Some months ago, I added Steve Nelson to the honor roll of this blog because everything I read by this remarkable man made so much sense. He is the headmaster of the Calhoun School, a fine New York City private school.
Yet he isn’t looking out for the self-interest of the private schools and their pupils, but for the good of American children and our society.
In this article, Nelson surveys the media moaning over PISA scores and says that the critics have chosen the wrong target.
Our schools are not broken, he writes.
Our society is.
Here is a sample of his thinking, which I share and admire:
We don’t have an education problem in America. We have a social disease. It is as though we are starving our children to death and trying to fix it by investing in more scales so we can weigh them constantly.
Charter schools, Common Core, voucher programs, online education, Teach for America… None of these initiatives, whether financially-motivated opportunism or sincere effort at reform, will make a dent in our educational malaise, because the assumptions are wrong.
As is often the case in our “blame the victim” culture, it is generally believed that improving education will cure poverty. This invites the inference that poor education created poverty. But it is simply not true. Poverty created poor education. The victim blamers cite lazy children and bad parenting as contributors to poverty. But poverty dulls motivation and cripples parents.
And perhaps worst of all, the poor performance of our students is attributed to poor teaching and unions. I propose that today’s teachers (even the underprepared Teach For America kind) are as good or better than teachers were a generation ago. Neither they nor their weakened unions are the cause of our education problems.
It is also asserted that our place in the global economy is threatened by the poor quality of American education. But this is also backwards. Our place in the global economy threatens education, not the other way around. In the service of economic global dominance, we have sacrificed families and schools.
But we persist in our misguided efforts to “fix” education nonetheless. Education reform has been underway for many years, most energetically since No Child Left Behind was enacted in 2001. I challenge any reader to provide comprehensive evidence that education has improved since then.
And I would add, though nothing need be added, that “school reform” has become a Great Distraction, a way of NOT addressing the root causes of low academic performance.
That may explain why so many billionaires and corporations love to invest in “school reform,” because it is so much more cost efficient than doing something about income inequality and wealth inequality, which are worst than at any point in the past century.
But again, Nelson says it better than I could. He writes:
Raise the minimum wage to a real living wage. Provide affordable health care for every family. End the regressive tax system that has eviscerated local communities. Provide disincentives to the multi-national corporations that have abandoned American communities while chasing the cheapest labor overseas. Put Americans to work with bold infrastructure investment. Extend the meager unemployment benefits that keep many families out of abject poverty. Stop pretending that racism is dead. Instead of telling people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, remove the boot heels of oppression.
Let’s do these things for a decade, and then we’ll talk about PISA scores.

Love ya, Diane, but did you intend to include a link? 😉
LikeLike
Dienne, I did it again! Thanks for helping me as my asst editor:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-nelson/education-isnt-broken-our_b_4441918.html
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“It is also asserted that our place in the global economy is threatened by the poor quality of American education. But this is also backwards. Our place in the global economy threatens education, not the other way around. In the service of economic global dominance, we have sacrificed families and schools.”
If only that could be a bumper sticker.
LikeLike
Wow! Excellent observations. He knows how to frame the situation and put it in perspective.
Meanwhile, the privatizers continue manipulating the discourse in order to make their money now with no concern about the residue left behind. To them, it i:s just collateral damage necessary for them to meet their bottom line. Sounds like 2008.
LikeLike
Brilliant! But Nelson neglected to call for adequate and equitable funding of our public schools commensurate with the learning needs of the children they serve.
LikeLike
I know there was a donnybrook on Twitter about this, but this is pretty rich stuff coming from a $400K headmaster at a school where tuition is $40,000 year (and increasing far faster than the rate of inflation), and where only about 15% of the student body receives financial aid of any kind.
Change begins with small steps. What he is proposing is huge and complicated and totally beyond his scope of influence. I would humbly submit that a far more effective and meaningful way Nelson could kickstart a cultural sea change is to insist that Calhoun admit and educate far more children living in poverty than it does now. Surely a community so committed to progressive ideals can make more room in its classrooms and pay more in tuition to accommodate those in need.
