Peter Greene describes what it would be like to teach in a public school without tenure. Anyone in the building with more authority than a teacher has the power to end his or her career, for any reason.
The worst thing, he writes, is not that you can be fired for anything at all. The worst thing is the threat of firing.
He writes:
“Firing ends a teacher’s career. The threat of firing allows other people to control every day of that teacher’s career.
“The threat of firing is the great “Do this or else…” It takes all the powerful people a teacher must deal with and arms each one with a nuclear device.
“Give my child the lead in the school play, or else. Stop assigning homework to those kids, or else. Implement these bad practices, or else. Keep quiet about how we are going to spend the taxpayers’ money, or else. Forget about the bullying you saw, or else. Don’t speak up about administration conduct, or else. Teach these materials even though you know they’re wrong, or else. Stop advocating for your students, or else.
“Firing simply stops a teacher from doing her job.
“The threat of firing coerces her into doing the job poorly.
“The lack of tenure, of due process, of any requirement that a school district only fire teachers for some actual legitimate reason– it interferes with teachers’ ability to do the job they were hired to do. It forces teachers to work under a chilling cloud where their best professional judgment, their desire to advocate for and help students, their ability to speak out and stand up are all smothered by people with the power to say, “Do as I tell you, or else.”
“Civilians need to understand– the biggest problem with the destruction of tenure is not that a handful of teachers will lose their jobs, but that entire buildings full of teachers will lose the freedom to do their jobs well…..
“Without tenure, every teacher is the pawn and puppet of whoever happens to be the most powerful person in the building today. Without tenure, anybody can shoulder his way into the classroom and declare, “You’re going to do things my way, or else.”
“Tenure is not a crown and scepter for every teacher, to make them powerful and untouchable. Tenure is a bodyguard who stands at the classroom door and says, “You go ahead and teach, buddy. I’ll make sure nobody interrupts just to mess with you.” Taxpayers are paying us for our best professional judgment; the least they deserve is a system that allows us to give them what they’re paying us for.”

Well said. there is a propensity in these matters to liken a school to a sweatshop or small manufactory. In such a shop the owner wields the full power of ownership which includes hiring and firing rights that are limited by very little. Consider at the other end of the spectrum are things like law firms where the partners in the firm wield that power democratically. Which do you think a school is closer to? The plutocrats want it to be like a sweat shop. The teachers want it to be like a law firm. It is somewhere in between but much closer to the law firm than the sweat shop.
Part of this viewpoint is due to thinking of schools as being part of a large governmental bureaucracy. But the leader of each school is closer to being equivalent to a teacher in status and pay and education, etc. Plus the leader is also an employee of the same people (the school board) who are operating the school in a public trust.
School boards do not actively supervise the supervisors, so how could they possibly monitor them for abuses? Tenure, that is a form of due process, provides the oversight in that if disciplinary action needs to be taken, a formal hearing with all of its disclosure protections and requirements protects the interests of all involved.
LikeLike
“Firing simply stops a teacher from doing her job.
The threat of firing coerces her into doing the job poorly.”
TAGO! David
LikeLike
“Firing ends a teacher’s career. The threat of firing allows other people to control every day of that teacher’s career.”
Otro TAGO, David!!
LikeLike
http://www.philosophywithoutahome.com/blog/2011/03/23/why-teachers-like-us-support-unions/
LikeLike
Well said!
LikeLike
“Without tenure, every teacher is the pawn and puppet of whoever happens to be the most powerful person in the building today.”
I might add and ‘in the community today’. Teachers in TN have been harassed by church congregations for teaching stories the preacher deems are promoting witchcraft & satanism. We’ve had cheerleader teacher/coaches run out for not selecting the powerful parent’s daughter. Evolution and climate change continue to be controversial and teaching them can be a firing offense.
Once again, the smartest guys in the room fail to acknowledge the faults and fallout of putting their ideas into practice.
LikeLike
I agree that some parents make absolutely ridiculous demands regarding their robustly entitled spawn, many calling for the termination of teachers, coaches or arts directors. I have been in meetings where this was the key issue and have fought against these requests when I felt that they were ridiculous.
Any principal who will not back a teacher, librarian, coach, arts director or other staffer who is simply doing his/her job is absolutely spineless and is unfit for the responsibility.
The meeting that I attended had a complaint against a coach brought by perhaps the top medical specialist in his field, who is not accustomed to experiencing any resistance to what he wants to do.
This irate elite specialist was rebuffed in his quest to get a coach fired. The specialist and I are now friends and I would and do recommend him to friends and relatives as he is the very best in his field.
Outside that field, he is just another guy.
It is critical that principals and heads of school and school boards thoroughly investigate claims of incompetence or impropriety and act accordingly.
