When I was writing my book “Reign of Error,” I wrote about Jeb Bush’s plan called “Digital Learning Now!” It made bold promises about how technology would bring about a wonderful new world of learning and equity and why every district should open their doors to online schools and deregulate them. they need not even have a physical office in the state. Then I went in search of the research on which the report relied. Some was drawn from higher education, some from industry, some from the military. There was no research to support the claims of the Jeb Bush machine. The report was sponsored by the usual philanthropies but also by a bunch of tech companies, who would win big contracts if the recommendations were enacted.
Now Newt Gingrich has written an article lambasting our 19th century schools and recommending the brave new world that lies in front of us, in which technology replaces teachers.
He writes:
“The results of this method of teaching have been astounding, especially in charter schools that have adopted it early, like KIPP Empower Academy in Los Angeles. Nestled in an impoverished neighborhood where most students receive free or reduced lunch (a proxy for poverty), KIPP Empower has adopted blended learning and has seen progress that was once unthinkable. It recently scored an amazing 991 (out of 1,000 possible points) on the California Academic Performance Index. That makes KIPP Empower the top-performing school in Los Angeles County and one of the best in the state of California.
“Traditional public schools have also benefited from this model. Oakland Unified partnered with the Rogers Foundation to set up a similar program in a handful of inner-city schools in that district. The results are far fewer discipline problems and much better scores. At one of the pilot schools, the number of students reading at grade level actually doubled.
“Promising blended learning programs are underway in settings as wide-ranging as Washington, D.C., South Carolina’s Horry County Schools, and Middletown, New York, according to the Lexington Institute’s Don Soifer.
“In addition to these achievement gains, blended learning is also proving to be more cost-effective for taxpayers than the traditional model.
The cost of educating each student declines in blended-learning environments, in part because schools require fewer teachers to manage the classrooms. With fewer discipline issues, students become more engaged in the material and as a result, learn better. Additionally, teachers have more free time to spend with each student. This makes classroom size rules obsolete, and since compensating teachers has been the main cost driver in education, it is a big breakthrough.”
Isn’t technology wonderful! Fewer teachers, no more discipline problems, larger class sizes, reduced costs. What did he leave out? No more teacher certification? A vastly expanded gross national product. An end to poverty and inequality.

One of the problems of the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision is that the ceiling is removed for political donations to extremists such as Newt Gengrich.
The Las Vegas casino owner put endless millions into the Gingrich campaign, which would have died a peaceful death far earlier without those massive donations.
I suggest that the removal of limits on political contributions will prove to be one the most harmful events in the history of our society.
LikeLike
America… The best country money can buy.
LikeLike
Well you won’t respond so why do I bother. GOP is in bed with the reformers like Michelle Rhee and they both shot their ignorance when they try to sound like they know something about education. But you do tend to show your own bias and ignorance about instruction technology when you publish stories on technology. Oh that’s right, one of your blog minions is the anti-technology one. Better get that boy off your staff and quick, he is beginning to sound a lot like the GOP folks.
LikeLike
And who is that blog minion? The suspense is killing me.
LikeLike
Having the imprimatur of Newt Gingrich is a kiss of death for just about any product or program for all but a very small segment of the population. He is about less popular than several unpleasant diseases, if I recall correctly from his last ridiculous run for the presidency.
The fact that blended learning appeals to him is also a sign that it is not worth investigation, much like his grand plan to remove poor children from their homes and move them into government-run internment camps.
The man is a dangerous buffoon.
LikeLike
Chris in Florida: re the tenor of this comment, I am making an exception in Newt Gingrich’s case.
Here is an individual whose money argument for impeaching a sitting president was that he was unfaithful to his wife with one other woman. This from a man who, as one wag put it, defines traditional marriage as “a relationship between a man and a woman and another woman and another woman.” And not to forget his merry hopping from one ‘deeply felt’ religious affiliation to another to another.
He is an exemplar of the shameless self-serving double-talk that defines so-called “education reform.”
And more, much more, than that—
A), “He’s a stupid man’s idea of what a smart man sounds like.”
