It is a strange world we live in, when schools are compelled to compete for “customers” and when some chain schools hold themselves up as owners of a “secret sauce” to produce high test scores, and some individuals market themselves as savants. We have a plethora of savants, individuals who claim that they alone have cured vexing educational problems. They boast, and their boasting naturally draws scrutiny.
Steve Perry, who is principal of a magnet school in Hartford, Connecticut, has perfected the style of the boastful savant. He used to be a commentator on CNN, which accepted his self-portrait as a miracle man. He recently created a managent company to open charter schools at a hefty fee. He claims a graduation rate of 100%.
No one has been more relentless in fact-checking Perry’s claims than Connecticut political analyst and blogger Jonathan Pelto. See here and numerous other entries.
In his latest blog, Pelto shows that Perry’s school has lower test scores for African American students than the much-maligned public schools of Hartford. yet Perry now seeks to open more schools.
A couple of years ago, when I checked various “miracle schools,” none turned out to be true. All had high attrition, skimming, or other ways of manufacturing high scores. And then there are charters who get high scores by turning children into “little test-taking machines.” This is the current definition of “success,” but there are no careers that rely on test-taking. It is difficult to see the exaltation of the ability to guess the one right answer as the key to success in college or careers.

It’s fascinating how little interest the “data-driven decision makers” among the education deformers have in actual data about performance.
From the Reformish Lexicon:
data chat. Local-level meeting to enforce the will of the Common Core Curriculum Commissariat and Ministry of Truth (C^4MiniTru). See waterboarding.
data-driven decision making. Rheformish numerology.
data wall. Public shaming device and demotivational tool; the equivalent, in schools, of targets and production figures for pig iron, etc., continually broadcast by every Fascist regime.
failure. What U.S. public schools did before they were replaced by virtual charters run by the grifter brothers, cousins, and golfing buddies of Party members.
research. Process by which one gathers and manipulates numerical information to yield the outcomes one was looking for to begin with. See data-driven decision making.
rigor. General-purpose descriptive to lend an air of value, necessity, and inevitability to any product of the Reformish propaganda mills and curriculum mines, derived from logic and mathematics, where the term denotes susceptibility to algorithmic truth-checking.
technocratic Philistinism. Replacement for quaint values of humane scholarship and research, teaching and learning; another name for the Rheformish faith.
VAM. Value-Added Measurement, or Vacuity-of-curriculum-and-pedagogy Acceleration Mechanism; means for enforcing the reduction of the complex, unquantifiable, humane enterprise of teaching and learning to a number intended to measure the extent to which a teacher has
a) effectively narrowed his or her curricula to the bullet list of “standards”;
b) based his or her pedagogy on extrinsic punishment and reward;
c) robotically parroted his or her canned scripts;
d) modeled for his or her students absolute obsequiousness to superiors; and
e) identically milled his or her differing students to specification, via test preparation, thereby inuring them to the performance of meaningless tasks and preparing them for the low-wage service jobs of the future.
LikeLike
I love how crazy it is that his whole theory rests on firing people (“from the lunch ladies on up”) yet he seems to be completely immune from getting fired.
How long has the investigation into his misuse of state time for his own private projects been going on now? He seems to be enjoying some due process. Under his own “fire than all and let God sort them out” management theory, he should have been gone by now.
It seems to be really difficult to fire an ed reformer in management. Can someone point me to a single high profile reformer who has EVER been fired (other than by an election, I mean).
What are the odds, right? Ed reformers in management have a 100% retention rate! They’re 100% excellent!
LikeLike
I love your “fire them all and let God sort them out” analogy, Chiara.
For those who don’t know, this is a reference to an event that occurred in 1209 when forces of the Inquisition, led by Arnaud Amalric, besieged the city of Béziers in southern France, where the Cathar heresy was practiced.
When asked how to sort the Roman Catholics from the heretics in the city, Amalric answered, “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius”–“Kill them all. For the Lord knows those who are his.”