I have seen cases where replacement is essential as a poor hiring choice was made and
an entirely inappropriate fit for a teacher and a class resulted.
I acted appropriately and the situation was addressed. Eventually.
LikeLike
We need to start calling it “due process”. This phrase is more accurate for K12. In a world of sound bytes, hash tags, and money is speech, every word counts. Due process rings true and reverberates with freedom loving Americans. It is harder for libertarians to argue less due process is more liberty. Conservatives who value constitutional rights also find due process more appealing. K12 does not have tenure in the post-secondary sense. “Due process” also focuses opponents on explaining why rights are being eliminated IN a public forum, not a rigged courtroom or sheltered ivory tower.
LikeLike
Teaching here in North Carolina, I can relate to what Peter writes. Administration exhibits a my way or the highway mentality.
LikeLike
Taking a different approach, can anyone cite an entity that does have a best practice management example of a program that is both fair and effective in addressing an allegation by parents that a teacher or principal is not a fit for the position held?
I will be the first to grant that many cases of poor fits have as the root cause being burned out by inept administration practices over an extended period of time. There are probably tens of thousands of cases of teacher burn out in our systems.
We need effective means of identifying those organizations having systemic flaws that do
induce teacher burn out as well as identifying the best means of addressing those flaws.
LikeLike
Tenure stands in the gap, a guard against any force that would disturb authentic teaching and learning. In this time of “edu-corporate reform fever” it is more vital than ever.
LikeLike
Due process means that a teacher can be an advocate for students.
Take that away, and you’ve made an already very difficult and uncomfortable situation—
Next To Impossible.
Then people will complain that teachers aren’t “standing up and delivering”!
W. Edwards Deming pegged the sort of thinking behind such worst practices “management by fear.”
Hard to improve on his formulation.
😎
LikeLike
Our superintendent once told me, years ago, give me what I want or your professional career is over. I did give him what he said he wanted and was demoted anyway. That was about a quarter of a century ago. He was a politician and played the Board of Education like a violin. Became the second highest paid superintendent in our area by jumping through hoops, destroying the work of many of our best teachers who had devoted their lives to building quality education in our school district.
This is nothing new except that over the U. S. it keeps getting worse it seems like.
LikeLike
Let me offer a slightly different perspective. I’ve taught in both public schools and private (independent) school. My final schtick was at a private school (no tenure, of course) under an excellently supportive headmaster (the reason I went there to teach). After 6 years, that headmaster was kicked out (essentially) by a new majority of neuvo-riche Wall Street types on the Board, and replaced with a face-man who was only interested in creating ‘image’, not educating children.
He and I locked horns almost immediately, however he was afraid to fire me. Why? By that time, enough influential parents had heard from their kids that I had taught how well-prepared they felt when they moved to the ‘next level’. Most teachers have far more support than they know among the parents. They need to cultivate that support. Maintain those contacts, directly, and you get ‘de facto’ tenure rather quickly.
I worked for the ‘face-man” for another 6 years, and it was a running battle. I would ask “innocent” questions in open forums that would reveal his ignorance, he would ask the Dean of Faculty to ‘observe’ me and assign to me a heavier load. The heavier load, however, simply meant that almost ALL juniors and seniors passed through my classes (all electives, BTW), thus increasing my parent support base.
It was sweet revenge in the end. An opportunity to make double my salary suddenly cropped up when an opening suddenly appeared at nearby school a week before classes started. I had (of course) already signed a contract with the face-man. I calculated, however, that he wanted to get rid of me so badly that he would do whatever was needed to get me to go. I was right…. off I went to bring in enough of a nest egg to retire the following year. AND, at the end of that year, the face-man got canned.
In fact, many teachers have tenure they don’t exercise, and most poor administrators hang from a far thinner thread (and they know it)! The key to winning the tenure fight is to communicate with parents (both formally and, in particular, informally at, say, sporting events or grocery stores). Teachers and parents have much in common. They are both interested in providing the best for their children. Don’t let some some incompetent administrator or narcissistic politician get in the way!
I think the ONLY way for teachers to win the very necessary fight for (legally recognized) due process is for them to build and rely on their parent support base to come to their aid. Parents and teachers, together, are an irresistible force (and, I don’t mean the administrator-manipulated PTA). Teachers, by themselves, are vulnerable.
LikeLike
I am afraid that due process and continuing contracts for teachers will soon not be enough to save their jobs. With the new teacher evaluation system brought forth by “Race to the Bottom”, no teacher’s job is safe. If you get an unfair evaluator who gives you a poor evaluation with no reasons and then get poor test scores because you had a difficult class that year, watch out. There has been crazy talk in my school district that if a teacher gets an ineffective rating 3 years in a row, that teacher is fired, even with a continuing contract.
