If we truly want better education for all, then we must be concerned about the high levels of poverty and income inequality in our society. Social scientists have long known that family income and education are highly correlated with academic performance and educational attainment. If we reduce poverty, we increase students’ chances of having good health, a secure home, and the conditions that support learning.
In this context, Robert Reich’s recent article about poverty in America is relevant. Although he says that only Romania has more child poverty than the U.S. among developed nations, Romania was stuck in a repressive dictatorship for decades until 1989, and should not be in the same comparison group with the world’s most powerful economy. We are truly–in this humiliating statistic–#1.
This is the issue that “reformers” don’t want to talk about. They say that if you talk about what matters most, you are making excuses. Hardly. Something has gone terribly wrong in the past three decades or so, says Reich.
He writes:
“Although it’s still possible to win the lottery (your chance of winning $636 million in the recent Mega Millions sweepstakes was one in 259 million), the biggest lottery of all is what family we’re born into. Our life chances are now determined to an unprecedented degree by the wealth of our parents.
“That’s not always been the case. The faith that anyone could move from rags to riches – with enough guts and gumption, hard work and nose to the grindstone – was once at the core of the American Dream.
“And equal opportunity was the heart of the American creed. Although imperfectly achieved, that ideal eventually propelled us to overcome legalized segregation by race, and to guarantee civil rights. It fueled efforts to improve all our schools and widen access to higher education. It pushed the nation to help the unemployed, raise the minimum wage, and provide pathways to good jobs. Much of this was financed by taxes on the most fortunate.
“But for more than three decades we’ve been going backwards. It’s far more difficult today for a child from a poor family to become a middle-class or wealthy adult. Or even for a middle-class child to become wealthy.
“The major reason is widening inequality. The longer the ladder, the harder the climb. America is now more unequal that it’s been for eighty or more years, with the most unequal distribution of income and wealth of all developed nations. Equal opportunity has become a pipe dream.
“Rather than respond with policies to reverse the trend and get us back on the road to equal opportunity and widely-shared prosperity, we’ve spent much of the last three decades doing the opposite.”
He asks:
“How can the economy be back on track when 95 percent of the economic gains since the recovery began in 2009 have gone to the richest 1 percent?
“The underlying issue is a moral one: What do we owe one another as members of the same society?”
These are important questions to think about on Christmas Day, as some enjoy the bounty of our beautiful land, while far too many go hungry.

It’s a depressing thought. Yet many of the teachers who share on this blog are in the front lines. We are doing our best to give all our students a chance of success. Unfortunately, “those who have, get more!”
For about six months, my son’s friend, DaMere, was living with us after his father kicked him out. I tried to get help for him. His father and mother refused to give any assistance. Young, healthy males can’t get social services. They are told to get a job.
There was a job opening in a restaurant up the street. He and my son walked there together and both applied. Who would you hire – the clean shaven, white young man, or the grubby, bearded black nineteen year old (who actually had some work experience)? I took one look at the two and knew. My son worked at this upscale restaurant for four years. DaMere eventually went home and ended up working at Mighty Taco, last I heard.
My son has a future. DaMere, doesn’t even have a GED. I tried, but bucking trends are almost impossible. Both went to an excellent high school, which had a GED program. Damere was not from the inner city, but the inner city mentality was in him. The opportunities were there – I was willing to help. He wasn’t willing to be helped.
LikeLike
With any luck, DaMere will work his way up to full time employment at Mighty Taco and will be pulling down a cool 14.5K per year!!!!!
LikeLike
Actually, Mighty Taco pays more per hour than the upscale restaurant my son worked at until recently. Full time would give DaMere over $20,000 a year.
LikeLike
Something about your story rings false Ellen. Can’t quite put my finger on it. Hmmmmmm
LikeLike
More of the story comes out in future posts. I can assure you, Betsy, that everything I said is true. What sounds invented?
LikeLike
Diane, I’m sure you’ve heard about the Moral Monday protests in NC. The issues were voting rights, health care and civil rights, but also education.
As you know, NC has adopted a “reform” agenda that includes the usual roster we’ve seen in reform states: union busting, privatization of public schools and vouchers, cutting funding for public ed while increasing funding for charters and vouchers.
The Moral Monday protesters were targeted by Art Pope who is a wealthy conservative in NC and a state official (he was appointed to a position in state government by the politician he purchased).
Pope’s PR arm created a smear site where the Moral Monday protesters were listed.
I thought it was really interesting how many of those targeted work for public schools or public universities. Outside of clergy or religious people, I think the largest group that were targeted were people who work in education, looking at the list Pope compiled:
http://www.nccivitas.org/moralmonday/
LikeLike
When the US balance of payments is as skewed in unfavorable deficits as it is today, it means that US jobs and wages are also deficient. .Congress is responsible for all trade agreements. So when Congress allows the US balance of payments to continue to be unfavorable, Congress should be blamed for joblessness and poverty wages. However ,you never will hear a peep out of any news sources to pin this blame, because the owners of news sources are profiting by selling low priced imported items at high sales markups.
Pray for term limits in Congress to make it easier for better candidates to run for office. .
LikeLike
Agree that the trade deficit is costing US jobs and that the media never report on this issue. The problem with the trade deals is not the manufacturing jobs going to low-wage countries, but rather the fact that the trade deals allow US firms to buy abroad while not allowing US firms to sell abroad. This creates the trade deficit and allows $ to escape from the US economy, thereby weakening demand.
LikeLike
term limits are not the answer, its the people who vote against thier own interests. an election is a term limit. stop electing people who only benefit their constuents; donars.
LikeLike
Labor Lawyer
When Congress was sold on global economy by economists, they were told that all the dollars US consumers would spend on imports would return to the US. In other words, the dollars would be used to buy US products. Wnell we all now know that the dollars are being used as a world currency and loaned back to the US government instead. Or staying out of the US and is being used to expand foreign economies.
Yet nothing is being done by our Congress to balance the trade imbalance because …………………..?
Term limits is the only solution.
Regards and good will blogging
LikeLike
It is far more difficult for a middle class child to remain middle class since even college graduates have trouble getting interviews or jobs.
LikeLike
Deb, I always wonder about that. My children have never had a problem securing a job. They each had paper routes and then worked at various jobs from fifteen or sixteen on. Two are now professionals on an excellent career path. The other two are still finding their way, but securing a job is not an issue. One just picked up a part time job at a bead factory making jewelry. Not her career path, but good for the moment while she decides whether to go back to school for a Master’s degree. My son is taking a break, but he won’t have any trouble finding work due to his excellent reputation in the culinary field.
The jobs are out there – definitely for the children of the white middle class. The question is – are they willing to do the work?
LikeLike
“millions of college graduates over all—not just recent ones—suffer a mismatch between education and employment, holding jobs that don’t require a costly college degree.”
http://chronicle.com/article/Millions-of-Graduates-Hold/136879/
That’s regarding the US, but we are not alone. Underemployment and unemployment are high for college graduates in parts of Europe, as well as in China and Korea, too.
A lot of companies have slashed full time jobs and just hire part timers now, so they don’t have to provide benefits. Some hire employees as independent contractors, so they can circumvent labor laws, including minimum wage and unemployment compensation, and to avoid paying payroll taxes. Many college grads.have resorted to taking low paying jobs and/or piecing together several part time jobs, just to try and get by.
LikeLike
Elizabeth has had numerous opportunities to further her career. At the moment, she is dealing with some personal issues. She really wasn’t even looking for a job, it just landed in her lap. As she enjoys making jewelry, this job is a good fit at this time. (More like a hobby.) Once she gets her head on straight, I have no doubt she will find a successful career path.
I worry more about my son who has a GED and can’t handle college. Yet, he has an excellent future in the culinary field. My concern is that restaurants are a transitory business with little job security and little to no benefits. However, there are still opportunities which look promising – at places like Wegmans or the local University, which do give benefit packages. He just turned 22, and has money saved, so he has time to sort things out.
I still maintain that there is work our there for those who want it. It might not be the perfect job, but all experiences add up to future possibilities. You don’t start at the top. Everyone must pay their dues.
LikeLike
So much for “trickle down”.
LikeLike
Reteach:
Too many students treat college as a consumption good: They make choices based on lifestyle rather than the future. They have no idea of the massive salary and earning differences by major. They implicitly assume that someone owes them a job.
On Saturday I met a young grad student in Chemistry from Rensselear. She is a top student just starting her PhD program. I asked what she was going to do. She said that it was too early to start think about that. Both her Dad and I said in unison, no it is not. Now is the time to keep your eyes wide open and look around for those who can help you in the future whatever you might want to do. By all means do what you are passionate about, but most of us need to keep an eye on the future and take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves. The only way her fellow PhDs and undergraduate English Majors and Damere will get good jobs is if 10 or 20% of her current colleagues help start businesses by meeting new or unmet needs. If everybody hangs around waiting for the other guy, nothing will happen..
LikeLike
Ellen–“The question is – are they willing to do the work?”
I wonder if kids nowdays think about settling in a job for long. I hear my own tell me, I don’t want this or that job (position) because it doesn’t pay anymore than what I’m doing which is doing less. I’m tired of my job (which they’ve only had for 2 years). My kids are more carefree about building their careers. Or are they just adapting to the job market and stability of the economy?
LikeLike
Deb, that’s the new world. Our kids will go through many jobs and career changes before they really settle down, if ever. I think my two oldest will stick with their current jobs – they are good ones. The two little ones have a long way to go.
We just have to grit our teeth and be supportive. My mantra has always been – do you feel good about yourself and what you’ve accomplished at the end of the day? If they can answer yes the majority of the time, then the jobs a keeper. If not . . .
LikeLike
I meant Jon. Your kids are doing just fine. They’ll know when they’ve found the right job.
LikeLike
Some people have been lucky and don’t realize how many others don’t benefit from the same good fortune, even when they’ve completed college programs. I worked at a Culinary Arts College where the wealthy entrepreneur who was hired as president expressed utter shock when he discovered how low the typical salary was for our graduates in my city.
LikeLike
I would watch FoxNews if I wanted to hear that kind of BS, Bernie. There are very good reasons why people recognize shades of Bill O’Reilly in you. You “blame the victim” a lot.