The papal forces massacred the roughly 14,500 men, women, children, and infants of the city.
What did the Cathars do to deserve this? Well, they practiced such horrific heresies as vegetarianism, equation of god with love, rejection of materialism, belief in reincarnation, and dualism.
LikeLike
Charter CEOs have a job for life. They conveniently are never “accountable”. They employ their friends and family members and rake in dollars. But, it’s worth it because they alone are saving America and fighting for civil rights.
LikeLike
Post secondary schools have always been compelled to compete for “customers” as have private primary and secondary schools and public magnet schools. It does not seem to be so very strange a world to me.
LikeLike
Post-secondary schools also have admissions policies that will disallow students from attending their schools. Not every applicant gets in. They have greater control over their student body composition.
Should we move that model to K-12? How many 11 year olds will find themselves denied admission to every school they apply to?
LikeLike
By the way, those admission policies also apply to private and magnet schools. So should every school do that? I have students who didn’t get into local parochials due to any number of factors. In fact, we have special ed students here whose older siblings went to Catholic schools but they don’t. Guess why?
LikeLike
Traditional zoned public schools use a different admission system based on geography, and have jailed parents for violating that admission procedure. Eleven year olds are denied admission to almost all traditional public school.
LikeLike
TE,
“Eleven year olds are denied admission to almost all traditional public school.
Disingenuous nonsense.
Obvious difference….the 11 year old WILL DEFINITELY, FOR SURE, be admitted to the school they are zoned for. In fact, in many instances, if that 11 year old turns out to have any number of psychiatric, behavioral, emotional or learning issues, that same school will not be able to turn him away. Yep, he will still be offered an education.
Cool, huh?
LikeLike
Let me propose another system, where students whose second letter of their first name determines which school they attend. Students with letters A – G will attend eastern middle school, students with letters H-M will attend western middle school, students with letters N-Q will attend northern middle school, and students with letters R-Z will attend southern middle school. That would satisfy your criteria that all students DEFINITELY,
FOR SURE will be admitted to a school in the district. Pretty cool, huh?
If you don’t like the letter system, we could do it based on the first digit of the social security number, the second digit, or if the day of the year a student is born is prime or divisible by three or any other admission system that covers all the possible students.
If you object that travel time will be higher with this system, the same is often true with the geographic system. Students living in my address, for example, are assigned to the second closest middle school in my town, not the closest. Students living in my address are assigned to the high school that is furthest away from the their home address.
In the end, arbitrary is arbitrary.
LikeLike
More silly, disingenuous misdirection.
So, obviously, splitting up similar age kids from the same families and kids who live in close proximity to one another would not be cost effective or practical. (yes, I am sure you can pull your usual trick and find some outlier example where this happens, but you KNOW it is not the norm).
Busing cost money and (at least down here) we are required to provide transportation. Parents needing to attend various meetings and school events will have extra burdens of going to several schools and going to schools potentially very far from the home.
So, no. Not cool. IMHO.
Re: “Students living in my address are assigned to the high school that is furthest away from the their home address.”
Sounds like a problem you should take up with your elected school board.
LikeLike
Certainly treating each student as an individual rather than a street address is more expensive. The interesting thing about choice schools is that the parents can decide if the school is worth the extra burden. I think that is better that the parents make the decision for themselves.
The issue in my town is that the school board is seeking to balance SES across schools, and the school board has put more weight on that goal than making parents lives easier.
LikeLike
TE,
Is the goal post heavy?
Anyway…
“The interesting thing about choice schools is that the parents can decide if the school is worth the extra burden”
Yep.
And they can pay for it, too.
If you want me to chip in, I want a voice and I want some benefit.
We apparently disagree.
Fine.
LikeLike
Do you think it is only the children of the relatively wealthy that can benefit from acing their parents decide what sacrifices to make or that only the children of the relatively wealthy deserve it?
