Smart politicians understand that the appearance of reform is even better than real reform. Chicago Democrats have learned that lesson and turned it into an art form.
Here is an article from the Chicago Tribune that makes the point–not about schools but about crime and police. In education,”reform” means closing schools, shutting down libraries, and replacing experienced teachers with newcomers.
“Chicago Democrats a protected species on the national stage”
John Kass
July 9, 2014
Prominent Chicago Democrats have had an easy time with the national media for decades — as easy as shaking a ring of keys to distract an anxious child in church.
Former Mayor Richard M. Daley rode a bicycle in photo ops and put a few plants on the roof of City Hall, leading the national news networks to cast him as the “green” mayor, not as the absolute boss of a broken and corrupt political system that piled debt on the city and drained its future for the benefit of the insiders.
President Barack Obama appeared on the late-night talk shows as the mystical healer of America’s broken politics, not as some untested suit who held the hand of now-imprisoned bagman Tony Rezko while learning to cross Chicago’s political streets.
And Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s former chief of staff?
He hangs with Jimmy Fallon and they tell jokes about jumping into a freezing Lake Michigan. Emanuel is as cool and practiced a media manipulator as the fictional Frank Underwood in “House of Cards.”
But a headline of 82 people shot in Chicago in 84 hours is embarrassing to the mayor, particularly for a mayor who sees the fifth floor of City Hall as a mere stop on the road to his national political destiny.
So he held a news conference on the Far South Side this week, a familiar exercise, full of the necessary archetypes:
Wise neighborhood matrons flanking the mayor and nodding their heads in agreement. Grieving families in support, better there at his side than out on the street asking angry questions.
They talked of the need for everyone to step up to face the crisis, from community leaders to parents, federal officials, judges — everyone except, of course, the mayor of Chicago.
And he avoided the overriding question, again and again: When are we going to hire more police officers?
“Now, a lot of people will say, ‘Where were the police? What were the police doing?’ That’s a fair question, but not the only question,” the mayor said.
“Where are the parents? Where is the community? Where are the gun laws? Where are the national leaders, so we don’t have the guns of Cook County, Indiana and downstate Illinois flowing into the city?”
Rattle those keys, Mr. Mayor.
A TV reporter asked him about tired police officers who’ve been working overtime because he won’t hire more. Another reporter asked why New York and Los Angeles have lower homicide rates than Chicago.
“Well, thank you (for) your question,” Rahm said, launching into a diatribe on gun laws, rather than on police staffing.
He’s good at shaking keys. And some analysts bought his talking points, agreeing with City Hall that talking of police manpower was just too easy.
Too easy? What else is left? A miracle?
According to city data, overall Police Department staffing was about 12,250 at the start of this year, down almost 900 officers from the end of 2009. The Rahmfather has been hiring police, but not at a fast enough rate to keep up with attrition.
Just about every police officer I’ve talked to feels overworked and tired. They’re worn thin. Morale is down. That’s what month after month of overtime can do.
On Wednesday, Pat Camden, spokesman for the Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, wasn’t receptive to the mayor’s policies during an interview with me and Lauren Cohn on WLS-AM 890.
“It would have been nice to hear the mayor saying, ‘Where were the police? The police are out there doing their job, and if I had more police maybe we wouldn’t have had so many shootings.’ But that’s not the way he operates,” Camden said.
There’s always money to be found when the politicians want to find it.
Some $50 million has been set aside for yet another monument to a Daley, a park named for the former mayor’s late wife. And there’s about $600 million or so for a lakefront project that includes a new athletic venue for DePaul University, although the Bulls and Blackhawks offered the use of the United Center rent-free.
And just before his last election, Gov. Pat Quinn found $54.5 million in state cash for a violence-reduction program now being investigated by the feds as a possible political slush fund.
There are not enough good-paying jobs on the predominantly African-American South and West sides. But there seems to be plenty of political cash to toss around.
Meanwhile, Democrats are encouraging waves of unskilled labor from south of the border to compete for what few low-skilled jobs still exist.
Families already savaged by decades of dependency on government programs continue to dissolve. Violence reigns. The giant street gangs have broken up into small and viperous neighborhood cliques.
Many children aren’t allowed outside. I remember a detective telling me that for such children, it’s like the “Hunger Games” out there.
But the political class in charge for decade after decade after decade — the Chicago Democrats — isn’t ever held to account nationally.