B), He’s also an immoral man’s idea of what a moral man sounds like.
Those in mad dog pursuit of $tudent $ucce$$ deserve him. He’s one of them. He’s just not clever about hiding his hypocrisy.
😎
LikeLike
And, according to Newt, after the students are done with school, they can sweep the floors – probably using high tech brooms.
LikeLike
These people are out of their minds. Our children now spend half their lives on their cell phones and computers, many have little or no interaction with their parents or other adults, they are immune to all the real-life violence around them all over the world because they’re watching violent video games and movies–so how would any one in their right mind not one children to interact more, not less, with compassionate excellent teachers who act as the main role model for many of our children. Of course our children have to be trained in technology, but they also need to be “trained” in human interaction, sensitivity, different opinions, how to think out of the box, etc. Technology can’t do it all. These extremists are intentionally destroying this country for their own sake of profits and greed. We also wouldn’t have a funding problems if big corporations paid their fair share of taxes–we sure have plenty of money for our military/industrial complex.
LikeLike
In my book, actual newts are higher among lifeforms than this fellow is.
I have long been an advocate of use of advanced technologies in education. I will spare everyone, here, the long list of valuable uses of educational technology.
HOWEVER, . . .
education, as I see it, is PRIMARILY a transaction whereby a generation of people passes to the next generation that which matters to it. (Culture is that which is created and transmitted between generations.) Essential to this transaction is the continual reaffirmation in practice, by all involved–by learners and by teachers–that the subject matter MATTERS to actual people.
In our country, we use the term “Humanities.” In Germany, there is a somewhat broader term that I like better, the Geisteswissenschaften (literally, “the sciences of the spirit”). What the newt suggests is equivalent to replacing therapists, ministers, rabbis, and other counselors and spiritual leaders with vending machines. Put in your quarter, and the machine spits out advice: “Try harder. If at first you don’t succeed.” Perhaps we could replace religious leaders and psychologists with machines built by fortune cookie companies. That makes about as much sense as what the newt is suggesting.
Technology should never be used to undermine the humane transaction that is education. It should in no way compromise the relationship between a teacher, who, ideally, serves the essential function of being a model of what a learner is, and a pupil, who, ideally, sees in his or her teacher that model of what he or she can become.
People like the lowlife newt have a vision of a future in which 400 students are in a room doing worksheets on a screen while one low-paid aide wanders among them making sure that the machines are operating correctly and occasionally answering questions. After all, almost all the cost of education is in teacher salaries. If that model worked, one could simply put students in a room with piles of textbooks and tell the kids to start at the beginning and read through the texts and do all the exercises. Gee, I think something might be lost there, huh?
It’s unfair to newts to call this person by that name.
LikeLike
Those with Newt’s vision first pinned their hopes for dramatically cutting the size of the teaching force on distance education. But gee, that didn’t work out for them. Completion rates and learning rates were both terrible. So now they’ve moved on to the “kids in rooms with tablets and an overseer” model.
Sickening.
LikeLike
USDE and McKinsey & Co. are propagating tech as the next best reform under the cynical banner of RESPECT (for Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence, and Collaborative Teaching), an agenda under the radar screen of a lot of people, just like the common core. The talking points are here
http://mckinseyonsociety.com/closing-the-students-gap/
and here USDE’s National Education Technology Plan 2010.” Available at: http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
with the full vision of (dis) RESPECT here http://www2.ed.gov/documents/respect/blueprint-for-respect.pdf
The most polished marketing tool from USDE on the RESPECT project is based on an April 2013 McKinsey “discussion guide” prepared to give the appearance that this version of techie classrooms is a grassroots and teacher-led effort–one teacher in charge of 100-150 kids for 90 minute classes in a big room with lots of computers with some help from mostly part timers (and much else, like vanished tenure and unions).
The pitch for RESPECT enlists Whitehouse aids and Board Certified teachers as marketers. The teachers are given prepared scripts and paid to identify others for a discussion group. The teachers have a time and scripted topic guide to a discussion (duration less than an hour), and a form that stuctures and captures the points made in break-out groups. The teacherhas a form to report back to USDE. All of the goodies in the “tool kit” help to document the apparently spontaneous “national conversations” favoring the USDE/McKinsey blueprint for transforming the profession of teaching, and teacher education, and certification, and you name it.