LikeLike
Reteach:
Can you show me where I have “blamed the victim”? Is any talk of assuming personal responsibility “blaming the victim”? Did Ellen “blame the victim” when she pointed out that DaMere did little to help himself by getting his GED? “Blame the victim” is a trope or meme that can be used to avoid wrestling with the tough issues and claiming some sort of moral superiority. It does not work with me.
LikeLike
I don’t think this is a matter of people thinking they are owed a job. Too many Americans fail to recognize that transitioning from adolescence to adulthood can be quite challenging for many kids, as they struggle to figure out their place in the world and what they want to do with their lives. That’s one reason why taking a gap year between high school and college has become a common practice in the UK. It’s a time when kids can get a paying job or do volunteer work, as they take a breather from school, deal with existential issues, examine their options and make decisions about their future.
Not everyone gets that opportunity though. When kids have dropped out of high school, it’s an even more challenging time, because kids are often immediately confronted with many limitations.
I sat in a Chinese carry out restaurant waiting for my lunch order recently and heard a family very vocally dealing with this matter. A white mom was waiting for her order, too, when her teenage black son arrived. They immediately started arguing about who was going to pay for the food. (It seemed like the tail end of a dispute that had begun earlier.) The mom said the son needed to pay for the food if he wanted to eat it. He said he had no money. She told him that he had to get a job if he wanted food. The son said he had tried and no one would hire him because he was a drop out. She told him he needed to register to get his GED immediately if he wanted to eat. He was clearly very hungry and frustrated and ultimately he agreed to do that.
I thought the mom handled this pretty well, because she was clearly determined to not enable her son’s foundering and was willing to put her foot down and make him face consequences, even if she sounded somewhat harsh and it was in public. I don’t think this is so unusual. My sister went through something similar with her daughter. Many kids need a lot of guidance as they face the brutal realities of adulthood. Some people think there should be mentorship programs for kids who are in need during this transition period and I would tend to agree, because not all families can readily get through to their struggling kids.
LikeLike
Bingo. Claiming that people think they are owed a job is the view from YOUR high horse, Bernie.
LikeLike
Reteach:
Why so unpleasant and hostile?
LikeLike
What goes around comes around, Bernie. Don’t expect to spout your conservative claptrap here and characterize liberals as those “who take tax write-offs for their old underwear” without it being dished right back atcha.
LikeLike
Reteach:
That is pretty weak. How about the question about “blaming the victim” or is the main line of argument ad hominem.
LikeLike
You are looking in the mirror.
LikeLike
ReTeach – do you have children? They all think the world owes them. That’s why they go to college. Will they have a shock when they enter the real world? Of course! Will they struggle with numerous low paying jobs? You bet! Will this make them grow as human beings? That’s the goal.
As parents we give them the morality. As teachers we give them the basics. As individuals they learn the ropes.
I’m as liberal as they come, but I’m also realistic. You get out, what you put in. It’s a hard lesson. A lesson learned through experience. However, once learned, it goes a long way towards a successful career.
Happy New Year.
LikeLike
Ellen, Such anecdotes and your failure to acknowledge the genuine plight of workers in this economy feed the cold-hearted beliefs of rightwingers and serve as fodder in defense of business class elites. You would be wise to recognize that the developmental issues of adolescents transitioning to adulthood, described by Veteran Educator, differ from those of more mature adults.
LikeLike
Reteach – That’s why I wonder. I see many truths. It’s not like the path has been easy for me or my children. Yet, we each put ourselves out there and worked our way through the system. And any work experience is an opportunity for growth and learning. My son sold Xmas trees, my daughter was a maid at a local hotel, another daughter taught exercise classes. They paid their dues.
What keeps other teens from entering the employment field? Is it lack of opportunity or being unwilling to do hard work for minimum wage (being a maid is the worst job ever).
There are many roads to a career, but you have to leave home base and travel a bit to find them. Are they having problems finding their bearings or are they stuck under the blankets of their own beds? I wonder.
LikeLike
The war against public school teachers and public schools is going to escalate because the wealthy and powerful are beginning to see that the push back against their agenda of privatization has become better organized. The more the 1% feel threatened the more vicious they will become. We can not depend on any of our elected officials, including de’Blasio, to turn the tide against the status quo of corporate education reform unless people on the front lines are willing to work together to spread the true narrative and enlist the help of other organizations within their own communities.
LikeLike
So glad to see an article on this blog by Robert Reich! If America is to regain the empowerment of all its people, we need to have more than just public educators taking a look at the reality of the loss of checks and balances fueling our nation’s problems. We need to have an integrated effort with workers and professionals from all fields of endeavor and walks of life.
LikeLike
All true power flows from the good will and energy of the people. Teachers are but one part of this effort. We strive everyday to make a difference in the lives of our students.
LikeLike
Perhaps, we are beginning ro see the emergence of a ‘hard’ discussion about the issues that confront not only public schools but all thos institutions that are the warp and woof of our social structure. The critical issues we confront transcend the particulars of ‘education reform’, rather, these issues are the ‘hidden curriculum’ at the heart of what it means to live in a ‘just’ society, one built on equity, rather than wealth. unless these critical economic, political, cultural and social issues are faced square-on, we are condemned to getting bogged down in individual pitched battles – none lacking merit or importance- and become diverted from the over arching structural issues that inform those battles. Like three card monte and the proverbial shell game, the con men, illusionists, divert our eyes from what clearly lies in front of them.
We struggle on, fighting for public education, cursing the mendacity of the ‘reformers’. But what about the central, dominating institutions that are :..Working for the Clamp Down” of the ninety-nine percent of the population? We must struggle to save public education from its usurpers. But, we can’t forget the source of societal inequities.
LikeLike
I absolutely agree. I was a late-comer to realizing the interconnectedness of what has happened to education as being representative of what has happened to our society. It has crept upon us like a disease.
I feel like Citizens United opened the gates of control for the 1% and only now do I recognize the “players” orchestrating the big deals that are swallowing up the voice of the common man.
In Ohio, our “governor” told people to “get on his bus” or he’d run over us. He tried but failed. We pushed back SB5. But, he keeps on trying. He and his friends lie constantly. It is publicly known, but nothing seems to stop them. They want to dictate what the common person has the right to do, but they can choose for themselves.
They have trampled the toll roads, the police, the firefighters, local government, education, and morale in all public service jobs.
Yes, this is but one area, education, that needs to be addressed, but it is tied to more pervasive problems nationwide.
LikeLike
Deb, I agree.
LikeLike
And here is a glimpse into what is occurring in North Carolina, mirroring the past events in Wisconsin, Ohio, and other states. Bit by bit, state by state, there is a small group of monied people trying to change public policies.
http://billmoyers.com/segment/north-carolina-battleground-state/
LikeLike
When I came to the States in 1973, the major difference I noticed was that people in the US believed they could make their own lives better and most did and have. If you preach long enough and hard enough you will undermine that mind set and you will empower the likes of Robert Reich. He is, in my opinion, a part of the problem not the solution. If you legitimate a world where an Andy Capp life style is acceptable, i.e., living on the “dole” with enough money for cigarettes and beer, you will get more and more Andy Capps. That was the face of Britain in the 70s and continues to be a massive threat. If you legitimate a world that glamorizes do nothings like the Kardashians or the latest pop or sports idols, then you create a fantasy world, where things just happen rather than the individual making them happen through hard work over an extended period of time.
Ellen’s story of DaMere is sad, but the hard reality is that it is up to DaMere to determine his future and if he believes his future is a dead end, then it will most certainly be one. Life is certainly easier for the children of the rich, but there are masses of opportunities for those with the right mind set and the willingness to out work the idle and spoiled rich kids.
The issue of gross income inequality is a separate one from motivation and opportunities to succeed.
LikeLike
And Bernie, that is the problem. How do we motivate our children to reach out a grab a better life? My own kids are not an issue, I’ve taught them that you get out what you put in. They are all hard workers. They are all competent.
Not so much other people’s children.
Yet, I have hope. Many of the children I tutored and the students I taught are working – granted it’s at places like Wendy’s and MacDonalds, but that’s a start. They want more from their lives. Many are in college.
If we can get the economy to a manageable level – where entry level positions are available, the middle class will once again flourish.
I see this moment as a key to the future. Do we let the next generation in or shut them out? And that’s the real battle.
We can’t help all the DaMeres. We can help the ones who are willing to be helped.
LikeLike
Ellen:
It is not easy. It is even harder to talk about it without resorting to apparent clichés or “blaming the victim”.
Historically in the US, every 30 or 40 years there used to be an “awakening” which along with the religious overtones reasserted the basic elements of individual responsibility and self-discipline. Those days are gone. Perhaps instead of self-indulgent reality shows like Big Brother or Bachelorette, 4 or 5 TV programs focusing on “making it in life” might reset the conversation.
In all likelihood it will have to be one young person at a time. With young men like DaMere going to North Dakota seizing the opportunities that are there, like the pioneers of old or many immigrants.
LikeLike
And relocating is an option. There is life outside of New York State. Several of my friends have relocated to the cities where their children have found jobs. Once you retire – there is more freedom. (If you have a pension or savings). Of course, my associates have middle class values. It’s easier if you are in the majority to take advantage of what the system has to offer.
LikeLike
It’s easier if you are in the majority to take advantage of what the system has to offer.
Bingo
It has been my experience that children of reasonably well off parents ( pensions, savings, property, education, etc. with an extra bonus if you are dominate culture) are much better able to ” take a break” and ” find themselves”, take low wage, low or no benefit jobs, etc. for a time then recover financially and career wise.
LikeLike
And Ang, I’ve worked hard to achieve this spot in life. I can afford to help my children so that they don’t have to deal with all the struggles I had to face. So far, they’ve done me proud.
I’d be a fool not to take advantage of my knowledge of the system.
I try to share this with others – whether they listen is another story.
LikeLike
The dystopia you describe is a cultural adaptation to manufacturing decline and the hollowing out of the middle class. Britain just got there before we did. I remember my first visit to UK/Eur in early ’70’s, being surprised at the cheap tabloid journalism & celebrity [aristocrat/royals]-worship prevailing in what I’d long admired as an intellectual culture. It arrived here on the same wave of economic malaise just a decade later, along with the lottery, & bigbox discounts replacing department stores. People are ‘on the dole’ for lack of work; gov provides beer, cigarettes, & lotto to distract them from its abject economic failure. DaMere’s evident lack of hope in the future is defensive and self-fulfilling, but to blame it on the maintenance-meds (‘the dole’) rather than the illness (no work) is wishful thinking.