LikeLike
I am also curious about how much say you want because you “chip in”. Would you give the teacher in the school wide latitude, demand strict adherence to a particular curriculum, or something in between?
LikeLike
That’s rather thin TE. Every 11 year old in our geographic zone is admitted without any decision coming from the school. Parochial and magnets can reject kids who live across the street from their schools. They have TOTAL control of who gets in. Public schools don’t. That’s a huge difference.
And in this era of competition, I can tell you that residency checks are virtually non-existent. My district has plenty of kids that don’t live in our “geographic” boundaries.
LikeLike
My point is that all schools have admission criteria. I think using a geographically based criteria results in irresistible pressure to standardize public schools which is why I prefer alternative admission criteria for schools.
Enforcement of geographic admission criteria seems to differ from state to state, district to district.
In Ohio, Ms. Kelley Williams-Bolar was jailed for sending her children to a school in the Copley-Fairlawn District in January of 2011.
The Clifton, New Jersey school district offers a $300 bounty to anyone who gives them information about an out of district student attending a Clifton district school.
The Clark school district has a retired police officer to investigate illegal students.
In 2010-2011 school the Chesapeake School District investigated 5,000 and expelled 45 by early February of that year, a lower rate than previous year when 223 were expelled. The lower totals might be the result of budget cuts: in 2010-11 the district only had two full time investigators instead of the four full time investigators that it usually employs.
Other examples are easy to find.
LikeLike
I’m sure you can find other examples. But there’s no way I can quantify what a tiny percentage that actually is in relation to the number of kids attending schools that they are not geographically designated to.
Note that the difference of admission criteria to a regular public school is simple and not based on applying to lotteries, meeting prerequisite performance requirements and parental participation. My point is that public schools have far LESS control over the make up of their student bodies.
You’re implying that all admissions requirements are equal. They clearly are not. We have to take a severe special needs child if he lives in the district. Charters don’t. Parochials don’t. Privates don’t. They all have the ability to either deny admission or usher out that student. We don’t. That’s a huge difference.
LikeLike
The geographic admission system has it’s own complexities and expenses. The way illegal students are typically caught, for example, is through school employees or hired private investigators. (Here is an Al Jazeera story about a detective agency in New Jersey that specializes in finding illegal students for public school districts:http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/america-tonight/america-tonight-blog/2014/1/20/stealing-educationsoledadobrien.html )
I am not claiming all admission requirements are equal. I am claiming that different admission requirements have different impacts on how schools are managed in a district or state. If families are given no choice of which school to attend, the political system will face an irresistible pressure to standardize what goes on inside the school in order to make the lack of choice irrelevant. Parents will simply not put up with their child being assigned (or not assigned) to a Waldorf school because of their street address unless ALL the possible schools are Waldorf (or not Waldorf) schools
LikeLike
“My district has plenty of kids that don’t live in our “geographic” boundaries.”
Ditto
LikeLike
Those students are attending your school illegally. They are fugitives, and their parents run the risk of going to jail and/or being fined in the tens of thousands of dollars. Rye Public School in New York, for example, charges out of district parents $30,000 a year for tuition. They will want their pound of flesh from any out of district student that cheats the system.
LikeLike
“They will want their pound of flesh from any out of district student that cheats the system”.
I am aware of no prosecutions in my district.
LikeLike
TE,
“. . . Traditional zoned public schools use a different admission system based on geography. . . ”
The public schools are not based on geography but on political/governmental areas based in law. It is the constitution, through the laws that define said “catchment” areas which by definition have to be “geographical”.
LikeLike
And it is not an “admission system”. That is not the proper description for what is occurring.
LikeLike
Sure it is. Any student with some special characteristic (lives at this street address, holds a winning number in an admission lottery, etc) is admitted to a school. Any student without those characteristics is not admitted. I think it is just so ubiquitous an admission policy that folks are not used to seeing if for what it is.
