Myra Blackmon, who writes regularly for the Athens Banner-Herald in Georgia, returned from the Network for Public Education conference in Austin ready to write about what she learned and how it applied to Georgia.
She realized that the Common Core is just a symptom of a larger problem.
She writes:
My “a-ha moment” came when I realized CCSS and testing aren’t the real problems. They’re symptoms of a bigger problem. The real problem is a systemic, far-reaching one that can be stopped only by a revolt among parents and educators. The real problem is that a very few, very wealthy individuals override the voices of thousands upon thousands of experienced educators and parents.
The real problem is that Bill Gates, who has put more than $200 million into the CCSS, has more influence than his millions of customers. The Walton family has more influence than the 1.4 million Americans who try to scrape together a living working at their stores. The Broad Foundation carries more weight than the 15,000 elected school boards in this country.
The huge education companies, with Pearson at the head of the pack, have a hugely profitable lock on the education system. They write the tests, which favor their own textbooks and packaged teacher training. They administer and score the hundreds of thousands of tests administered each year. They pour huge amounts of money into the coffers of politicians and so-called “reform” organizations.
Friends, this is, pure and simple, a corporate takeover of American public education. When the education companies have more say-so in developing standards than experienced educators, we are out of whack. When education decisions are driven by profit instead of real student achievement, we have utterly surrendered control of what happens to our children in public schools.
The job for the public, she saw, was to wake up and take back their schools from destructive federal programs like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top.
If it sounds like doomsday, it could well be if we don’t get busy and change it. We have to recommit at the local level, electing school boards willing to stand up to big money and the state and federal governments when they see policies that damage our children.
Thanks, Myra, for helping the public understand what is at risk today: our schools, our society, our future.

Myra Blackmon has taken that step backward and is seeing the larger, more frightening and dangerous picture. Each of these tsunamis of corporate educational reforms/deforms/conforms wrecks more havoc than the ones that have preceded it.
We need to acknowledge her perspective and decide how best to proceed in order to protect those most in need of our protection: our children!
LikeLike
Hey this worked out great for the defense industry. The government and corporations in bed together making love in a giant pile of money.
It was only a matter of time until this business model was applied to the public schools.
LikeLike
I would have hoped we would have taken our inspiration from Sir Ken Robinson who suggested that education was not an industrial model but rather an agricultural one in that a farmer or a gardener cannot grow a plant but only provide an environment in which a plant or flower might grow. Farmers and gardeners, teachers and parents all know that there are so many conditions outside their control that can have a significant impact on the actual growth of their flowers/plant / children.
LikeLike
I like that analogy..
Good Post!
LikeLike
No mention of the Unions?
LikeLike
Joseph,
I saw Mercedes’ blog on Randi Weingarten yesterday and posted something there, too.
Like many educators, I was MAD as hell at the start of the last school year, when a lot of the Core-porate Curriculum crap first hit the fan in New York State. I wrote to NYSUT president Dick Iannuzzi and told him as much. And, to Dick’s credit, he has exchanged e-mails with me a number of times. I was not ignored by my union. Which is a lot more than I can say for my treatment by Governor Cuomo et al…….
As I wrote to Dick at the end of last summer after I finally cooled off a bit, I consider myself lucky to be teaching in a public school here in New York State and to be part of NYSUT. When I think about the shoddy support for students in other states and what’s happened to public employees in places like Wisconsin, well, it puts whatever complaints I have in perspective. Maybe it was on this blog where someone documented how far corporations are outspending unions when it comes to politics in this country?
A fond memory: I was at a NYSUT “legislative brunch” in January 2013 and went completely off the handle at NYSUT Vice President Andy Pallotta. (Well, Andy, you DID ask if anyone had questions.) All sorts of lawmakers were there, including U.S. Congressman Chris Gibson, sitting right next to me. My rant went something to the tune that I have generations of teachers in my family and that for the first time the common core nonsense was making me embarrassed to be a teacher….. etc, etc….What was NYSUT going to do about this mess?
It was one of those moments that, when you stop talking you can hear the clink of the ice in water glasses …..almost. total. silence. But the union didn’t banish me and, in fact, keeps inviting me back.
