Mike Petrilli leads the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which advocates for the Common Core and for privatization of public education. Although I was a founding board member of TBF, I left the team because I no longer agree with the rightwing agenda.
But on one thing we can agree: Arne Duncan has overstepped his bounds as Secretary of Education. Mike is exercised because Duncan’s Office of Civil Rights believes that all children as a matter of right should have equal access to Advanced Placement courses. Mike writes:
Another obsession of Duncan’s OCR has been getting more poor and minority students into advanced courses, such as the College Board’s AP classes. On its face this is a laudable goal, and reform-minded districts (and charter schools) have made much progress in preparing disadvantaged students for the rigors of challenging coursework. But is this an appropriate realm for civil-rights enforcement?
If schools are forced by an OCR investigation to expand access to AP classes for poor and minority kids, what are the chances that they will also do all the complex work it takes (from kindergarten through 11th grade) to make sure those students are ready? To implement solid curricula, hire stronger teachers, provide extra help for struggling children? Isn’t it much more likely that bureaucrats will simply flood AP courses with unprepared students? We can all guess what the impact will be on the students who are ready for AP coursework, whose classes will be inundated by peers who haven’t mastered the prerequisite material.
From one perspective, Duncan is shoveling more money towards the College Board to pay for AP courses. This is very profitable for the College Board, run by Arne’s buddy David Coleman, architect of the Common Core. Taking an AP course does not guarantee that one will pass it, although OCR might require that too.
But that is the least of Arne’s meddling. He used Race to the Top to force states to adopt the Common Core standards before the ink was dry on them; the former Commissioner of Education in Texas, Robert Scott, said he was asked to endorse them before they were finished. He used Race to the Top to force states to evaluate teachers by the test scores of their students, which has failed wherever it has been tried. He used Race to the Top to demand greater privatization of public schools. He has rewarded schools that close public schools and replace them with privately managed charters. Now, he is punishing states that refuse to bow to his edicts about teacher evaluation by canceling their waivers from the onerous and absurd sanctions of No Child Left Behind.
This is a man who never taught, but thinks he knows better than any teacher what should happen in the classroom and how teachers should be judged. I have not decided whether he suffers from a surfeit of arrogance or a lack of judgment or something else.
Whatever it is, Arne Duncan will be remembered as a man who was a destructive force in public education, a man who blithely closed schools and fired staffs, a man who disrupted the public education system of the most successful nation in the world.
I admit that I have lost all respect for Duncan. I believe he disregards federalism. His funding of Common Core tests, in my view, directly breaks federal laws that prohibit any officer of the government from trying to influence, control or direct instruction and curriculum. To cling to the transparent fiction that testing does not influence curriculum or instruction fools no one.
When I worked for Lamar Alexander in the U.S. Department of Education, one thing I admired about Lamar was that he did not think his ideas were better than those of everyone else in the nation. Arne does not have that sense of humility. In fact, he has no humility at all. He tramples on the lives of children, teachers, and educators as though they were insects under his feet, awaiting his all-powerful judgement. Where he got the idea that he knows more about education than people who have actually taught children for many years is a mystery.
My experience working at the Department of Education taught me an important lesson: there are very few people who work there who are educators. There are many program administrators, contract managers, and clerks. They should not tell schools how to educate children because they have not done it. Arne should not do it either. It is against the law.
Granted completely, Diane. But I wouldn’t want Mike Petrilli making the calls on educational policy or practice, either, and I have to wonder what it means when anyone closely connected to Thomas B. Fordham is criticizing Duncan, given their general adoration of CCSSI. It took a long time for some people to warm to you as a voice for reasonable criticism of the education deform movement (and some will likely never trust you, though I’m not one of them). It will take many of us far longer to believe that there’s been a major shift in world-view at TBF.
“Whatever it is, Arne Duncan will be remembered as a man who was a destructive force in public education, a man who blithely closed schools and fired staffs, a man who disrupted the public education system of the most successful nation in the world.”
Agreed, but I would make one amendment. Take out “Arne Duncan” and replace with “Barack Obama”. The buck stops with him. Unless he is completely ignorant of what his secretary is doing, which I don’t believe, or incompetent, which I can, but don’t want to, believe, he is Duncan’s boss and enabler, and Arne is only doing what his superior wants.
Now back to schoolhouseliive.org. Thank you, Diane.