LikeLike
Admission is based on street address. Yes, the system has a basis in law. So does the lottery system of admissions in NYC.
LikeLike
K-12 competing for customers is pathetic. There should be stable neighborhood schools for children to attend. It shouldn’t be a crap shoot from year to year whether funds exist to educate children properly. The Sec. of Ed. at the state and national level should be experienced individuals who actually help to create real standards for education so parents and children don’t get ripped off by edushysters!!!!
LikeLike
“K-12 competing for customers is pathetic.”
Agree.
They are not customers. They are children and their families members of my community. A customer is someone you sell something to. I serve my community.
LikeLike
Is Steve Perry ineffective under his own measure, and if so, who will fire him?
Steve Perry might have to apply his own management principles and fire himself.
This is some job protection racket they’ve set up. I almost admire it. They can turn in any performance at all, and if they’re analyzed or criticized it’s “the unions are after me!” or “people are protecting the status quo” or (my favorite) “people are afraid of my bold, brilliant reforms”
The management tier in ed reform have effectively immunized themselves from any kind of rational performance review, which may be why they never get fired.
LikeLike
Nobody!!! He has a job for life! It is the scam of scams.
LikeLike
Perry’s individual performance is worthy of review, but I don’t want to forget what the public was sold on ed reform. The public was sold that national ed reformers like Steve Perry would IMPROVE public schools. Not run magnet schools. Not open charter schools. Improve public schools. That’s what they said they were about. I haven’t seen any evidence of this, but that was the stated goal of this “movement”.
How’s that going? We have thousands of paid ed reformers, and many of them are paid by the public. What are the results for existing public schools?
LikeLike
Thanks, Chiara, for reminding us what the public was sold about how charters and ed reformers would improve public schools. This seems to have been forgotten as charters are seeking more opportunities to grow, many times to the detriment (e.g., co-location) of public schools.
LikeLike
I have despised this man ever since he was the guest on Melissa Harris Perry’s show about a year and a half ago. He was spewing horrible lies, like first year teachers making $50,000, so we shouldn’t feel sorry for them. Meanwhile, I was in my first year teaching, making a good $15,000 less than that *before* taxes, in an expensive metropolitan area Title I school. His claims are outlandish and it honestly makes my blood boil that he goes on national TV with that stuff (and that MHP would have him on the show!). He said other ridiculous lies again, but I’ll have to get on my home computer to remember those.
LikeLike
Read Jonathan Pelto’s blog regularly for the scoop on this snake oil salesman.
You will learn that he spends an extreme amount of time away from his school jet setting around the country giving for profit personal speaking engagements.
You will learn that he doesn’t really believe in the concept of ‘bullying’, and that he bullies his teachers all the time, as well as allowing students to bully one another in his midst.
You will learn that he forces ill mannered children sit at The Table Of Shame to eat lunch alone while surrounded by peers.
You will learn about his inappropriate and threatening Twitter tantrums and rants. Sample, “All that did was piss me off!… Strap up- there are going to be head injuries!” after not getting his way on an initiative.
You will see him argue with blog posters, under any one of his MANY ‘handles’ with parents about the behavior of children that lead them to deserve the bullying the child received, unabated, under his care.
You will be sickened by how much “America’s most trusted educator’ A NAME HE GAVE HIMSELF, gets away with!
LikeLike
Joy,
Don’t spend too much time looking at them, you don’t want to pollute your mind anymore than you have to.
Duane
LikeLike
It just shows how worthless people like MHP are because she did nothing to cross check his facts. No one has. The people like Rhee go on these shows and spout bs and no one holds them accountable.
LikeLike
Chiara Duggan: the disruptive and self-destructive management style of “fire your way to excellence” is only to be applied to those under ownership and top management.
