Archives for the year of: 2013

Carol Burris, the principal of South Side High School in Rockville Center, New York, was an early proponent of the Common Core standards. She wrote a book about how to implement them to benefit students.

But as the standards are turning into reality, what she imagined is going sour. She recently wrote two articles (here and here) about why she has decided she cannot support the Common Core.

To her dismay, the Common Core has turned out to be a way to standardize curriculum and testing across the nation and to generate uniform data.

This is not what she hoped for.

She writes:

“I confess that I was naïve. I should have known in an age in which standardized tests direct teaching and learning, that the standards themselves would quickly become operationalized by tests. Testing, coupled with the evaluation of teachers by scores, is driving its implementation. The promise of the Common Core is dying and teaching and learning are being distorted. The well that should sustain the Core has been poisoned.”

In her second article, she expresses concern about the developmentally inappropriate nature of the standards in the early grades. She explains them in this way:

“The disconnect between the standards and childhood development is not difficult to explain. The standards were developed through backwards mapping, that is, standards for college readiness were established and then skills were walked backward through the grades. However, children move forward not backward through development, and as any pediatrician will tell you, they do so at individual, unique paces.”

A recent post reported that Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify business won a contract to develop the formative assessments for one of the two federally-funded consortia preparing tests for the Common Core standards. Joel Klein is head of Amplify. As in any conversation among knowledgeable adults, we often don’t explain every word to outsiders. Do you object to the Common Core? to the online assessments? to the contract going to Murdoch and Klein? to the profit-making at a time of budget cuts? This student has a question about that post. Please explain your concerns to him or her:

“So, question. I’m a student and don’t understand exactly what this is about? What I see it as being, given the comments, is that its like a boring sort of Leapfrog. Or mass produced education. Is this correct? Someone correct me if its not.”

Sheila Kaplan of Education Néw York is a specialist in student privacy issues.

She recommends this model law to protect children from marketing of their personal data.

Supporters of corporate reform have several phrases they favor to persuade skeptics that resistance is futile.

One is to say that “the train has left the station.”

In other words, you have no choice. (Even though they prattle on about why kids need choice and how choice is the civil rights issue of the decade, they don’t think any educator or citizen should be able to choose to say no to their bad ideas.)

You must surrender or be fired.

Or they say, in states that were dumb enough to win Race to the Top funding, “the law is the law.” Even if the law is wrong, you must obey.

Even if value-added assessment has been rejected by dozens of research studies, you cannot refuse to obey.

Even if value-added assessment is inaccurate, you must not fight it.

You are allowed to argue about whether you want it to count for 20% or 30% or 50%, but not to insist that it is an absurd way to measure teacher quality.

Here is my take: Don’t comply with what you know is wrong.

Don’t agree with what you know to be unethical and demeaning, to you as a professional and to your students.

Don’t quibble around the edges.

Mobilize, organize, fight back. Get teachers and parents to understand that what the federal government has mandated has no research to support it. It is wrong. Do not compromise with what is wrong.

EduShyster has captured in one small post the essence of the classroom of the future.

Here it is.

We will go where no nation in the world has ever dared to go:

Schools where happy teachers (all of them Excellent) have classes of 100 or more students, each one enjoying a customized, personalized education on their own tablet.

Think of the savings! Think of the market! Think of the profits!

Watch the video embedded in the link and you may notice the delightful homogeneity of the children in the cafeteria-style classroom, each learning at his or her own pace, all well-scrubbed, well-clothed and very happy to have their very own tablet.

A blogger took a close look at the latest report from DC on proficiency rates. As Matt Di Carlo and others have repeatedly shown, proficiency rates are notoriously easy to manipulate by moving the cut scores and other tricks.
But in DC, one fact is undeniable
: the rates went up in Affluentt districts and down in poor ones.

If you live in NewYork, contact your elected state officials. If you don’t, find a state legislator to introduce similar legislation. Our children’s personal data must not be released to inBloom (Gates and Murdoch) to give or sell to marketing corporations.

Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters reports:

Great news! on Wednesday, Assemblymember Daniel O’Donnell introduced a bill, A6059, to protect student privacy that would block the NY State Education Department and DOE from sharing our children’s confidential personally identifiable data with corporations without parental consent.

Please call your Assemblymember today and ask him or her to co-sponsor this bill, A6059, to Protect Student Privacy. Contact information for your Assemblymember can be found here; just plug in your address here: http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/?sh=search Tell him or her that children’s personal data should not be shared with third party corporations without parental consent.

Our press conference on the steps of Tweed yesterday morning was terrific. Among those who spoke out against this reckless and outrageous plan to distribute our children’s highly sensitive information without parental consent included civil rights attorney Norman Siegel, Council Members Steve Levin, Tish James, and Daniel Dromm, and Tom Allon. Here is an article in the Daily News about this outrageous plan; here is my accompanying oped.

Other newsclips from our press conference are from Schoolbook/WNYC, CBS News, AP , Politics 365, and a follow-up from the Daily News about the O’Donnell bill.

Parents Tory Frye, Karen Sprowal, Molly Sackler, and Lisa Shaw were among the fifty or so parents who attended, and they expressed their personal outrage that their children’s names, grades, emails, phone numbers, test scores, health, special education and disciplinary records could be so recklessly shared, without even consulting them about it. We also showed how all this data is being provided to for-profit vendors, with no thought of how this could leak out, stigmatize and endanger our children’s privacy and their success for years to come.

Our press release, with quotes from many other elected and public officials, including Comptroller John Liu and Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio, is posted on our blog here: http://shar.es/ecV4P

But please contact your Assemblymember today! And share this message with others who care.

Obama’s former budget director Peter Orszag recently wrote an article claiming that teachers should be judged by the test scores of their students. He read about the Raj Chetty study and the Gates MET study, and that was good enough for him.

From what he writes, it is clear that he knows nothing of the research critiquing those two studies. Hundreds of millions of scarce dollars are being wasted to make VAM work. It is not working anywhere. The tests are not designed to measure teacher quality.

VAM is junk science.

Not to worry, Orszag is a banker so he knows how to evaluate teachers.

Here, Mercedes Schneider examines Peter Orszag’s assertions.

On March 22, Governor Paul LePage will host an event for Jeb Bush and his merry team of market-model crusaders in Augusta, Maine.

Bush will present the full range of ALEC-inspired “reforms” guaranteed to bring privatization and for-profit entrepreneurs to Maine, while demoralizing Maine’s teachers and principals.

How clever to present the rightwing agenda as “reform,” and at the same time advertising Jeb’s Presidential run in 2016.

Michigan created an “Educational Achievement Authority” in which it clustered the state’s lowest performing schools. Of course, it is corporate reform-speak to identify the schools with the lowest test scores and say they are part of an “achievement” district. But, hey, it is only words.

Seems the EAA needed an infusion of cash, so the Broad Foundation plunked down $10 million to keep it going. This makes sense because all of the schools in the EAA are controlled by John Covington, who “graduated” from Broad’s unaccredited superintendent’s academy in 2008. Covington previously was superintendent of the Kansas City schools, where he closed half the city’s schools before resigning abruptly for a bigger salary and unchecked power in Michigan.

There are certainly advantages to being part of Eli Broad’s network.

We will see what it does for the kids. They are waiting to hear something more than grandiose promises and test prep.