The “grassroots “discussion paper and USDE blueprint have all of the preferred rhetorical devices in several McKinsey reports (recruiting “top talent,” gifted teachers, top performers, and also a staffing diagram). All of the key points and the diagram from McKinsey discussion paper were only lightly modified but graphically improved in USDE’s version.
The USDE blueprint portrays the following organizations as participants in, contributors to, and endorsers of the RESPECT project: American Association of School Administrators (AASA), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), the National Education Association (NEA), and the National School Board Association (NSBA). But I could not find any documentation to support this claim.
This blueprint is on hold as another unproven federal intervention. A stalled Congress helped. The blueprint called for a $5 billion program to treat teachers as temp workers, whose ranks would be churned every three to five years by stack ratings of their performance with the production of “more than a year’s worth of gain in test scores” in three out of five years the closest thing to job security.
The bait for this transformational switcheroo is the fantasy that taxpayers will pay teachers who survive this triage a salary of up to $150,000 a year–but a year with longer school days, shorter vacations (10 days to two weeks to start) more managerial duties for all, with unscheduled time invested in community outreach that includes recruiting local corporations and foundations as “partners.”
Pensions are also addressed. Older workers get less in order to fund the pensions of younger workers and all of these great techie, distributed staffing plns.
LikeLike
Great work, Laura. Thank you.
LikeLike
As I recall, this isn’t a new idea with newt, nor is it particularly original. He is a vending machine, corporations insert money, hyperbole and buzzwords erupt from the other orifice.
LikeLike
“Technology should never be used to undermine the humane transaction that is education. It should in no way compromise the relationship between a teacher, who, ideally, serves the essential function of being a model of what a learner is, and a pupil, who, ideally, sees in his or her teacher that model of what he or she can become.”
Perfectly stated!
LikeLike
Bob’s words have the ring of wisdom –unlike the pontifications of most education “experts”. I wonder when “wisdom” will become an education buzzword and the charlatans will start publishing how-to guides at Heinemann. The psychometricians will develop an onerous standardized test that teases out how much wisdom a third-grader possesses.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, “wisdom” will be redefined to suit the “ed reformy crowd. Anyone care to guess what the “reform” revised definition of “wisdom will be?
LikeLike
“Newt” as in “GingRICH” gives the word “newt” a bad name! Delicious irony in that a wonderful Czech satirist, Karel Capek wrote a fabulous book called, “War with Newts” and its irony IS SO IN LINE WITH THE TOPIC AT HAND!
LikeLike
It is an insult to fig NEWT-tons as well, and the cookie has a higher social utlity than Mr. Gingrich . . . .
It would be fun to grind him up and use him as the filling for our own home made fig newtons. . . . and serve them up at high tea to the GOP and Tea Party. But then they’s all come down with food poisoning of the worst kind . . . . .
LikeLike
The brave new world lies in front of us, in which technology replaces politicians.
President Newt Gingrich, now that’s a nightmare all by itself. Why this man is taken seriously is beyond comprehension, he is a major league joke.
LikeLike
I’m sure that the children and grandchildren of Newt G and Bill G and Michelle R and the rest of these “reformers” are enrolled in charter schools where they “work” on computers most of the day in classrooms holding 100+ students and a couple of low-paid temporary subs — excuse me, TFA temps — right?
Sure.
LikeLike
This idea has been discussed for over 10 years in the tech world. Technology is a tool not an educator. Used as a tool to supplement education it can be effective. Look at PA cyber schools only 1 out of 12 made AYP. It takes a highly motivated self disciplined learner to be successful with online instruction. Newt must be drinking koolaide with the techies.
LikeLike
“Newt must be drinking koolaide with the techies.”
To bad it wasn’t with Jim Jones. A lot of grief would have been spared.
LikeLike
Actual newts don’t leave a trail of slime behind them.
LikeLike
Right. Slugs do.
