The Chicago Tribune’s poll of voters‘ views of Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s school policies showed very low approval for the Mayor. The mayoral election is in February 2015, and it appears that education is Rahm’s weak spot. He favors charter schools and shut down nearly 50 public schools in one fell swoop, an act unprecedented in American history. He has fought bitterly with the Chicago Teachers Union over school funding. It is not working well for him politically, the poll shows.
“Asked about Emanuel’s handling of public schools, 65 percent disapproved, 26 percent approved and 10 percent had no opinion. The latest findings show a shift of 5 percentage points toward disapproval from a Tribune poll in May 2013 — just before a vote by the school board to shut nearly 50 public schools.
“While dissatisfaction with the mayor on education crossed racial lines, it was more intense among African-American voters. Critics contend black neighborhoods were disproportionately targeted for school closings. Fully 77 percent of black voters disapproved of Emanuel’s handling of the city’s schools while only 14 percent approved.”
“Among parents of children in Chicago Public Schools — about one-fifth of those taking part in the survey — nearly 4 out of 5 disapproved of the mayor’s handling of public education while only 19 percent approved. But even those without children in the public schools disapproved at a 62 percent rate, while only 27 percent approved.
“Emanuel’s approach on charters versus neighborhood schools was roundly criticized by voters: 72 percent disagreed with that approach, compared with 18 percent who agreed. African-American voters most severely opposed the policy — at 83 percent — while only 10 percent agreed with Emanuel. Nearly 8 in 10 parents of CPS children also were opposed, as well as 75 percent of female voters, 69 percent of men and 63 percent of whites.”
“Little more than 15 months ago, more than one-third of Chicago voters did not choose a side between Emanuel and the union. The latest poll finds that the bulk of those voters have opted to side with the union: 62 percent, up from 41 percent in May 2013. A total of 23 percent sided with Emanuel, up from 19 percent more than a year ago. Only 7 percent opted to choose neither the union nor the mayor in the new poll.”
The Tribune has been a vocal critic of the CTU. Friday afternoon is traditionally the time to release stories to get minimum attention.
The conclusion to be drawn from this poll is that Rahm is in big trouble because of his hostility to public schools and his devotion to privatization.

I think progressives would be well-served to do everything in our power to make sure both that Karen Lewis unseats Rahm and that Zephyr Teachout beats Cuomo in NY.
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
My impression is that Karen Lewis has a better shot in Chicago than Zephyr Teachout does in New York.
But I’d love to see Junior Cuomo follow in Rick Perry’s footsteps and join the club of governors criminally indicted for attempting to quash anti-corruption probes in their states.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss Teachout’s chances. Speculation that a candidate can’t win is often self-fulfilling prophecy (see http://34justice.com/2014/06/03/political-pragmatism-undermines-progressive-goals/). It’s really too bad that the WFP didn’t have the guts to endorse her.
LikeLike
Rahm will never be getting my vote again, and I would be thrilled if Karen Lewis decides to run!
LikeLike
And I was not surved by the Trib.
LikeLike
Kudos to the CTU! The work they did in reaching out to parents during the strike is paying dividends in a large way. Teachers DO know how to educate.
LikeLike
Exactly ^^. All of us can learn from the way the CTU organized — from its democracy to its community presence/support-giving to its call for “the schools Chicago’s children deserve.” To me, this is the main message — how we can make our unions into the social-justice fighters/organizers they must be in 2014.
LikeLike
Perhaps Scott’s Miracle Gro will have another opening on its board by February 2015.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on We Are More.
LikeLike
This story needs to be retold:
Several years ago Rahm’s brother appeared on 60 Minutes and said something to the effect that anyone who opposes the mayor might as well give in and give up because “my brother never loses.” I can remember thinking, “He will lose to the teachers.”
And it looks as though he will!
LikeLike
Democrats don’t care what actual voters think about public schools. Every poll says public school parents want funding and support for public schools and fewer standardized tests. Every poll says people trust teachers over politicians on public school issues. Politicians would kill for the kind of polling on “trust” teachers get.
They completely ignore us. They live in a bubble and they’ve made up their minds that we’re all in agreement with ed reform. If we’re NOT in agreement, well, they have an answer for that, too. In that case we’re self-interested or unimaginative or “protecting the status quo” and they’re bold reformers doing what’s best for kids whether we like it or not.
