Below is a letter from Leonie Haimson, who was previously added to the honor roll of this blog for fighting for students, parents, and public education.
Leonie almost singlehandedly stopped the effort to mine student data, whose sponsors wanted confidential and identifiable information about every child “for the children’s sake.” Leonie saw through that ruse and raised a national ruckus to fight for student privacy. Privacy of student records is supposedly protected by federal law (FERPA), but Arne Duncan weakened the regulations so that parents could not opt out of the data mining.
It is not over. The Gates Foundation and Carnegie Corporation put up $100 million to start inBloom, and Rupert Murdoch’s Wireless Generation got the contract to develop the software, and amazon.com plans to put it on a “cloud.” They will be back. We count on Haimson and the many parents she has inspired to remain vigilant on behalf of our children. As a grandparent of a child in second grade in a Brooklyn public school, I have a personal interest in keeping his information private.
Here is Leonie’s letter, written 12/20/13:
Dear folks,
I have good news to report! Yesterday, Sheldon Silver, Speaker of the NYS Assembly, along with Education Chair Cathy Nolan and fifty Democratic Assemblymembers sent a letter to Commissioner King, urging him to put a halt to inBloom.
“It is our job to protect New York’s children. In this case, that means protecting their personally identifiable information from falling into the wrong hands,” said Silver. “Until we are confident that this information can remain protected, the plan to share student data with InBloom must be put on hold.”
Why is this important? Because Speaker Silver and the Democrats in the Assembly appoint the Board of Regents, as the Daily News noted. The Regents control education policy in New York, and appoint the commissioner.
We have begun to make real headway in the past year against inBloom, but we need your support so we can continue the fight for student privacy and smaller classes in the public schools.
We count on donations from individuals like you as our main source of funding. If you appreciate our work and want it to continue and grow stronger, please give a tax-deductible contribution right now by clicking here: http://www.nycharities.org/donate/c_donate.asp?CharityCode=1757 or sending a check to the address below.
I am proud to have been called “the nation’s foremost parent expert on inBloom and the current threat to student data privacy.” We were the first advocacy group in the nation to sound the alarm about inBloom’s plan to create a multi-state database to be stored on a vulnerable data cloud run by Amazon.com with an operating system built by Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify. The explicit goal of inBloom was to package this information in an easily digestible form and offer it up to data-mining vendors without parental consent.
In February, inBloom formally launched as a separate corporation, and nine states were listed as “partners.” We worked hard to get the word out through blogging, personal outreach to parent activists and the mainstream media. After protests erupted in states throughout the country, inBloom’s “partners” pulled out. Now, eight out of these states have severed all ties with inBloom or put their data sharing plans on indefinite hold.
Sadly, as of yesterday, New York education officials were still intent on sharing with inBloom a complete statewide set of personal data for all public school students– including names, addresses, phone numbers, test scores and grades, disabilities, health conditions, disciplinary records and more. To stop this, we helped to organize a lawsuit on behalf of NYC parents which will be heard in state court on January 10 in Albany (note the new date), asking for an immediate injunction to block the state’s plan. (The state has delayed the hearing in order to gain more time to respond to our legal briefs.)
In addition, we will continue our work on the critical issue of class size. As a result of our reports, testimonies and public outreach, we have been able to shine a bright light on what many consider to be the most shameful aspect of Mayor Bloomberg’s education legacy: the fact that class sizes in NYC have increased sharply over the last six years and are now the largest in the early grades since 1998. More on this issue is in my Indypendent article just published, called Grading the Education Mayor
Class sizes have increased every year, despite the fact that the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case was supposedly “settled” by a state law in 2007 that required NYC to reduce class sizes in all grades. As a result, 86% of NYC principals say they are unable to provide a quality education because classes are too large. Parents say that smaller classes are their top priority according to the Department of Education’s own surveys. There is no more critical need than smaller classes if the city’s children are to have an equitable chance to learn.
But class size is not just a critical issue in NYC public schools. Because of budget cuts, class sizes have risen sharply throughout the state and the nation as a whole. In more than half of all states, per-pupil funding is lower than in 2008 and school districts have cut 324,000 jobs.
At the same time, more and more money is being spent by billionaires and venture philanthropists on bogus “studies” to try to convince states and districts that class size doesn’t matter and public funds should be spent instead on outsourcing education into private hands – despite much rigorous research showing the opposite to be true.
With vendors trying to grab your child’s data in the name of providing “personalized” instruction – a euphemism that really means instruction delivered via computers and data-mining software in place of real-life teachers giving meaningful feedback in a class small enough to make this possible — our efforts are more crucial than ever before.
Please make a donation so that our work can continue and be even more effective in 2014.
Thanks for your support and Happy New Year,
Leonie Haimson
Executive Director
Class Size Matters
124 Waverly Pl.
New York, NY 10011
212-674-7320
Leonie is a national treasure.
Thank you for all of these efforts!
We moved our kids from NYC schools when the oldest was just starting Kindergarten and PS 234 was already overcrowded and that was before 2 large condos came online.
In Garden City we have a small but growing group of concerned parents. What amazes me is the Left, which usually shuns for profit anything is embracing this Federal takeover (and subsequent hand-off to Pearson, et al) of what is clearly and state and local issue. Maybe Rupert Murdoch’s name will shock them into their senses!!
Keep up the good work and donation on the way!!
