Archives for the year of: 2014

Blogger Peter Goodman writes that the Néw York Board of Regents has a charter problem: they have low standards and refuse to be held accountable.

The Refents approved the Greater Works charter inRochester without investigating the qualifications of the lead applicant and CEO. The young man claimed to have many degrees, but none were verified by journalists. The Regents’ first response was that the State Education Department was to blame, and they insisted that the school would open anyway. Eventually, with so much terrible publicity, the Refents decided not to open the charter. Along the way, a spokesman for the State Education Department defended the approval by saying that they review proposals, not individuals. This was as outrageous as the approval of the proposal. Would the SED approve a beautifully written proposal from Charles Manson? Really.

The Regents also approved a charter for Steve Perry of Hartford, who modestly calls himself “America’s Most Trusted Educator” and is frequently away from his desk making speeches in other cities. Jonathan Pelto has called for an investigation of Perry’s plan to use materials developed and owned by the Hartford Public Schools in his private charter operation. He has also written that Perry’s academic results are below those of the Hartford public schools for African-American males. He is noted for bluntness; last year, in a speech in Minneapolis, he referred to teachers’ unions as “roaches.” Count on him for provocative rhetoric.

The Regents should take care in authorizing charter schools. They got egg on their faces over the Richester schools. Parents across the state are outraged by their obsession with standardized testing. At the very least, they should move forward with prudence and listen to the public, whom they are supposed to serve.

In this incisive article posted on Salon, Elias Isquith points out that it is not enough to chant slogans about the young black men who have been murdered, without any consequences for those who murdered them. He is particularly concerned about the cautiousness of Democratic politicians, who are seeking some line to straddle to show that they are “balanced.” The exception in this case is Mayor Bill de Blasio, who was able to speak of his family, his warnings to his children, his fears for their safety, and centuries of racism.

 

As a society, we cannot continue to exonerate those who kill young black men. When it is done by a police officer, it is even more horrible. Each instance is abhorrent in its own way. In New York City, Eric Garner was put into a chokehold, which suffocated him; police regulations specifically ban the use of the chokehold because of its deadly consequences.

 

Again, actions matter more than words. What will President Obama do? What will the Department of Justice do? What will governors and legislatures do? What will police departments do? More black and Hispanic police officers would help. But much more is needed to eradicate the attitudes behind the actions. Citizens, whatever their race, should not fear the police, whose job is to protect them, not to kill them.

 

 

Peter Berger teaches English at Weathersfield High School in Vermont. He says that the amount of instructional time wasted for faux professional development days is absurd. Equally absurd is the time and money wasted on consultants touring the latest fad, who never were teachers.

Likewise, the new online Common Core tests are a boon to the tech corporations, but not to the students, who actually write more on paper-and-pencil tests.

“I’ve stood behind my eighth-grade students as they’ve taken several publishers’ Common Core era tests. The directions were convoluted, the questions frequently did “focus on small details” and isolated, obscure bits of literary terminology, rather than on “overall comprehension,” and the questions often were ambiguous. Many were actually indecipherable, with words missing and incorrectly arranged so that students were left asking me what the question meant, and I was left to fill in the syntactical blanks and guess what they were being asked to do.

“The myth that these assessments are scientifically designed to generate meaningful data is insupportable. Any such guarantee is a fraud. Last week’s test was accompanied by a notice that the assessment contractor had added five questions to the test this year, for a total of 20 questions, in order to “provide more accurate test scores and less fluctuation in scores between test windows.”

“In other words, students, teachers, and schools that failed last time, and suffered interventions and sanctions as a result, maybe didn’t fail. Of course, students, teachers, and schools that appeared to succeed maybe didn’t succeed.

“Oh, well.”

Who dreamed up all this nonsense?

It is clear that the issue of desegregation has fallen off the agenda of the nation and the U.S. Department of Education. Not even DOE’s Office of Civil Rights has shown much interest in the resegregation of our narion’s schools

However, the ACLU still remembers the Brown decision and the numerous federal court orders banning segregated schools.

The ACLU just sued the state of Delaware for permitting segregated charter schools. See the court filing here and the exhibits here.

“As detailed in Part IV of this complaint, Delaware’s expansion of charter schools has led to segregated charter schools for students of color, students from low income families, and students with disabilities. Specifically, more than three-quarters of the state’s charter schools are racially identifiable.11 High-performing charter schools are almost entirely racially identifiable as White. In addition, low income students and students with disabilities (to the extent that students with disabilities are served by charter schools) are disproportionately relegated to failing charter schools and charter schools that are racially identifiable as African-American or Hispanic. Relatedly, the proliferation of charter schools has been accompanied by increased segregation in public schools located in districts where charter schools operate.”

This is a lawsuit that could have sweeping national consequences. That is, if the Brown decision is still in effect.

