are obsessed with test scores, even though this data is corrupted and invalid. Why do they ignore HS and college graduation rates at historic highs? Why do they ignore record number of college applications and admissions despite exorbitant student loan rates and tuition costs?
Answer.. They ignore data that challenges their claim based on a political and financial agenda. Folks there’s trillions to be made on ed reform, it’s all about profits, not the economy, not the country and especially not the children.
Let’s us also keep in mind our creativity and innovation that flourishes (or used to flourish) in the United States. It seem possible that someone like Steve Jobs, would not have the same opportunities if he had been schooled under this present oppressive data driven testing regime that is ruining public schools. This is zapping enthusiasm from students and makes learning for the test the focus for learning in public schools.
although there are usually unintended consequences to any plan. . .so some hope can reside in that factor while we wait for this reform phase to pass. People are clever and resilient.
Thank you for this important perspective. How can we persuade our billionaires to turn their attention to supporting maternal and infant health, instead of experimenting with our school system? The NYTimes just covered the link between bigger (full term) babies and better performance in school: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/upshot/heavier-babies-do-better-in-school.html
“Happy, healthy, and ready to learn” used to be the mantra of policymakers involved in early childhood initiatives. Now, according to Arne Duncan, ECE is about rigor, not happiness or health. It’s so odd to me that as we gain more understanding of the links between learning/cognitive growth and physical/emotional health, people actually seem *less* inclined to support programs directed at children’s physical and emotional well-being.
one sentence in the blog says it all: Solution? Lobbyist for more early education.
We are the most over-tested nation in the world, and the benefits accrue to testing corporations like Pearson and McGraw-Hill, not to children.
I just finished Anthony Cody, THE EDUCATOR AND THE OLIGARCH (2014), and am in the middle of Yong Zhao, WHO’S AFRAID OF THE BIG BAD DRAGON (2014). Both very recently published.
These are must reads for those for a “better education for all”—and best read, IMHO, in tandem. And then reread.
Chapter 1 includes a discussion of PISA, international test scores and rankings. The last four paragraphs (p. 28):
[start quote]
China does present a dangerous threat. That threat, however, does not originate with China or its actions.The threat comes from the West’s current infatuation with China’s educational system. and from the actions that countries such as the United States and Great Britain have taken to emulate that system. Those actions betray a shallow understanding of a very old and complex culture, and they confuse short-term outcomes with long-term sustainable progress.
Chinese education is authoritarian in nature, and it has been for centuries. The spirit of education in China today flows from a two-thousand-year history of imperial exams. Chinese education produces excellent test scores., a short-term outcome that can be achieved by rote memorization and hard work, but like the Chinese government itself, it does not produce a citizenry of diverse, creative, and innovative talent. Chinese education proved a failure back in 1842, when China lost the First Opium War to Great Britain. Ever since then, China has been trying to learn from the West.
If Western countries successfully adopt China’s education model and abandon their own tradition of education, they may see their standing rise on international tests, but they will lose what has made them modern: creativity, entrepreneurship, and a genuine diversity of talents.
The only way China will win the global competition of the future is for the West to begin educating the way China does.
[end quote]
A wealth of information and thought-provoking observations can be found throughout his book.
😎
Did you read The Teacher Wars? Did you like it? I’m almost finished with it, then I’ll start the other two you mentioned.
No, I have not read Dana Goldstein, THE TEACHER WARS.
Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Do you recommend?
😎
yes, I do.
“The Leaning Tower of PISA”
Rigor is de rigueur
Testing is the norm
PISA is the figure
By which we gauge reform
SomeDAM Poet:
TAGO!
😜
A bit of updated doggerel from my youth—
“You’re a poet
And you know
And your toes show it.
They’re long fellows”
😎
Diane, this was a perfect article about the difference between us and the international community. Poverty is at the root of all the problems. We really need the leaders in the poor communities to step up and address the many problems. If they do that, then the health and well-being of pre-term births will decline.
Problem is, the leaders don’t want to fix it. They want further dependence on the government so they can have a free ride.
Ann, no one wants their babies to die or be disabled. Not in any community.
Cross-posted at :http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/The-International-Statisti-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Diane-Ravitch_Future_Important-141016-993.html#comment516242
with this comment (and embedded links to other posts here)
‘As a nation, we worry far too much about PISA scores, which rank and rate students according to standardized tests. Many nations have higher average scores than we do, yet we are the most powerful nation on earth–economically, technologically, and militarily. What do the PISA scores mean? One thing is clear: the PISA scores do not predict the future of our economy. They never have. Our students have never had high scores on international tests, not since the first international test of math was administered in 1964, and our seniors scored last among 12 nations. We went on over the half-century since then to outcompete the other 11 nations with higher test scores. Let’s look at some other international measures, those that reflect the well-being of children; while we obsess over test scores, we ignore other important indicators, for example, the proportion of children who…
comment:The testing mania was put into place for one purpose… to force the evaluation of teachers by student scores, a fallacious argument, that allowed them to invent failures, and thus create a ‘reform’ narrative that bamboozles the people, promote ‘choice’ such as charters.
Pearson, which is part of Rupert Murdich’s holdings, promotes the testing mania, which has made the publishers of test-prep rich, and has ended the role of the professional teacher to plan lessons based on real learning objectives.
Testing mania has turned off children and made school a place that hurts their young minds, and parents across the country have forced their districts to drop testing.
FromL
Tearing Our School Apart: Is it Worth It
https://dianeravitch.net/2014/05/31/tearing-our-school-apart-is-it-worth-it/
“Under current feral an state laws, test scores are supposed to go higher every year. Every year, the students are a different cohort, but their scores must be higher than those who preceded them. High expectations–no matter how unrealistic–are supposed to produce high achievement. Think of it this way, if students are running track and can barely jump over a 3′ bar, raise the bar to 4′ and see what happens. The assumption (usually by politicians) is that raising the bar will cause students to jump higher. But many will fail because the theory doesn’t work.A seventh -grade teacher in a Title I (high-poverty) school in Texas writes:”I can say from personal experience that the “scores” are ripping my department apart. Last year two-thirds of our group were shuffled between grades because of low test scores. Result, even worse scores this year. All I can say is that failure begins at the top. Ugly comments have been made, morale could not be lower.. The students are beginning to check out.”Is it worth it all?
So much talk about all kinds of issues. No one, including myself, has enough swack to DO anything about it. All talk, no answers. Everyone has a theory or way to ‘fix things,” but nothing is DONE.
That includes Common Core, Ebola, whether to close the borders or not and comparing us to the international countries. And, there, we are not comparing apples to apples when comparing the U.S. and other countries. They can’t be compared.
“Test to the Top (TTTT)” (also known as “The Billionaire’s T Party”)
“The measure of success
Is score on standard test”
Said William Gates
Who did quite great
On SAT, no less
It’s really not surprising that the people most firmly behind Common Core and standardized testing are precisely those who excelled on standardized tests (Bill Gates got 1590 out of 1600 on the SAT).
If only every American could be more like them.