LikeLike
When debating, one is supposed to address the topics, not personalities. By resorting to the fallacy of an ad hominem attack, you conclusively demonstrate why your opinion is discounted to zero.
It’s funny how those who recommend cutting “entitlements” like Social Security and Medicare are lauded in the media for their “courage,” as if it takes courage to parrot ideas that echo ruling class interests. Yet, when someone stakes out a position different from the class interests of their employers, they are attacked for their elitism.
You, sir, are a troll.
LikeLike
Well, Tim, you simply have your facts wrong, whatever your intent. My compensation is irrelevant and inaccurate. 25% of the student body receives tuition assistance, many at nearly 100% of tuition. More than 30% of our students are students of color and we are leading a national anti-racism program, Deconstructing Race, including a full length documentary candidly examining the pernicious effects of racism in schools, public and private. A clearly stated part of our mission is to be a private school with a public purpose and, therefore, we seek to instill a deep commitment to social justice in all our students.
LikeLike
Thanks for the response, Steve. Looks like we’ll have to split the difference between my 15% and your 25: your tuition assistance FAQ says “Each year, tuition assistance is awarded to approximately 20 percent of the student body.”
http://www.calhoun.org/tafaqs
If that FAQ isn’t accurate, I trust that you’ll have it updated as soon as possible (preferably with an exact percentage for the current school year, a number you can access with a few mouseclicks if you don’t know it by heart).
I stand by my original suggestion that you leverage the influence and respect you have within your school to make a strong push to include much greater numbers of children living in poverty. The points you make in your Huffington Post editorial are all sound and well-taken, but a problem as intractable and as tied to segregation as poverty needs a full-on assault from all angles.
It is inevitable that at some point in the near future, the annual tuition at Calhoun will exceed the median household income in New York City. To say that an institution where 75, 80, or 85% of the student body can pay that much tuition in cash as “diverse” is, in a word, risible. The impact of a school like Calhoun making a concerted effort to admit and commit to paying for 13 years of education for children living in extreme poverty–even if it meant larger class sizes or higher tuition for those who can afford to pay–would reverberate far beyond the elite Manhattan private school scene.
LikeLike
Michael, I’ll take this harangue with plenty of grains of salt, being that it’s coming from someone who offers up ad hominem attacks on a daily basis. Lame, hoary ones, too, like saying that every word out of a reformer’s mouth is a lie, including and and the.
(You’ll justify this by saying war has been declared on unionized public school teachers, so all bets are off, am I right?)
Give me a break.
LikeLike
Will update the FAQ. The number this year is 23%, so I’ll split the difference between the difference splitting.
LikeLike
Well said, Steve! You write beautifully.
LikeLike
Tim, I’m happy to discuss with you on these pages, point for point, how everything the so-called reformers say is a lie.
Your turn…
LikeLike
This was pretty good until the last paragraph. Nelson’s remedies for our broken society are the very policies that have created this society, from The War on Poverty to No Child Left Behind to President Obama’s stimulus package with its emphasis on infrastructure (and shovel ready jobs) and affordable health care. I am reminded of John Lindsay’s famous (infamous?) proclamation when he was mayor of New York: “There is nothing wrong with New York that a doubling of the budget cannot cure.” By the end of Lindsay’s tenure as mayor that budget had been doubled and not only were things not better, they were worse.
LikeLike
Well said, Steve and Diane. But if I happen to be an educator – someone who wakes up every day and goes to work in a school that serves children from high-poverty backgrounds – what exactly do you want me to do for the next decade while we’re sorting out minimum wage reform, rewriting the tax code and ending racism, etc?
I’m happy to take to the streets on all of these issues. I’ve done that. I’ve knocked on doors for progressive political candidates, made phone calls for MoveOn.org, and donated what little disposable income I have to progressive causes.
But are you telling me that I should basically reject all of the ideas that are percolating among education reformers because they’re basically a distraction from the root cause of the VERY REAL differences in academic outcomes between low-income students and their more affluent peers? Are there no ways that technology might contribute to the solution? Or better teacher training, evaluation, and coaching? Or more coherent curriculum that better reflects the realities of what students will face in the 21st Century work place?