Duncan and Obama and by extension Bill Gates will all be remembered by history as perpetrating a status quo of reform that hurt kids.
Gates won’t be remembered as a benevolent billionaire. He will get an asterisk by his name for defending the indefensible just like Henry Ford did once his anti Semitic views became known.
Ford: “You can have any color you want…..as long as it’s black.”
Gates: “You can have any curriculum you want…..as long as its the common core.”
You can have any curriculum you want…..as long as its the common core.”
Very funny
Great analogy.
It actually goes very deep.
Both Ford and Gates are obsessed with “standardization.”
Ford invented an assembly line to turn out cars.
Gates invented an assembly line to turn out students.
Sorry, I have to disagree with you. Obama is turning into another neo-liberal centrist like Bill Clinton, as Cornell West says. This is not an argument from typical right. It’s from the left. He does not seem to be interested in the mess reformers are doing with public education.
“I have not decided whether he suffers from a surfeit of arrogance or a lack of judgment or something else.”
That something else seems to be that he’s not too bright, an ironic trait to possess as an education secretary.
We were fooled into believing we elected a Democrat for President. Duncan is a doofus, and Obama has pretty much forgotten on which Part’y’ss Platform he ran. He apprently likes getting beat up by Republicans, even thought most of what he has done fit their agenda more than it does the Dems. Aside from Affordable Care, I am hard-pressed to think of any other even moderately liberal initiatives coming from his time in office. His administration has definitely not been a friend of American Public Education,Labor, or Low-Income/poverty level Americans. He throws them bones, not meat. For example I am a strong supporter of freedom to marry whom you want and I applaud President Obama;s clear support for it, but I don’t see the same intensity of support t on any of our more pressing universal issues. such as Right To Work, Minimum Wage, College Costs. Feel free to point out the error of my ways rather than ad hominem attacks on me. Untll then, I remain a Homeless Moderately Liberal Democrat.
Obama is no Democrat; he is no friend to the working class. He is no friend to our most vulnerable – children and senior citizens. As a plaything of the Prtizker family, he delivers on the billionaire’s agenda, whether it be charter schools or the Cat Food Commission which called for dismantling Social Security in order to preserve low taxes for the one percent.
He criticized Hillary Clinton for her proposed health care plan, and then promptly adopted the Mitt Romney/Heritage Foundation model, without even providing a public option.
He promised working families he would put on his walking shoes and walk alongside them for labor justice.
The man is a liar, a coward, and a destroyer of our commons, such as our public school system.
He deceptively dons his African-American heritage while doing the bidding of the one percent. After all, Mr. Obama is a young man, and is eyeing how to take his place within the ranks of the one percent after he leaves office.
Cornell West, Glen Ford and the Black Agenda Report have been the few who have called Mr. Obama out on his duplicity. History will not be kind to Mr. Obama.
What really bothers me is that he can break the law with no consequences. It took me a long time to realize that unless one had the money and power to challenge an unlawful action, nothing would happen. Politicians can blithely enact any legislation they want knowing that in many instances no one will have the where with all to challenge breaches. They can look good and still do nothing. No one is going to challenge Arnie, so he can do whatever he damn well pleases.
Vote 3rd party.
Arne Duncan suffers from doing as he is told. He suffers from lack of conscience and lack of integrity, which is what all reformers suffer from.
His bank account doesn’t suffer; nor do those of the reformers.
Follow the ca$h, and you will be enlightened.
Sadly, politicians are eager to do the bidding of their funders, and change laws and policies that favor the reformer’s truly empty agenda. Reform has not enriched the students; it has only taken money away from those who need it most, and stripped students of services, libraries, librarians, nurses, teachers, and schools.
I have diagnosed Arne and his ilk….thieves without conscience or integrity.
This idea that ALL, I mean 100% of students should take AP courses seems ridiculous. I just don’t see it happening that schools are denying kids the AP classes if they are ready for them.
I suspect it has a lot to do with the, what is it, $93 per exam?
I think it’s $96 now.
I my district, we are forced to take ANY kid in AP who signs up. For some kids, it’s a good booster for them–it helps them step their work up to the next level and really gets them to think. For the amazingly gifted kids, it’s great for the challenge it gives them. The problem is with the kids who THINK they can handle it (often with encouragement from their parents), but are not ready. I have some students right now who are totally lost and, as a result, are incredibly disruptive, and I can’t get them out of the class. So the rest of my students suffer because of these few. It’s frustrating.
