This is an amazing story, written by investigative reporter George Joseph. It seems there are recruitment agencies that go to other nations, the Philippines especially, hire good teachers, charge outrageous placement fees, and send them to work in American schools.
He writes:
“Between 2007 and 2009, 350 Filipino teachers arrived in Louisiana, excited for the opportunity to teach math and science in public schools throughout the state. They’d been recruited through a company called Universal Placement International Inc., which professes on its website to “successfully place teachers in different schools thru out [sic] the United States.” As a lawsuit later revealed, however, their journey through the American public school system was fraught with abuse.
“According to court documents, Lourdes Navarro, chief recruiter and head of Universal Placement, made applicants pay a whopping $12,550 in interview and “processing fees” before they’d even left the Philippines. But the exploitation didn’t stop there. Immediately after the teachers landed in LAX, Navarro coerced them into signing a contract paying her 10 percent of their first and second years’ salaries; she threatened those who refused with instant deportation. Even after they started at their schools, Navarro kept the teachers dependent on her by only obtaining them one-year visas before exorbitantly charging them for an annual renewal fee. She also confiscated their passports.
“We were herded into a path, a slowly constricting path,” said Ingrid Cruz, one of the teachers, during the trial, “where the moment you feel the suspicion that something is not right, you’re already way past the point of no return.” Eventually, a Los Angeles jury awarded the teachers $4.5 million.
“Similar horror stories have abounded across the country for years. Starting in 2001, the private contractor Omni Consortium promised 273 Filipino teachers jobs within the Houston, Texas school district—in reality, there were only 100 spots open. Once they arrived, the teachers were crammed into groups of 10 to 15 in unfinished housing properties. Omni Consortium kept all their documents, did not allow them their own transportation, and threatened them with deportation if they complained about their unemployment status or looked for another job.”
In a cruel twist of fate, the recruiting agencies strip the Philippines of good teachers and at the same time, Teach for America’s international division sends in ill-trained recruits to overcrowded classrooms in the Philippines:
“Launched last year, Teach for the Philippines presents itself as “the solution” to this lack of quality teachers in the country. The Teach for Philippines promo video begins with black and white shots of multitudes of young Filipino schoolchildren packed into crowded classrooms, bored and on the verge of tears. A cover version of a Killers song proclaims, “When there’s nowhere else to run … If you can hold on, hold on” as the video shifts to the students’ inevitable fates: scenes of tattooed gang kids smoking, an isolated girl and even a desperate man behind bars. In the midst of this grotesquely Orientalizing imagery, text declares, “Our Country Needs Guidance,” “Our Country Needs Inspiration,” and finally “Our Country Needs Teachers.”
“Teach for the Philippines, though relatively small now with 53 teachers in 10 schools, presents a disturbing vision for the future of teaching in the context of a global workforce. While the Filipino teachers imported to America are not necessarily ideal fits, given their inability to remain as long-term contributors to a school community, at least they are for the most part trained, experienced instructors. Within the Teach for the Philippines paradigm, however, Filipino students, robbed of their best instructors, are forced to study under recruits, who may lack a strong understanding of the communities they are joining and have often have never even had any actual classroom experience.”
A strange labor market indeed.

Sounds very unfortunate. They are crooks around. Here in Minnesota, some schools have worked with a group called Amity to bring in people who will serve as aides and help students learn other languages. These “amity aides” are bi-lingual. Anyone else had experience with this group?
LikeLike
UNFORTUNATE????!!!! That is the understatement of the year. It’s immoral, unethical, and illegal. It’s slavery. And states are doing it because it’s cheaper than hiring U.S. teachers. This is horrifying, NOT unfortunate.
LikeLike
A favorite meme among Ed Deformers is that schooling is too expensive. And what is the biggest cost of school? Pay and benefits for teachers. And how do you reduce those?
Well, you do away with due process so that you can fire people and replace them with cheaper labor.
You increase class sizes.
And you make a switch to computer-adaptive instruction incorporating instructional videos.
Here’s the future that the Ed Deformers are imagining: 400 kids in a room, all working at tablets, doing their worksheets on a screen, and one low-level aide walking among them to answer questions and make sure the tablets are working.