When seen in the national news, they’re about as green as forest ferns. Or they’re all about soothing old political scars and healing divisions.
Or they’re hip and they know Hollywood and can jump into icy lakes with late-night TV personalities.
All they have to do is rattle the keys, misdirect, smile and turn on the charm.
jskass@tribune.com

Mayor 1 Percent simply does not care about anyone or anything outside of his circle of privilege. While he is slashing police officers, cutting pensions and shuttering public schools, Rahm sits on a corporate welfare slush fund that has diverted $5.5 billion in property taxes from homeowners and businesses since 1986. (SOURCE: http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/chicago_pensions_0.pdf)
Billions that could have been used to combat poverty, resource schools, and provide the staff needed for public safety have been diverted into the mayoral slush fund. Now he wants to raise taxes the on the working class homeowners?
I’ll acknowledge that downtown Chicago is gorgeous, but every time we drive southward out of there, my heart sinks a little bit at the drabness of the rest of the city, where most Chicagoans live – areas and neighborhoods where Rahm, the ballet dancer, will likely never traipse across. The majority of Chicagoans, and their neighborhoods which could use a boost for their schools, their safety, and even aesthetics, do not exist for this vile man.
The kindest wish I could offer for him is that Karma returns to him ten-fold what he has done to others. Hell might even be too good of a place for this heartless, cruel sociopath. And to think he wants to move onto the national stage?
Here’s more on Rahm:
http://pando.com/2014/04/04/revealed-rahm-emanuel-cuts-public-pensions-diverts-money-to-benefit-campaign-donors/
“Living up to his billing as “Mayor 1%,” Emanuel has used the fund to (among other things) offer up $7 million of taxpayer cash for a new grocery store, $7.5 million for a proposed data center, $29 million for an office high rise and $55 million for a huge new hotel (and that latter project is on top of $75 million more in tax money Emanuel has offered up to build a private university a new basketball stadium). And these are just a few of the corporate subsidy proposals in a $300 million spending spree Emanuel has championed at the very moment he has pled poverty to justify pension cuts, property tax increases and the largest school closure in his city’s history.”
LikeLike
BREAKING NEWS:
The AFT convention debate is totally rigged in favor of supporting Common Core.
Only pro-Common Core party liners are being allowed to speak.
Watch it live NOW:
http://www.aft.org/convention/live.cfm
LikeLike
And as Diane has posted here before, this is what Austerity looks like in action. No cops, no employment, no public schools, no public school teachers, no reliable infrastructure, no political leaders with keys to the kingdom of democracy, rich civic engagement, creative/empowering school systems, surrounded by safe/sustainable neighborhoods. We have a choice. Read Andrew Bacevich’s BREACH OF TRUST on the longterm costs of endless wars that can’t be won. The bill has come due.
LikeLike
(Re-posting because comment is being held up for moderation. I’m not sure why this is happening.)
Mayor 1 Percent simply does not care about anyone or anything outside of his circle of privilege. While he is slashing police officers, cutting pensions and shuttering public schools, Rahm sits on a corporate welfare slush fund that has diverted $5.5 billion in property taxes from homeowners and businesses since 1986. (SOURCE: http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/chicago_pensions_0.pdf)
Billions that could have been used to combat poverty, resource schools, and provide the staff needed for public safety have been diverted into the mayoral slush fund. Now he wants to raise taxes the on the working class homeowners?
I’ll acknowledge that downtown Chicago is gorgeous, but every time we drive southward out of there, my heart sinks a little bit at the drabness of the rest of the city, where most Chicagoans live – areas and neighborhoods where Rahm, the ballet dancer, will likely never traipse across. The majority of Chicagoans, and their neighborhoods which could use a boost for their schools, their safety, and even aesthetics, do not exist for this vile man.
The kindest wish I could offer for him is that Karma returns to him ten-fold what he has done to others. Hell might even be too good of a place for this heartless, cruel sociopath. And to think he wants to move onto the national stage?
Here’s more on Rahm:
http://pando.com/2014/04/04/revealed-rahm-emanuel-cuts-public-pensions-diverts-money-to-benefit-campaign-donors/
“Living up to his billing as “Mayor 1%,” Emanuel has used the fund to (among other things) offer up $7 million of taxpayer cash for a new grocery store, $7.5 million for a proposed data center, $29 million for an office high rise and $55 million for a huge new hotel (and that latter project is on top of $75 million more in tax money Emanuel has offered up to build a private university a new basketball stadium). And these are just a few of the corporate subsidy proposals in a $300 million spending spree Emanuel has championed at the very moment he has pled poverty to justify pension cuts, property tax increase
LikeLike
The bill has come due for the weakest among us and it’s coming for the middle class. The best liar wins. Very sad.