Am I merely just supposed to fight a political battle for the next decade, and not a pedagogical one?
LikeLike
You have hit the KEY! The powerless only have power when we TAKE IT TO THE STREETS! We have to peacefully assemble to petition for a redress of grievances. For our sakes, for our students, for our posterity we have to make the society stop, cause social pain and disruption, and demand change. Power and the powerful will concede nothing without DEMAND!!! (F. Douglas) See R. Flacks Making History one of the most important books no one ever read!
Name the time, each of us can go to the town green like Occupy did, and only then can we turn the ship around. We are intellectuals but we need to become activists, and protesters. POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!
LikeLike
What, specifically, would you demand?
LikeLike
A system that ignores societies ills is broken. But, it won’t be solved by a test. It will be solved by real learning, preparing real kids for a real future.
Yes, we must fix societies ills, we also must develop a system that takes kids from where they are. Yes, I daid it, DO BOTH.
We also must get away from the ignorant either or mentality. FIX BOTH Like this http://savingstudents-caplee.blogspot.com/2013/12/accountability-with-honor-and-yes-we.html
LikeLike
The system is broken AND society is broken. We must abandon the either or mentality that drives this countries politics.
A system that does not adjust to societies ills is non functional for that society. We must attack both with a vengeance.
Even with a total elimination of poverty, students will still range in abilities from the severe cognitively disabled to the good testing book learned kids. That’s a fact.
A realty check here, kids are different, and always will be. Don’t pretend that with the elimination of poverty, all will be the same. And don’t pretend that poverty will be fixed in the near future. Don’t use excuses, adapt the system to today’s society, here and now, not make believe. http://savingstudents-caplee.blogspot.com/2013/12/accountability-with-honor-and-yes-we.html
LikeLike
I don’t believe he or anyone believes anything is fail proof. Poverty can’t be fixed completely. Education can’t be fixed completely either. Both impact the other. But when private gains trump both, too many people are dumped unto a chasm of hopelessness. Playing politics with hope is cruel. Being blind to others’ difficulties isn’t admirable … Ever.
LikeLike
Steve is spot on.
LikeLike
I am very much in agreement with Steve Nelson. In my book, I write in depth on this issue starting with, “American schools as they have existed and continue to exist are a product of their governmental and civic environment. Children develop in a world they inhabit, not in a school cocoon. Schools and children, separate or together cannot be malleableized as a single entity, up or down. A constitution, a Supreme Court, a President and a Congress as national entities that do not, and are not expected to provide equality mandates about household income, education of parents, poverty rates, children born out of wedlock, health care coverage, school spending , academic learning genes, and equal media representation cannot fairly expect they can mandate “the schools” as a singular entity, to produce equal outcomes in all phases of learning for the children and youth of America. The book then develops: “What is a desired Future for Learning in American? –And How Do We Get There? Specific answer lie in “emerging awakening patterns” in how children and youth learn, in how a balanced economy is best for all of the people, in how the earth will survive better with an ethical approach to ecology for all or its people, and in learning to separate the very good from the disastrous applications of technology to humans.
LikeLike
If you don’t mind a bit of unsolicited advice, as a top Amazon reviewer, if you want your book to get good reviews and to sell well, I would strongly suggest simplifying and streamlining your language. I have no idea what “malleableized” means and your second sentence is practically longer than the Gettysburg Address. I would probably agree with the premise and the arguments of your book, but based on the snippet you’ve provided, I wouldn’t venture to read it.
LikeLike
I agree. Those were some long sentences and difficult to follow. But I agree with his observations.
LikeLike
Dienne,
Although there are two sentences that are 78 and 61 words and the first is a bit convoluted, I don’t think it’s that unreadable. But then again I’ve read enough Spanish to have read sentences ten times as long as those. We Americans (sic) can be sparse with our words at times.
LikeLike
I wonder, Bill, if you would clarify what you mean by a “balanced economy”? Balanced between what and what?