But to bring about that vision, you have to make the big switch to digital, you need big databases of student info and learning portals for the software, and, importantly, you need a single national list of “standards” to tag all the software to.
At one time in the U.S., we had many millions of call center and receptionist jobs. To a large extent, those have now been replaced by “customer self service portals.” The time and effort to figure out problem, place an order, etc., has been shifted to the customer.
It’s no accident that the Thomas B. Fordham Institute puts together cutsie videos about how “Class Size Doesn’t Matter.”
It’s no accident that Ed Deformers go onto national talk shows to say that the average teacher makes over a hundred thousand dollars a year.
It’s no accident that Bill Gates, over the past few years, has made the rounds of all the big conservative organizations to give talks about how school is too expensive and we need to cut costs and we need more computerized assessment. And it’s no accident that he is funding experiments at universities in just the model I described–large numbers of kids working at laptops or tablets with one instructor there to answer questions. At the University of Arizona, one of these schools, the Executive Vice Provost says that within 3 years, 80 percent of classes there will be taught in this way.
Why have professors giving lectures? Simply videotape them once. Then fire them and play the videotapes from then on.
Remove the human element from teaching.
Teaching, there’s an app for that!
The past few decades in the U.S. have seen productivity and average work hours by American workers both dramatically increase while pay for workers has remained flat. At the same time, pay for C-level execs has skyrocketed.
And now, what has been done to the rest of U.S. industry is to be done to education.
And your unions are supporting that–throwing itself behind the implementation of the invariant national bullet list on which the software that is to replace teachers depends.
Figure that one out.
LikeLike
Yes, thanks Bob, for making the corporate-tech strategy so legible. Bob is right, productivity of American workers has been zooming up but wages not, enabling the super-rich to accumulate their vast wealth to buy up everything in sight. 1979-2009 productivity of American workers increased 80% while hourly compensation(wages /benefits) rose meager 8%(sources Reich, Piketty, Saenz, EPI) 1947-1979 productivity of American workers rose 119% while hourly comp rose 100%, still a gap enabling owning class to amass wealth but a smaller gap enabling 99% to increase standard of living.
LikeLike
Thanks, Ira. Think of the consequences of what you wrote in that one paragraph for millions and millions of working people!!!
So now the oligarchs want to do to education what they have done to the rest of U.S. labor, and the sickening thing is that the teachers’ unions ARE ASSISTING THEM IN THIS!!! Education was pretty far down the list of priorities because teachers weren’t earning much anyway, and it took the deformers some time to figure out how they were going to make big profits on the educational system (via using taxpayer funding of charter schools to build real-estate equity, by selling software and data systems). Here are the medians for teacher salaries, with some other for comparison. These are Dept of Labor stats for 2011-12:
High-school: $55,050
Middle school: $53,400
Kindergarten and elementary: $53,090
Sales Manager: $105,260
Human Resources Manager: $99,720
Postsecondary Education Administrator: $86,490
Dental Hygienist: $70,210
Auto Damage Appraiser: $59,850
Cost Estimator: $58,860
Boilermaker: $56,560
Librarians: $55,370
Dietician: $55,240
Building inspector: $53,450
Mail Carrier: $53,100
Mortician: $51,600
Electrical equipment installers: $51,220
Plumber: $49,140
Millwright/Industrial Machinery Mechanic: $45,840
Brickmasons: $44,950
Sheet metal worker: $43,290
Chef/head cook: $42,480
Diesel mechanic: $42,320
Person trainer: $41,600
Construction equipment operator: $40,980
Machinist: $40,910
Correctional officer: $38,970
LikeLike
So, teachers are on the high end of the blue collar scale, but, according to deformers, they are too expensive.
Teaching, there’s an app for that.
And Pearson and Gates will be happy to sell it to you.
LikeLike
What is unfolding is a concerted plan to switch from delivery of education via print and people to digital delivery of the same. And the one thing that was needed in order to build the new digital educational system that the high tech ed deform crowd has envisioned was that national bullet list of standards to key all the software and assessments to–the Common Core.
The Common Core was the prerequisite to implementing this strategy. It’s development was paid for by Gates and Pearson, the ones who will benefit from this transition.