Ben Austin is stepping down as head of the organization called “Parent Revolution,” which is funded by the Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and numerous other foundations. Austin was instrumental in passage of California’s “parent trigger” law in 2010. Under that law, if a majority of parents sign a petition, they can take control of their community’s public school and hand it over to a private charter operator, fire staff, or make other changes.

 

In the past four years, several other states have copied California’s “parent trigger” law.

 

Despite the millions spent to promote the idea of the “parent trigger,” very few schools have actually utilized it. According to the article, four years after the law’s passage, only three schools in the Los Angeles area have converted to charters, and three have used it to force changes (like the firing of a respected Hispanic principal). There are as yet no results for the schools that converted to charters, since they are so  new. Actually, the only school I am sure was turned into a charter by Parent Revolution was Desert Trails in Adelanto. If you know of others, please let me know.

 

The conservative billionaire Philip Anschutz made a movie (“Won’t Back Down”) to publicize the “parent trigger” idea, but the movie did poorly at the box-office and didn’t have much impact, despite an excellent cast and extensive publicity.

Crack investigative reporter David Sirota is looking for a journalist to hire:

http://davidsirota.com/

** December 4, 2014
————————————————————

Friends:

A quick note to let you know that International Business Times has a new job opening for a journalist to team up with me on political/financial investigative reporting. This is part of our effort to build out our capacity to do more of the kinds of hard-hitting, impactful work we’ve been doing over the last year. To see the kind of work we are looking to expand on, click here (http://www.ibtimes.com/reporters/david-sirota) .

If you or someone you know is interested in the job, please email me at d.sirota@ibtimes.com (mailto:d.sirota@ibtimes.com?subject=IBT%20Job%20Opening) with clips and a resume. The job is not necessarily location-specific – I work in Denver, and the person we hire can work from anywhere, as long as the work can get done. The journalist we hire will be working directly with me.

Please forward this around to anyone you know who might be interested!

Rock the boat,

D

David Sirota · c/o Creators Syndicate · 737 3rd St. · Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 · USA

EduShyster, aka Jennifer Berkshire, interviews political economist Gordon Lafer in this post. He explains the role of corporate education reform in a broad economic and political context. This is one of the most enlightening interviews she has conducted. I urge you to read it.

 

She asks Lafer whether Walmart is helping poor kids get a better education by swelling the coffers of the Walton Family Foundation, which generously funds charters and vouchers across the nation.

 

He replies:

 

First of all, the thing that correlates most clearly with educational performance in every study is poverty. So when you look at the agenda of the biggest and richest corporate lobbies in the country, it’s impossible to conclude that they want to see the full flowering of the potential of each little kid in poor cities. To say *I want to cut the minimum wage, I want to prevent cities from passing laws raising wages or requiring sick time, I want to cut food stamps, I want to cut the earned income tax credit, I want to cut home heating assistance. Oh but, by the way, I’m really concerned about the quality of education that poor kids are getting*—it’s just not credible. You’re creating the problem that you now claim to want to solve….Walmart has no trouble filling positions and operating with very high turnover because what’s demanded of people who work there is so little. They’re certainly not asking *where are we going to find more people who can do algebra and craft well-written paragraphs? In fact, the big problem with the *send every kid to college* argument is that there aren’t jobs for these kids after they graduate. You cannot find an economist who predicts that more than one-third of jobs in the US are going to require a college degree in our lifetime. The real question is not how can everybody be a college graduate, but how can people make a decent living. And here is where you see that the same corporate lobbies that are pushing education reform are doing everything possible to make that harder.

 

EduShyster pushed Lafer to explain how the corporate reform agenda made sense–especially the combination of budget cuts for the public schools combined with tax cuts for corporations. Lafer answered:

 

I think the direction that the most powerful forces in the country is pushing is a bleak and frankly scary one—that at some level they want us to forget the idea of having a right to a decent public education, which is one of the last remaining entitlements, and make it more like health care, which is increasingly seen as a privilege. What’s being done to schooling is, I think, devastating on its merits. It has ideological implications for lowering expectations for what you have a right to as a citizen or a resident. And it raises big, profound questions: How does your experience in school affect, not just your skill set for employment, but your sense of yourself as a person and what you think you deserve from life? I think that for the real one percent, the big political challenge is *how do we pursue a policy agenda that makes the country ever more unequal and that makes life harder for the vast majority of people without provoking a populist backlash?* One of the ways of doing that is by lowering people’s expectations, and one of the key places to do that is in the school system.

 

The good news is that the interview ends on a hopeful note. We can’t abandon hope, because if we do, we are lost from the get-go. We must believe that a political awakening will happen if we work hard enough to make it happen, and that the Robber Barons will be tamed. American history runs in cycles, historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., argued, and we must not give up believing that we can make change. Because we can.

 

 

 

In part 1, we learned that Forbers asked a group of billionaires how to fix American education. In this installment, a group of leaders review the billionaires’ agenda.