LikeLike
But it’s “free” Diane! That’s what the piece says under the photo: “educating the world for free”
Except for the 25 million Gingrich wants to push out to contractors.
We don’t have an education problem in this country. We have a corruption problem.
These people don’t work for us.
LikeLike
Of course it’s all free. Don’t you remember the headlines in Los Angeles? All of those iPads are free! Oh, wait…no, that’s not right.
LikeLike
“We don’t have an education problem in this country. We have a corruption problem.”
Yep. That says it all, Chiara. Thanks for the succinct diagnosis!
LikeLike
It’s the same arrogance they always start from. The assumption is people are too stupid to incorporate this responsibly in ways that make sense to them and they will “resist” because they’re protecting some “status quo”
I’m sick of the sales pitches. It’s insulting. Newt Gingrich knows about as much as I do about “blended learning”. He has absolutely no idea whether this will be a net plus. None of them do.
I don’t know why they have to come out of the gate with all this phony certainty and what amounts to browbeating people into submission. I didn’t read a single thing in this piece that was at all persuasive and I have no idea why I would take limited (and ever-shrinking!) public education money and buy these products.
The author of this bill he’s pushing has no idea what she’s talking about either. The “bill” itself is a joke. It’s a 25 million dollar subsidy to tech concerns. It reads as if she spent about 5 minutes on it.
LikeLike
I think they should drop the pretense and just endorse specific products.
I would respect them more as straight- up salespeople.
LikeLike
Self-proclaimed “experts” on education ARE the problem and offer nothing in the way of solutions for a problem THEY created. Before profiteering reform initiatives students were engaged by creative teaching, had smaller classes, didn’t learn in a test prep culture, and had access to music, art and support services that have now become unaffordable when districts feel the need to target dollars for unfunded mandates and test prep materials. Large classes sitting in front of computers is NOT the personal learning that students need. Maybe Newt Clueless should look.at the research on young children and the need to limit “screen time” for their developing brains.
LikeLike
Sigh. Another educational rawgabbit.
How is technology used in the schools attended by his progeny? Not as a replacement for teachers, I’ll wager.
LikeLike
Yeah, just like we need more “historians” like Newt Gingrich!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> a:hover { color: red; } a { text-decoration: none; color: #0088cc; } a.primaryactionlink:link, a.primaryactionlink:visited { background-color: #2585B2; color: #fff; } a.primaryactionlink:hover, a.primaryactionlink:active { background-color: #11729E !important; color: #fff !important; } /* @media only screen and (max-device-width: 480px) { .post { min-width: 700px !important; } } */ WordPress.com dianeravitch posted: “When I was writing my book “Reign of Error,” I wrote about Jeb Bush’s plan called “Digital Learning Now!” It made bold promises about how technology would bring about a wonderful new world of learning and equity. Then I went in search of the research on w”
LikeLike
Hey We were told repeatedly that this would not be used as a cheap replacement for adequate funding of low and middle income schools.
But that’s what lobbyists and other interested parties are pushing.
So were we lied to?
Why is all this awesomeness always pushed on the bottom half? Why not test it out on the top half?
LikeLike
Of course!
Because they deserve it!
Because they’re too good for it!
LikeLike
KIPP Empower Academy is a K-4 school and the API rating is based on the test scores for one year, 2013, of the 104 children who were in 2nd grade, no other grades, according to the Great Schools website: http://www.greatschools.org/california/los-angeles/25197-KIPP-Empower-Academy/?tab=test-scores
Look at the parents’ educational levels there –which predict student achievement as much as income:
Overall Average Education*: 3.39 (based on the 94% who responded)
Graduate School 15%
College Graduate 23%
Some College 50%
High School Graduate 7%
Not a High School Graduate 4%
*Parent Education is the average of all responses where “1” represents “Not a high school graduate” and “5” represents “Graduate school.”
http://school-ratings.com/school_details/19647330121699.html
KIPP is colocated in a separate building on the campus on the neighborhood school, Raymond Avenue Elementary, and these are the educational levels of their parents:
Overall Average Education: 1.91 (based on the 72% who responded)
Graduate School 0%
College Graduate 4%
Some College 21%
High School Graduate 36%
Not a High School Graduate 39%
http://school-ratings.com/school_details/19647336018840.html
Is KIPP skimming children of parents with higher educational levels than typically found in most low income communities? If you look at the other KIPP schools nearby, like KIPP Academy of Opportunity, it looks like it: http://school-ratings.com/school_details/19647330101444.html
LikeLike
That’s stunning! It probably accounts for 100% of KIPP’s performance in this case.