LikeLike
My take on “balance economy” is one that is opposite of what we have now where so few take and have so much (and who started out with so much more than the vast majority) and so many earn and have so little (the vast majority of time through no fault of their own) that our economy has taken a major third world downturn from where we were in the 50s,60s & 70s. His term seems to me to be a bit of “couched” language.
LikeLike
I’ll wait for his clarification. Actually I could use clarification from you too. What would the opposite of the present economy look like? What legislation would be needed to effect it?
LikeLike
Well, the first thing that needs to be done is to have a couple of constitutional amendments, one to eliminate “corporate personhood” and another allowing for strict limitation of campaign expenditures by individuals and by candidates, but better yet.perhaps a publicly funded system of paying for all elections, with mandatory voting with minimal fines for not voting that would then go into the election funding. Now, I don’t see how that would set well with you HU, as it doesn’t all sit that well with me for myriad reasons, but until something is done about the money involved we will never have true and fair elections. And while I’m at it proportional runoff voting.
That’s the start.
LikeLike
Interesting and explicit proposals, Duane. Do you think the past election would have come out differently if your proposals had been law? Would that have pleased you? I have heard that some countries (Australia???) have mandatory voting. As for corporate personhood, I tend to think that’s a legitimate ruling, in spite of its seeming counter intuitive. All wealth, of course, is created by corporations, some small, some large, and those wealth creators have legitimate interests and moreover are composed of persons, so I don’t see that as a problem. Your own living possibly is derived from taxes on corporations and on those who earn a living working for them or have a living based on their profits. No profits, no livings.
LikeLike
Interesting questions HU!
1st question: Don’t know, I’m not a big counterfactual type person.
And I completely disagree with “All wealth, of course, is created by corporations. . . ” I have 12 acres of woods. So if I cut the trees to earn money that doesn’t count? I’m “creating” wealth” at least for me and I’m not a corporaton. Historically wealth has come from natural resources.
Not sure what you mean by “no profits, no livings”. Please explain.
And I don’t agree that “my living is derived from taxes on corporations”. I believe that my living comes from real estate taxes more than anything.
LikeLike
How does your cutting wood differ from a corporation transforming natural resources into purchasable products?
The people who pay the real estate taxes that pay you generally work for businesses and businesses must be one of three types of corporation. All public sector jobs are paid for by private profit.
LikeLike
I am not a “corporation”.
LikeLike
If you ran a wood business you would be, or be selling lumber illegally. Even if you do not enter into interstate trade, the government can regulate what you plant. Corporations can own property. You do own property. What’s the fundamental difference?
LikeLike
And I don’t get all the tax breaks, government subsidies and all those other perks given to corporations.
LikeLike
If you incorporated as a gentleman farmer, you would. But of course you are too moral to seek to pay fewer taxes even if it were legal. I suppose you take a mortgage deduction on your personal income tax. If you own land, you are a capitalist, at least in potentia. Disturbing thought, eh?
LikeLike
No, it’s not a disturbing thought, as I think there is still enough to go around for everyone if the few avaricious bastards at the top of the world would live ethically. How can I be a “capitalist” if I own my own little parcel of land? Hell, the capitalists still own it until I pay them about $250,000 for the privilege of lending me $80,000?
Yep, I’m a fucking capitalist for wanting to own a little piece of land, the only thing I can hope to give to my kids when I die!
LikeLike
Duane,
What outcomes would you expect from eliminating corporate personhood? Would every firm cease to exist at the death of the founder?
LikeLike
TE,
From my meager readings of the concept of corporations, and how they were originally viewed, I’d say that each corporation be given five-ten year “lifes” and then be subject to renewal (after all it is the government, i.e., the people, who allow them to exist to begin with). There should be mechanisms for continuation after the founders demise as long as the corporation continues in good standing according to their charter.
LikeLike
Duane,
What would happen to the teacher pension funds invested in the company if it should ail to be renewed? What would be the price that politicians ask from a company in order to renew it? I am not sure you have thought this through.