Randi Weingarten’s behavior later on at the June 2013 NYSUT rally in Albany did strike me as a bit… odd -as I mention in my comment on Mercede’s blog. I would hope all unions flee from whatever support they have expressed for the common core fiasco. Talk about being on the wrong side of history.
Hey, by the way, speaking of history: a shout out to my great friend and colleague Hugh McCammon, who has now been retired from teaching English for 13 years! I recall those times when Mac came unglued at some administrator, board member, phony politician or fellow teacher……and they DESERVED EVERY MOMENT of his wrath and intelligent criticism. You were an inspiration. This is what the United States and our public schools are meant to be about: freedom, honesty and the ability to actually debate ideas. We miss you Mac.
-John O.
LikeLike
This is true. However, this is orchestrated by the Koch Brothers and ALEC legislative initiatives/directives and attempting to infiltrate every aspect of American life through lie campaigns and buying elections. Schools are a final thrust to simply “take America back” to the pre Civil Rights days because these people do not want America to be anything other than a kingdom for white, Judeo-Christian monied males. This has been exacerbated by Citizens United and round two of that is underway. I have to think that in many ways, overtaking schools brings the process full circle. We need to stop voting in people whose goal is to make America the land of the monied.
LikeLike
Has any group (or how would a group?) organize a boycott of something that might hit Bill Gates and/or the Walton family where it REALLY matters to them -their bottom lines?
Every time I see one of Microsoft’s cheesy ads for its search engine Bing I say to myself, nope, never going to go there.
So many people hate what’s happening. There’s got to be some way for teachers, parents and students to deliver a coordinated message that costs these corporations money…. bucks. Of course, that is the language that truly matters to them. Forget the common core’s so-called “academic vocabulary”.
I don’t know how to make things go “viral” but I’d sure donate money to someone who does know how to do that.
Gates, Duncan, Cuomo…… it’s come to the point where they all skeeve me out me so much that when I see NY Governor Andrew Cuomo’s BROTHER, Chris, doing his TV journalism gig, I want to change the channel on him, too! (Sorry, Chris. CNN would call it collateral damage.)
LikeLike
Our economy is so close to crashing that they need to loot education as well as the Ukraine.
LikeLike
http://laschoolreport.com/teacher-in-vergara-trial-blames-student-for-performing-poorly/?utm_source=LA+School+Report+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=52e9abe778-Daily_Newsletter_June_18_6_18_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_2ad2e2e3a4-52e9abe778-31287185
It’s just nuts. I would have never predicted I would be reading a story where wealthy people got together, hired prestigious lawyers, and put a teacher on trial for “bad teaching”
The linked article is just surreal. She’s defending her use of weekly progress reports. That was the testimony.
What an absolute joke this is, using the court system for an ed reform marketing push to bash public school teachers and public schools. It is CRAZY, what’s going on.
LikeLike
Chiara, the article is beyond disgusting. I find it disgusting that a student is allowed to completely blame a teacher for not doing classwork and assignments. It is obvious the parents didn’t do their job. This story is just plain sick.
LikeLike
In my district, we are being told that it is our fault if a student fails. Some schools in the district are requiring a two page long form for EACH student with a failing grade, documenting every contact with a parent, and giving a rationale for EVERY assignment, as to why it was assigned. I’m not a fan of busy work, but to have to give a rationale for every assignment is beyond contemptible. Why aren’t teachers trusted? And the morale is beyond low, and yet the district sees no problems with this. Complaints to our teacher association (no unions in Utah!) fall on deaf ears. The “leaders” won’t even respond to my calls or emails anymore.
LikeLike
You might want to visit the Calvin & Hobbes from April 21, 1993. Bill Watterson, or Calvin, was way ahead of the students blaming teachers for not teaching. Ah, but that was just a cartoon!
http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1993/04/21#.Uxz7EP3fbwI
LikeLike
Thanks for the link. I agree with Dee Dee, it is beyond disgusting. It is wrong on so many levels, where to begin? As per a comment in the article, overtones of Salem witch trials.
LikeLike
Public education just won a case in court: http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-kansas-schools-20140308,0,5562455.story#axzz2vBaF1dmD
Gannon vs. Kansas
Tell it on the Mountain!