LikeLike
Yeah, I guess I disagree on “Chicago Democrats”. There’s nothing unique about taxpayer-funded stadiums and and corruption in Illinois isn’t even limited to “Democrats”.
I don’t think the piece makes any sense. Isn’t the rap on Mayor Emanuel that he isn’t running that city for the benefit of the people who live there but is instead a DC person? How is that “Chicago Democrats”?
We have a corruption and capture in government problem, not a “Chicago” problem. Utah has a pay to play corrupt culture where even their “top cop”, the attorney general, was implicated, along with the (formerly) “good government” state of Wisconsin where they are apparently running political campaigns out of the governor’s office. We have a “huge amount of money in politics” problem.
It’s everywhere. I can’t think of a single exception. Maybe Vermont? I don’t know. I haven’t heard of any Vermont corruption.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303546204579435692150080568
LikeLike
Keep in mind Kass is a raging right-winger who will always shine a spotlight on the Democrats, but look the other way about Republicans or the general system of “austerity”/neoliberalism/neoconservatism. I’m no defender of the Democrats, especially Hiz Honor Mayor 1%, but this isn’t about the Democrats. It’s about the fleecing of the people, especially poor and minority people, by the corporations and rich folks. It’s also not about lack of police. It’s about lack of jobs and about schools, libraries and mental health clinics closing and “Safe Passages” and gentrification and many other issues Kass is way too shallow to understand.
LikeLike
I agree. I thought it was standard-issue partisan political rant. “Chicago Democrats” is supposed to produce a knee-jerk response from the reader.
If Kass believes Mr. Rauner would be any less captured or corrupt he is kidding himself. Rauner might get a slightly better price when selling off public assets, you know, because of his “business background” 🙂
LikeLike
Partisan politics is steeped in its own version of “gang affiliation.” This article should be about the individuals, not parties. The only way we can make governance fair is to level the playing field: Take the party mentality out of politics and reduce the need for high dollar fund-raising. As long as there is an advantage to be taken, there will always be someone to take it.
LikeLike
Hello Diane, I read all your posts usually with a belief that I have someone who can give me more details about the horrific status of public school operations in the US. But, then there was this post below and I was not pleased with the conservative political hyperbole (even though I might agree with some of it) but it spoiled the overall input of the piece making it a political rant instead of an insight on what is happening regarding deaths from shootings in Chicago. Here is the Chicago Sun-TImes piece on the same subject, which I found a much more useful perspective: http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2014/07/12/330784587/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-violence-in-chicago The post point was about the shootings, wasn’t it? Christine Dudding Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:01:28 +0000 To: cdudd44@hotmail.com
LikeLike
Christine, the point of the post was that Democrats in Chicago are given a free ride by the media, whether it is crime stats or closing 50 public schools and calling it “reform.”
LikeLike
Republicans are given the same pass. It just happens that Illinois is controlled by Democrats at this time. There is no difference between the parties nor between how the media reacts to one vs. the other party.
LikeLike
Dienne,
YES!
LikeLike
Rahm is supporting Rauner. He is firmly in the pocket of the 1 percent, and does not give a rat’s @$$ about the middle and working classes, and cares even less about the poor. Running him out of town on a rail would be too good for him.
LikeLike
ayor 1 Percent simply does not care about anyone or anything outside of his circle of privilege. While he is slashing police officers, cutting pensions and shuttering public schools, Rahm sits on a corporate welfare slush fund that has diverted $5.5 billion in property taxes from homeowners and businesses since 1986. (SOURCE: http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/chicago_pensions_0.pdf)
Billions that could have been used to combat poverty, resource schools, and provide the staff needed for public safety have been diverted into the mayoral slush fund. Now he wants to raise taxes the on the working class homeowners?
I’ll acknowledge that downtown Chicago is gorgeous, but every time we drive southward out of there, my heart sinks a little bit at the drabness of the rest of the city, where most Chicagoans live – areas and neighborhoods where Rahm, the ballet dancer, will likely never traipse across. The majority of Chicagoans, and their neighborhoods which could use a boost for their schools, their safety, and even aesthetics, do not exist for this vile man.