And they paid off both the teachers’ unions to become propaganda ministries for that national bullet list.
Astonishing, but true.
LikeLike
cx: Its development, of course. Sorry about the typo.
LikeLike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjxBClx01jc
LikeLike
I am a lecturer at a university where “flipped” classrooms are being pushed as though they are the gold standard. Other lecturers are taking money to create videos and put their classes online. I have spoken to them about my concern that they are cooperating with a process that’s going to put a lot of us out of work eventually. They refuse to believe it. It’s a depressing situation to teach in — to feel that your humanness and caring for your students are not valued.
LikeLike
Thanks for sounding the alarm again, Bob. I find many teachers are unprepared to grasp this threat of being made obsolete. “Computers are good, not bad! ” Once again I see teachers’ knowledge-poor education as the culprit. One needs to have read about the history of capitalism and technology’s impacts to see the pattern that enables one to forecast this fate.
LikeLike
Gates gives talks ALL THE TIME in which he mentions how expensive college is and then goes on to say that one can use videos to do instruction. It’s mind-blowing that people haven’t picked up on this.
Go into a college. Make allowing videotaping of classes a condition of employment. Videotape all the professors for one academic year. Then fire them all, nationwide. Replace them with the contingent, part-time workers.
That’s the plan.
LikeLike
Don’t be so superficial. TFA is a naive and easily exploited “philanthropy.” If you really wanted to stop it you’d challenge their tax deductibility and build the case for fraud.
And, like TFA, unions are hardly the bad guys, having invented most of the innovations – from Charter Schools to alternatives to tenure – that the fascists have corrupted. They’re not the problem, but they are no longer an adequate solution.
And, finally, tech is hardly the answer – for either good or bad guys. It’s far more neutral. Look at Eric Mazur’s alternative at Harvard, for example (http://www.northeastern.edu/law/academics/institutes/crrjustice.html). Lectures are not just stylistically passe, they really are better online, since you can pause, research, go back, and argue. They are a new textbook. Not the solution to all instruction or cost-formulae, but they’re useful when used as a medium, just like a book. What’s needed is the “value added” by a real teacher – who once might have lectured, once might have mentored, once might have just – like Mark Hopkins at one of a log (http://wso.williams.edu/wiki/index.php/Mark_Hopkins) – listened and talked students through new knowledge.
Be very careful about blaming solutions which are mis-applied as if they were plots with bad intentions. There really are very few badguys in the ed biz, but there are plenty of people with narrow, provincial, self-interests that obscure real learning. Don’t join the bad to beat them, or you’ll just lose.
LikeLike
joe, I have written many times on this blog about how ed tech can be positive or negative, given its use. If its intended use is to reduce the teacher force–and make no mistake about it, that is the intent–these guys want to reduce education costs by using tech to reduce, dramatically, the number of teachers–then it is my opinion that they have misunderstood, fundamentally, what teaching is about. It is, at its most fundamental level, transactional.
LikeLike
joe, you speak as though I am making up a plot. I am making nothing up. There are many pilot projects being funded, right now, around the United States, by the Gates Foundation, to demonstrate saving money by using ed tech to reduce the number of faculty needed. Class size doesn’t matter is one of the most common rallying cries of the Ed Deform movement.
LikeLike
They’re right, class size doesn’t matter, it’s how you organize it. Montessori taught 73 kids in a single classroom, all diagnosed as “retarded,” yet she individualized each student not by age but by competence. They taught each other, and she organized that instruction. There are many, many years of data on the irrelevance of class size if organization is an option, as it usually is in most classes. (It’s a little tough in some very young groups, or in some labs, and very tough in shop classes, but still quite possible when you organize “peer mentors.”)
LikeLike
This notion that class size doesn’t matter is one of the most ridiculous ideas that anyone ever had about education. The ideal class size is 1.
Anything more will involve compromises.
LikeLike
Any person who actually believes that class size does not matter should not be allowed anywhere near a school or an educational policy-making desk. I have heard a lot of really crazy ideas about education in my time, but that tops the crazy list.
LikeLike
Joe Beckmann, please read the chapter on class size in my book “Reign of Error.” There is a large body of research showing that it DOES matter. It matters far more than charters, vouchers, Teach for America, or any of the other “reforms” of the day. When kids are struggling to read, they need more of the teacher’s attention. That can happen with reduced class size.