LikeLike
This article nails it. NCLB and Race to the Top are trojan horses to the corporate-ization of our public schools.
We citizens must pay closer attention to our elected representatives. We must also become more involved in our local and state communities where our collective children are involved.
Otherwise, our republican way of life will be a memory, if it is not already.
And this should scare the 99% to death.
LikeLike
Consumers have purchase power. It may be small in comparison, but I absolutely refuse to spend my money, if avoidable, on Microsoft, Walmart, and the long list of TFA Charity companies. Will not buy anything that even comes close to Pearson…etc. Educators have strength in numbers and we need to figure out ways to send that message. Quickly!!
LikeLike
What does Pearson own these days? I’ve lost track.
LikeLike
It can be so dispiriting to watch, because how many times have we made this same dumb mistake?
How many times have we deregulated and then privatized? It never, ever works as planned. It’s always presented the same way, and it ALWAYS harms the people it’s ostensibly done to help, the most vulnerable people.
Privatization isn’t a policy choice, it’s a belief system. It has to be, because it always ends the same way yet it re-appears in each and every public sector, regular as rain.
We have privatized foster care coordinators now, in this county. It’s an operation out of Michigan. I have no idea whether they’re even classified as “state actors” so whether they come under the statute and administrative rules and I have no idea to whom they are accountable.
I do know they’re paying them half what the public employees make. I asked them.
LikeLike
And I would bet the private owners are getting rich…because they are taking on “risk”. It “justifies” paying crappy wages to those who actually do the WORK.
The sad think is: these privatizers say that no one should complain because they have the “right” to be a privatizer, too. But SOME of us would actually like to work WITH the students or the people in need if SERVICES and earn a living wage for doing so. We are made to seem foolish and ignorant for not participating in their greedy “game”.
Something needs to change.
LikeLike
You are quite correct deb, in that it is “sad think”. TAGO!
LikeLike
A great article of the privatizers on the government’s take (including David Steiner, one of Detroit’s new bosses of its now privatized waste management, and Ken Packard, CEO of K12, Inc., among others) called “Exposed: America’s Highest Paid Government Workers*, *They’re not who you think they are.”
Click to access americas_highest_paid_government_workers.pdf
LikeLike
There are two books that are essential for understanding the corporate takeover of American democracy. 1) “Democracy Incorporated” by Sheldon Wolin; and 2) “The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism” by Naomi Klein. Below are links to PDF copies of each book:
Click to access Democracy-Inc.pdf
Click to access NaomiKlein-TheShockDoctrine.pdf
LikeLike
Here is an OPT OUT letter from Opt Out Long Island. I have attached 3 Spanish translation for the New York City Council.
Jeanette Brunelle Deutermann
Get your letters in!! We have the power to bring this machine to a grinding halt!!
Dear (name of administrator)
We are writing today to formally inform the district of our decision to refuse to allow our child (name) , to participate in the ELA and math standardized assessments imposed on children across the state for the 2013-2014 school year. Our refusal should in no way reflect on the teachers, administration, or school board. This was not an easy decision for us, but we feel that we have no other choice. We simply see these tests as harmful, expensive, and a waste of time and valuable resources.
We refuse to allow any data to be… used for purposes other than the individual teacher’s own formative or cumulative assessment. We are opposed to assessments whose data is used to determine school ranking, teacher effectiveness, state or federal longitudinal studies or any other purpose other than for the individual classroom teacher’s own use to improve his or her instruction.
We will be encouraging other parents to stand up against the testing fad and, more importantly, the corporate and government takeover of our schools. We believe in and trust our highly qualified and dedicated teachers and administrators. We believe in the high quality of teaching and learning that occur in our child’s school. We hope our efforts will be understood in the context in which they are intended: to support the quality of instruction promoted by the school, and to advocate for what is best for all children. Our schools will not suffer when these tests are finally gone, they will flourish.