LikeLike
teachingeconomist,
As an economist, you know, or should know, that the liquidation of a company would result in the pension plan being taken over by the PBGC (Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation), the federal government agency that oversees private sector pensions, which would thereafter administer it.
As for your question to Duane about whether a corporation would disappear upon the death of its founder, I think you are being willfully obtuse: he is addressing the fact that, while companies are given the free speech rights of individuals, they have limited liability that human beings do not have, thus receiving inordinate protection from prosecution for criminal acts.
The fact that none of the systemic crimes that caused the 2008 financial crisis have been prosecuted by the Obama administration (even George Bush was willing to go after Enron and it’s executives), proves Duane’s point.
LikeLike
Michael,
My concern was not with the pensions of the former companies employees, but with the folks that owned stock in the company. When Boeing is liquidated, what happens to stock that CalPERS owns? Do they simply get a share of the value of the assets? It seems to me that Boeing is worth far far more as an ongoing concern than it would be worth as a collection of machinery and half built planes.
LikeLike
Do you think that in the event Boeing were to be executed for committing corporate crimes – inconceivable, but let’s consider it as a thought experiment – that the company would dissolve and have its physical plant liquidated?
Yes, Calpers and other pension funds would take a hit, to say nothing about the Seattle area and the nation as a whole, but what about that good old creative destruction that free market fundamentalists are always bowing to? Would it suddenly disappear, or would others step in to manage the company and create more added value?
Are you implying that creative destruction is in play when the public schools are being destabilized, but would cease if a big corporate player were to fall?
LikeLike
Certainly companies outlive their economic usefulness. Take a look at the companies that made up the Dow Jones average 80 years ago and see row many names you recognize. The concern would be that companies might outlive their political usefulness and be destroyed.
Others might step in to buy the assets of Boeing, but getting them to work productively again would likely take a decade or longer.
Given the risk of expropriation that this policy would create, I doubt that any investor would provide capital to any US company either by buying shares or bonds so Calpers would have to go abroad to find secure investments for the state employees retirement funds.
Shall we go on to think about the amount of corruption this idea would generate? If every corporation must be judged worthy by politicians in order to operate, the politicians will find a way to get a cut of the revenues they have the power to cut off.
LikeLike
Something like that, Michael. It would be, in my opinion, a proposition worth examining that the public schools have to be destroyed to save education. I love my local high school, but it works because my grandkids work. They’d learn anywhere. I see nothing special about the publicness of public education. If the public schools that exist were universally funded by vouchers I see no difference in the education they would offer except deunionizing and that, in my view would be a good thing. Return the “democracy” to direct democracy of individual purchasing decisions. So called democratic control of the public schools puts politics into the process and I think it should not be there. To easy for unions to buy legislators and the legislators to raid the public coffers for the benefit of their union campaign contributors.
LikeLike
Bill,
What’s the title and where might I get a copy?
Thanks,
Duane
P.S. I had no trouble understanding what you wrote. Now perhaps homogenized might be more understood than malleableized although I can see that neologism working if you mean more forcibly homogenized.
LikeLike
EXCELLENT! Well said! Thank you!
LikeLike
What a Festival of Light!!! This Steve Nelson article illuminates it all. Shine On, Brother! is all I can say. Remove the boot heels of oppression and watch what America becomes. It would be beautiful to behold. His vision is my holiday wish.
LikeLike
MAGIC MATH:
The NYSED had come up with a FOOL PROOF way of predicting numbers (final assessments, lotto, whatever)! While filling out my SLO, I noticed that NYSED has conjured up a formula to determine the predictions we are supposed to make for our students’ grades on their final assessment. It’s so REDICULOUSLY easy! Just take 100 points subtract your students pre-assessment grade, divide that result by two, add it to your students’ preassessment grade and voila! You have predicted exactly what grade they will get on their post assessment! I wish I would have known this MAGICAL mathematical trick years ago. I could have conjured up all the winning lotto numbers perfectly all these years! What disturbs me though, is how many “educated” people are falling for this! Just goes to show you, a democracy can’t function unless you have an educated population. Here we are in the dark ages, again.