I hope Democrats get shellacked in the next election. That kind of patronizing disregard for their constituents deserves rebuke. They earned it.
LikeLike
“what’s best for kids” is a total ruse. It’s what’s best for the business plan, their personal ambitions and their wallets
LikeLike
Yes, you are right. In a California poll asking “who do you trust” teachers came out second only to pastors, and ahead of physicians.
LikeLike
And, I hate to keep bringing this up because I know how unfashionable public schools are, but we were told ed reformers would IMPROVE public schools.
That was the sales pitch. Not replace or dismantle or privatize or “disrupt” but IMPROVE.
We’re 14 years into this. When do we get to the “improve existing public schools” part? How are Chicago Public Schools doing, you know, the schools that exist and are full of children? Anyone working on them, or are we just busy replacing them?
If Democrats were planning on replacing public schools maybe they should have run on that. They DIDN’T run on that because they wouldn’t have been elected.
LikeLike
As much as I would love to dance on Emanuel’s political grave (attn. NSA: that’s POLITICAL, hokay?), I don’t think a shift of 5 points in a 15-month period constitutes a landslide.
Having said that, I will definitely donate to Karen Lewis if she runs against him.
LikeLike
Oh Happy Day!
What’s particularly gratifying about these latest poll numbers is the response of the black community—the citizens who have been hit hardest by Emanuel’s vindictive and counterproductive school policies. They’re not so easily fooled by this odious, deceptive claim about Emanuel’s anti-education policies being “the civil rights struggle of our time.”
The black community’s overwhelming and steadfast rejection of Emanuel’s horrific school closures demonstrates the absolutely fraudulent nature of this claim: Poverty is not the same thing as stupidity, Emanuel and his backers are now finding out. And Rosa Parks would never have refused to give up her seat on a city bus in order to shut down the public schools in her neighborhood and replace them with charters.
As with Washington DC during the Reign of Rhee and Felty, African Americans, the community that is most negatively impacted by these pro – Privatization policies are again leading the way, alerting the rest of the city as to the destructive nature of Emanuel’s policies and “education reform” in general.
Here’s an idea: the next time you hear one of these self styled ‘ed reformers’ who are gleefully aligning themselves with the policies of Jeb Bush, Rick Scott, Chris Christie and The Koch Brothers, ask them to go into the communities whose schools have been shuttered for manipulative and vindictive reasons and start comparing Rahm Emanuel to Martin Luther King…
And then see what kind of a response you get. It will be a good way to gague the level of support you have in the very communities who have seen first hand what this is really all about.
LikeLike
Knowing the Tribune and having seen some of its previous “survey”, I’d be willing to bet this was a very biased “push poll” – thinly disguised propaganda for the mayor (which is the job of a major newspaper, right? /snark). The fact that the numbers are so strongly against the mayor despite that is very gratifying. I bet if a more neutral organization did a survey, the numbers would be even more strongly against the mayor.
LikeLike
Hello People of Chicago! You/we need to get back to a ‘democratically elected’ school board. Like the one we had way back in the 1980’s. Enough of this ‘Corporate’ school board controlled by whoever the mayor is.
Stop begging to a school board that is never going to listen! Plus…charter schools are not public schools. They’re also controlled by the corporate school board. Duh!
Thank you for your moderation.
LikeLike
Actually, Chicago has never had an elected school board. Other districts in Illinois are required to have elected boards but, even before mayoral control in Chicago, it was one of the many exceptions in the Illinois school code that applies just to cities with populations over 500K i.e., only Chicago. All the more reason to finally have an elected school board now.
LikeLike
Rahm is a segregationist. Public schools have struggled for decades because of poverty. This is not his fault but his job is to make the schools as good as he can. Instead, he gives up and opens charters, convinced they’ll be better because they are not unionized. But the charters are only better when students are cherry picked , proving again and again that unions are not the problem, poverty is.
So the alternative is using charters as vehicles for hedge funds to make lucrative write-offs. Rahm knows well the revolving door.
LikeLike
Never underestimate the ability of those who WON’T be required to pay for it to demand “gimme, gimme”.
LikeLike