Florida never ceases to amaze. In 2012, the voters overwhelmingly defeated a constitutional amendment to permit school vouchers, yet the Legislature keeps finding ingenious ways to siphon off public funds for vouchers.
Now, Julie Delegal writes, a local school board member–presumably elected to strengthen and support his district’s public schools–has come out strongly in opposition to the Florida School Boards Association’s lawsuit against private school vouchers.
What you need to know to understand this story is that former Governor Jeb Bush loves vouchers, and everyone on his team does what Jeb wants.
This is how her article begins. It is worth reading it all to see how the privatization movement is trying to starve public education and send money to unaccountable private schools:
Duval County School board member Jason Fischer is a nice young man. But in politics, I’ve learned, it’s the nice young men you have to watch.
His most recent actions reveal that he’s a foot soldier in the war to destroy public education. And his bread may be getting buttered by lieutenants in the Jeb-Bush-brand, school privatization movement — the ones who are affiliated with his employer, Uretek Holdings.
Fischer’s recent activities put him squarely in the camp that has been systematically destroying Florida’s public schools for more than a decade. As both governor and puppet-master, Bush has overseen the implementation of a punitive school-grades system and an overreaching teacher-accountability scheme.
Meanwhile, the Bush camp has promoted privatization — and the funding choices that go with it – while the Legislature has been starving our public schools. Despite Gov. Rick Scott’s claims that he’s boosted spending for education, The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says that, in real dollars, per pupil spending in Florida public schools is still not up to pre-recessionary levels.
Fischer has come out strongly against the lawsuit filed by the Florida School Boards Association, which questions the constitutionality of Florida’s private-school voucher program. He not only published a guest editorial in the Jacksonvlle Times Union, he also asked his fellow public school board members to pass a resolution condemning the suit.
Voucher funding now drains state coffers by more than $300 million yearly.
Duval Superintendent Nikolai Vitti is on record saying that privatization — voucher schools, charter schools, etc. — could siphon away up to $70 million from Duval next year.
With support from the FEA, the NAACP, the League of Women Voters, the Florida PTA, and other education advocates, the FSBA is asking a Leon County judge to declare the tax credit voucher program unconstitutional on two grounds. Plaintiffs say that by permitting corporations to pay their taxes to the voucher program called “Step Up for Students,” instead of to the Florida treasury, the program creates a separate, shadow school system. The Florida Constitution, the suit points out, calls for a single, “high quality,” and “uniform” public school system.
The Constitution also forbids aid to religious institutions, and the majority of schools funded by “Step Up” are religious schools.
The response to the lawsuit from voucher supporters is, essentially, “You’re picking on poor children who need to have ‘choice,’ you big meanies.”
Is there hope for public education in Florida? Yes. Parents must organize and fight this attack on their public schools. School boards must be vigilant against privatization. Working together, they stopped the “parent trigger” twice in the Legislature. They have the power, and they can’t let down their guard for a minute. The privatization movement never rests, and neither should the defenders of public education.

They are planting them everywhere. They are infiltrating from the inside…and I’m not even kidding.
LikeLike
I wonder what percentage of voters elected him? Ideally (and ethically) regardless of how many people voted for him, Mr. Fischer would fight for public schools. Unfortunately, this is not the case and people need to do their research and to get out and vote in every single election.
LikeLike
Maybe my expectations are too high, but that seems like it would be the rock-bottom minimum duty for taking that job.
I guess we have to ask, now. “You’re running for school board. Public schools: pro or con?”
LikeLike
We had two reformers run in our county, luckily neither won.
LikeLike
One would think, Chiara. I know. It’s puzzling.
LikeLike
Yes. I think 40% voter turnout is what got NC where we are.
That can change! Big efforts to help it in the western part of the state, where some of the most egregious ALEC members reside.
Of course, what about our Governor? I think he just doesn’t know who he wants to please.
LikeLike
I think that’s the cost of this that hasn’t been calculated (yet). What happens to existing public schools when they’re simply abandoned by lawmakers?