LikeLike
Yep, it probably does. There are no miracle cures for poverty in P-12 education, including technology nor larger class sizes nor fewer teachers, but it sure does help to have educated parents –and that is supported by a large research base.
LikeLike
So now that we know another critical strategy that KIPP uses to game the system and juke the stats, creaming the kids who come from the most educated parents, we ought to get Gary Rubenstein on this faux miracle. That’s because KIPP is claiming they have higher test scores than all other kinds of LA schools and higher than the state average: http://www.kippla.org/results/academic-results.cfm
Who knew? We’re fortunate that CA provides the data on parent educational levels. I haven’t seen that info for schools in other states, but maybe it could be located.
LikeLike
Bravo, Cosmic Tinker!
One teacher activist explained this
phenomenon with the following analogy:
“It’s like you have two oncology (cancer
treatment) practices:
“Oncology Practice A
“&
“Oncology Practice B.
“Oncology Practice A only accepts patients
with Stage 1 cancers, carefully screening
out those with Stages 2, 3, or 4 cancers.
They send the latter down the street to
Oncology Practice B. If one of the latter
happens to sneak by this screening
process, or advances to Stage 2, they
likewise are immediately referred down
the street to Oncology Practice B.
“Meanwhile, Oncology Practice B, by
law, MUST ACCEPT ALL PATIENTS
who show up in their waiting room, and
are banned from doing what Oncology
Practice A is doing—again, being
selective at the outset to only accept the
Stage 1 cancer patients, and doing a
later screening out to maintain that
their patients are exclusively Stage 1.
“Well, low and behold, as things play
out, the ‘data’ shows that Oncology
Practice A has much higher cure
rates and higher remissions, while
Oncology Practice B has a greater
percentage of patients who are
relapsing, having to undergo multiple
surgeries, enduring extra rounds of
chemotherapy, etc., and of course,
dying.
“Proponents of Oncology Practice A
then claim, ‘Look at all that’s wrong
with all Oncology Practice B. Their
patients are suffering, not being cured,
and even dying.
“And then look at how wonderfully
we’re doing here over at Oncology
Practice A’.”
LikeLike
Marry ignorance
to arrogance and you get
poor old Newt Gimgrich
LikeLike
This morning on television, a clip of a new Candid Camera series was broadcast. It showed a guy in the dentist chair facing a computer screen for online dentistry. It was a Candid Camera piece, and not actual online dentistry. However, given the insanity of trying to convert so many things to online versions, one did wonder if the spoof was a view of the future.
I do see that for students with severe immune system issues, senior citizens wanting to keep their brains active with free online college classes, etc. that there is a role for an online component to learning, but I have no interest in my child only having the option of online classes.
LikeLike
One of the ideas Newt left out to increase all scores, the Mother of ALL Score Raisers…Zell (GA Governor) Miller’s Mozart ‘tapes’ from the 1980’s, given to every newborn at hospitals, guaranteed to raise IQ points. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart never worked so hard in his life, but GA is still struggling. Oh, it’s the same overlooked issue: POVERTY. ZELL’s Mozart Tapes were the tech intervention of its day & it might have worked. Don’t we just love the quick fixes of our legislators. What would education be without their brilliance, created chaos & promise to solve our nation’s social ills.
Well, at least Newt taught History at West Georgia College, in his days.
Everybody is ‘In It’ Why Not Newt?
LikeLike
Newt is definitely the Gingrich who stole Christmas.
Make that “Ghing-Grinch” . . . .
You’re a mean one, Mr. Newt.
