Eva Moskowitz, an attorney who served on the New York City Council and was chair of the education committee, opened her own chain of charter schools in Harlem in 2006. Moskowitz is an interesting, brilliant woman with a Ph.D. in history. Her chain initially was called Harlem Success Academy, but has since been renamed Success Academy, presumably because it is now moving into other neighborhoods. Her schools regularly win editorial plaudits from the city’s tabloids for their high scores. In this article in The New Yorker, it appears that she has the “secret sauce” to overcome poverty and send the poorest kids to college. According to the New Yorker article, her chain spends over $1 million a year on marketing–such as direct mail, ads on buses and bus stop shelters, flyers, etc.– which pumps up the number of applicants for the schools and helps to build the chain’s reputation. It also paid over $500,000 to SDK Knickerbocker, the high-powered D.C. public relations firm, which includes Anita Dunn, who was interim communications director for President Obama in 2009.
Eva’s schools have the advantage of enormous financial support from hedge fund managers, who agree with her that her mission is to prove that public education is a failure as compared to her methods.
Whereas the original purpose of charters was to serve as a laboratory of innovation for public schools and to help public schools improve, Eva’s approach is distinctly competitive, not collaborative. She wants to beat the public schools, and she often belittles them for their inability to match her unparalleled success. If there is something she knows that can help all children, she is not sharing it.
But Eva has a problem. Mayor Bill de Blasio has said that he intends to charge rent to charters that can afford to pay it, and that clearly includes Eva’s charters. This is not likely to create a deficit since the schools are very well-funded, but it certainly has set off a media war by Eva against Bill.
What are those methods? Read here about turning children into “little test-taking machines.” Of course, that is not all that happens at Eva’s schools. The children study science and play chess. But the rules are very strict, and students who do not comply are likely to be suspended and/or expelled.
A few months ago, I began corresponding with a teacher at one of the Success Academy charter schools. I do not know which school he or she teaches in; I do not know the teacher’s name or gender. By various details, I believe the email is authentic. I asked the teacher to explain why the school gets high scores. He or she sent the following answer. It does not take into demographics, nor the school’s legendary disciplinary policy, but it does explain what matters most to the SA schools:
Focus on English Language Arts and Math. We spend the vast majority of class time teaching ELA and Math all year long. Kids have several blocks of each daily. We do not teach history or foreign languages in elementary school. We do have a good science program. They have a Specials period every day too. Aside from that, it’s reading, writing, math from 8:00AM to 5:00PM. Obviously the extended day and extended school year helps in terms of sheer volume of time.
Put the best teachers in testing grades. During the first few months of school, teachers and assistant principals are shuffled between grades and even schools. The goal is to put the strongest teachers in grades 3 and up. So a strong Kindergarten teacher might suddenly find herself teaching fourth grade.
Test prep starts in November: ELA test prep starts in November for two periods a week. After winter break, we have daily hourlong ELA test prep. Then we add math. By late February, we spend several hours a day on it. The last few weeks are almost all day test prep.
Custom Test Prep Materials: I think many schools use practice workbooks from publishers like Kaplan, etc. We have people whose job it is to put together custom test prep packets based on state guidance. Much more aligned to common core and closer to the test than the published books I’ve seen. Also, teachers are putting together additional worksheets and practice based on what we see in the classroom. Huge volume of practice materials for every possible need (and we use it all, too). Also many practice tests and quizzes that copy format of the test.
Intensive organization-wide focus on test prep: For the last months and weeks before the test, everyone from Eva on down is completely focused on test prep. Just a few examples….
We have to give kids 1/2/3/4 scores daily. Kids are broken up into small groups based on the data and get differentiated instruction. If they get a 1, they stay back from recess or after school for extra practice.
Thousands of dollars spent on prizes to incentivize the kids to work hard. Some teachers have expressed concern about bribing them with basketballs and other toys instead of learning for the sake of learning. The response is “prizes aren’t optional.”
We get daily inspirational emails from principals with a countdown, anecdotes about the importance of state tests, and ever-multiplying plans for “getting kids over the finish line” (these get old fast).
Old-fashioned hard work: Teachers are working nonstop during test prep. Literally pour 100% of yourself into it day in and day out. We work hard all year, but test prep brings the hours and workload to a new level. I think the same is true of all staff in schools and at Network.