Except for the mention of disruptive students, I share your experience. I teach AP Euro (senior course) and I have 57 students this year. It is the FIRST AP CLASS for 42 of them.
I’ll obviously do my best to bring them up to speed but we just completed our first document-based essay and it was a nightmare. The kids tried but the expectations for this class are remarkably difficult (code for the kids are in unprepared for this task) for them.
I like that they have taken on the challenge but it’s plain that many are frustrated with the difficulty of the work. I’ve used it as an opportunity for the students to do a little self-examination and figure out where they are academically and what might be a good plan of action post-graduation.
To the original point, the idea that every kid should take an AP class is ridiculous. Not every kid should go to college. (I’m not saying they shouldn’t have that opportunity.) But for many, there are more practical paths. This push for college has led to too many generating debt without a degree.
The cost of college has become so prohibitive that many of our brightest have opted for two years at low-cost community college before transferring to a four-year university. Just good budgeting in my opinion.
This madness had its start with Tom Luce, undersecretary of ed under George Bush. (Luce unsuccessfully ran for governor of Texas against George, before the latter’s ascension to POTUS.) He gave it the official sounding monicker of National Math and Science Initiative. When the local version, Massachusetts Math and Science Initiative, was implemented in my school (about 2005), it turned the place upside down, with a flood of pre-AP texts, CD’s, vertical alignment, workbooks, mandated teacher workshops and total overhauls of the school’s schedule.
http://www.nms.org/AboutNMSI/BoardofDirectors.aspx
So much more $$ than just the tests’ cost flowed out of the school to outsiders. Included was rewards to kids for passing scores of 4’s and 5’s and merit pay to teachers. Because it was limited to Math, Science and English AP’s, students and teachers involved in other AP’s such as History, Spanish and French were left out of the equation and the kids came to attribute an inferior view of these courses.
They donned the cloak of civil rights and the Massachusetts version is still running videos of some of my students on their website. The kids are now in their 3rd or 4th year of college, and were always going to be among our most successful students anyway. I doubt when their parents signed off allowing their children to be used in this fashion that they had the least notion of how they were being used. Really, it was an early incursion of the monetization of public schooling.
2old2teach: What about all the Teachers’ unions’ money and their sell out to money? What about the so called Black organizations and their sell out to money? Their is plenty of blame to go around including our so called advocates. Arne has no real opposition.
Just makes my point. Money speaks. I do not excuse our so-called advocates. It is past time for everyone to wake up and decide what kind of country they want to live in. Practically my whole adult life, I have felt like the American dream was exactly that: a dream. It has become a useful fantasy for those who truly hold the reins of power. We can continue to live in fantasy land or we can take ownership of the direction in which this country moves. I can probably manage to live out my days without sliding into abject poverty, but I would like to leave this world knowing that the little guy can still realize his dreams.
“Where’s Arne?”
Arne overstepped his bounds
He isn’t in his chair
He isn’t on the White House grounds
He isn’t at O’Hare
He isn’t in the USA
He isn’t on the Earth
It seems that he is on his way
To Mars, for what it’s worth
One of the surest signs that the tide is slowly, if painfully, turning against the self-styled “education reform” is the increasing energy with which they are turning against each other. As is their SOP, instead of serious self-reflection and self-correction re their words and deeds, each one of them finds that somebody else—anybody else!—is to blame.
And it’s just recently that Arne Duncan overstepped the boundaries set by competence, experience, morality and sanity? How about just his April 2013 speech to the AERA annual meeting in which he is simultaneously for, against, and somewhat for/somewhat against standardized testing? And among other things, lambastes those critical of his ruthless push for high-stakes standardized tests by citing Campbell’s Law—accusing them of not getting testing right! *You know, thereby getting testing ‘wrong.’*
😱
Link: http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/choosing-right-battles-remarks-and-conversation
Does he understand the words coming out of his own mouth? As John Duffy writes above, it “seems to be that he’s not too bright, an ironic trait to possess as an education secretary.”
Not irony if you’re want someone who devotes body and soul to pushing privatization and ROI/MC [ReturnOnInvestment/Monetizing Children]—and then beams broadly at finding himself among the leaders of the “new civil rights movement of our time” aka the ed biz.
Let me put it another way.