LikeLike
DaMere chose his lifestyle. With a little effort he could have gotten his GED. I was willing to drive him to a job. He just wanted to veg out on my “hospitality”. Why work when this “wealthy” white woman gives you a place to stay and hot meals.
My son, PJ, kicked him out when DaMere started bumming money off of him. PJ wasn’t willing to give away any of his hard earned dollars. Once the free ride was over, DaMere returned home and eventually his folks made him get a job.
I don’t feel sorry for DaMere. We had many conversations, but it is almost impossible to overcome a family life that supports abusing the system. I know because I’ve been down this path many times – he was not the only young man we helped when they were down on their luck. We can only do so much by setting a good example. I have absolved myself of all guilt. At least all the young men were polite and respectful. I still have hope that some of them will lead constructive lives. The potential was there.
LikeLike
SFF:
I am not blaming the dole. The question for me is who creates jobs. There is nothing wrong with big box stores. If DaMere has a bright idea and starts his own fast food franchise, more power to him. If he has enlightened labor practices and encourages his workers to pursue their own careers, then that is even better. One of the scarier books I recall reading some years ago is Ira Magaziner’s The Silent War – not because of US outsourcing but the energy, drive and motivation unleashed among ordinary people in the Tiger economies.
LikeLike
Part of the problem is the mentality of the worker – DaMere had a hard time getting a job because he was often late or didn’t show up at all. Many young people treat a job the way they treated their education – they dropped in when it was convenient. DaMere was accepted into a job training program which also paid a salary. I drove him each morning to the bus stop, gave him some money for the fare and lunch, then sent him on his way. He lasted two days. It was too much work for him and the hours were inconvenient.
LikeLike
There is still hope. My foster son was basically living on the street, but turned himself around and is now married with a full time job and children. We still have to help out with money apron occasion, but he has come a long way from what he was at 19.
LikeLike
TE:
My youngest has struggled as well. Let’s hope they and all continue to improve themselves in 2014 and beyond. Happy New Year!!
LikeLike
There is always hope. A nineteen year old will grow and mature. As parents we are there to guide them and come to their assistance when needed. The problem is when the parents are at the same level as their kids and the support system is lacking.
My days of taking in young friends of my children are over (I hope). I never understood parents who would throw their own children out on the street. They were just putting their problems on to someone else. I wasn’t the only adult harboring these young teenage boys.
Eventually these kids grow up. Hopefully they learn from their parents mistakes. Hopefully they become productive members of society. Hopefully they have a good support network. We all need one.
LikeLike
The adopted mother of my foster son suffered from sever mental illness. When she went off her medications she ended up having to be removed from the classroom by the police. It was not really a choice on her part.
LikeLike
Glad to hear about this progress, TE. Also, thanks for taking in a foster son. LOTS of work.
LikeLike
Ellen:
You are far kinder and gentler to Betsy than I am want to be. Good for you. Happy New Year.
LikeLike
TE – mental illness adds a whole other dimension to the discussion. Your foster son was lucky to find a supportive home. I know it made a difference.
LikeLike
Bernie, you seem to be unaware or are dismissive of the fact that tens of millions of Americans are indeed working very hard, they are not lazy, they are not on the dole but their wages are stagnant or falling. There are more people than there are jobs and so too many Americans have to settle for temp or part time jobs until they can find more permanent work, if that is even possible. Permanent, full time jobs with health benefits and pensions are becoming rarer with each passing year. Income inequality is a fact and it is just as bad as during the age of the robber barons. Thank goodness that we have a voice for the poor and the working class in the person of Robert Reich. If you preach the right wing/libertarian ideology long enough and hard enough you will undermine the sensible ideas of Reich and you will empower the likes of Bill O’Reilly. Of course, a jackarse like O’Reilly calls Reich a communist. O’Reilly is a shill and pimp for the corporate elites, he gets paid big bucks to smear and demonize a hero like Robert Reich.
LikeLike
Joe:
I am not dismissive at all. I have created jobs for young folks like DaMere. You may have done so also. Robert Reich has done diddly-squat. If we create a generation of young people who believe that someone owes them a job, we will perpetuate the issues we have now. Demonizing the likes of Bill O’Reilly is silly and does nothing to truly empower young people like Ellen’s children or DaMere.
LikeLike
Joe: You are referring to the current Entitlement generation. There is much to be said about the way each younger generation perceives their future and act upon it. And how is the previous generation responsible for that occurrence?
LikeLike
It is a fact, a deeply regrettable fact, that millions of Americans are working in jobs with few if any benefits. Some of them are earning so little that they their children are eligible for free/reduced lunch.
Seems to me that we have to simultaneously work to improve public schools and work to have more well paying jobs and good health care here. Not one or the other, both.
LikeLike
Funny, my job as a beginning teacher qualified me for both food stamps and a free lunch at the school I worked at. I wasn’t sure how to apply for either.
LikeLike
Food insecurity is a common issue for literally millions of Early Childhood Education teachers who work in private child care centers –both new hires and longstanding teachers. That’s the model for the corporate education “reform” agenda, too, and what is awaiting in the wings, since those schools are already privatized. many have multiple funding streams, including government funds, and teachers are typically non-union, low-paid workers. (The McModel is KinderCare* –see below.)
As is typical, at my jobs in private child care centers, for decades, I was paid minimum wage or just slightly above it and I counted on the free meal that such schools are required to provide to teachers in my state, which is due to a child care licensing regulation that teachers sit down at the table and eat “family style” with children. (Child care centers are regulated by states, but standards vary dramatically from one state to the next and some states have very minimal requirements.)
I really appreciated and relied on that free meal. It was not a given though, despite my state’s requirement, especially at schools which had the food catered, because many only ordered meals for children, so teachers didn’t eat there unless some kids didn’t show up. Weekends and holidays were very challenging, as they are for children who rely on the federal food program in school to eat. I don’t know if I qualified for Food Stamps or inclusion in the federal food program, because I was too proud to even inquire about them for myself, but food insecurity has been a lifelong daily issue for me and I have eaten only one meal a day for decades as a result. My colleagues and I have regularly remarked that we feel rich when our refrigerators are full.
* McKinderCare is the largest for-profit child care chain in the country, owned by convicted felon (for fraud) right-wing billionaire Mike Milken –who also was involved in establishing the controversial online K12 Inc. He tries to keep his name off such educational enterprises though, because many jurisdictions prevent convicted felons from receiving government funds. However, if you’ve ever worked at any of them, it’s evident that he is the puppet master pulling the strings behind the curtain. McKinderCare is a highly profitable publicly traded corporation. They have minimal qualifications for teachers, implement scripted curriculum and they push academics on kids from the cradle onwards, as well as charge separate fees for “enrichment.”
LikeLike
And that was the issue for adults who were interested in Early Childhood Education. An important occupation which paid less than nothing. It’s a little better today if you can get a job in the public school systems which offer ECC.
I was fully certified, but worked under the table at a local Day Care Center for $5.00 an hour when my two oldest were toddlers. Obviously, I could bring my kids with me. It gave me some pocket money. My husband was a researcher at RGH making $15,000 a year (at that time it was a decent salary). We ended up back in Buffalo, so he could pursue a degree in Microbiology, and I became a substitute teacher.
Somehow we managed.
LikeLike
It’s not better in my area, where we have universal preschool for 3 and 4 year olds primarily situated in private child care centers. Public education funds only pay for two and a half hours per day, while kids are typically enrolled all day for child care services –often 6 am to 6 pm.
It’s also not better for many McKinderCare teachers I’ve worked with across the country. Unless teachers have an additional source of income, like another family member bringing in a decent salary, teachers can’t live on those wages.
LikeLike
This is a pretty amazing charter story to start off the new year:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/bobcook/2013/12/26/deion-sanders-to-be-rehired-again-at-charter-school-he-founded/
It’s absolute chaos. I don’t know who is supposed to be regulating this school but obviously they aren’t doing any real or rigorous or independent regulatory actions. I would be surprised if any state regulatory agency had the staff or resources to monitor these schools, even if they wanted to monitor them, which they don’t.
LikeLike
@chiara Duggan.. thanks for this link. I thought it would have made a great screen play for an episode of The Three Stooges… I would chuckle except that this school is for real as it its leaders who have no qualifications (or emotional develppment) to be in a position of education leadership. Ughh….
LikeLike
We were I trouble when this incredibly bright and right man left his job as Sec of Labor under Clinton. It was an act that foreshadowed everything.
LikeLike
Robert Reich makes good points, but he is talking to the wrong audience. Americans are more “survival of the fittest” and “individualistic.” We are very diverse, and most Americans don’t have much in common with each other, let alone their little subgroup. Ride a subway in any big city and notice the “zero” connection between riders. Immigrants came here to get rich or practice strange religions. We aren’t a society like Germany, Ireland, England, etc. We aren’t a common people with shared history, and most people I talk to have no concern for non family members, etc. (They would never say this, but it is in their actions) People in America are out for themselves, and this may be because the system has shaped them this way. The communal thing has gone, and this struggle for capital is our reality. It is a battle for survival with dwindling resources. How much can I “hustle” from you? When Dr. Ravitch or Robert Reich talk about “community” and helping one another (even public schools), their arguments fall on deaf ears for the most part. That is simply not our reality. America has veered much more to the Right. This is a world of “makers” and “takers.” I don’t agree with this world, but as an artist, this is my perception of America of 2013. If you want the caring world Reich and Dr. Ravitch talk about, you better move somewhere else (Scandinavia). We will all be long dead before anything changes in America.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, I agree with you. I find it quite indicative of our culture just now that “selfie” was chosen as the new word of the year.
We are, indeed, a self-centered society. It is next to impossible to get anyone who is so inclined to change. I sometimes feel like I am beating my head against the wall. Thevsmug one-liner, blinders wearing, insulting bumper sticker crowd is so self-assured that they dismiss anyone who cares about the community as an ignorant socialist trying to rob them of their “earnings”. As if …
LikeLike
“Ride a subway in any big city and notice the “zero” connection between riders.”
Until someone asks for directions. Then watch the stereotypically heartless NYers selflessly help their fellow man. I assume the same for Boston, DC, etc. Just because commuters/travelers mind their own business doesn’t mean they don’t feel a connection. The situation must call for it. Otherwise, they’d like some alone time, such as it is.