I think those are the main points. We do not cheat on the tests, as some critics speculate. But we do devote an extraordinary amount of resources to them each year, arguably at the expense of actual learning. The justification I’ve heard is that these tests can determine our kids’ futures and we owe it to them to make sure they’re prepared. Obviously we as an organization are judged by them as well, so we make it a priority. What I find most disturbing is that we claim that the test scores are a result of our excellent curriculum…no mention of test prep. If we have faith in the curriculum, why not allow us to teach it and skip the test prep?
Her way of working emulates very much the “colleges” which charge so much more than public universities, spend huge amounts on advertising, and then students who do manage to graduate cannot find jobs because they lack the proficiency to do their work.
Too, this is so reminiscent of the “great Japanese schools” which we just HAD to emulate when Japanese autos supplanted in quality, made Detroit fall on its face, but the Japanese found to their horror that traditional Japanese values of working together had disappeared in these schools, that graduates from high school had learned two things: 1. to hate schools and learning and 2. how to pass tests. They had never even learned the material, just how to answer “correctly” the questions posed.
“When will we ever learn, when will we ever learn?”.
LikeLike
You should not pay much attention to the sticker price of private institutions. Most students are offered a discount.
LikeLike
Can’t wait for the longitudinal studies on these kids. Reminds me of lab rats in cages. What will their future be if the love of learning is taken from them? And how will they survive if they expect a tangible reward for every thing they do?
LikeLike
The teacher from Success Academy does not specifically mention it, butt it is implied that the school does not keep any children who struggle. They probably do not behave in such an environment. Thus, of course whoever is there gets high scores on tests.
LikeLike
As children are focused on algebraic algorithms, cold and dull passages of reading excerpts and inappropriate age level direct instruction, it seems that this deadening of the mind is a part of the Centennial of the creation of a new public school system.
A recent article from the Economist indicates that 47% of all jobs will be automated by 2034 and governments are beginning to prepare for this. Already New York State is beginning to upgrade its privatized prison population with so called “education” and the Governor has plans to direct two billion dollars toward educational computers.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/17/rise-of-the-machines-economist_n_4616931.html
The article states that the winners will be those who have acquired “creative and social skills”.
It has been said that creativity is as fragile as a butterfly’s wing. It would seem that only entrepreneurs will be the survivors.
Shouldn’t our educational system be creative, flexible and sociable, where children work together rather than in direct instruction isolation?
Yankee Come Home!
LikeLike
“Eva Moskowitz, an attorney…”
Does this explain all the test prep in her charters? I assume that like most attorneys I know she attended law school for three years and then, in order to get her license she had to take and pass the state-mandated bar exam, meaning that she spent the summer after graduation from law school in rigorous test prep. That is because law school prepares you to think like a lawyer; the bar exam tests your ability to answer multiple choice questions. If I am wrong, someone please set me straight.
The crime here is that in these charters the test prep is now the school, and passing the test does not demonstrate that the school has produced a well-rounded human being with critical thinking skills and a love of life and learning.
In my opinion we need more teachers, and fewer lawyers, in education.
LikeLike
The President of the NY teachers union is a lawyer too. She thinks that way also, and that teachers should pass a “bar exam”. How will that make them care about kids?
LikeLike
The President of NYSUT is a former 4th grade teacher, HIS name is Dick Ianuzzi. The President of the NYC Teachers Union (UFT) is Mike Mulgrew.
LikeLike
The author of this blog does, too.
LikeLike
Billy Wilder once famously wrote “well, nobody’s perfect” and that applies here.
From my experience, teachers’ colleges do their jobs just fine, teaching is then practiced and learned on the job, and a few years of experience and mentoring quickly separate the wheat from the chaff. The good teachers stick with it because of the job satisfaction. The others move on. We don’t need more tests, for students or teachers.
LikeLike
Sad, Randi has virtually no experience in the classroom. The fine example of education in Finland and elsewhere requires extensive education free of the market place. A test does not make a good teacher, but a person who is interested in education and how the classroom delivers it. Teachers are given no time to share their experiences with each other, as other countries permit. It takes five years to become a good teacher through careful observation, not sitting down with a number 2 pencil, and “sharing ideas”.
Why does Randi think the current teachers suck, and that they need her help designing lesson plans for Mr. Gates’ Common Core. It is hard enough to retain the best since NCLB in 2000. Teachers become disgusted because their union cares only about money. I would bet that the good teachers would take a 10% pay cut if they were left alone to learn their craft outside of this privatized paradigm. Maybe we should have a “bar exam” to become labor leaders. First required courses:
“How To Get Arrested 101 To Bring Attention To Your Members Rights”.