LikeLike
Joe, again, I wish to reiterate that I am a huge proponent of the use of technology in education. Trains can be used to take people to work or on vacation, or they can be used to ship children from the Lodz Ghetto to Chelmno. Same technology, different applications. I am deeply interested in the possibilities inherent in universal, open access to the Universal Library of Knowledge; by the collaborative possibilities that the Internet creates; by the possibilities for real individualization (as opposed to the ersatz individualization being instantiated in a lot of current ed tech); by the possibilities for open sourcing and crowd sourcing of educational materials; by the astonishing uses to which tech can be put for demonstration and simulation purposes; and by much more that can be done with technology in education. But I have spent several years now reviewing K-12 ed tech products. Most are just awful. Dumbed down push technology worksheets on a screen, all glitz, little content. All hat, not cattle. And, very, very regimented, standardized, and (despite all the glitz) demotivating for most students, who have superb crap detectors.
LikeLike
If 73 is the ideal class size, why do you suppose the Montessori Foundation claims that 25 – 30 is the ideal in early childhood and elementary education? (They also say it may be less in some circumstances, such as for new early childhood groups e.g., ages 3-6).
Click to access designing_facilities.pdf
States typically regulate maximum group sizes and student/teacher ratios for early childhood, so those Montessori classes are usually smaller than that and they have more teachers. However, states don’t usually regulate private elementary schools. I know a lot of Montessori proprietors of such schools who probably would have taken advantage of the opportunity to rake in mega-bucks from wealthy parents if they could put 73 kids in a class with just one teacher and get away with it by claiming that’s what Maria Montessori prescribed and what research indicates works best.
It’s just not true.
LikeLike
Gates actually funded, and the Department of Education administered, a big project to use galvanic skin response bracelets, retinal scanners, and other devices to continually monitor students’ gritful attention to their worksheets on a screen. This work was described by the USDE in its infamous Grit, Tenacity, and Perseverance report. Why this? Because if you are going to have 400 students in a room doing worksheets on a screen and one aide walking among them, that aide needs an alarm to let him or her know when some student is not being gritful.
LikeLike
or, for those prescriptivist grammarians out there: “devices to monitor, continually, students’ gritful attention. . . .”
LikeLike
Bob,
I am reading The Cognitive Style of Power Point. I have always hated Power Point presentations and now thanks to you I am learning why. I feel like why don’t you just talk to me like in the old days.
LikeLike
WONDERFUL!!! Isn’t it awesome?
I wish that everyone involved in ed tech and everyone who has had crappy ed tech foisted on his or her students, would read this illuminating piece by Tufte. What he says describes most ed tech extraordinarily well. Tufte nails one of the key problems with most of this crap.
“There’s no bullet list like Stalin’s bullet list.” –Edward Tufte, author of “The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint”
LikeLike
The exploitation goes on and on. I knew a Filipino teacher who paid most of her salary for transportation. An individual with the company who recruited her also had a driving service which transported these teachers too and from their schools daily (in areas where public transportation was not as accessible). This woman would get to school one hour early and leave either before she was ready or would wait up to 2 hours. Other teachers could not give her rides home as she had to use the service regularly or lose it. She later lost her position because of a district legal “oversight”… as did other Filipino teachers (who were promised permanent residency). The promise was made not just by the recruiter but by the school district as well – they misread the laws.
LikeLike
Some eager Ed.D. student should explore the (obvious) parallels between the worst of parochial education and today’s charter corruption. It’s not coincidence that so many charters start in former parish schools. Nor that so many nuns were imported at the turn of the last century, undermining the populism of 19th century public education by inventing segregation even before public schools accepted black students.
LikeLike
I am wordless over the arrogance of Teach for the Philippines.
Mouth open.
LikeLike
This is one I had not heard before. Is there no bottom to the level Reformyness will sink?
LikeLike
There is no limit to how low they will go if there is a dollar lying there. Once they hit bottom the dig below the surface to get what they want. The only thing that makes them pause is the light of disclosure, which they do their best to avoid. When caught they use their corporate personhood to buy their way out, after all, how can you jail the corporation, the people will claim they didn’t steal anything.