-A nitpicky former NYer
LikeLike
To piggy back on your comment – Buffalo is also known as “the city of good neighbors”. If you’ve ever been stranded in your car during a blizzard – you ‘d understand.
LikeLike
Very true! As a westerner who’s heard all of the stereotypical things about New Yorkers, I was pleased and somewhat surprised to see all of the help I got when I was stranded in southern Manhattan when the subway line I needed was closed because of an emergency. The number of people who came to my aid to help me navigate. And the “lack of connection” in public transit is the same in all major cities the world over. It’s not indicative of anything.
LikeLike
I agree America demonstrate acts of kindness.
However, I also agree with John that Americans are common in that we are very uncommon. We argue to win arguments. We are materialistic. We out do our neighbors. We take advantage of our elders and loved ones when push comes to shove. Etc… Do we value other people’s lives (their needs, hopes and dreams)?
“Individualism,” narcissism, egocentrism…stand in our way of our beliefs and values that we want for our country. So people with money and position will always have it to control others unless your lucky to “fit in” and succumb to the dark side. We live in hypocrisy where we are desensitized to it. And perhaps we use it as a light switch to convince ourselves that demonstrating random acts of kindness (taught in schools) are enough to valid individual “wealth”. And for that, we don’t value human life.
It is about beliefs and values (to live right by other human beings) reserved for only a small portion of those who live it with integrity throughout their lives. One of my students who comes from a tramatic life experience said, “We don’t need lots of money to live.”
How can we insure that our 12 year olds, who believe in social justice at this stage in their lives, are resilient to the corruption and hyposcrisy as adults?
LikeLike
jon:
Speak for your self. Americans give more to charity and spend more time than folks from other countries.
LikeLike
Bernie,
This is more than contributions. I remember someone saying that poverty isn’t charity. Because throwing money at poverty doesn’t solve it. It is about how people really feel about solving issues. It is about income inequality. We keep putting bandaids on things for temporary fixes. Lots of times giving money enables people.
LikeLike
Throwing charity at poverty and taking tax write-offs isn’t helping reduce inequity. All it does is make the giver feel “good” for the moment and put the situation of “others” out of sight, out of mind. The same people who think their charity is “enough” tend to think that “those people” should get a job. Being educated and having a job that will help a person gain independence are the ways out of inequity. Otherwise it is just a “pat on the back” for the donor. Try giving without expecting a tax write-off.
LikeLike
Deb:
My response was to Jon’s comment that American’s are essentially selfish. I strongly disagree and philanthropic data indicates that compared to those in other countries Americans are exceedingly generous. What is astounding is the hypocrisy of out-spoken liberals who take tax write-offs for their old underwear or give less than 1% of their income to charity. The issue is not the tax write-offs it is the mindset.
LikeLike
jon:
I am not sure of your point.
LikeLike
I represent an organization who’s mission is to provide support for women, children, and youth throughout the world. Money designated for specific projects is not wasted.
My own group made sandwiches (done once a month) for a facility that feeds the poor, donated Christmas gifts for a local school for problem children, donated hats, mittens, and scarves to a battered women and children’s shelter, made party favors for a local nursing home, sent boxes filled with numerous fun and useful items as Christmas gifts to children in other countries, made fruit and cookie baskets for the shut ins, etc., and that was this past month.
None of this is done for a tax write off. We aren’t all heartless bastards.
LikeLike
Ellen:
I commend both your generosity and your restraint.
LikeLike
Bernie – I have been blessed and it is only right that I give back. 2013 was filled with some amazing moments. Here’s to a successful 2014. (If we each did our part, the world would be a better place.)
LikeLike
Thank you for doing this.
LikeLike
“Why the Rich Don’t Give to Charity: The wealthiest Americans donate 1.3 percent of their income; the poorest, 3.2 percent. What’s up with that?”
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/04/why-the-rich-dont-give/309254/
LikeLike
Interesting article. I agree with the premise that the farther away one is from the need, the less they will notice that the need exists.
There are wealthy in other places besides NYC and many have created institutes who support the public good. And I don’t have a problem with someone sponsoring a building at a local college – not all the money goes to Harvard. And the Arts have always been supported by wealthy patrons. A masterpiece can be enjoyed by all.
I don’t feel comfortable dictating how others should spend their money. Perhaps we can use our influence to educate them, but I would prefer to expend our efforts on educating our youth about the opportunities available to make the world a better place.
LikeLike
We have to start somewhere. That’s why I support the requirement of community service hours for graduation. It’s already being done in the local suburban schools. Institutes such as the Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and other civic organizations require projects to help their communities (and not just by selling cookies and popcorn). Even the college sorority I joined required a yearly service project.
That means they take their bodies to a location and actually get their hands “dirty” (I mean this figuratively, but sometimes the tasks actually required cleaning up locations).
The child needs to grow in body, mind, and spirit. Volunteer work is good for the soul.
LikeLike
Agree on the value of community service. We’ve helped start some innovative district & charter public schools that do this. I also support an integration of service into classes…like a class where students studied ecology and then challenged (successfully) 3 large companies that were “stinking up” the air in the community.
LikeLike
And Joe, our children need more experiences like that. They will then learn the power of their voices and be more willing to speak out.
Now we are talking standards.
LikeLike
Agreed that youngsters need more experience like this.
LikeLike
So I’ve noticed there’s this new thing, where media outlets and various reform orgs are doing a “thank a teacher” bit. I’m not a teacher, but I’m always curious about new reform marketing, and my sense is it’s a bit of a pushback against the really nutty teacher-bashing they’ve been doing for a decade.
Anyway, I thought this was sad:
“As a middle-school student in the 1980s, Lee Buono stayed after school one day to remove the brain and spinal cord from a frog. He did such a good job that his science teacher told him he might become a neurosurgeon someday.
That’s exactly what Buono did.
Years later, a patient with a tumor came to see Buono. The growth was benign but interfered with the patient’s speech. “He can get some words out,” Buono recalls, “but it’s almost unintelligible. It’s almost like someone’s sewing your mouth closed.”
“I’m talking to his wife, and we tried to lighten up the situation,” he continues. “They started asking me about myself.” They asked Buono who inspired him to become a surgeon, and he told them about his old teacher, Al Siedlecki, back at Medford Memorial Middle School in Medford, N.J.
The surgery was a success. The patient’s powers of speech returned. “He’s just excited and happy and crying and wanted to just hug me,” Buono says.
“You make sure you call that teacher,” the patient told him. “You make sure you thank him.”
So Buono did. Siedlecki hadn’t heard from Buono since he was in high school.
“I want to thank you,” Buono told him.
“I was flabbergasted,” Siedlecki remembers. “I said, ‘Of all the people in your entire career, you want to thank me?’
Lately, Siedlecki admits, “I almost am afraid to say that I’m a teacher to some people.”
Not anymore, he tells Buono, “because you called me. I’m a teacher, and I’m going to help as many people as I can to find their passion too.”
Now, you tell me. Why is this person “almost afraid to say that he’s a teacher” ? Who did this? Who created this completely insane climate where this guy is “afraid” to say he’s a teacher?
I would argue ed reformers in both orgs and government and and their promoters in media did this. I think it’s nuts and I’m not a teacher. The next time they’re cheering Chris Christie (who is WILDLY powerful) screaming at a teacher maybe they think about who is responsible for this.
http://www.npr.org/2013/12/27/257401046/recalling-his-inspiration-a-neurosurgeon-thanks-a-teacher
LikeLike
It’s right before New Year’s Day, and I’m in the home of my hairdresser who is a single parent of two children. She is a licensed beautician who cannot afford the luxury of operating her business in a beautician’s shop. Therefore, she works from home. Her daughter attend Medgar Evers, and her son is enrolled in a charter school. It’s ironic that as I read this blog, I was sitting under the hair dryer in her very tiny 1 bedroom apartment. The kitchen is where she services customers. Poverty resides in her home. Looking up at her usually packed shelves, I can infer that she hasn’t yet received her benefits. Hmmmmm I silently whispered. His mother indulge herself into church. She often quotes, “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and everything else will be granted unto you.” She’s doing all the right things, but she is POOR. She knows a lot about the bible but zero about the educational system. She believes charter school is the answer. Her son needs additional support in math. She asked about my friend, a math teacher who at one time tutored her daughter. She is better off than a lot of other families but she is one of them. Poverty is a powerful force and it stands in the way of poor children succeeding. America what are you going to do?
LikeLike
Sybil, This mom has the right attitude. Her children will do just fine. It’s not a matter of money. Being poor is not the issue. The main quest should be the need to do better for one’s children. This woman works hard. She is teaching her children good values. She is taking their education seriously (maybe the Charter School isn’t the best choice, but she recognizes he needs help in math). They will land on their feet.
Believe it or not, money doesn’t make one happy. And people in poverty can live rewarding fulfilling lives.
LikeLike
Completely agree with Reich’s thoughts re income inequality. However, the strongest argument against income inequality is not morality but rather economics.
As Reich himself explains in his book “Aftershock”, income inequality (or, more specifically, rechanneling national income from the middle class to the rich) is a major — probably the major — cause of the Great Recession and our current economic stagnation. The critical economic insight — rarely noted by media columnists — is that the middle class spends virtually all of their income while the rich spend only relatively small percentage of their income. When the rich buy CDs, stocks, bonds, gold, art, or real estate, this is rarely “spending” in the economic sense. The items purchased are usually either legal creations representing another form of $ or already-existing physical products that are being sold by sellers who did not create the physical products. Most of the $ spent to purchase these items sits idle after the sale, often for long time periods. The $ spent to purchase these items is not immediately spent to purchase goods/services. By contrast, when the middle class spend their $, they are buying food, vacations, cars, furniture, college educations. Most of the $ spent to purchase these items immediately reenters the economy.
When $ leaves the economy, the result is insufficient demand for goods/services. Businesses anticipating weak demand for goods/services have no incentive to increase inventories, expand production, or start new businesses. The result is high under/unemployment and downward pressure on wages as workers compete for the few available jobs. The govt usually tries to offset this escaping $ by deficit spending. All this is really Eco 101 stuff.