How did InBloom think they could get away with circumventing a parent/child’s civil rights? I guess we aren’t as stupid as they thought we all were. Way to go Leonie – keep getting the word out.
inBloom….Amazon….CIA….Amazon….what next?
http://www.thenation.com/blog/177661/amazon-washington-post-and-600-million-cia-contract
Thank you, Leonie, for kicking ass and taking names. We’re fighting out here in Washington State as well.
Many thanks, Leonie, for your tireless advocacy efforts on behalf of children, And congratulations on your successes! Yes, corporate reformers don’t capitulate easily, so know that, after they regroup and attack again, our encouragement, support and appreciation will be right there with you!!!
They will be back? They never left…
“Sadly, as of yesterday, New York education officials were still intent on sharing with inBloom a complete statewide set of personal data for all public school students…”
They are not “sharing data”. Inbloom provides a secure data service. They do nothing with the data except provide the service. In fact, it’s completely encrypted and controlled by the customer.
Sooo…. Do you call bus companies profiteers? People who sell textbooks? People who run the cafeteria? How about people who sell books that complain about people selling education products for a profit? Since you’re not in favor of capitalism, do you lean toward socialism or communism?
Not giving parents control over their children’s information is BS – and anyone who would defend such a practice must be involved with the side benefitting from this Federal takeover of what is supposed to be a State and local issue.
Handing education over to for-profit companies is in no one’s interest but the shareholders of said companies.
I am a capitalist through and through but the last thing I want is for-profit police and fire, of for-profit primary education. Look what for-profit has done to college tuitions over the last two decades.
I’m for public schools also. I went to one. My kids go to them. But all government agencies buy stuff from for-profit companies. Fire trucks, police cars, equipment, software for the police and fire department – all built by for-profit companies and used by our local governments.
ALittleCommonSense: yes, the public sector buys goods and services from the private sector. But what is happening in many districts and states is a concerted effort to turn the public sector into a private market of choices. For-profit schools are an abomination. Many of the “nonprofit” chains are about money, huge executive compensation, and replacing public schools with privately managed schools.
Question for aLittleCommonsense: are you employed by the Gates Foundation, the Broad Foundation, Students First or any of the other insidious groups undermining the remnants of democracy in America ?
No, none of the above.
Diane, I’m definitely not an advocate for for-profit schools. Thanks for the reply.
You make a lot of sense. This anti-InBloom movement of misinformation by a disingenuous woman is frightening to watch. The followers of this ‘heroine” should do more homework.
So much FUD is spread by those who ulterior motives. The docs are fully available and show that the data is encrypted. The Districts control to what extent teachers,parents,students can see and do within various applications. The entire source code for the project is public and anyone can take a look and see that nothing malicious is going on.
” We were the first advocacy group in the nation to sound the alarm about inBloom’s plan to create a multi-state database to be stored on a vulnerable data cloud run by Amazon.com with an operating system built by Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify. The explicit goal of inBloom was to package this information in an easily digestible form and offer it up to data-mining vendors without parental consent.”
AWS provides far better security than your average state or district can provide. Part of this is because AWS has such a large customer base that they have the resources to implement technologies that are far out of reach for the average district.
AWS is pretty transparent about this as well. Take a look at http://awsmedia.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/AWS_Security_Whitepaper.pdf
Amplify did not build an “Operating System” they developed the code which runs on top of an operating system. This code is completely public. https://github.com/inbloom/secure-data-service
The design of the system does not allow data mining to occur and this is clearly not the stated goal of inBloom.
I don’t think anyone would argue that class size is important. In fact, I suspect that I was in high school far more recently than anyone else reading this. I can say with certainty that the inBloom platform could have made a huge impact in our classrooms.
I think that some of the people who are so quick to jump the gun and assume inBloom and similar companies are out to get them, and sell their student data should take the time to actually reach out to inBloom. I imagine they would have no problems having an honest discussion with those that have concerns.
Thanks for sharing this information.
inBloom’s CTO Garrett Suhm @gsuhm tweets & has said he is available to answer questions. I’ve been RTing his answers.
Other tech people have joined the conversation. I’m loving it because it’s new to me & not even close to what I’ve been reading and hearing. I always like learning more about data security. @funnymonkey has also been amazingly generous w his time & patient.
IMO? Good stuff. yay.
Another aspect of this Federal takeover of a what should be a state and local issue is the message these lessons plans carry.
In NY state I am looking over a reading assignment that is as ridiculous as it is boring : an in-depth reading of the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights….this assignment is for 5th graders.
1. Shouldn’t a lesson be both challenging AND engaging?!
2. I personally do not want my child reading one thing from the only organization more dysfunctional than our own current government – the United Nations.
By the way, NY State’s ELA suggested reading list includes The Autobiography of Malcolm X and Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx. My point of mentioning these three things is that this Federal takeover has a very Socialistic message and education should not be politically motivated. I’m all for my children learning about Dr. King and his message of change through peaceful protest. Learning about two men whose more famous quotes are, “By any means necessary” and “The last Capitalist we hang will be the one that sells us the rope” is not my idea of a quality education.
Sam…. As I continue to say, the recommended reading list is one example of how the Common Core was not properly vetted. This list obviously did not have input from librarians or teachers who were familiar with the reading levels and interests of their students. None of those titles you mentioned is appropriate for 5th graders and would be better served as a part of a US history class taught to high school juniors (and not necessarily as required reading). The entire list needs to be chucked and rewritten. Even if it were a good list, it should be revised every few years to include some of the newer literature/nonfiction reading available.