LikeLike
myself, typo corretion, “ridiculously”
LikeLike
“What disturbs me though, is how many “educated” people are falling for this! Just goes to show you, a democracy can’t function unless you have an educated population. Here we are in the dark ages, again.”
Those “educated” people of whom you speak are GAGAers. Most have not developed their critical thinking skills.
Paraphrasing Upton Sinclair:
It’s difficult (if not impossible) to get a teacher to stand up to mandated educational malpractices and not implement them when their salaries depend on them implementing them.
LikeLike
There is a scene in Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities in which a beggar starves to death leaning up against a wall on the other side of which a group of wealthy people have a Satyricon-like feast–an extraordinarily wasteful debauch.
How does one live like that? How does one consume immoderately while others go without? Well, to do that and live with one’s conscience, a person has to make up a story. We humans are storytelling creatures. Storytelling is a primary means by which we make sense of the world (whatever David Coleman might think about the relative value of personal narrative; frankly, if it weren’t for the shocking influence of this guy on U.S. education, I wouldn’t give a @#&&$#@!! what he thinks).
So, what stories do people tell themselves to justify the breathtaking inequity of income and wealth in the world. Here are a couple of them:
It’s their fault. They are where they are because of their own moral failure. They are not hard working, decent people like you and I. They are dirty and dishonest and disreputable and, above all, lazy. They have gotten what they deserve.
It’s the way of nature. All nature is red in tooth and claw. Only the strong survive. That’s the way things are meant to be. The weak are meant to die out. The strong are meant to prosper and pass on their superior genes.
So, help these people, and all you will do is perpetuate their moral failure or undermine the natural order that winnows out the weak.
If you want to help them, there is only one way to do that—get tough with them. Accept no excuses. That baby born to the crack-addicted mother in an urban or rural American community that looks like Dresden after the bomb needs to get off its butt and borrow money from its Uncle Mitt to start a business and become not a moocher but a job creator. That baby needs to be like me. I got where I am because I worked for it. I got those good grades at Leman Manhattan Preparatory School and Harvard. I got those great job reviews at McKinsey. I started that company and built. Nobody handed this to me. I earned it.
Never mind the fact that the fix is in from the start. Never mind the fact that if you switched those name bracelets in the hospital nursery, that kid from nowhere has every chance of growing up to become a Master of the Universe. Never mind the fact that contemporary genetics shows us that environmental conditions dramatically affect gene expression and that that Social Darwinist genetic argument is based on superstition, not science. Never mind the fact that the common is, at birth, already portioned out among families—that a few own the land and the minerals and the fishing rights. Never mind that one child starts with a trust fund and the house bought by Daddy. Never mind that the other child is born into a system in which most money exists only on paper in the form of debt created by a government-granted fiat that enables the wealthy to lend assets they don’t really have in exchange for the future slavery of the poor and that the only way for the poor child to start that business is to borrow that imaginary money and to promise far, far more than a pound of flesh to the wealthy, for decades to come, in exchange.
If you want some few to climb out of poverty, you have to be tough with them. The rest–well, that’s just the way of things, isn’t it? To think otherwise is to go against what John D. Rockefeller, discussing the survival of the fittest, called “nature’s law and God’s law.”
and now, having written about people who think like this, I need to go take a bath.
LikeLike
NB: the “like you and I” error, above, was intentional. One usually gets, from such people, pretensions that far exceed their actual knowledge and abilities
LikeLike
Damn, that’s good, Robert!
LikeLike
Thank you, Steve, and thank you for your powerful words, above!
LikeLike
The article, Steve, is magnificent. Beautifully written. Spot on. Thank you for speaking out against the insanity of the standards-and-testing deforms.
LikeLike
Damn, an administrator used damn-just funnin ya!!
Well said above. And, damn, I can’t even blame you for being a GAGAer and just coming around now because the negative consequences are starting to hit your school.
LikeLike
I do think access to online education will be very helpful to the rural poor in isolated school districts. It will create important opportunities for these students.
LikeLike
I agree. Emphatically so.