From the end of WWII through the late 1970s, increases in national income were shared equally by the poor, the middle class, and the rich. Starting around 1980, changes in national policies (tax, labor, corporate governance, financial regulation) rechanneled an increasing percentage of the national income from the middle class to the rich. This, in turn, significantly increased the amount of $ escaping from the economy as the non-spending rich controlled an ever-increasing share of the national income. The middle class maintained its spending in the face of flat income by sending the wife to work and by borrowing $ (credit cards, home equity loans, refinancing mortgages). When the middle class exhausted these vehicles, spending flat-lined and we had the Great Recession.
Until and unless we reverse those changes in national policies and rechannel more of the national income back to the spending middle class, there will continue to be insufficient spending/demand in the economy and the economy will continue to stagnate with high under/unemployment and downward pressure on wages.
In other words, reducing income inequality will restart the economy — it’s sound moral policy and necessary economic policy.
(Rechanneling income from the spending middle class to the non-spending rich is only one source of the increasing amount of $ escaping from the US economy over the past 30+ years — trade deals increasing trade deficits by allowing US firms to buy abroad but not sell abroad and dramatically increased numbers of immigrants sending $ to relatives in the home country are two other sources of $ escaping from the US economy.)
LikeLike
$ spent on, say, a bank CD, are used by the bank to make loans, often to the middle class, for homes, businesses, cars, etc.
LikeLike
Correct
LikeLike
Banks make loans at usury interest rates to people in the middle class because policies and laws have been written to allow banks to just that. Only the wealthy can borrow money at rates that help them to make money on their money. So smug, so wrong!
LikeLike
Betsy:
There is a lot wrong with the way the banking system operates, but it is pure and utter nonsense to talk about banks lending money to the middle class at usurious interest rates. It simply is not true. Nor is it true that the rates charged to the rich are that different from others.
If you want to talk about unsecured lending, then you might have more of a point. But you have to ask yourself what do you need to charge to off-set the likelihood of default.
LikeLike
Not smug, not wrong. Millions upon millions of those of us (and I include myself) have gotten loans at reasonable interest rates. My wife and I have had mortgages, home equity lines, and business loans at good rates. Your emotional outburst there is completely evidence-free.
LikeLike
“Your emotional outburst there is completely evidence-free.” So I will add patronizing to smug and wrong. Your statements of fact are also evidence-free. I am sure that we both could offer linked sources to make our arguments more cogent but that goes a bit far afield from the discussion here.
LikeLike
Betsy,
You really don’t understand economics. Please quote me the usurious rates Bank of America charges on 30-year loans while I go mingle with my middle class neighbors with mortgages. Your name calling doesn’t substitute for an argument. Or knowledge.
LikeLike
SC Math Teacher…. You chose Bank of America to use as an example? I can give you more links (see below) if you want to study up on the malfeasance of banks. In fact there are now books written (several of which I have read) on the subject of our banking system and the financial meltdown of 2008. Would you would like me to list a few of them for you?
The collapse of the economy in 2008 was used by those pushing education form as one reason to defund public education. It is not really an issue of there being no money to fund a good education for all children and pay teachers a professional wage with good benefits.
Perhaps I understand the broader issues of economics, history and political gamesmanship better than you do.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/23/us-bankofamerica-hustle-idUSBRE98M11H20130923
LikeLike
The article you link to is about a law suit that accuses a Countrywide of giving loans to unqualified people. I don’t see how this supports your contention that the banking system only gives loans to rich people.
LikeLike
Betsy:
The article you linked to has nothing to do with your assertion about usurious interest rates. I started my response by noting that there is much that is wrong with the banking industry. That is different from any claim about usurious interest rates for middle class borrowers. Do you have a more pertinent reference?
LikeLike
SC Math Teacher — Economic theory teaches that the bank uses the CD $ to make loans to house buyers or local businesses and that in this way the CD $ re-enters the economy. However, that economic theory assumes that no $ is escaping from the economy and that there is therefore sufficient demand in the economy to support full economic activity. In practice, $ is escaping from the economy and there is insufficient total demand in the economy. Therefore, the bank does not loan the CD $ out to new home buyers or to local businesses. (Loans to someone buying an already-existing home does not generate real economic activity.). The fact that banks are paying historically low interest rates on CDs is strong evidence that there is little demand for loans.
LikeLike
What do the sellers of the already existing homes do with the proceeds from the sale?
LikeLike
Labor lawyer:
So what role do historically low fed rates have? The Government deficit by definition is borrowing and the rate paid on federal borrowing is very low. When rates return to historical norms, we are going to have a massive bill to pay through taxes, reduced spending and/or inflation. The piper will be paid.
LikeLike
TE… I never said that banks only give loans to rich people.
LikeLike
Eventually, a home will be sold and the seller will use the $ to buy actual goods/services rather than simply another already existing house. However, most of the real estate transactions involve a seller of existing real estate selling and then using the proceeds of the sale to buy either another piece of existing real estate or to buy another kind of investment vehicle (i.e., stocks, bonds, CDs. gold). This type of economic activity generates very few jobs and probably, on balance, sucks additional $ out of the economy as middle class/upper-middle class home buyers spend increasing amounts of their income for the same but now higher-priced house rather than spending that income on consumer products/services that would actually generate jobs.
Republican trickle-down economic theorists like to equate all investment spending with business expansion/creation spending (i.e., buying new machines for an existing factory, building a new factory, or starting a new store or restaurant). This latter type of investment spending does create jobs. But, this latter type of investment spending is only a small fraction of all investment “spending”.
LikeLike
Much to the dismay of my students, economists draw a distinction between household saving (which is much of what you describe) and investment, which is what firms do to expand. Households may well try to rebalance their savings by, say, corporate bonds and buying CD’s, but that will not change the total amount a household saves, and in normal times, not the amount of investment firms do.
LikeLike
Actually the poverty rate was higher in the late 50’s and early 60’s than today. Here are an interesting set of charts from the Washington Post, but they are a bit dated (data only goes through 2010): http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/11/poverty-in-the-50-years-since-the-other-america-in-five-charts/
The current poverty rate of about 15% is considerably lower than the 22% poverty rate in 1959. The lowest poverty rate in the US was 11.1% in 1973.
LikeLike
TE — The poverty rate declined during the 1960s due to the implementation of Johnson’s Great Society programs — Medicare, Medicaid, and food stamps. Starting in the 1970s, changes in national policies overrode the effects of the Great Society programs, although there were some national policy changes that tended to reduce poverty (i.e., the Earned Income Tax Credit in the late 1970s and the Medicare drug benefit). The large increase in women entering the workforce as well as middle class borrowing also tended to offset the negative effect that the national policy changes would otherwise have had on total spending/demand.
My point here is that, if the federal govt had continued the national policies of the 1960s (re tax, labor, financial regulation, and corporate governance) through the present day, the middle class would have had a lot more income, there would have been much more spending/demand in the economy, there would have been much more economic growth, and everyone would have been better off economically than they are today — certainly, the poor and the middle class would have been better off and perhaps even most of the rich.
LikeLike
We also came close to hitting an all time low in the poverty rate in 2000. Since 2000, the main expansion to the federal government’s anti-poverty program has been the earned income tax credit, which has no impact on measured poverty but does have an impact on actual poverty.
LikeLike
One, but certainly not the only change that happened in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s was that low skilled, middle class wage paying jobs left the US.
A number of southern Governors of both parties (including Riley, Clinton & Hunt, who Democrats, and Alexander, a Republican) found that jobs their states had enticed from the NE and places like Ohio to their states because of lower wage rates (and fewer unions) were in many cases, leaving the SE. US Companies were setting up business in central America and in parts of Asia.
This helped produce the Gov’s interest in improving education. These Governors concluded that improving education in their states would help improve their economies. In 1986, they issued a report through the National Governors Association which said among other things that
a. they thought early childhood education for students from low income families and all day kg should be high priorities and that
b. they were ready to reduce regulations if educators would be more responsible for results. (please see last sentence on the page of this summary published in Phi Delta Kappan Magazine.
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20403306?uid=3739736&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103282450923
The early childhood recommendation came from the Childrens Defense Fund. This “bargain” was one of the things that a number of teachers, union officials and school principals suggested when they testified in task force meetings with governors and their staffs.
The Governors issued this report. There was not a lot of response from main stream education groups, though they had been involved in developing & making recommendations, many of which were included.
One response was the chartered public school movement. It accepted the offer that Governors made – reduced regulation in exchange for greater responsibility as results.
LikeLike
The poverty rate is determined by the net effect of many govt policies, of social policies (i.e., sending the wife to work, using borrowed $ for current expenses), and of economic factors outside the control of the US govt (i.e., international oil prices). By 2000, the govt was operating several policies that redistributed $ from the rich and middle class to the poor; the govt was also operating several policies that rechanneled an increasing share of national income/assets from the middle class to the rich. The middle class were maintaining the economy (that is, middle-class consumer spending) in the face of flat hourly wages by sending the wife to work and by borrowing $ to spend on current consumer goods/services. The net effect of all this might well have been a relatively low poverty rate. However, the middle class was hurting — they were working longer hours and borrowing $ to maintain/increase consumer spending.
LikeLike
The poverty rate is also a function of how we decide to measure it. We do it rather badly in the United States.
LikeLike
LL:
So long as too few people are ready, willing and able to start new sustainable, i.e., profitable, businesses and create jobs then we will continue with this malaise. Demonizing entrepreneurs and business folks is no way to grow an economy and address real needs. Income redistribution policies will be far easier in a growing economy as opposed to a stagnant one. The economic multiplier for the kind of redistribution you are suggesting. IMHO, is simply too small: There is far too much leakage via expenditures on imported consumer goods.
Raising minimum wages now, will simply ensure continued stagnation and set off a round of inflation.
The economy, at least in the Northeast, would get far more of a boost if the Federal government got behind more natural gas exploration and encouraged the replacement of home heating oil with gas. It would positively affect the balance of payment and this type of investment in infrastructure and ancillary equipment would have a much higher economic multiplier with less leakage.
LikeLike
Well I hope you are wrong, Bernie. I support a living wage, but I’ll take an increased minimum wage as a start. I predict a stronger economy, but perhaps I’m wrong. In the meantime, the lives of numerous families will be improved. And with a promise of a way out of poverty, perhaps our nation’s youth will start taking education more seriously. Viola!