(Name of School District) should have a unified policy in place to address children who are refusing these state assessments. We do apologize in advance for the inconvenience or scrutiny that this decision may cause the administration, the school, and staff. Sincerely, (your name)
Michele Myers Trageser 7:47am Mar 9
Nassau / Suffolk schools do not hold kids back due to the test scores or opting out. In NYC under Bloomberg, he said that those scores would be used to determine retention, HOWEVER according to change the stakes ( providing info for NYC families) no child who opted out last year in NYC was held back. You can contact them for more info. First graders do not take state exams, they are given in grades 3-8
Results From 3 Translators
•English to Spanish
•Spanish to English
Sube tus cartas!! Tenemos el poder para traer esta máquina abruptamente!!
Estimado (nombre del administrador)
Hoy estamos escribiendo para informar formalmente el distrito de nuestra decisión de negarse a permitir que nuestro hijo (nombre) participar en la ELA y matemáticas estandarizado cuotas impuestas a los niños a través del estado para el año escolar 2013-2014. Nuestro rechazo en ninguna manera debe reflexionar sobre los maestros, administración o la junta escolar. Esto no fue una decisión fácil para nosotros, pero creemos que no tenemos otra opción. Simplemente vemos estas pruebas como perjudiciales, caro y una pérdida de tiempo y recursos valiosos.
Nos negamos a permitir que cualquier dato que… utilizados para fines distintos de la evaluación del maestro individual formativo o acumulativo. Nos oponemos a las evaluaciones cuyos datos se utilizan para determinar la graduación de la escuela, efectividad del maestro, estatal, federales estudios longitudinales o cualquier otro propósito distinto para el uso del maestro de aula individual mejorar su instrucción.
Nos hará estar alentando a otros padres para enfrentarse a la prueba fad y, más importante aún, la adquisición corporativa y gobierno de nuestras escuelas. Creemos en y confiar en nuestros maestros altamente calificados y dedicados y administradores. Creemos en la alta calidad de enseñanza y aprendizaje que se producen en la escuela de nuestros hijos. Esperamos que nuestros esfuerzos se entenderá en el contexto en el cual se destinan: para apoyar la calidad de la instrucción promovida por la escuela y abogar por lo que es mejor para todos los niños. Nuestras escuelas no sufrirá cuando estas pruebas están finalmente, ellos prosperarán.
(Nombre del distrito escolar) debe tener una política unificada en su lugar a los niños de la dirección que se niegan a estas evaluaciones del estado.
Nos disculpamos de antemano por la inconveniencia o escrutinio que esta decisión puede causar la administración, la escuela y el personal.
Atentamente,
(tu nombre)
Microsoft Translator
Obtener las cartas!! Tenemos el poder de poner fin a esta máquina con un frenazo!!
Estimado/a (nombre del administrador)
Hoy estamos escribiendo para informar oficialmente a la distrito de nuestra decisión de negarse a permitir que nuestro hijo (nombre) , para participar en la ELA y matemáticas evaluaciones estandarizadas impuestas a los niños en todo el estado para el 2013-2014 año escolar. Nuestro rechazo de ninguna manera debería reflexionar sobre los profesores, la administración, o la junta directiva de las escuelas. Esta no fue una decisión fácil para nosotros, pero nos parece que no tenemos otra opción. Simplemente ver estas pruebas como perjudicial, caro y es una pérdida de tiempo y recursos valiosos.
Nos negamos a permitir que los datos que se deben … utilizado para fines distintos a los del propio profesor formativa o evaluación acumulativa. Nos oponemos a las cuotas cuyos datos se utilizan para determinar clasificación de las escuelas, eficacia docente, estatales o federales estudios longitudinales o cualquier otro propósito que no sea para la clase del propio profesor para mejorar su enseñanza.
Alentaremos a otros padres a la fad y pruebas, lo que es más importante, el gobierno y las empresas adquisición de nuestras escuelas. En los que creemos y confiamos altamente calificados y dedicados maestros y administradores. Creemos en la calidad de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje que se producen en nuestra escuela. Esperamos que nuestros esfuerzos se entiende en el contexto en el que se destina: para mantener la calidad de la enseñanza promovida por la escuela, y de defender lo que es mejor para todos los niños. Nuestras escuelas no sufren cuando estas pruebas son, florezcan.