This voucher fight in Florida will once again dominate everyone’s energy and time, and public schools will once again be relegated to an afterthought, if they’re considered at all.
I think the neglect does more lasting damage than outright aggressively trying to replace schools with other schools. We’ll pay for that, down the road.
LikeLike
For what it’s worth the supervisor of elections website shows 74% turn out.
LikeLike
It’s still hard to get my head around people who voluntarily take jobs running public schools and then immediately begin working as hard as they can to discredit and undermine the schools they promised to serve. How do they justify this to themselves? Why take a job running an entity you don’t value and hope disappears completely?
LikeLike
I think they take the job so they can dismantle the public schools they hate.
I think their main goal is to lower taxes in the short term and like everything else (fracking comes to mind) they don’t care about the long-term costs.
LikeLike
Yep.
LikeLike
It’s as if he created a board seat “representative for private schools” and then filled it, but didn’t tell anyone. Don’t private schools have their own boards and advocates? Why doesn’t he work there?
LikeLike
“The privatization movement never rests.”
Darn. I was hoping after the disasters we’ve been seeing around the country that the silver lining would be at least we could say we tried that and it didn’t work.
But then again you’d have thought the same thing about trickle down economics and yet in NC that’s where we are.
The tax cuts to one corporation alone would have funded our text book crisis and the teaching assistants we lost.
We can’t take anything for granted, huh? And in NC we likely got into this mess simply by low voter turnout.
Hopefully that will change in about three weeks. But then, hopefully, we will have learned that privatization fantasies will always be swirling around. It makes me tired just thinking about it.
LikeLike
A few months ago I left a comment that the privatization crowd would use its money to buy state level and large urban district votes. But I have a sickening sense that the privatization supporters have caught on to the fact that only a small percentage of people vote in local school board elections. They understand that almost every community has an anti-tax faction who would readily support any candidate who runs on a platform claiming they can save money and increase test scores… and in some cases the anti-tax faction won’t even care about the test scores. Thus, the big money folks who are bankrolling high profile urban campaigns and state level campaigns are finding they can get more traction for their ideas by going to the “grassroots” elections where no one pays attention to anything going on in schools but is concerned about the local tax rates. “Concerned Mom” is right: ….people need to do their research and to get out and vote in every single election.
LikeLike
Well, it’ll work for a while but eventually people are going to notice no one is paying any attention to public schools, since most people go to public schools.
No one in Las Vegas noticed they weren’t building any public schools?
How many fawning articles have we read about Agassi and Rocketship? No one in government said “excuse me, I hate to interrupt this love-fest, but our public school system seems to be collapsing”?
“Schools in this suddenly robust community are so packed these days that 13 of them stay open 12 months a year. Children go to classes and eat lunch in cramped, windowless trailers, bustling with restless students. Thousands more take online classes at home, and school district administrators, desperate for space, are looking to abandoned strip malls for classrooms.”
LikeLike
As upsetting and counterintuitive as it may seem, someone who is bitterly opposed to public schools–even to the point of wanting to see them dismantled entirely–is still a stakeholder in public schools and the democratic process.
Local control is local control. Indeed it can create odd tensions: from my part of the world, the East Ramapo situation springs to mind: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/07/28/nyregion/parents-in-east-ramapo-school-district-ask-state-to-oust-orthodox-jews-on-board.html.
LikeLike
“he’s a foot soldier in the war to destroy public education.”
I would correct he’s “a snake in the grass.”
LikeLike
Roger Williams at Florida Weekly, Sept. 24-30, in his article, “The Business of High Stakes Testing”, makes it clear there are no principles underlying the deform movement.
LikeLike
School board members are not elected to serve the schools or taxpayers. They are elected to ensure that each student receives a quality education and Mr. Fischer has always been transparent about his “agenda.” If the public schools were outperforming private schools, you would have a sound case. But they’re not. And you don’t.
LikeLike
Public schools in Florida outperform charter schools. Mr Fischer is a double agent. School boards are elected to strengthen public schools, not to undermine them. He is a disgrace.
LikeLike