LikeLike
Ellen:
It is not a question of shortchanging anyone. The hard reality is that many businesses will make precisely the choices TE indicated. We had a retail store and paid above minimum wage, but a jump as is frequently envisaged would definitely have led to a reduction in hours and staff and potentially closing the store. The equation is nastily simple and unavoidable. I wish I believed as you do that simply increasing the minimum wage would have the effect you wish. Alas, it will likely have the opposite effect. That is why in my first response to your story about Damere, I emphasized the need to first create real jobs.
LikeLike
Well, it looks like minimum wage will be increased, so we shall both see.
LikeLike
Count me as one of the borrowers. I’m still trying to pay down my debt.
LikeLike
I still owe money on a mortgage as well, though I have to admire I have refinanced a couple of times to improve my house.
LikeLike
bernie1815 — I am not demonizing entrepreneurs; I’m making the obvious observation that rational businesses will not expand or start new enterprises if they perceive flat current/future demand. The issue that we perhaps disagree on is the extent to which the rich spend their income. In my view, the rich spend only a relatively small percentage of their income and “invest” the rest of their income; most of this “invested” income is invested via transactions that do not create demand in the economy — that is, the income is invested in CDs, stocks, bonds, existing art, existing real estate, existing gold. Only a small part of this “invested” income is invested via transactions that create demand in the economy — that is, building a new factory or starting a new business. Of course, the $ invested in CDs, stocks, bonds, etc. will eventually be used in transactions that create demand (i.e., buying a consumer product/service or starting a new business), but there will often be an long delay before that occurs and during the interim the $ is missing from the economy.
LikeLike
But we have no right to dictate how they use their money. We could keep them from putting their funds in off shore accounts or limiting some of their tax shelters. We could discourage them from investing overseas through tax laws and tariffs. Perhaps we could encourage them to spend money in the US through tax breaks. I’m not an expert on economics, but is this another case of damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
LikeLike
Bottom line: Reich is asking if we are a decent society. Are those people who refuse to care about anyone but the few decent people? It depends on one’s definition of decency. By my definition the answer is no. When the goal is to obtain money by working others at a wage that won’t sustain them, to hoard that money merely to obtain more unearned money that will not be put to use to circulate in the economy, it isn’t humane or decent. It is simple selfishness and greed.
LikeLike
Deb – I agree the rich tend to be selfish and greedy. And their contributions are self serving. But selfishness is not against the law. Neither is greed. And even self serving contributions can be beneficial.
We all are guilty of the above to a certain degree. We are just more critical of the wealthy because they have the potential to do so much more good. Yet, think of Gates. He feels he is doing good – he’s helping public education. A worthy cause – the wrong platform.
I struggle with this concept. I have enough, I give a little in money, I do more in action. My actions aren’t for glorification, but they do feed my sense of self worth. At the end of the day I want to feel I have done the right thing. Noble or self serving?
What would I do if I had lots of money? In my imagination I’ve assisted family, friends, organizations I’ve been involved with – and here my vision ends. What would I do if I had enough money to truly make a difference? I don’t know. Do you?
LikeLike
My comments aren’t directed so much at the individuals as at the financial class of people who have manipulated the laws to work in ways that compound their advantages while blocking the less fortunate from even entering the playing field.
There is only so much of the pie to go around even if you manufacture money and pretend that there is more. An economy will not work if there is no circulation of money to keep it oiled to run smoothly.
Some have hoarded so much and own so much that they no longer feel they need a society other than having a group of people to do their bidding. If that is a free society for all, I don’t buy into it. When they have reached a the point that not one of us matters, there is no “one nation”. And we are approaching that.
When they make donations that put food in their mouths or provide vjust enough wages to keep the poor dependent on crumbs but never moving forward, they are behaving heartlessly. They are not interested in civility or others. They are interested in acquiring money for the sake of money.
Just because something is legal, it doesn’t make it moral or right. Legalities serve those who make the rules. Money can help circumvent the rules. Example: the boy who was ruled ruled not guilty becausecof affluenza.
So are we a decent society? I say no because we have allowed indecent laws to exist.
What would I do if I were wealthy? I don’t know specifically. I have no desire to take more than I need or earn. But I would make sure I was debt free. I owe very little. And I might buy a new car. Ours are 1992 and 1998 vintage. I would help my sisters. I think I would use the rest to start an organization to change laws to be more fair and equitable, esp for food , housing, and education.
I have no interest in luxurious stuff and travel. I don’t want more homes or finecjewels. Never did. Never will. I prefer to share. But that is only a start.
LikeLike
Deb, you’ll get no arguments from me. Well said.
And I’m like you. I’m buying the new car, anyway – money or not. I’d pay off my debts and help family and friends, but I’ve no desire to live a wealthy lifestyle. My guess is that neither of us would be comfortable with that sort of personality. We know too much.
LikeLike
Ellen and Deb:
I am puzzled. If you did benefit from a windfall (and I hope you do) why would you not start a business that employs folks. I have one or two businesses I would like to try to start if I was ever to win the lottery. Like you I am frugal and strongly dislike all forms of conspicuous consumption ( 5 of my last cars reached 170K or more and one of the current vehicles just hit 6 figures), but the notion of starting another business without threatening my retirement savings remains appealing.
LikeLike
At one point, I was going to buy the Sabers with my lottery winnings. I possibly would buy a restaurant for my son or set him up in some other business. At one point I dreamed of having my own bookstore. Yes, Bernie, I guess we all have hidden secret wishes. What’s the old saying – “If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride.”
LikeLike
Ellen:
Interesting choices.
As a Bruins fan, I assure you the Sabers need far more than an infusion of cash. 😉
Your bookstore idea is swimming against the tide – and I speak as one who cannot pass a used book store without going in.
To have a measurable impact on employment, you need businesses that can scale or at least are capable of becoming franchises and that in fact create new markets. It can still be done. For example, I visited one son down in Norfolk and he introduced me to WaWas. They have not come to New England yet, but present a huge improvement in my mind to the omnipresent Dunkins. I checked out the possibilities but I would need to win the lottery and/or be 30 years younger.
LikeLike
We have Tim Horton’s in Buffalo. In the morning, the line is out the door. There’s also Manhatten Bagel and Jays Bagels. Plus, there’s a coffee shop on every other block. You’ve got your choice of dozens. But if you want the best doughnuts, it’s Paula’s. They are a big step above Dunkin Donuts.
The book shop would have been for me, not to make money. I imagined story hours for the kids and author visits. I pictured myself in a rocking chair reading all my favorites. And sharing my knowledge with the customers.
The Sabers are now owned by someone with lots of money (and a love for his team). He’s made some good moves in management, now we need some new players (we got rid of our best players under the old management). Some world class players have come through Buffalo (see members on the US Olympic team).
LikeLike
I am not sure I would know how to start a business. By the time I’d figure it out, i’d be senile.
LikeLike
deb:
That is why we need Ellen’s kids and Damere to have the mindset and energy to start new businesses.
LikeLike
LL:
Sorry, I didn’t mean to suggest that you have demonized entrepreneurs. You have not. Your comments are splendidly cogent and reasonable. I plan today to look for some research and data on variations in the economic multiplier by income level and activity, since I believe with you that is the fundamental issue. I was fortunate to be taught by some of Keynes’ immediate disciples (Robinson, Kahn and Kaldor) so I am pretty familiar with the effective demand arguments. The issue is the relative economic efficiency and impact of a $ in the hands of one group or another. As Keynes might argue we need to revitalize “the animal spirits” of business people and ensure that it is not killed in the young by a sense of entitlement and immediate gratification.
LikeLike
bernie1815 — Sounds like you are much better versed in economic theory than I am. I look forward to your insights re multiplier effect by income class. Agree that some spending (business as well as consumer spending) will be to purchase goods/services from outside the US and that this will result in some $ escaping from the US economy; however, most of the spending will remain in the US economy while, by contrast, $ that is not spent at all (the rich buying CDs or pre-existing stock shares) will all disappear — at least temporarily — from the US economy. An important variable impacting the multiplier effect of “investment” (buying CDs or pre-existing stock shares, not building a new factory) would be whether there is adequate total demand in the US economy to stimulate business expansion; the more demand, the greater likelihood that the “invested” $ will be quickly recycled into business expansion. If you would like to correspond directly, my email address is jelligers@msn.com.
LikeLike
LL:
If you have access to NBER working papers, this paper by Neumark et al “REVISITING THE MINIMUM WAGE-EMPLOYMENT DEBATE: THROWING OUT THE BABY WITH THE BATHWATER?” provides a pretty good up-to-date summary of the debate though it is a bit technical. It does not address the value of the economic multiplier directly but it does address it indirectly.
LikeLike
Here is a copy that is not behind a pay wall:http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~pjkuhn/Ec250A/Readings/Neumark_etal_Bathwater.pdf
LikeLike
TE:
Thanks. That is very helpful. Did you have a chance to take a look at it? Any thoughts?
LikeLike
No disrespect to waitpeople – but isn’t something a bit nuts about where teacher salaries are compared to some wait people earning $80-$150K?
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304137304579292350943682222
LikeLike
Joe – those high paying servers jobs are far and few between.
LikeLike
Ellen — I am not suggesting that the govt force the rich to spend their income differently. Rather, I am arguing that the rich spend only a small portion of their income and that therefore the US economy would be better off if a larger share of the national income went to the spending middle class rather than to the non-spending rich. We should return to the national policies (tax, labor, financial regulations, corporate governance) of the 1950s-1960s that channeled a larger share of the national income to the spending middle class and a smaller share of the national income to the non-spending rich.
LikeLike
LL, I agree, but I don’t see that happening anytime soon, if ever.
LikeLike
I skimmed the minimum-wage-impact-on-employment paper. I must concede that it is beyond my reasonable comprehension — I’d have to spend a lot of time carefully reading and thinking about each paragraph + not sure I’d reach any informed conclusion. Bottom line of the paper seems to be that the authors think there is a negative impact on employment of raising the minimum wage, but that other researchers reach an opposite result. My admittedly marginally-informed view is that a minimum wage increase will have a short-term negative impact on employment with a short-term/long-term positive impact on total earnings + that the positive impact on total earnings when subjected to a multiplier will have a long-term positive impact on economic growth which, in turn, will ultimately increase total employment. Some caveats to my opinion — the higher the current under/unemployment rate, the higher the corporate profit margins, and the weaker the total demand in the economy at the time of the minimum wage increase, the smaller the negative impact on total employment.