Anyway, why can’t the reprehensible Newt just stick to things he knows well and does better than anyone else:
1) Cheating on his wife;
2) Engaging surreptitiously with multiple mistresses;
3) Negotiating for an open marriage, sort of like relationships with a multitude of women as best friends with benefits.
Newt, I suggest you go into any school – public, private, charter, cyber, and guest teach a few lessons to the kiddies about morals and values.
I’m sure they can learn a lot from you, and when they bring their little drawings home of what they learned from you to mommy and daddy, it will be fun to see their parents go after you like a great white shark opening it’s protracted teeth to a little black, isolated seal . . . .
Gulp.
Oh, Newt, can’t you just live in your very private world of Jenna Jameson, the bible, and small government and leave education to the educators?
LikeLike
Conservatives view technology as a way to address education of the masses as a cheap alternative to traditional classrooms. Research is indicating that these on-line alternatives seem to only work on highly motivated mature,middle class students. Teaching and learning are about making connections, not just cognitive, but social and emotional as well. Technology can be useful to supplement, not supplant meaning face to face instruction. The most absurd notion is the “virtual preschool.” Experts in child development tell us that young children learn through their senses interacting with real experiences. More top down nonsense from those that want to profit from education!
LikeLike
Well put! Technology is critical for education ONLY when it is judiciously used . . .
LikeLike
Technology is only a tool, not an end in itself. Like all tools, tech can be used for good, for bad, or for nothing of much consequence. We have many tools in education: books of all kinds, magazines, chalk, whiteboards/blackboards, rulers, manipulables, schoolyards, auditoriums, gymnasiums, cafeterias, labs, PA systems, testing regimens, xerox machines, filmstrips and slides, movies, etc. The crucial issue here is the relation of tools to teaching and learning–what kinds of knowledge-making they help, hinder, or ignore, what kinds of relationships between students and teachers they enable or disable. We also need to ask about the unequal distribution of tools: which teaching/learning tools are available to whom for what kinds of practices? The learning process is installed by the teaching practice which uses tools to make the lesson plan and curriculum happen. Most important, what subject matters and problems are posed to students? Which topics are excluded? Are students asked to reflection and rethink the material put in front of them, to question what they are given? What views of self and society, of the world, do our practices and tools promote? If we want to develop in kids a robust civic intelligence and a vigorous encounter with the arts of democracy, we have to announce such goals and figure out which tools used in which way can encourage these humane outcomes.
LikeLike
@Ira echoes my views, however on Diane’s blog, technology always seems to be cast in the role of the bad guy or at least it’s only recognized for its negative role.
LikeLike
For what it’s worth, I was a big techie user when I taught math in DC for 30 years, ever since I got access to classroom sets of Commodore-64s in 1983. I wrote and rewrote and revised a bunch of computer programs in BASIC, Pascal, LOGO, assembler and so on until commercial ventures started publishing decent “apps” as we would say today. Some of them, including spreadsheets in general, various graphing utilities, and “computer-aided geometry” programs such as Geometer’s Sketchpad or Cabri or Geometrix or Geogebra should be available to each and every math teacher to use as he/she sees fit.
Whether my extensive efforts in creating and using original computer programs in the 80s and. 90s were worthwhile is a question that should be posed to my several thousands of former students. I don’t know the answer.
But I am quite certain that while technology is very useful in teaching, esp in math and science, it does not remove the need for a flesh and blood teacher.
Guy Brandenburg Sent from my iPhone so possibly full of hilarious errors… ;-€}}
>
LikeLike
Dr. Bob, like many other tools, there is good and bad in technology. It can make our lives better or worse. It can create miracle drugs, and it can create bombs. It can help students, teachers, and scholars gain access to knowledge, or it can be used to replace teachers and put 150 children in a room or at home connected only to a computer. It is clear where the business world wants to go.
LikeLike
Newt, and everyone else, ought to read Isaac Asimov’s “The Fun They Had” about the joys of replacing teachers with computers. He might follow that up with Ray Bradbury’s “There Will Come Soft Rains.” Perhaps David Coleman could help him do a close reading.