LikeLike
They may be on to something, though. It could be that injecting enough TFA scabs into the teaching forces of foreign nations will prove effective at lowering their students’ scores on international standardized tests, which will enable the USA to rise in rank. WIN!
LikeLike
Teach for Finland!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
The fake education reform (greed fed insanity) movement steals teachers from other countries; then treats them like indentured servants or slaves, who, out of fear of being sent home, never stop paying, while Teach for America (TFA) invades other countries with its cancerous educational theories and practices.
LikeLike
Did anyone else notice that the “investigative reporter” of this alarming article, George Joseph, is an UNDERGRADUATE student at Columbia University? Wow! Not too many “education reporters” today would know enough about Paulo Freire to use such relevant quotations from him.
What an incredible report on a truly horrific neoliberal practice, born right here in Milton Friedman’s free-market land of the greed, home of the grave (for veteran teachers).
LikeLike
My wife’s family is from the Philippines, and I was there over the Christmas season to attend a wedding.While there a met a lovely young woman who had just started Teach for the Philippines.
The usual story: she had received minimal training, had over fifty students in her class, and had received intensive indoctrination about how she and her TFP were the only competent teachers and the only one’s who could “save” their students.
I kept my mouth shut while she was describing her experiences. She was confused, sensing the huge gulf between the TFP sales pitch/cult dogma and the realities she was facing in the classroom – lack of preparation, overcrowding, disregard for the conditions faced by students and teachers – and seemed to be trying to sort things out. Hopefully, she will come to realize what a vicious fraud TFA is.
Do we need any more proof that so-called education reform is not limited to the US, and is in fact a global project of the Overclass?
LikeLike
Are you saying that you buy the Glenn Beck/Tea Party take on Agenda 21?
I don’t think this is about the UK royal family, the Rothschilds, etc. trying to colonize and rule the world. They’ve already done that.
I think this is about greedy American billionaires and entrepreneurs exporting Milton Friedman’s exploitative neoliberal practices for personal gain, as they have been encouraged to do since Clinton’s presidency –but revved up under Obama. I have to wonder how many of these for-profit and non-profit scammers who are more crafty and sly are hiding assets overseas, too, including Teach for the World (or whatever it’s called internationally).
LikeLike
You’re jumping to wild conclusions: where is there anything in my comment about Agenda 21? And what’s with your projections on to me about the royal family and the Rothschilds?
Are you next going to accuse me of pushing the Blood Libel and The Protocols of The Elders of Zion?
If you haven’t noticed, neoliberalism is a global project, has been for decades, and my comment was intended to relate a personal anecdote to a global phenomenon.
LikeLike
Just because Glenn Beck can be easily discredited does not mean that what he has said about the Common Core and Agenda 21 are not true.
Andrew Cuomo sat on President Clinton’s Presidential Council on Sustainable Development back in 1993. Look at him now. He is sending “Cleaner Greener Grants” throughout NYS to implement Agenda 21. Look at any NY county comprehensive plan and you will find discussions of limiting C02 levels by 2025, the limiting of vehicle miles traveled by certain dates, the introduction of stack and pack housing in urban areas and the plan to end funding of rural road maintenance as key objectives. Then you have Cuomo loving the Common Core and increasing the cap on charter schools to allow his charter investor friends (who have supported him with $800,000) to wreck havoc on NY.
Obama’s latest announcement is to stop the production of coal power plants and raise the price of electricity “for the good of the planet.” He is doing everything in his power to shut down any kind of physical productive capacity the U.S. ever had and either ship it overseas or regulate it out of business. He is implementing the goals of Agenda 21 every day. Crush the developed nations ability to function financially, productively and diplomatically.
If you think Bill Gates has no use for the U.N. or Agenda 21, explain the agreement he signed in 2004. Microsoft, represented by Bill Gates, signed and initialed every page of an agreement to use a digital platform to disseminate the goals of UNESCO by creating a curriculum for world-wide distribution. The Common Core soon emerged, paid for by Gates, developed under David Coleman of Achieve Incorporated.