If you know of any research specifically addressing the percentage of income “spent” by income level, please give a citation.
LikeLike
LL:
Certainly Neumark strongly argues for the negative employment consequences of increases in the minimum wage and has done so for 25 years or more. This paper is very much a methodological evisceration of a series of papers that argued that the findings of a negative employment effect from an increase in the minimum wage because if you statistically control for local (Regional, State or County) employment trends then this negative consequence is no longer statistically significant. Neumark’s careful replication of these studies – which in my opinion represents a very strong counterargument – and shows that critics analysis is not robust to either the period for calculating the trend or for changes in the geography for employment trends. I will write to Neumark and find if any of the authors he critiqued responded to this paper.
I will keep looking for multiplier data but the consumption rate by income level that you are looking for is very different from the multiplier since the actual goods purchased help determine the size of the multiplier.
LikeLike
bernie1815 — We are probably talking about two separate albeit related concepts.
One concept is the issue of the multiplier effect for $ spent by the rich vs. the multiplier effect for $ spent by the middle class or the poor. I have not read (or even thought) about this concept. When the rich spend $, they presumably purchase different goods/services than the middle class/poor and it makes sense that the purchase of goods/services X would have a different multiplier effect than the purchase of goods/services Y — particularly if much of the $ spent on X ends up in a foreign economy while much of the $ spent on Y ends up in the domestic economy (for example, purchasing a $400 TV vs. purchasing two $200 theater tickets).
The second concept is the issue of the percentage of their income that the rich spend on goods/services vs. the percentage of their incomoe that the middle class/poor spend on goods/srvices. This, to me, is the far more important concept. It seems likely that the rich — particularly the very rich — spend only a relatively small percentage of their income on goods/services that were created for them to purchase (that is, buying an already existing house or famous artwork from the previous owner of the house/artwork would not count as spending for goods/services). Conversely, the middle class/poor spend virtually all of their income on such goods/services. In my opinion, it is spending to purchase these kinds of goods/services (i.e., food, restaurant meals, movie tickets, new clothes, utilities, computers, new furniture) that creates demand in the economy. Spending to purchase a newly-constructed house would also create demand.
LikeLike
Labor Lawyer:
You said, “However, the strongest argument against income inequality is not morality but rather economics.”
Then you said, “In other words, reducing income inequality will restart the economy — it’s sound moral policy and necessary economic policy.”
Can you clarify the morality between the two?
In the end, it is a moral issue no matter how you look at it.
LikeLike
jon — Large income inequality (the rich having much larger incomes than the middle class/poor) is immoral in the sense that the rich, the middle class, and the poor each, on average, probably put forth roughly the same amount of effort on a day-in/day-out basis + for many of the rich, the reason they are rich is that their parents/grandparents were themselves well-educated/affluent so the rich started life way ahead of the middle class/poor. This morality argument is the one that Dems and commentators usually make when attacking income inequality. I agree with this argument. However, I think the much stronger and more convincing argument in favor of govt policies that would reduce income inequality is the economic argument I outlined above — that is, that putting $ in the hands of the rich inevitably results in much of that $ escaping from the economy (at least temporarily) with a consequent reduction in total demand for goods/services in the economy while putting $ in the hands of the middle class/poor results in virtually all of the $ being immediately recycled back into the economy.
LikeLike
That’s why I don’t understand the pushback against raising the minimum wage. That money will be reinvested into the economy. I doubt that much will end up in a savings account. I foresee new clothes and supplies, some outings – perhaps at local restaurants, recreational activities, and shopping trips, etc.
It will be like priming the pump. Much better than trickle down.
LikeLike
The problem with raising the minimum wage is the trade off between higher wages for some, and no jobs for others.
In restaurants, for example, how high would the the minimum wage have to get before the waitstaff is replaced by an iPad?
LikeLike
If the restaurant wants to be successful, they have to have the correct amount of staffing. Waitressing and working in the kitchen is hard, thankless work (that’s why I always leave a decent tip). My son worked his way up the ladder from dish washer to line cook to assistant manager. His pay did not go up to match his added responsibility. In the end, the kitchen was a rotating door for young black men willing to work for minimum wage.
And this was a very nice restaurant. But management was making a profit off the backs of the workers. I’m sorry, if the Mighty Taco next door could afford to pay their employees $12.00 an hour, so could an upscale restaurant.
I’m not buying your argument.
LikeLike
Most restaurants operate on the edge of profitability, that is why so many fail. If the nice restaurant your son was working in did such a reliably profitable business, I would expect to see other restaurants open up and end up taking customers away.
I expect that the reason the nice restaurant could get away with paying less than the fast food place is that the nice restaurant also offered staff the opportunity to learn about the restaurant business while the fast food place offered nothing but pay.
LikeLike
My son had a unique opportunity to develop his culinary skill at a restaurant that actually prepared it’s own food, but he also gave 100% effort for a small pay check. Until two weeks ago, when they replaced the old manager, demoted him, and brought in someone from corporate headquarters, he was the only one left from the original crew that opened the restaurant four years earlier. He’s now taken a hiatus.
I realize the profit margin is small, but not so small that they can’t pay their employees a slightly better wage. Someone is making money.
LikeLike
No doubt the restaurant does not want to pay more than it has to for its employees. The question is why it is able to pay your son less than he would make at the fast food place and your son would still stay at the restaurant. I suspect it was because your son realized that he was getting more from the job than just a paycheck, he was getting valuable experience in the industry that a fast food place would not provide. It seems to me that this is a good, long run oriented decision on your son’s part.
LikeLike
I encouraged him to stay as long as they were training him and there was room for advancement, even though the pay was low. Then the person who hired him was forced to retire and recently the sous chef in charge was also fired. PJ was being groomed as the next sous chef, and all of a sudden he was demoted to pizza maker.
However, he did develop a good reputation, so finding another position should not be an issue. Opportunities await. And once he gets enough experience, perhaps we can help him start his own restaurant. Much farther down the road.
LikeLike
And Buffalo is a big restaurant town.
LikeLike
Since when do IPads have the capability of serving food? I highly doubt most restaurants will suddenly be converted to self-serve/cafeterias.
The minimum wage for tipped workers has been $2.13 per hour for the past 22 years. “Imagine your average server in an IHOP in Texas earning $2.13 an hour, graveyard shift, no tips” …“The company’s supposed to make up the difference between $2.13 and $7.25 but time and time again that doesn’t happen.”
See Moyers and Company, “THE POVERTY LINE: The Minimum Wage Doesn’t Apply to Everyone” http://billmoyers.com/2013/07/26/the-minimum-wage-doesnt-apply-to-everyone/
LikeLike
iPads are starting to be used to take orders (http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/01/05/how-restaurants-are-using-the-ipad/#!q3LUR) , though if labor costs go up enough I would not be surprised if simple robots will be used to bring the food out in the foreseeable future.
High cost drives innovation in any business. If labor costs are high, folks will think long and hard about what they can do to economize on labor use.
LikeLike
Most restaurants, especially the chains, use prepackaged food which is heated up. That’s how they save money.
I prefer going somewhere that makes it’s food fresh.
I’d never frequent a restaurant run by robots.
LikeLike
ETK — Agree with your analysis. Even if raising the minimum wage results in the loss of a few jobs to automation or perhaps restaurant closings, raising the minimum wage will result in more $ going to the working poor who will immediately spend all of that $ and most of that increased $ going to the working poor will come from either the upper-middle-class/rich business owners or the middle-class customers who would. on balance, spend less of the $.
I also doubt that many of the jobs would be lost to automation. Virtually all minimum wage jobs are personal service hands-on jobs that cannot be easily performed by an inexpensive machine. Re businesses being forced out of business by an increase in the minimum wage — If all the businesses providing that service in the geographic area have to comply with the minimum wage, then the effect of raising the minimum wage will not disadvantage Business A vis-à-vis its competitor Business B. A and B might both have to raise their prices, but unless their customers decide not to use the service at all, the customers will have to pay the higher prices. Again, seems like the bottom line net effect of raising the minimum wage will be to rechannel income from the rich/upper-middle-class to the working poor.
LikeLike
How many jobs would be lost to the customer doing the personal services themselves? I pump my own gas, often check myself out of the grocery store, deposit checks at any hour of the day or night by taking a picture of them, etc.. Have we run out of self serve possibilities? I doubt it.
LikeLike
Finally, LL, I finally found someone who agrees with me. To me it’s a no brainier, but the push back has been so intense, I’ve felt like a salmon swimming upstream. Many families will benefit from the proposed higher wages.Thanks for the support. Now it needs to be passed.
LikeLike
Ellen:
The issue is the size of the economic multiplier. It is much lower than you and LL assume, when wages of the lowest paid workers are increased. It may not seem fair or just but that is the economic reality.
Perhaps the Henry Ford example will serve. Henry Ford raised wages for his factory workers so that they could in fact buy his cars. That is the way a multiplier works. In that case it proved potent. Increased wages that allow folks to buy imports, however, simply has a far lower effect on the level of economic activities. As LL observed there is too much leakage through imports.
LikeLike
And it is almost impossible to buy American. I ordered something online from LaMaze for my new grandson. Two weeks later I got a package from China. We wondered if the item was safe to use.
LikeLike
Ellen:
The economic consequences of massive Chinese imports are indeed complex and long-term.
LikeLike
Bernie – I would never purposely buy a product from China.
LikeLike
The impact of China on the world economy is moderating. The labor force in China is shrinking and wages are growing rapidly. We will likely see increases in wage growth in the US over the commming decade.
LikeLike
TE:
Perhaps. You are more optimistic than I am about a resurgence of consumer goods manufacturing in the US. On the other hand, it would not take much of an increase in wages in China to increase demand for American foodstuffs.
LikeLike
Raising the minimum raise might result in a few jobs being lost to customer self-service, but again this will be a relatively small number compared to the huge effect of rechanneling $ from the business owners (rich/upper-middle-class) to the working poor. Most of the customer self-service opportunities are the result of fairly expensive automation coupled with a willingness on the part of the customer to do the work him/herself. Whether the minimum wage is $8 or $10 will influence only a very few of these business decisions.