LikeLike
Scary stuff. If you believe teachers should be replaced by computers you want a nation of ignorant sociopaths.
There is MORE to education than just regurgitating information.
LikeLike
For teachers, having students who live in single mom head of households is common.
I am curious as to what some of the aforementioned computers might say to reassure a fourth grader whose single mom did not come home last night. Again.
LikeLike
Gingrich doesn’t link to the bill he’s lobbying for in this product sales pitch- apparently he hasn’t figured out how to use the internet for actual information himself – but I think I found it:
Click to access BILLS-113hr5303ih.pdf
It specifically includes for-profits and has a special designation for charter schools, so that’s good. Let’s funnel more public education dollars to for-profit providers! Great idea.
Can we get a disclosure at the end of this ad disguised as an “opinion” listing the people Newt Gingrich actually works for? Someone pays him. He doesn’t sell this stuff out of the goodness of his heart.
Does CNN know who pays Newt Gingrich? Why don’t media outlets reveal that to readers?
LikeLike
Parents and others who actually rely on the public school system were specifically assured that the following would not happen with blended learning:
“The cost of educating each student declines in blended-learning environments, in part because schools require fewer teachers to manage the classrooms. With fewer discipline issues, students become more engaged in the material and as a result, learn better. Additionally, teachers have more free time to spend with each student. This makes classroom size rules obsolete, and since compensating teachers has been the main cost driver in education, it is a big breakthrough.”
We were specifically told corrupt lawmakers and others would not use it to create huge classes and stick low and middle income kids in front of screens.
Now that it’s being openly marketed for exactly that purpose can we get an honest response from state and federal lawmakers? They’re selling it. Who will be held responsible for this when it’s used to cut public education funding for certain groups of students. If this wasn’t the intended goal why didn’t they anticipate this would happen? An absolute moron could have predicted this. They didn’t?
LikeLike
This is a great piece on how NJ directs money to charter facilities funding and away from public school facilities funding:
“The 2009 federal stimulus authorized states to allocate $22 billion in qualified school construction bonds (QSCBs), which allow cash-strapped schools to secure interest-free bond financing. Banks that finance school construction receive subsidies from the feds equivalent to some benchmark interest rate around 5 percent. Banks can pull in a tidy profit, as can the motley cast of counsels and intermediaries who ink the deals.
Of the $440 million in QSCBs New Jersey received, nearly three-quarters have been approved – and so far, every penny has gone to charters. TEAM Academy alone gobbled up $138 million. This exclusive allocation of QSCBs to charter schools is highly unusual. California and Texas, for comparison, each allocated less than one-fifth of their QSCBs to charter schools.”
“Basically there wasn’t any work being done,” says Moriah Kinberg of Healthy Schools Now, a coalition that advocates for school repairs. While over 700 projects broke ground in the decade before, not a single project was initiated and completed between 2010 and 2013.”
It’s amazing. They’re deliberately destroying their existing public schools in that state.
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/25425-flipping-schools-the-hidden-forces-behind-new-jersey-education-reform?utm_content=bufferf8708&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
LikeLike
NEWT is NOT an expert in anything! Including parenting.
SCUM BAG!
YES! Diane (please post)
LikeLike
I’m glad to see that several here know and remember Newt’s “illustrious” career. One comment/correction for everyone and to Mr. Hurley’s great comments…..Take it from some one who knows!! Newt DID NOT “teach” history at West Georgia College. AT ANY TIME, during course registration, if history classes were mentioned, countless students would ALWAYS tell you MAKE SURE YOU DON’T SIGN UP FOR OR GET GINGRICH for history. He is a HORRIBLE teacher! Thankfully, there were many other fantastic history teachers at West Georgia College–Dr. Jackson, Dr. Gay, etc!!–but NOT NEWT!!!
LikeLike
And, Mr. Rendo, to add to your 1)…..
Newt didn’t just “cheat on his wife”! He walked into the hospital, immediately after she was recovering from cancer surgery, to inform his wife that he wanted a divorce! His first wife, Jackie, was a very well-respected, much-loved math teacher!!! A woman who was truly an educator and touched so many, many young lives. She suffered and struggled financially so desperately with her two daughters after the divorce that a local church helped sustain them until Jackie could get back on her feet to recover physically, financially, and emotionally.