What we are finding out in my school district are that teacher ratings are all over the place because they are subjective and done my different principals. One teacher in my district is a full rating above me (I heard her talking), and all she does all day is yell and scream (other teachers and my two children told me). But, she is in a different building being evaluated by a different administrator. I know this teacher is not a better teacher than me, and she does not even have the stress of a state test. The whole process is silly and demoralizing to the teachers who are being harshly and unfairly evaluated.
It would be very easy to get an ineffective rating, much easier than people think. The only thing that is saving me these days are my test scores and I’m loved by parents and the kids. All of my beloved bosses have moved on, and I am stuck with this hateful administrator that no one can figure out how he keeps his job. What a mess. I am grateful that my teaching career will be over within 2 years. I love to teach, and I dearly love my students – but, sadly, it is just not worth all of the stress and low pay anymore.
I just wanted to write in and let everyone know though that continuing contracts and due process might not be enough to save teachers who are being discriminated against because of age and unfair evaluations. The unions really need to read over their contracts and begin to place language in there that protects their teachers when they are given unfair evaluations based on the new teacher evaluation system. I am a union member, and without the unions, the career status of teachers will be over.
LikeLike
There are certainly toxic administrators and organizations out there.
I suggest that there is a dire need for a Yelp-like website which could be used to provide a heads-up to these toxic disasters.
If only one person alleges that a given principal is incompetent and a control freak, it might or might not gain traction.
When twenty five individuals post experiences that an individual has a pattern of dysfunctional management, it gets attention. This is how Angie’s List has virtually eliminated the grief from home remodeling, which earlier could be a nightmare, as homeowners once had no effective recourse.
That is definitely not the case now.
LikeLike
You are so right! This would be a great idea! I know my administrator was looking for new employment this summer, but we were all horrified that he will be back this fall with his toxic manner of running our school. I am so grateful to God for all of the wonderful years of teaching I got “in” with wonderful administrators who supported me in my classroom. I would have never survived those past years of teaching with this principal who should not be a principal. When you place a new teachers’ evaluation system in the hands of an incompetent principal on a power trip, oh, my . . . .80% of the staff is in trouble…..especially the older, more experienced teachers like myself. They give you an unfair evaluation BECAUSE THEY CAN. It’s all a power trip. I don’t know what the younger teachers are going to do….many of them think as long as they are a good teacher…they have nothing to fear….which is so untrue. Thank you so much for your reply! (:
LikeLike
Referring to tenure as due process is a very simple yet effective rhetorical concession we should make as comments here confirm. For the public tenure is offensive and for good reason. As we all know, there are bad teachers, administrators and officials. The system is infested with the worst offenders however, and protects them, even openly promoting an unrepentant policy that puts these individuals on some kind of divine pedestal that allows them to malign, harass, misinform and act out in egregious malice against society’s subclass, public school teachers.
No one asks how the hell teachers can pull it all off when they are managing classes with four dozen students, lacking support and resources, intentionally sabotaged by districts that aes eager to usher in charters and afraid that some kid will accus them of giving a kid a sideways glare and end up disgraced and unemployable . It happens. A lot.
Out unions have not come out soon enough to defend due process andwhen they did , it wasnt very convincing.
The new leadership at NEA seems promising , but CTA has yet to appeal the Vergara ruling and we know the state is unlikely to now with an election coming up. This makes me suspect Jerry Nrown and Thorkelson plan to let the ruling roll unumpeded because it looks like a way to beat a huge pension benefits obligation that LAUSD alone is many billions shy of in the very near future. Brown and company probably dislike this choice but see no way around it. Is it for the greater good?
Not really.
It is rather astounding that Brown would assume the costs of labor will translate into the state budget becoming unburdened by its educational alotments if charter schools circumvented public schools and defered to cheap TFA interns who are afforded part timers with real experience and credentials who get work as mentor teachers. The pprimary reasons for this is state laws about the ratio of teachers to interns , which will eventually get legislated out as schools for profit streamline costs by way pf edtech, which is already proving to be lucrative for captains of industry. With the federal mandates anticipated for common core, the saleries of shiftkess CEOs and the ramoant corruption conpletely deregulated , it is unlikely the citizens will get tax breaks or that the quqlity of education will improve.
Moreover , Brown’s steadfast belief thay the economy is best served when workers are assured an adequate wage, one wonders how much harm an economy suffers when such a large professional demographic , most of them baby boomers , are quite literally confronting financial ruin rather than retirement thanks to the antics of John Deasy amd other reform minded grifters . Though installed in large school districts to destroy pubkic schools and teachers, these individuals are afforded immunity as Deasy repeatedly demonstrates with daily doses of audacity .
LikeLike