A more sophisticated — but valid — argument that one rarely sees in the media is that the economy as a whole actually benefits by raising the minimum wage to the point where automation replaces some extremely low-skilled labor. The net effect is increased productivity in the economy as a whole. Eventually, the extremely low-skilled employee who was laid off by the automated process will get another job that is, on balance, more productive than his/her old job (assuming, that is, that there is sufficient demand in the economy to generate something close to full employment). In other words, the invention and widespread use of the automobile put a lot of people out of work but eventually resulted in more people working at higher real wages with a higher real standard of living.
LikeLike
I certainly agree that increased productivity is the key to long term wage growth. I think the current deviation we are seeing between the two is largely the result of the sudden inclusion of China in the world economy. As that works its way out, I believe you will see a return to a more normal relationship.
I also applaud your concentration on the long run. Staying with your car example, I expect that there will be no professional drivers in a relatively short time. Everything will be able to drive itself. It will result in higher unemployment (what economists call structural unemployment) and more poverty in the short run, but much higher productivity and many lives saved in the long run.
LikeLike
It may be slightly off topic to post this, but, I think there is a marked difference in the kind of unemployment we have today. We have highly skilled, highly educated people who have been kicked off their jobs due to various changes. I am not claiming to be an “economist” and don’t wish to be criticized for that fact, but it seems to me that when Trickle Down pooled, it was because of our loopholes and the lack of the decency that Reich wonders about created a whole new type of “business” and “earning” that, prior to that time wasn’t a real option, not on a massive scale, anyway. (I know, that was a long sentence).
The push back against regulation in the name of “free market”, imo, simply puts the “needs” of corporations above the “needs” of an equitable (and functioning) society. Some call it greed. I think it is also willful blindness and some telling themselves that even those in poverty aren’t “that bad off”. When the “requirements” of capitalism require constant profit and not only that … increasing profits, someone has to “lose”. And, in the climate currently being pushed by some extremists, including Koch Brothers, ALEC and Gates as well as a political faction, not only are those who “lose” losers, they are deservedly so and they are labeled as takers and moochers.
Sure there are lifelong takers, but they are on both ends of the economic scale, and at all intervals between. But, now there are those who have been useful, productive, vital members are the working community are being put out to pasture, ignored, and disrespected. They are lumped in with the lazy ones. And, if they are bright, they are expected to be entrepreneurs instead of wanting a job with a business. They may not have the savings (or at this point, any credit score) to start up a business. Or, they may not be trained to do so and can’t afford the education to learn how to do so.
In any case, this came along rapidly once businesses were able to put their options in place, buying up companies and then selling them for gain, pushing people out of jobs, ruining communities, and causing so many people to become depressed and even suicidal, losing homes, losing self-respect, and losing hope.
This is why I get so angry when people say that they are all about Ayn Rand’s philosophy and care not for others.
If we actually want to have a society that shows how wonderful capitalism is, then it needs to work for everyone, not just for the 1-2%.
If we actually want equity in education, then we need to have a means of placing all of the innovations, technology, and skills in all schools.
To remove our children from the public school in a manner that is obviously done to segregate and sort by class, intelligence, race, and/or talent doesn’t seem like an equitable opportunity for everyone. It seems that it is creating a greater divide. The fact is: Some People Do Not Care. And we know who they are. They self-identify.
No I am not a leftist. I am only slightly left of center on every scale that I have explored. I just get highly upset when I see injustice and when that is deliberate and haughtily viewed as being “pro-American”. I couldn’t disagree more.
Happy New Year!
LikeLike
Honestly, this has nothing to do with education. Fixing inequality is a matter of raising wages at the bottom and raising taxes on the rich. All the education in the world isn’t going to change pay scales.
LikeLike
We get Reich’s weekly column in the San Francisco Chronicle and I almost always learn something from it. He published a column last week about the failings of philanthropy and I was disappointed that he missed the concept of “venture philanthropy”, where foundations push a sector in one way to create a new market for their benefactors.
Readers of this blog regularly see venture philanthropy in the education world. Even my local large NPR station, KQED, has underwriting announcements telling us that the Walton Family Foundation is improving education by promoting “school choice”. I would prefer that a good investigative reporter tell me whether they are “improving” education. Unfortunately, a publicly-supported informational radio station broadcasts this unexamined charitable-deduction assertion a few times a day.
Here’s Reich’s column:
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/reich/article/Philanthropy-of-wealthy-not-always-charitable-5082580.php
What do you think, did Reich miss “venture philanthropy”?
LikeLike
Ron: I sincerely appreciate all the good that charitable foundations do.
However, others with more wit have appropriately labeled what much of educational philanthropy is all about: “malanthropy” and “vulture philanthropy.”
Hasty Optimists for $tudent $ucce$$ anyone?
I leave it to others to make an acronym for the above.
😎
LikeLike
Reich praised Gates. He also supports Obama’s education policies on his Inequality for All page. If Reich really wants to help low income people and the dwindling middle class, he’s going to have to stop supporting neo-liberal Democrats who are on the same page as the GOP.
LikeLike
“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.” -FDR
Until Reich can unequivacally denounce all those who feather their nests with gold and jewels at the expense of their countrymen he will have no credibility on poverty, income inequality, or anything related.
LikeLike
What of those that feather their nests providing valuable goods and services to their countrymen and others around the world?
LikeLike
What bothered me about Reich’s article was dismissing people’s contribution to The Arts. We weren’t rich, but I was at Lincoln Center on more than one occasion as a child. I also went to The Guggenheim on school trips. The glory of NYC is the preponderance of numerous art forms which should be supported by private donations. Buffalo has our share of The Arts which are frequented by the community. Many have “free” days where they are open to the public. They are always busy and not just with wealthy patrons.
And the public schools take advantage of programming, even the inner city schools.
We now have a new Erie County Executive, mainly because he cut back funding for Public Libraries and The Arts. Lesson: Don’t mess with those “luxuries” (necessities) that the public holds dear.
LikeLike
In order to move forward http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_in_Biology_Makes_Sense_Except_in_the_Light_of_Evolution. What if we understand educational assessment by connecting biology and the genotype and phenotype of educating homo sapiens…and that maybe our education failures are resultant from that lack of clarity in student/system assessment. Tinbergen’s four questions and ethology’s sound science observations over ed. Psych’s mish-mash of ID focused, Freudian, Piagetian, operant conditioned, Gestalt, structuralism, etc, assessment failures. For example of awareness of this failure is, http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001109
Ethology is observably structured for an uber assessment of our dysfunctional social and educational issues. Read up on what memes are! Until we grasp that, I’m afraid we are merely treading water or worse.
LikeLike
In Finland, often cited here as a model from which the US can learn, families can choose among different kinds of schools, each of which receive state support. For example, there are schools that teach youngsters in Swedish, schools that teacher students in Finnish, and schools that use both languages:
http://finland.fi/Public/default.aspx?contentid=291854&nodeid=41807&culture=en-US
LikeLike
They don’t just “receive state support.” 99% attend state schools. Many of us support choice within the school system here, but not outside of it in privatized schools.
LikeLike
Dolly,
What is your definition of a privatized school? The only charter school in my town is chartered by the public school board. Does that make it a privatized school or a public school?
LikeLike
Dolly, “state schools” in Finland include those affiliated with a religion (as there is an established church in Finland, unlike the US). State schools also include the options that I have described.
Personally, I oppose public funding of k-12 religious schools – but some here have urged us to do what Finland does. That’s one of many things Finland does.
LikeLike
It’s unusual to us, Joe, but actually, it’s not quite as simple as religious education in one “established church” nor separate schools for different religions. Students of all religions in Finland have a right to a religious education, in their own religion and municipalities. With increased immigration, that has become rather diverse. It looks like they are working through a lot of the kinks: http://www15.uta.fi/FAST/FIN/REL/vh-relig.html
LikeLike
Privatized schools such as charters function outside the public school system and are minimally regulated by or accountable to the district, even though they receive public funds.
If politicians think that choice and deregulation are so wonderful for promoting innovation and student achievement, then they should deregulate all of the public schools and promote choice and innovation within districts, not show favoritism to schools operating outside the system.
LikeLike
What about the charter school in my town that is controlled by the elected public school board? Is it a public charter?
What about a charter school that is funded by the state, not local funding. Does it have to be responsible to the local politicians or to state politicians?
LikeLike
Dolly, in many states district public schools can convert to charters if they want to.
LikeLike
Charter schools siphon public funds and school board oversight is typically perfunctory, since charters usually have their own non-elected boards. They get away with doing things that public schools would never be permitted to do, such as the charter chain that has been raking in six figures per year by charging students for behavioral infractions.
http://www.msnbc.com/melissa-harris-perry/chicago-charter-schools-rake-thousands
I think it’s outrageous that parent concerns are ignored in such schools, but that’s how the system is set up when the district school board prefers privatized schools that have no democratic representation. Parents are supposed to just shop for another school if they don’t like it. Unfortunately, a neighborhood school is no longer an option for them because theirs was converted to a charter, so they often have to go across town to yet another charter where they will have no say.
You are not going to talk me into liking privatization, so you might as well give up now.
LikeLike
Just read through the 129 comments on this post, many of which got somewhat off track about the issues of educational reform. It is true that social media infiltrates most all of the internet presently. My input here will refer to a recent article in the Washington Post by Valerie Strauss which references P.L. Thomas’ book: I believe this one hits the nail squarely on its head: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/12/27/the-invisibility-of-teachers/?goback=.gde_1941347_member_5823132001426755585#!
LikeLike
Great article. His voice needs to be heard.
LikeLike
Interesting study about philanthropy in/from the African American community:
http://www.npr.org/2013/12/30/258382689/redefining-philanthropy-how-african-americans-give-back
LikeLike
sbegem,
I read your link. What is really invisible in the US is not only teachers. What is the purpose of teaching children subjects that will do nothing to prepare them for a livable wage job when Congress has allowed 30 million US jobs to be outsourced and does nothing to correct unfavorable trade balances, the root problem of joblessness in the US. What is invisible is a Congress who does nothing to correct the error of their policies and nothing about job creation, the number one political promise made by politicians in the last election
Regards and good will blogging
LikeLike
A follow up on DaMere (now 23) – my daughter informed me that he is living with his girlfriend and has a new baby girl. He does have a full time job. So, maybe there is hope.
LikeLike
Ellen:
That is good news. Cynics beware.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.
LikeLike