LikeLike
Now I understand the article he has experience inflicting pain in the underdog.
LikeLike
Don’t you know that the new reform movement, unfortunately, has invited so many (but certainly not all) despicable people who are jumping on the bandwagon . . .
LikeLike
A Teacher From Georgia: so what Newt Gingrich did to his first wife, a math teacher, exemplifies the spirit of self-styled “education reformers” and CCSS supporters everywhere—
He ‘taught’ her “grit” and “rigor”!
😡
LikeLike
Then however did Newt Gingrich ever get educated?
LikeLike
Evidently, he didn’t.
LikeLike
Good piece in the Texas Observer about Latino activists lobbying the legislature:
“It’s also worth noting what’s not listed among the top priorities: charter school chains, vouchers and full-time online schools, which the report dismisses as “privatization experiment efforts” that siphon money away from the schools most kids attend. In other words, if you ask Latino teachers and activists—and not Sen. Dan Patrick—there are plenty of “civil rights issues of our time” more pressing than school choice.
It’s not that teachers and advocates were opposed to charter schools or any particular group of reformers, Lopez says, just those “who come in who have no historical participation in a community, and see it as a potential market.”
To the surprise of no one (except perhaps Newt Gingrich) what they want most is “funding” followed by “teachers”.
“Privatization experiments” ! How impolite of them! 🙂
http://www.texasobserver.org/latino-education-agenda-more-money-better-teachers/
LikeLike
Let’s see, it used to be Newt Gingrich, the Speaker of the House . . . um, that didn’t work to well, so then it was Newt Gingrich the presidential candidate . . . that ended badly . . . so now it’s Newt Gingrich the educational expert . . . hummmm, that’s got a little ring to it, so now Newt’s going to advise us on how to salvage one of the worst public school systems in the entire world . . . where was he 20 years ago with this?
LikeLike
Replace Newt with technology: obsolete and non functional.
LikeLike
Cross-posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Newt-Gingrich-Educational-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Contracts_Education_Error_Research-140811-168.html#comment506042 and linked on my Facebook timeline.
LikeLike
Yes…let’s listen to the guy who while his wife was battling cancer, asked her for a Divorce to be with his Mistress. What a great person to help us decide how to educate our children. I wonder how much money he will make off this idea and who’s actually backing it.
LikeLike
Whatever the field of endeavor, character seems to be the prevailing factor of long term success and justice.
It appears that Messrs. Gingrich and the Dallas Cowboys current owner Jerry Jones are equally endowed with character.
Their results are comparable.
LikeLike
Do what with technology? Replace teachers? Is this guy serious? Did he forget how he was educated and got to where he is today? How far do we think we are going to go with this nonsensical thinking? Newt Gingrich really?
LikeLike
I submit that one of the most detrimental impacts on our society has been from the US Supreme Court decision on the Citizens United case, in which limits on one’s political contributions were eliminated.
Previlously, when a candidate was so far out of the realm of the mainstream, s/he would run out of funs to take the campaign forward.
Now, all it takes to keep the weirdest creature on the face of the earth actively campaigning is one uber deep pockets campaign donor who would like to see his views made public policy.
Until a way is found to reverse Citizens United, I am afraid that American citizens are going to have to tolerate absolutely bizarre specimens such as Newt Gengrich obfuscating our free system of choosing our public policy makers.
Among the most impacted is the State of Texas, which is both huge and contains widely separated major television markets. The distances are so great that, even with a private jet, personally appearing in a critical mass of the cities is impossible.
Thus, the candidate with the funding to purchase the most television ads in those widely dispersed major markets has a huge advantage.
This will explain to you the root cause of Texas having so many elected officials whom you might wonder how they ever got elected to any position.
OOPS!!!!
LikeLike
Today’s haiku —
Combine ignorance
and arrogance and you get
poor old Newt Gingrich
Edd Doerr (arlinc.org)
LikeLike