“Introduction to Telling Publishers to Place Their Inferior Profit Driven Materials………” ( an elective)
“The Art of Recognizing Fraudulent Staff Developers Who Look to Dumb Down Your Members”
Hmmmmmmm……. How about a bar exam for staff developers?
LikeLike
Good stuff. If Pearson can figure a way to make a buck off it we will soon see such a test.
LikeLike
How do standardized tests in elementary or middle school determine a student’s future? This is more about the future of Eva Moskowitz.
LikeLike
It will only be a matter of time before Eva Moskowitcz runs for NY City mayor. I don’t know if she will win, but she has a lot of clout and plutocrat/neo-liberal and not-so-liberal backers and friends.
Beware of Evil. She is relatively in the shadows now.
She will stop at nothing to destroy unions, public trusts, or to convert real unions into sham, facades for union/plutocrat cronyism . . . .
LikeLike
The last paragraph:
“I think those are the main points. We do not cheat on the tests, as some critics speculate. But we do devote an extraordinary amount of resources to them each year, arguably at the expense of actual learning. The justification I’ve heard is that these tests can determine our kids’ futures and we owe it to them to make sure they’re prepared. Obviously we as an organization are judged by them as well, so we make it a priority. What I find most disturbing is that we claim that the test scores are a result of our excellent curriculum…no mention of test prep. If we have faith in the curriculum, why not allow us to teach it and skip the test prep?”
Note the words “arguably at the expense of actual learning.”
If you know even a little about how high-stakes standardized tests are designed, produced, tested and administered—and this comes right from the psychometric community itself—
Then, with all due respect, it’s inarguably “at the expense of actual learning.”
Why? For the same reason that one of the the mantras of the High Holy Church of Testolatry makes no sense: “If you teach to the test, make sure that the test is worth teaching to.”
Please excuse me if I don’t make this clear. I will try to be as succinct and accurate as I can.
The tests sample broad areas [psychometricians use the term “domains”] of what the students being tested are supposed to have learned and be able to do. **Hint: since this involves one’s behavior & actions at a specific time under specific conditions and something is ‘produced,’ that is why “achievement” and “performance” are the psychometric words of choice and not terms like “learning.”** The bigger the areas to cover—and as children get older the “domains” get mindbogglingly huge—the more critical statistical sampling becomes. That is, a specific item or two or three from a subset of a subset of algebra is of very little interest to the psychometricians. What is critical is that the items on the standardized tests are proxies or representatives of the many other things that one is supposed to know from that particular area or areas.
Hence, when one not only ‘teaches to the test’ but ‘the curriculum becomes the test’ you have defeated the very purpose of sampling from extremely broad domains. In other words, instead of the test items representing a lot more than just themselves,
THAT’S ALL THERE IS!
So I agree with the assertion by the anonymous teacher that there doesn’t have to be any conventional “cheating” on the testing she describes. Nonetheless, I think the damage done is just as great, perhaps greater, because genuine learning and teaching have become so narrowed that they have been sacrificed in order to meet a astoundingly hollow numerical objective.
I apologize in advance if this is not clear.
😎
LikeLike
I think you’re on to something, Krazy TA.
LikeLike
“Nonetheless, I think the damage done is just as great, perhaps greater, because genuine learning and teaching have become so narrowed that they have been sacrificed in order to meet a astoundingly hollow numerical objective.”
Excellent.
Now, how do we make this stop?
I am spending the afternoon working on my “data” (as mandated by the district.)
What a load of crap.
LikeLike
Many (most?) people do not understand what a standardized test is or the concept of sampling. When students are prepped for these tests from September to May, the results are invalid.
LikeLike
…she might want to consider (once again for the sake of accuracy) to rename her school Success Test-Prep Academy.