(El nombre del Distrito Escolar) debe tener una política unificada en lugar de abordar los niños que se niegan estas evaluaciones estatales.
Le pedimos disculpas de antemano por las molestias o el examen que esta decisión puede causar la administración, la escuela y el personal.
Sinceramente,
(Tu nombre)
SDL
¡Ponga sus cartas adentro!! ¡Tenemos el poder de traer esta máquina a un alto de molienda!!
Querido (nombre de administrador)
Escribimos hoy para informar formalmente el distrito de nuestra decisión de rechazar permitir a nuestro hijo (nombre), participar en el ELA y las matemáticas estandarizaron evaluaciones impuestas a niños a través del estado para el 2013-2014 año escolar. Nuestra respuesta negativa no debería reflexionar de ninguna manera sobre los profesores, administración o consejo escolar. Esto no era una decisión fácil para nosotros, pero sentimos que no tenemos otra opción. Simplemente vemos estas pruebas como dañinas, caras, y una pérdida de tiempo y recursos valiosos.
Rechazamos permitir que cualesquiera datos… se usen con objetivos además de la propia evaluación formativa o acumulativa del profesor individual. Estamos en contra de evaluaciones cuyos datos son usados para determinar clasificación escolar, eficacia del profesor, estudios longitudinales estatales o federales o cualquier otro objetivo además de para el propio uso del profesor de aula individual para mejorar su instrucción.
Animaremos a otros padres a levantarse contra la manía de pruebas y, lo que es más importante la entrada en funciones corporativa y del gobierno de nuestras escuelas. Creemos en y confiamos en nuestros profesores muy calificados y dedicados y administradores. Creemos en la alta calidad de enseñanza y aprendiendo lo que ocurre en la escuela de nuestro hijo. Esperamos que nuestros esfuerzos se entiendan en el contexto en el cual se quieren: apoyar la calidad de instrucción promovida por la escuela y abogar para lo que es el mejor para todos los niños. Nuestras escuelas no sufrirán cuando estas pruebas finalmente se vayan, prosperarán.
(El nombre del Distrito escolar) debería tener una política unificada en el lugar para dirigirse a niños que rechazan estas evaluaciones estatales.
Realmente pedimos perdón de antemano por la molestia o escrutinio que esta decisión puede causar a la dirección, la escuela y personal.
Sinceramente,
(su nombre)
LikeLike
All three Spanish translations are kind of rough. I’m willing to help out, if you think a more correct translation is important.
LikeLike
“Rough” is being nice.
So easy to spot a computer “translation”.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Miss Frizzle Method and commented:
I can’t say I disagree.
LikeLike
Harry Reid has just launched the attack on the Koch brothers….and how they buy elections….hence Congress. It seems that they have more money than we have votes. However, let us ….educators, families, concerned citizens…..stay alert, strong, and creative. Our democracy has been threatened.
LikeLike
Our democracy is past the “has been threatened” mark. We do not have a viable democracy here in the good old “USA, USA, USA” (emphasized with wildly enthusiastic fist pumping). But, that doesn’t mean that we can’t get back on the path to equality and justice for all.
It is a simple fact that it always takes more time, and family sacrifice, to regain the rights that our parents and grandparents fought and died for, then it takes for the privileged few to dismantle those hard earned rights. After all, families who have amassed extreme amounts of wealth do not have to suffer personal sacrifice or engage in the struggle themselves because they have the resources to pay others to do their dirty work for them. The struggle is age old and will never end. The question is whether or not this generation of parents and grandparents will fight for the future of all children and beat back the selfish interests of the wealthy few.
LikeLike
I was very concerned when I read an article about Bill Gates maybe 5 years ago. Gates was disappointed in the results of some $2B he had put into education reform and realized that the only way he could have the impact he wanted was to get control of the national education funding budget (which monetarily dwarfed his contribution on an annual basis). With the help of Obama, Duncan, and Rhee (among others), he’s done it.
LikeLike
“You show me a capitalist, and I’ll show you a bloodsucker”
― Malcolm X
LikeLike
All I needed to know about education reform I learned from Dr Seuss.