Sir Michael Barber, formerly the adviser to Tony Blair, worked with David Coleman at McKinsey &Company, became the head of Pearson International, contracted to spread the Common Core far and wide.
These are facts, real connections, not conspiracy theories.
I am very sick of people ignoring the 800 pound gorilla in the room, namely the United Nations. Wake up. It exits. And its tentacles are many.
LikeLike
Well Dawn certainly bought it –hook, line and sinker. It is easier for some to believe in hoaxes than the science of global warming.
LikeLike
People who say “the science is settled, global warming is a fact” know nothing about the history of science or how science works. Science is never settled. It is always open to new evidence that emerges which throws older theories out the window or at least revises them. Anyone who insists the science is settled is waving a red flag letting us all know that he is an ideologue who will continue to believe even in the face of new evidence.
The International Panel on Climate Change is a political organization that has been discredited by now with there incorrect predictions all based on faulty computer models. There are 31,000 scientists in the U.S. alone who do not subscribe to the notion of man-made increase in C02 levels or even to the idea that an increase in C02 levels would be a bad thing for the planet if it were occurring since life is dependent on C02 and it would actually increase vegetation across the globe.
You can call me names but until you can back up your dire predictions with scientific facts, I will consider it to be you who have swallowed the Al Gore, just let me make some more money selling carbon offsets, plan to DE-industrialize the U.S. hook line and sinker. Who benefits from the global warming scam? Follow the money and notice that it leads you to the people who are in charge of education deform.
LikeLike
The Koch brothers, founders of the Tea Party, would prefer that people believe as you do, since their industries contribute substantially to greenhouse gas emissions. However, 97% of climatologists who have studied and published reports on their research agree that climate change is real and humans are the cause.
“The vast majority of scientists who conduct climatological research and publish their results in professional journals say humans are the cause of global warming. There is essentially no controversy among actual climate scientists about this.
Of course, if you read the Wall Street Journal or the contrarian blogs, you might think the controversy among scientists is bigger. But you’ll find that the vast majority of people writing those articles, or who are quoted in them, are not climatologists. You’ll also find many, including politicians so vocally denying global warming, are heavily funded by fossil fuel interests, or lead institutes funded that way.”
“New Study: Climate Scientists Overwhelmingly Agree Global Warming Is Real and Our Fault”
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/05/17/global_warming_climate_scientists_overwhelmingly_agree_it_s_real_and_is.html
Even a global warming skeptic who the Koch brothers funded to research climate change revised his views after studying the evidence:
“Koch-Funded Study Changes Prominent Global Warming Skeptic to a Believer”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/10/30/koch-funded-study-changes-prominent-global-warming-skeptic-to-a-believer/
There is a small margin between healthy levels of CO2 and damaging levels of CO2 on our planet. I’m guessing you don’t watch Cosmos. Science is subject to revision since empirical research is cumulative and because our interpretations are often viewed from different perspectives, such as the flat earth from the ground and the spherical planet from space. There came a time when people had to stop claiming the earth is flat and accept scientific evidence that the earth is a sphere. The same should be said of the damaging effects of high levels of CO2 on our planet, resulting from greenhouse gas emissions, even if that means the billionaire Koch brothers et al. will have to spend more money to reduce their industries’ contributions to that.
LikeLike
Edward Said would have had a serious chapter or two on Teach for the Phillippines… Still just honestly unable to grasp the hubris here.
The reformers are just orientalizing education.
LikeLike
Unless I’m mistaken, the SPLC took up the cause of these teachers and won a hefty settlement on their behalf.
LikeLike
It’s the free market at work. They got the best labor contractors money could buy.
LikeLike
This is an example of work visa scheme that leads to human rights abuse. This kind of exploitation must be stopped right away. Crowed classroom in Philippino schools is the problem with their education system, but spinning of TFA scheme to international teachers is nothing less than a disservice to their profession.
LikeLike
I came to the US through Omni Consortium in 2002 but I had a phone interview with the school principal and HR sent me all the documents I needed. But I didn’t leave Manila until I had all my documents in order and I was sure I had a job when I got here. My district helped me with my green card and eventually with my US citizenship.
I was one of the first teachers hired directly from the Philippines and fortunately didn’t experience the misfortune of those that came after I did.
LikeLike