The kindest wish I could offer for him is that Karma returns to him ten-fold what he has done to others. Hell might even be too good of a place for this heartless, cruel sociopath. And to think he wants to move onto the national stage?
LikeLike
ere’s more on Rahm:
http://pando.com/2014/04/04/revealed-rahm-emanuel-cuts-public-pensions-diverts-money-to-benefit-campaign-donors/
new report being released this morning shows that the supposedly budget-strapped Windy City – which for years has not made its full pension payments – actually has mountains of cash sitting in a slush fund controlled by Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Indeed, as the report documents, the slush fund now receives more money each year than it would cost to adequately finance Chicago’s pension funds. Yet, Emanuel is refusing to use the cash from that slush fund to shore up the pensions. Instead, his new pension “reform” proposal cuts pension benefits, requires higher contributions from public employees and raises property taxes in the name of fiscal responsibility. Yet, the same “reform” proposal will actually quietly increase his already bloated slush fund.
But it gets worse: an investigation by Pando has discovered that Emanuel has been using that same slush fund to enrich some of his biggest campaign contributors.
How a “shadow budget” is bankrupting Chicago
The new report, from the taxpayer watchdog group Good Jobs First, shows how Chicago’s roughly 150 “tax increment financing” (TIF) districts divert property taxes out of schools and public services and into what is now known as Chicago’s “shadow budget.” That’s a slightly nicer term for what is, in practice, Emanuel’s very own sovereign wealth fund.
Living up to his billing as “Mayor 1%,” Emanuel has used the fund to (among other things) offer up $7 million of taxpayer cash for a new grocery store, $7.5 million for a proposed data center, $29 million for an office high rise and $55 million for a huge new hotel (and that latter project is on top of $75 million more in tax money Emanuel has offered up to build a private university a new basketball stadium). And these are just a few of the corporate subsidy proposals in a $300 million spending spree Emanuel has championed at the very moment he has pled poverty to justify pension cuts, property tax increases and the largest school closure in his city’s history.
Contrary to the story of public employees bleeding taxpayers dry, the Good Jobs First report proves that the slush fund is the root of the city’s true fiscal problem. As the municipal budget figures show, over the last 14 years Chicago refused to make its necessary pension contributions. Yet, at the same time, the city’s TIF-based “shadow budget” skyrocketed. In effect, more and more public revenue that was contractually obligated to pensioners was being diverted by politicians to fund TIF subsidies, many of which go to subsidize wealthy corporations.
The scheme has gotten so out of control that, according to Good Jobs First, annual TIF revenues now far exceed the annual cost of funding the city’s pension systems. The report shows that in 2013 Chicago’s pension costs were $385 million whereas Emanuel’s slush fund that year received $457 million.
For his part, Emanuel has insisted that roughly a third of TIF funding goes into schools (at his sole discretion, of course). Yet, his slush fund is so opaque there’s little way to verify this claim. Indeed, Chicago’s local public radio station WBEZ recently noted that it “has repeatedly requested a breakdown of all current TIF-funded projects, but [the Emanuel administration] has not yet provided it.”
LikeLike
With “friends” like these, who needs Republicans?
I am going Independent.
LikeLike
Sorry about the reposts. My original comment was awaiting moderation.
Thanks all for your patience.
LikeLike
“There’s always money to be found when the politicians want to find it.”
Take note of this one, folks.
It has always fascinated me.
How is it that there is seemingly endless money for testing it self, test prep materials, computers on which to take the tests, new software, new data bases, district level folks to over see the mess, consultants to show the way, and on and on….
But the district, city, state, whatever is somehow, otherwise flat broke?
Notbuyingit
LikeLike
Yes, at the same time we *had* to close 50 schools to “save money”, we somehow had money to open a basketball arena for a private religious college, revamp the Riverwalk (for the 3rd time in 20 years), buy all new furniture for the central office, etc., etc., etc.
LikeLike
Exactly.
Somehow ATL has plenty of $ for a new stadium. Everything else is…well…you know….not really a priority.
LikeLike
We need more REAL stories in the media like this one.
Thank you.
LikeLike
Much of what is written in this article is true. But we must keep in mind that the Chicago Tribune is a conservative newspaper so it has an alternative motive for exposing this information. It is not for the betterment of the city.
LikeLike