I think of William Kamkwama, who grew up in a rural village, in Malawi, that lacked electricity for pumps and so experienced periods of unpredictable but devastating famine. He happened to find, in a government school, far from his home, among the few books, one on electricity, and it had a picture, on its cover, of a windmill.
He scavenged in garbage dumps and found the parts to built a windmill.
How I would like to go back and tell the Ptolemy who built the Library of Alexandra or to tell Leibniz or Diderot or H.G. Wells, “Remember that universal library, the one providing access to all the world’s knowledge, that you dreamed about? Well, we have it now. And people use it to surf videos of Miley Cyrus twerking and and to deliver canned cartoon curricula featuring Mario the Pizza Pie Fraction Guy.
The potential of this technology is truly astonishing. It can become a great equalizer. Knowledge is power. It can make knowledge universally accessible. The math developer that you often link to, TE, is an example of a company that is doing it right. Such companies can do an enormous amount of good in the world.
LikeLike
cs: A great equalizer of opportunity
LikeLike
Maybe, as from what I see most is being used for nefarious purposes, like credit recovery.
LikeLike
I am curious about the requirement that we increase wages AND require corporations not to chase cheaper labor oversees.
LikeLike
I just found my new hero. SPEAK the TRUTH, Steve Nelson!!!
LikeLike
Want to know how one of the wealthiest countries in the history of the world treats a quarter of its children?
Its children?
Well, in a word, it’s unspeakable.
Look, according to the Cost of War Project, we now have 6 trillion dollars of sunk costs and committed costs for the wars (or whatever the hell they have been) in Iraq and Afghanistan. Let me give you an idea how much that is. A million seconds is eleven and a half days. A trillion seconds is 31,688.8 years.
We have spent as many dollars is Iraq and Afghanistan as there are seconds in 190,133 years.
For what? The Army Times, the Army’s official publication, recently ran a cover story asking, 10 years on, what the hell is our mission over here, and what has it ever been?
I can tell you what the mission was: there was a whole lotta money made by defense companies.
The same folks who go ballistic about programs to feed hungry kids–who just can’t stand those big government programs (I am talking to you, Paul Ryan)–think that this is just peachy. The hypocrisy is mind blowing.
If you look at the official poverty thresholds, they are breathtakingly low. For a single parent with one child, in 2010, that number was $15,030 a year. For a family of four, $22,113. Imagine trying to live, you and your child, on $15,035 dollars a year. But you would be above the poverty line.
But even with thresholds this low, in 2012, according to the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s recent study on child poverty in the United States,
23 percent of all U.S. children were living in poverty.
37 percent of American Indian children.
40 percent of African American children.
34 percent of Hispanic or Latino children.
Oh, I see. It’s mostly dark children. No prob. Sorry I bothered you. Back to the Normal Rockwell Romney family Christmas.
LikeLike
Please run for president!
LikeLike
Evidently, one needs to be about as intelligent as a head of lettuce and about as morally discerning as parasitic wasp larvae to be considered for the office. And I would be horrified at the prospect of undergoing the surgery to have the key inserted to make me a proper windup toy for the oligarchs.
LikeLike
I’m sure you did not mean to insult parasitic wasp larvae.
LikeLike
yes, LG, you are right
mea culpa
LikeLike
What you have written is so easy to discern with minimal work and yet most folks don’t know these facts,
In America (sic) death and destruction have held sway over life and living for the last half century despite many efforts to change that fact. We should have listened to one who intimately knew what that death and destruction could do from personal experience, Dwight Eisenhower.
LikeLike
Take two kids–one born into wealth and one born into abject poverty. Switch them in the maternity ward. See what happens.
Want to make a bet about what happens?
We all freaking know what will happen. The wealthy one will become a Master of the Universe. Hell, if that child happens also to be brain damaged, he or she might even become a Senator or a President or sit on the board of Achieve.
LikeLike
There are more African American boys and men in prison today than there were in slavery at the beginning of the Civil War. This is how we have kept our promise of liberty and justice for all.
Jesse Jackson had it right when he said, “You can pay on the front end or you can pay on the back end.”