LikeLike
The focus on test prep described is amazingly similar to what I experienced teaching in one of the highest MCAS scoring districts in a suburb of Boston. When the MCAS first rolled out, the district did poorly. Wealthy parents were outraged and teachers were embarassed. Our principal said her only goal was to be #1 in test scores the following year. And we were. Each year, that little elementary school vied for #1, and stayed in the top 10-ish range every year following. We instituted all of these same teach-to-test methods. Perhaps not quite as long hours and less bribes with rewards, but that was surely because we had kids who were already overwhelmingly able to score highly thanks to their socioeconomic background and highly educated parents. Even our ELL students came here with parents doing post-doctoral studies or working in high level technology or medical fields. We did rank kids 1, 2, 3, 4 on every assignment and we did drop much in the non-tested subjects. As the test dates drew closer, our principal would give motivational speaches over the loudspeaker and give students hand-written notes to say how proud we all are of their hard work. The PTO would offer an ice cream or pizza party to kids after the tests were over to celebrate. As for curriculum planning, yes, we would go through the previous year’s scores on each kid and analyze who got what wrong and what we needed to cover more thoroughly. All of our lauguage arts curricula was eventually replaced with previous years’ tests as practice and test prep books. Spelling and grammar doesn’t count on the open response questions, so that fell by the wayside. Handwriting ledgibility doesn’t count so no one practiced writing and we had no cursive. I always had to wonder how much the poor handwriting quality of the 5th graders influenced the test readers’ scoring? (My own kids were being made to write and do worksheets at an age when I was coloring and cutting and playing at the sand table and now two have a barely functional pencil grips and difficulty writing neatly and quickly.) In order to make sure we had kids prepared, we pushed the 5th grade level science content all the way down to kindergarten and got them drilling on vocabulary early. When the state dropped the social studies portion of the test, I recall my fellow teacher dancing in her room because she “didn’t have to teach social studies now!” The biggest kicker was, we were the opposite of schools that try to avoid providing SPED resources to students in an effort to save money. We happily put anyone on a plan because written into every plan was test-taking accomodations such as: administer test in a separate setting, read aloud and clarify directions, provide a scribe for written answers, provide use of a graphic organizer, or provide use of math manipulatives. So we would “provide a lot of help” on tests!
For what it’s worth, this is a district where easily 95% of graduating seniors will get into a college of their choice and would surely do so with or without standardized tests. The best thing about the high test scores was the positive impact on real estate values! Parents clamored to move into the district. The district had to rezone schools because we became over-crowded. The principal eventually left for an elite, private elementary school.
I left teaching 5 years ago and my licensure has lapsed.
LikeLike
This is schooling? This is a test prep factory. I can’t believe this is schooling in America. Bizarre. This is nothing but chasing after test scores. This is not learning.
LikeLike
In the long run, we will pay quite a price for all this.
LikeLike
“We do not cheat on the tests, as some critics speculate.”
YES YOU DO:
“Custom Test Prep Materials: I think many schools use practice workbooks from publishers like Kaplan, etc. We have people whose job it is to put together custom test prep packets based on state guidance.”
This is called “teaching THE test” which is even worse than teaching to the test. They both disqualify the results of the test. Tests are supposed to find out how much students know, not how well they were prepared.
LikeLike
Exactly, Jim. When the charter schools’ CEO is a politician who has friends in high places, “state guidance” could very well mean she had access to the actual tests. At a minimum, she may have been given insider info about the tests, so her schools could have “Custom Test Prep Materials” designed that were “Much more aligned to common core and closer to the test than the published books I’ve seen” –while other schools were not privy to details about the Common Core being on the test.
And how does the SA teacher know this about the tests? Do SA teachers have access to tests that teachers in neighborhood schools are not permitted to see? Who administers the tests at SA and who administers them in neighborhood schools?
LikeLike
Cosmic Tinker: most excellent point!
Let’s add into the mix—as has been in-your-face evident in recent comments on this blog by SA supporters—that you are convinced you are in a winner-takes-all war with public schools. That is, not even the now-dated pretense that charters are the rising tide that lifts all public school boats, but a no-holds-barred agreement with Michelle Rhee that “cooperation, collaboration and consensus-building are way overrated.” Get your zero-sum game face on!
Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/31/AR2009103102357.html
With emotions running higher and higher in the EdufraudEchoChamber, what’s to stop the practices your describe—or worse—from happening?
Answer: little or nothing.
Not when “all’s fair in love and war” for edupreneurs and edubullies and edufrauds—and when love = $tudent $ucce$$ and war = get rid of the public school competition.
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Front Line Teachers and commented:
“…at the expense of actual learning.”
LikeLike
Interesting article on another (unintended?) consequence of all this testing and the test prep that goes with it. Seems, that in order to achieve better test trusts we are diagnosing, labeling and medicating our children at a heck of a pace.
Is this a feature or a bug?
Hum…
“What the team found was that high rates of ADHD diagnoses correlated closely with state laws that penalize schools when students fail. Nationally, this approach to education was enacted into law in 2001 with No Child Left Behind, which makes funding contingent on the number of students who pass standardized tests. In more recent years, similar testing-based strategies have been championed by education reformers such as Michelle Rhee. But many states passed these accountability laws as early as the 1980s, and within a few years of passage, ADHD diagnoses started going up in those states, the authors found, especially for kids near the poverty line.”