When the parents of my students ask me about Common Core, I refer them to”The Lorax” by Dr Seuss, because the Common Core is essentially a “Thneed” as described by Seuss in this story. Start with the original TV version or the Wikipedia summary.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lorax
The story begins when a shifty businessman called the Once-ler arrives in a beautiful valley populated by swans and happy creatures called Barbaloots who frolic in the shade of “Truffula trees.” (Think of the valley as our public schools prior to NCLB).
The Once-ler starts cutting these trees and weaves them into useless sweaters called “Thneeds” (think of them as 1970’s version of a “snuggie”).
The only voice that questions what will become industrialized environmental destruction comes from a strange orange, whiskered, creature who annoys the Once-ler to no end by “speaking for the tress.”
Through a slick marketing campaign (“You need a Thneed!”), demand exceeds capacity and production expands until the last Truffula tree is cut and all of the swans and barbaloots are forced to leave their now polluted homes.
The connection to the dismantling of public education is pretty obvious. There are a lot of “Once-lers in education reform today (Pearson,Gates,Walton,Broad, TFA, ALEC, Jeb Bush, Rhee, Charters, Duncan,etc) who seek to profit financially or politically from these reforms.
Sadly, the public, the media, and even our unions have been duped by those promoting these reforms. Instead of Thneeds, we are being sold the Common Core (equally useless). There are other Thneeds in education being sold like PARCC,Smarter Balanced, Charters, TIF, VAM, RTTT, and the Danileson evaluation framework, etc.
The Truffula tress in education are our schools and communities. The students are the swans and barbaloots whose homes were devastated. The Lorax is represented by people like Diane Ravitch who speak for our public schools.
Dissent is not to be tolerated. For another Seuss reference read “Yertle the Turtle.”
(“Silence shouted the king from atop of the stack! I’m king and you’re just a turtle named Mack!)
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education and commented:
Wow. So true!
LikeLike
Myra nails it: a handful override millions. That’s the essence of oligarchy.
LikeLike
From NAFTA, to the Trans Pacific Partnership, to No Child Left Behind to Race to the Top—it’s all done for the benefit of the investors. Not the workers, communities or children.
LikeLike
The Brookings Institution just called for the two organizations that copyrighted the Common Core State Standards to become a censorship office for curricula nationwide. I am not making this up. Here are the details:
Two economists at the Brookings Institution, Joshua Bleiberg and Darrell M. West, made three policy proposals in a piece published March 6, 2014, on the Brookings website. One was this:
“The Common Core [sic; they meant the NGA and the CCSSO] should vigorously enforce their licensing agreement. In the past textbook writers and others have inappropriately claimed that they aligned course content. Supporters of standards based reform should recognize that low quality content could sink the standards and enforce their copyright accordingly.”
Let’s be clear about what they are calling for here:
They are saying that the CCSSO and NGA should be censorship organizations that review curricula and gives it a “nihil obstat.” In effect, such a policy would create a national curriculum censorship organization, for if a state has adopted the Common Core, a publisher will not be able to sell product in that state without it being Common Core aligned, and in order to say that the product is Common Core aligned, the publisher would have to get CCSSO/NGA approval.
When I first read that the Common Core had been copyrighted, a disturbing thought occurred to me: “Were they planning, in the long term, to set up a national office to preapprove curricula?”
Now, that’s exactly what Brookings is calling for.
The Thought Police.
If you don’t find this REALLY CHILLING, you aren’t thinking AT ALL.
This is what totalitarianism looks like, folks.
Just when you think it can’t get worse, this.
LikeLike
Here’s the CCSS copyright notice:
http://www.corestandards.org/public-license/
So, when a state adopts the Common Core, it is putting a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION in charge and making its state standards into ONES THAT ARE PRIVATELY OWNED/PRIVATELY HELD by two organizations, the CCSSO and the NGA, that can decide who can and cannot use those and how.
Isn’t anyone concerned about this!!!!??????
LikeLike
In my town the teachers and students have taken a stand against this corporate takeover. However, due to ignorance in our public officials it doesn’t do anything. Ignorance has made New Mexico the second worst state in education, we demand a change for better education. Corporate takeover is the exact opposite of what we want.
LikeLike