But what the heck. Those private prisons are a great business. A BOOMING business. Just look how successful that business is! We now imprison a greater percentage of our population than does ANY OTHER COUNTRY ON THE EARTH. Think of the most despotic, most corrupt regime anywhere. We imprison more of our citizens than they do. And all that imprisoning sure does buy a lot of tinsel for that Christmas tree in the big house in the gated neighborhood–the one like those in the Christmas commercials on television. That prison company stock just goes up and up and up. Who knows what the limit is? We haven’t imprisoned ALL of the children of the poor by the time they turn sixteen, not yet.
But we’re working on it.
Just keep giving them schools and neighborhoods characterized by savage inequalities.
And while all that’s happening, blame those inequalities on bad teachers.
LikeLike
I know very little about prisons, but I am suddenly realizing I need to start paying attention. I read an article explaining how corporations use prisoners for cheap labor, and suddenly my eyes opened. Prisons provide a much cheaper and available workforce for a corporation. Workers inside a prison are more profitable to a business, than outsourcing or paying the minimum wage in the real world. I have been so focused on the damage being done to our schools by corporations I have been overlooking how prisons fit into the business plan. It is so obvious, but for some reason I hadn’t seen the connection to education. It is suddenly perfectly obvious to me. If corporations are able to increase the prison population, business profits increase. It is so scary to think of the numbers of students who may not graduate in the future from these so called reforms. For these students, life options will be only become more limited, and with hopelessness, often comes crime. Yet, by causing students to fail, it will work perfectly into the business plan. More possible workers to work in the prison, and more profits for corporations. A corporation won’t even have to outsource. Think of the savings!
And with my slow, but sudden awakening, I am now wondering, how many of the same people are presently involved in both the for-profit world of education and the for-profit world of prisons?
LikeLike
Yup. It’s Parchment Farm all over again.
Here’s the deal: Automation and outsourcing have made enormous numbers of workers superfluous from the point of view of the oligarchy.
Now, the theory is that if one lays off a thousand workers, those people are forced to do something else that is MORE VALUABLE. Nice in theory, but, the rate of increase of automation and the rate of outsourcing are rapidly outpacing retraining and development of new areas of work to replace the old (what replaces those call center jobs when they become “customer self service portals”? Increasingly, the answer is “Nothing does.” One company benefits this quarter, this year, by laying off 3,000 workers and replacing them with robot stock pickers. But when all of them do, no one is earning the wages to buy the company’s products. And so the company sees flagging demand and hordes cash and waits.
U.S. workers are among the most productive in the world, and rates of productivity of U.S. workers have skyrocketed, but in recent decades, workers have realized NONE of those gains. Their increased productivity has not resulted in increased purchasing power. Instead, they have seen steady erosions, increased unemployment and, importantly, chronic underemployment.
So, the need for workers is tending rapidly downward as the “need” for prisons is trending rapidly upward. Hm.
LikeLike
He’s right. Conventional thinking is entirely backward. It is sort of like saying that a community has wealthy citizens due to the presence of a mall with high end retailers. I’m sure anyone here would agree that is nonsense.
LikeLike
Depends on one’s definition of wealthy…true educators find value in critical thinking skills and a strong, healthy citizenry. Yet, the mantra pushed out to the public by the wealthy and powerful is about our economy. Hence, the reform message is about America winning with high “scores” and great financial wealth. Sounds like everyone should be a star major league baseball player.
LikeLike
Actually, I’m trying to make a point about getting causation backwards– not really a comment on the values of the wealthy or how we measure wealth.
Sorry if I wasn’t clear.
It’s like the discussion of Finland. Not only are teachers covered by collective bargaining agreements– 90% of the workforce is (and the 10 percent that aren’t have to be helped by having such a large percentage covered). I’m not discounting the role of teachers, but this is probably more important for student achievement than anything else– having an economy that functions well. By functioning well I simply mean it serves all equally and there is a sense of fairness. I don’t go by the definition that seems to prevail here– Our system is great because even if it has a lot of losers, it has some big winners.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Teach a Teacher and commented:
So inspiring, so correct:
LikeLike