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/01/the_truth_about_adhd_over_diagnosis_linked_to_cause_championed_by_michelle_rhee/
LikeLike
All the more reason for parents to encourage their children to “opt out” from standardized testing. If we can stop the incessant testing, many of the problems we face in education today will be diminished greatly. “Success Charters” will have to resort to actual teaching, teachers will be able to utilize what they KNOW to be best practices in teaching and learning, students will actually return to liking school and perhaps we will still have a chance to produce well rounded, well educated, productive members of society with the ability to think critically and independently. What a novel idea.
LikeLike
I like what was written here. However, I would take issue with this comment: “Put the best teachers in testing grades.” Are they the best teachers? Or are they the ones that buy into the testing/extreme discipline culture? Are they the best teachers, or the just the ones that intimidate the kids enough to make them sit in their desks.
What I have seen characterized as “Best teachers” are often the people that are the most controlling. The ones that love the “no opt-out” rule of teach like a champion. The ones that are later referred to as the reason someone “Left school,” The ones that are able to “make the kids do what their told.” I don’t think that these are the best teachers as much as they are the biggest bullies.
LikeLike
The insider reports that students have special subjects daily, but I would be curious to know if their related arts schedules, as well as the students in said classes, are in a constant state if flux–a morphing arts course enrollment based on the daily ELA and math “achievement” scores of the students.
This kind of daily re-arrangement of scheduling and class enrollment has been going on for well over a decade at some of the NYC charters.
Bronx Prep was taking these liberties 12 years ago. My ex-husband was the music teacher back then hired on the heels of a very popular music teacher who quit mid-year because of this nonsense.
His “arts program” was modified on a daily basis because of changes to the test prep grouping. The principal also had specific requirements for the group’s performance:
1) The rehearsal schedule was changed daily to accommodate extra test prep where “needed.”
2) Many of his students whose daily scores were low were not allowed to attend the rehearsals on a daily basis and instead had to engage in extra work on their weak areas. 3) His students were kicked out of their rehearsal space a few days a week because it was needed for remedial groups.
4) His students had to tote cellos, string basses, keyboards, amplifiers (yes, this school wanted an orchestra with guitars and keyboards) to and from the revolving rehearsal spots every day, many if which were in areas on upper floors of the old building with no elevators and only narrow staircases (oh, they also had to walk in complete silence or earn demerits).
5) His orchestra had to “audition” for the principal (who was not a musician nor music specialist) in order to perform at the concert in front of endowing dignitaries. If they were not found to be “good enough,” they would not be allowed to perform despite all of their hard work.
When my ex stood up to the “principal” stating that these circumstances were impeding the students’ music education, she fired him on the spot and had him escorted out of the building by security as if a criminal. He was not allowed to speak to any staff member or student during this process. There was no hearing–no opportunity to defend himself. He was just gone in an instant. All that mattered was the test scores…the orchestra was just a PR machine to impress those making donations. That was not arts education.
BTW, he was teaching a half-day schedule as a first year teacher with no certification and making more than I was as a full-time, certified public school teacher with four years of experience. He just wasn’t treated like a teacher with thoughts of his own. He filed for unemployment.
LikeLike
Regarding charter school “success” on state exams, consider this: Pools of charter schools teachers score charter school students’ ELA and Math written/extended responses, separately from district public school scoring. I have for several years worked in day and per session scoring of these 3-8 grade exams, as a district public school teacher. Last year I heard from a charter school teacher who participated in ELA and Math scoring in one such pool. She reported that her scoring was repeatedly found to be excessively low and was adjusted accordingly to give the student a higher score. She felt that this was considered an opportunity by charter school administrators to pump up their scores. We are not allowed to score exams from our district. Why are charter school teachers allowed to score exams exclusively from charter schools? Why aren’t pools of scorers integrated such that no potential conflicts of interest exist?
LikeLike
Maybe I only speak for myself having difficulty separating marketing, buzz word manipulation of test scores, the constant drum beat that has nothing to do with reality. Everyone goes along to get along and wow aren’t we slapped in the face. Newspapers so eager to print the next stupid new idea and we go along with it because we are sheep. We all should be humiliated by how we were so taken in by the nonsense of white noise of school reform. I only speak for myself not for the collective educators especially from Teach for America who are so much smarter than everyone else but I am surprised that the man behind the curtain took so long to be exposed.
LikeLike
Any advice for these students, who are challenging the NYC district bureaucracy about another problem?
LikeLike