A well-known example of same is the recently discontinued stack ranking/forced ranking/rank-and-yank/churn-and-burn system of evaluation and retention/expulsion at Microsoft. It was an unmitigated disaster. *For current examples, think VAManiacal teacher and school evals.*
[start quote]
Eichenwald’s conversations reveal that a management system known as “stack ranking”—a program that forces every unit to declare a certain percentage of employees as top performers, good performers, average, and poor—effectively crippled Microsoft’s ability to innovate. “Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of Microsoft, something that drove out untold numbers of employees,” Eichenwald writes. “If you were on a team of 10 people, you walked in the first day knowing that, no matter how good everyone was, 2 people were going to get a great review, 7 were going to get mediocre reviews, and 1 was going to get a terrible review,” says a former software developer. “It leads to employees focusing on competing with each other rather than competing with other companies.”
[end quote]
Link: http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2012/07/microsoft-downfall-emails-steve-ballmer
Strangely [?], the excellencies of this management by the numbers system were not enjoyed [?] by those who ran Microsoft. Like their “education reform” counterparts today, only those doing all the actual work were subject to the alleged benefits of said data-driven evaluations. Those applying the system exempted themselves from its strictures.
I wonder why that would be?
Wait a minute. During the recent “negotiations” [I use the term loosely] of LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy with the LAUSD board, he came out a winner despite the fact that, well, I quote from a Los Angeles Times piece that bore the subtitle “Supt. John Deasy, whose annual review will be conducted Tuesday, failed to meet many goals he set for himself. Even so, school board members and civic leaders cite long-term gains”:
[start quote]
On the eve of discussions over his future, Los Angeles schools Supt. John Deasy can count on broad support from the civic elite, but by his own yardsticks, his performance fell notably short this year.
Deasy set ambitious and specific targets to measure progress in the nation’s second-largest school system — and in category after category, he failed to hit his marks, even though L.A. Unified maintained a long trend of gradual improvement.
He didn’t reach goals in eight of nine academic categories measured by test scores. He also slipped behind in his targets for boosting the graduation rate and in attendance for students and teachers. He shined, however, in two categories: reducing the number of instructional days lost to suspensions and in the percentage of students who feel safe at school.
[end quote]
Link: http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-lausd-deasy-20131029,0,2199450,full.story#axzz2j57NzKVh
Double standards? Let’s see… From the same LATimes piece:
[start quote]
Roosevelt High School teacher Lisa Alva, a former Deasy supporter, said, however, that the superintendent has talked consistently about data, applying it to the fates of teachers and principals. Since he failed to meet his targets, he should possibly be put on probation, she said, and questioned whether his pay should also be docked in keeping with executive practices tying pay to performance.
“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander,” Alva said. “If we’re going to be held to standards that include test data and all kinds of metrics, so should he.”
[end quote]
So the education establishment applies one standard to themselves and another to everyone else?
“Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue.” [François de la Rochefoucauld]
He nailed it. And he’s not even an old dead Greek guy.
😎
LikeLike
When wolves smell the scent of blood or sense a weakness in their prey, they attack in packs. Steve Perry is a perfect example of today’s carpetbagger joining the human pack that plans to ravage the corpse of public eduction once they pull it down and go for the jugular.
If we were to use the latest brain scans on these carpetbaggers, I’m convinced that we’d discover the minds of sociopath and/or psychopaths.
LikeLike
And if we were to scan the minds of most career teachers, we’d discover the minds of empaths willing to die when their students are threatened by a psychopathic killer.
LikeLike
Dr. Steve Perry has never EVER been a K-12 teacher anywhere. I am unsure if/how he earned the CT 092 cert to be a principal without the 3 years minimum classroom experience CT requires to be an administrator.
These are the resumes of everyone chosen to be founders of his new charter school (still in the application process) in Bridgeport. http://courantblogs.com/cityline/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Harbor-Application-Part5.pdf
LikeLike
The resumes are fluffed, but, worse, there are many outright lies. For example, The Graduate Institute does not offer a degree in secondary education, so how could they have granted Beganski one?
LikeLike