He believes his own pr. He has become a victim of his own hype. He has done everything possible to make himself a caricature.
He will read Shakespeare and swear that this is an accurate quote: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our deeds and words, but that no one appreciated a loyal underling like myself.”
Qualifying himself for a lifetime membership in the MMA.
¿? Sorry. Not Mixed Martial Arts but Maligned Minions of America.
Or so the usual unconfirmed rumors go…
😎
Oh, well. I guess every single national ed reformer and ideological faction within The Movement can’t get each and every item on their personal wish list into every single public school.
The “bureaucrats” who work at my local public high school “flooding” AP courses as result of a lawsuit is really the least of my worries, and I’d venture a guess it’s not high on the list of local concerns either.
Last time I checked they were preparing to deal with the new, incredibly complex high school testing scheme, which includes 2 new Next Generation standardized tests a year in every single course, special tests to rank teachers every year, an ACT option, and then something they’re calling “industry credentials” which seems to be some kind of vocational testing.
Will TFAs be exempt from “industry credentials?” I betcha the Prez will pass a law that they are. Teachers must be certified and highly qualified, unless you’re with TFA. Industry credentials, for sure, will apply to REAL teachers only, and be meant to further oust them.
Newark has teachers working “out of certification” all over the place. There are so many that the union has concocted forms to deal with the problem.
I guess conservatives in ed reform were fine with federal “meddling” when Duncan was mandating lifting caps on charter schools, ranking teachers with ridiculous formulas, the Common Core and associated testing, and, last week, launching a $220 million federal building program for new charter schools over 12 states.
But keep the federal government out of AP courses! There, they stand athwart history, yelling “stop!”
Give me a break. Duncan gave conservatives everything they wanted, and they were happy to grab it with both hands and dump it on local public schools, and now all of a sudden there’s grave concerns about whether public schools can function under the BURDEN of potential civil rights lawsuits.
Whatever you think of Arne Duncan, recognize that he does what his boss (Obama) wants. Make sure you include Obama in your disdain. History will show Obama was a tool of Wall Street and his disasterous presidency weakened the economic security of all but the 1%. I hope he enjoys his 30 pieces of silver.
I left 3 comments on that National Review article; the logic Petrilli uses will lead you right back to Friedman’s ideas or Shumpeteri’s ideas and these are not satisfactory to me…. He talks about Duncan’s over-stepping in civil rights….. commenting on NRO “What if African-American and Latino students actually misbehave at higher rates than do white and Asian students? ” even if I gave you the “what-if ” conjecture only for the purpose of discussion, WHY are the penalties on the minority youth much harsher and more punitive ? Same as what happens in adult society with the disparate penalties for the affluent (cocaine users more frequently white males ) as opposed to the users of street drugs (more likely the minority minorities). ”
Petrilli would build a logic to justify the “school to prison pipeline” and I just won’t let him do that…..
Petrilli has two more articles on the Fordham site ; in this one about the charter school they sponsor in OH, Petrilli states: “But its “proficiency index”—which looks at the percentage of students getting to proficient and above—is a lowly C. Or perhaps not so lowly—almost no high-poverty schools in the state broke into the B range, because the proficiency index is almost perfectly correlated to school poverty levels.” If he gives an inch on what we know about tests being a proxy for SES, he still claims the school Fordham sponsors in OH has to be the greatest in the state….. He will find any way he can to justify his own logic…. Go to the Fordham site and download the two articles ….
A freelancer at Fordham was formerly the editorial page editor at the Dayton Daily News. She was at the helm when the DDN endorsed an anti-labor bill. While the paper’s news reporters have recently done an exemplary job in exposing the state’s charter fraud, IMO, the editorial page finds every opportunity to portray conservative views like Fordham’s, in a positive light. For example, the former owners of the Iams Co., the Mathiles, use their foundation money to support Fordham and they get two articles praising their contributions to education. Ohio middle class workers fund research, “Knowyourcharter.com” and they get an article with a headline that mentions critics and a quote from a Fordham spokesperson.
DDN’s editorial page gives over columns of space to laud home schooling and charter schools. Local conservatives get advocacy space. IMO, progressives get no space and moderates from the public schools, display great circumspection, failing to take a strong stand. Its like Fox vs. ABC. (CBS and NBC have lost all pretense of objectivity).
Reading Petrilli’s post leaves me with an uncomfortable whiff of underlying racism. Anyone else?