“In our last installment, Forbes called a summit of Many Very Rich People to lay out what it would cost to fulfill the Must Have list for remaking American education. Now, we’re going to sit around with some alleged representatives of education stakeholders. And we should note that it’s happening in the department of Forbes.

“Paul Tudor Jones (founder of the Robin Hood Foundation) will be directing traffic as Andy Cuomo, Arne Duncan, Randi Weingarten and Kay Henderson (DC school chancellor) jaw about this. I should note that I’ll be walking you through the Short and Marginally Sweeter transcript; apparently there is a longer version, but I just can’t bring myself to go there.”

So here are the billionaires’ five Big Ideas:

“1) Teacher efficacy– recruit best and brightest

2) Universal Pre-K– because childhood is too long

3) School leadership– give principals greater power over staff

4) Blended learning– broadband and computers for everybody

5) Common Core/ College Readiness– insert all classic baloney arguments here”

What do our leaders think? They love the Big Ideas. But they have different timelines and slightly different strategies.

Take Cuomo, for example:

“Cuomo observes that he didn’t get anything done by being nice, so he made everybody’s money contingent on how well they follow his orders and he hasn’t had any problems since. Money buys compliance!”

Here are Kaya Henderson and Arne Duncan:

“Henderson gives Arne some strokes for being the only government guy who will fund innovation, and I think we can all agree that using a bureaucratic waiver maneuver to create new laws without the benefit of Congress is pretty innovative. The guillotine was also hot new stuff in its day.

Arne will now deliver more History from an Alternative Universe:

Having a common way of measuring success is just so basic and fundamental to all of your businesses–that’s a radical concept in education. We need to get to that point of having a high bar and having clear ways of measuring how everybody is stacking up against that bar. Under No Child Left Behind, about 20 states dummied-down their standards, they reduced their standards. Why? To make politicians of both parties look good. It was terrible for children. Not one person challenged those politicians. Until [philanthropic leaders] and the broader citizenry hold politicians accountable, we’ll continue to be mired in mediocrity.

“It’s true. In thirty-plus years of teaching, I have never measured success in any manner. Just throw darts at a board and call it a day. But states did not dummy down under NCLB to make politicians look good. They did it to save their states’ school from punishment under the heavy brainless hand of top-down federal mandates. They did it to avoid an unavoidable punishment that was inevitable because the feds set standards that nobody believed could be met, but they set them anyway. The dummying down was a completely predictable result of the perverse incentives built into a unsustainable punishment-based test-driven system created by educational amateurs in Washington DC. Dammit, Arne, if you want to learn a lesson from NCLB, learn that one, and learn it in some manner other than repeating the same damn mistakes.”

Peter Greene here tells the jaw-dropping story of what happened when Forbes convened a group of billionaires to share their ideas about how to redesign American education.

What would it take, Forbes asks, to move our middling international test scores to the top five in the world?

Why not ask some of the richest people in the nation, who never taught, probably didn’t go to public school, and perhaps never set foot in a public school?

Where do the unicorns come in? Here is what Peter says about the Common Core, which the billionaires love:

“Wonder how CCSS is still hanging in there? One likely answer is that rich guys just love it. “While Common Core has critics on both extremes of the political spectrum, those in the sensible center rightly view high national standards, coupled with tools to achieve success, as a no-brainer.” This is unintentionally hilarious to me because I do indeed believe that Common Core makes the most sense if you do in fact have no brain. The Forbes Factoid Squad projects that it will cost $185.4 billion to make CCSS fully happen, but will yield returns of $27.9 trillion. Do you suppose that rich guys smoke really, really good drugs. Laced with unicorn blood?”

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan can’t get over his obsession with the idea that the only reason children don’t have higher test scores is because they have “bad teachers” with low expectations. He has consistently said that teachers’ colleges bear the blame for those “bad teachers.” Never having taught, he has strong opinions about how to fix teaching. He loves charter schools, especially those without unions; he loves Teach for America, because they are elite. He loves evaluating teachers, principals, schools, even teachers’ colleges, by student test scores.

 

David Berliner, one of our nation’s most eminent researchers, does not agree with Duncan. He has different ideas. He tells Duncan, as he once told his dean, how to solve the problems of teacher education.

 

Berliner writes:

 

 

“Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and the Obama administration want to improve teacher education. Me too. I always have. So I went to the president of the university I was then working at and showed him university data that I had collected. I informed him that a) we were running the cheapest program on campus, even cheaper to run than the English Literature and the History programs; and b) that some of our most expensive programs to run, computer science and various engineering programs, produced well-trained graduates that left the state. But teachers stayed in the state. I told my president he was wasting the states resources and investing unwisely.

 

“I told him that with the same amount of money as we spend on the students that leave the state I could design one year clinical programs so every teacher does clinical rotations in the classrooms of schools with different kinds of students, rotations modeled on medical education.”

 

Berliner has many other good ideas. Read them here. Arne should invite him to meet and hear his ideas on how to improve teacher education.