Peter Greene, an English teacher and blogger in Pennsylvania, reviewed the wild and wacky video made by the staff at the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Apparently the kids there wanted the world to see them as fun-loving buddies who can laugh at themselves, but Greene thinks it didn’t work. Despite the high production values, there is something unfunny about Fordham’s policy ideas (no to smaller classes, yes to Common Core).
Greene, you will note, updated his post at a time when he was teaching William Faulkner’s Light in August to high school students, a task we may assume is as valuable (more valuable?) to society than having a desk job in Washington and telling the nation’s teachers what they ought to be doing.
He writes:
“Final effect? People making wacky shenanigans out of policy ideas that are being used to destroy public education? It’s a hard thing to parse– how would “Springtime for Hitler” have come across if it had been staged by the Nazis themselves? I am not meaning to suggest that Fordham = Nazis, but I do wonder what we’re to make of people making themselves look more ridiculous that we could make them look on purpose.
“It is part of the tone deafness problem. I want to shake them and say, “Did you not see this? Do you not know how you look, both awkward and opposite-of-cool, while making jokes about policies being used to destroy peoples’ careers?” Somehow while shooting for cool and relaxed and with it, they’ve hit uncool and callous, thereby suggesting that they are imbued with so much hubris and arrogance that they either can’t see or don’t care (because only unimportant people will be bothered, and they don’t matter). This is the education industry equivalent of those bankers’ videos of obscenely wealthy parties, the Christmas cards from wealthy apartments, the total lack of understanding of what things are like out there on the street, because the street is just for the commoners who don’t matter.
“It’s an oddly fascinating train wreck. Is it awesomely funny because it’s so awful, or is it too awful to be funny. Whatever the case, it gives a strong 2:20 feel for what sort of attitude permeates Fordham, and it is just as bad as we ever imagined. maybe worse.”

They mock status quo while they portray status quo…a white guy who can’t dance while spewing hateful and disjointed rhetoric to ridicule and shame.
What did this cost to make? Maybe not too much evidently.
The fool Petrill, or whatever his name is, could have donated books to a school library.
How embarrassing for his children. How embarrassing for our nation when fools like this preach to real educators.
LikeLike
I think Fordham should come back to Ohio and clean up the mess they made. I just marvel that they’re constantly quoted in national media as the go-to experts on privatizing public schools.
Charter schools in this state are a mess, it gets worse every year, and the brain trust there at Fordham in the video have done not one thing to remedy the chaos they created in this state. Thankfully, even the Columbus Dispatch is finally catching on:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/01/12/watchdogs-can-profit-from-oversight.html
When I read that they were parachuting into rural areas as their next big think tank project all I could think was “why don’t they fix the mess they made in Ohio urban areas first?”
LikeLike
Is this model economically viable in rural areas? The definition of rural is large underpopulated geographical areas–in which case a charter can’t use the ‘choice’ sham. How many tens of miles will a rural kid on a two lane roads go to a sub-par charter school? Suburban parents are more savvy to be duped by charter PR blitz. Is chartering the nation confined to poverty urban areas?
LikeLike
Enron. Remember the emails and phone conversations? The smartest guys in the room?
LikeLike
Also, can someone else get quoted in this state by media? I recognize they’re all sitting around ready to pontificate on the public schools in this state none of them have so much as entered, but give me a break. I didn’t elect any of them, and I have no earthly idea who they are or why they seem to be running public education policy in this state.
Let’s shake this up a little. I’m more than tired of reading the Milton Friedman musings on my local public schools. Ask a teacher, ask a mayor, ask a school board member. Just because they churn out opinions that fit neatly into 8 column inches doesn’t mean any of it is worth listening to.
LikeLike
Stellar analysis.
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
I would cast teacher’s unions as the gadfly of education history, considering they have had to do nothing but fight to stay alive for a massive chunk of the twentieth century. They have never been the status quo. The status quo is the collective unwillingness to build an education infrastructure that won’t be torn down every other decade. Being the most recent policy wonk to divert attention from the real obstacles to quality, equitable education does not make a person Socrates.
LikeLike
I mistyped my email address from my comment under “Drew” on the peter Greene post.
Aphend2@uic.edu (originally uii)
Thanks Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
How embarrassing for everyone involved on this video!
LikeLike
Well, obviously this takes all professional credibility away from Thomas B. Fordham Institute!
They seem to be celebrating, dancing around their pot of Gold, poking fun and laughing at the rest of us for trying to save Education while Rome is burning yet they are cashing in for saying things their corporate sponsors want to hear!
LikeLike
I’m not teacher or an education expert, but I have watched the Fordham-style charter system in Ohio for nearly two decades now, and I have a question.
Is there anything Fordham can learn from public schools? Now that we’re watching the charter sector authorizing and regulatory system collapse in their home state of Ohio, would they be open to learning something about governance of a public entity from a public school system? How’s laissez-faire working out for the people who live here?
Because right now the “charter sector” in this state are pointing fingers at the schools, at the authorizers, at state government, at everyone but the various think tanks and roundtables that set the charter system up.
Maybe having the state “authorize” charter schools rather than regulate charter schools wasn’t smart. Maybe getting rid of school boards and having mayors “relinquish” responsibility and accountability for public schools wasn’t such a hot idea after all.
LikeLike
Last year (because of my handle) I made a tests = Hunger Games joke here. One of the other commenters linked to a YouTube video made by middle school kids and their teachers which give full visualization to that concept. Browsing the sidebar I saw that this was one of like 10 Hunger Games/Test Prep parody videos and that they all were just a tiny subset of the larger test prep performance/pep rally/parody video genre that had 100s, maybe 1000s of representations.
These videos are sweet and silly and full of “pep” (and provide an opportunity to make one’s teachers do funny stuff.) Many of them are extremely energetic and creative and involve lots of work (some have as high production values as the Fordham Institute one) but they are also sort of sad and desperate – a game attempt to put a positive face on something to avoid rage and despair. How nice it would be if this creativity and energy could be focused on something that advanced actual learning goals?
The YouTube parody video, cosplay, flash mobs – these are communication forms of the little people “talking back.” Does Fordham Institute think they can legitimately participate in that space?
Some examples of test prep parodies and or pep rallies:
LikeLike
The one idea with very solid research behind it – smaller class size – they are against ! ? God help us…
LikeLike
Do these Fordham types also play Cards Against Humanity education reform edition?
LikeLike
“. . . it is just as bad as we ever imagined. maybe worse.”
Indeed, someone has said that “truth is stranger than fiction”. Point understood!
LikeLike
Oh Lord, the Byron-y …
LikeLike
Byron • Don Juan (1823)
LikeLike
That is one of the sickest videos I have ever seen. And I don’t mean that in a good way.
The part that probably offends me the most is to realize that the maleovelent people who made this probably went to fancy private schools with a maximum of 18 kids per class; yet their one comprehensible policy suggestion is “Smaller Classes NO!” — aimed at our nation’s beleaguered urban public schools. (Remember Michael Bloomberg famously advocating firing half the NYC teachers and doubling the class sizes to 50?)
LikeLike
EASY – call Diane a kook
HARD – show up and debate her
LikeLike
Very creepy … Perhaps a cry for help?
The contents of the film indicate a break with reality as their reform tactics have become the status quo. It is definitely not funny as many students and educators have been devastated by their policies.
LikeLike
This video has been rated CC-17. Common Core-Not Suitable for Children.
LikeLike