Reader Sharon Sanders posted this comment:
The intentional destruction of our economy and educational system has been perpetrated by libertarians, right-wing and religious extremists, as well as corporatists, who want every last penny for themselves and their doctrines through private prisons, charter schools, private armies, a biased corporate media– everything, while they ship our factories and jobs overseas. There can be no economy and no way out of poverty until America rises up and realizes what’s being done to them. There can be no economy without jobs. Now there are few jobs except low-paying ones where people must work two or three to make ends meet, forcing children to grow up without adult supervision and time to care for, help them, and love them. It’s all intentional.
These multinational corporations are determined that only the elite few shall be well-educated–after all, no one else can afford good college educations today. They want to profit from phony standards for schools, unaccountable charter schools, while they dismantle collective bargaining rights and pensions, not only from teachers, but from every workerr in this country and overseas. We will have no country ever again worth two cents until and unless these greedy corporatists are forced to keep their hands out of our schools, until we give each and every child the right to the best education possible with excellent thinking skills, challenges, necessary facts, real history, civics, building a base of knowledge and critical thinking for the future. I’m afraid these extremists have so overtaken our country, that there may be no turning back–but we must keep fighting. I taught at a time when creativity and thinking and knowledge were highly regarded and excellent public schools were respected.

Ms. Sanders has eloquently given voice to concerns and fears I share with her. Thank you.
LikeLike
I get these fears, but I don’t think there is a sinister mission to ruin our country.
I think the people who lead these efforts are: doing what they were trained to do; think profit driven venture is the way markets fix everything; have succumbed to, perhaps, the narcissism that is a hazard of being American; and have some fear driving them that if they don’t keep doing what they are doing they will sink to the bottom.
I personally think teachers and those who do become disenfranchised have to keep reaching out. Without dialogue the wall around the 1% will heighten more. We can cower, or we can confront, converse, and attempt to creatively affect the direction of our country. We have to. We have to do that.
LikeLike
I agree with you completely.
LikeLike
Could Hillary be the savior?
LikeLike
Absolutely effin NOT!
But then again maybe my sarcasmometer hasn’t had a chance to completely thaw out from all that snow outside.
LikeLike
Do you think she can be wooed over from the dark side?
LikeLike
She is the dark side!
LikeLike
Duane be careful, she may be your mother.
LikeLike
Dems fightin woids!
LikeLike
Hillary is one of them from the get-go, I’m afraid. Here she is with Eli Broad, at Broad’s own Inauguration dinner for Obama in 2009.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34577258@N02/3215180133/
LikeLike
She has not given any indication that she has split from the corporatist democrats that have been entrenched in the democrat party since her husbands presidency. We don’t need a 3rd term for the Clintons.
LikeLike
Like we didn’t need a third term for the Bushes, eh?
I am curious to see what Democrats do step up to run.
People should consider Anthony Foxx. Sec of Trans. Former mayor of Charlotte. He is a reasonable guy.
LikeLike
Absolutely not. Democrats are tearing us down just as much as republicans. They represent the warmer, fuzzier side of the 1%,
and while they shout “freedom! Freedom!” from the roof tops their leader, President Barack Obama, strips liberty after liberty from the common man while granting ever greater rights to corporate America and the 1%. No political party or president can fix what ails America, for they are all whores wrestling for the 1%’s campaign funds. This will take a true grass roots movement by people who refuse to allow their children to become a homogenized resource pool for the 1%’s financial gain.
LikeLike
No but Robert Reich might be.
LikeLike
My comment was in response to NY Teacher’s question… “Could Hillary be the savior?
LikeLike
From Wikipedia:
Political and philosophical stances[edit]
Official Department of Labor portrait of Robert Reich
In an interview with The New York Times, he explained that “I don’t believe in redistribution of wealth for the sake of redistributing wealth. But I am concerned about how we can afford to pay for what we as a nation need to do…[Taxes should pay] for what we need in order to be safe and productive. As Oliver Wendell Holmes once wrote, “taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society.”[28]
In response to a question as to what to recommend to the incoming president regarding a fair and sustainable income and wealth distribution, Reich said, “Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit — a wage supplement for lower-income people, and finance it with a higher marginal income tax on the top five percent. For the longer term, invest in education for lower income communities, starting with early-childhood education and extending all the way up to better access to post-secondary education.”[28]
Reich is pro-union, saying “Unionization is not just good for workers in unions, unionization is very, very important for the economy overall, and would create broad benefits for the United States.”[29][30]
LikeLike
Reich is a HUGE disappointment because he supports Obama’s education policies on his “Inequality for All” website.
And the Earned Income Credit is only for people with dependent children –which excludes a lot of us poor folk.
Hillary is just as much a neoliberal as Bill. She sat on the Walton’s board.
LikeLike
To whom can we turn?
LikeLike
We, the people, are the saviors of the republic, if it’s to be saved.
If you think that a Hillary (or even a decent human being like Elizabeth Warren, should she run and be nominated) is going to save us, we’re doomed. The only hope is a mass (non-violent) uprising that puts the fear of God into the Overclass and forces concessions from them, making them abide by some kind of just social contract.
History shows that’s the only thing that works.
LikeLike
2 Bushes + 2 Clintons = Monarchy
LikeLike
“The intentional destruction of our economy and educational system has been perpetrated by libertarians, right-wing and religious extremists. . . ”
HU, I didn’t know you were that powerful-ha ha!!
LikeLike
Although there may be no turning back, there could easily be a move forward that humanizes Common Core, or what’s left of it. Think of CC as part of a process. I confess I am a strong proponent of proficiency based learning. It is time to abandon the letter grades that simply mask the reality of student learning as well as grade levels that keep kids moving forward without learning.
Of course the battle must continue to be fought, however, we must look forward. Although childhood stress, malnutrition, chronic illness, homelessness and a wide variety of other issues must be eliminated, this will not happen in the near future. Until then we must stop the artificial failure of students leading to the white flight of today.
We must make every effort to take likds from where they are, not where we wish they were. Never again should we fail kids for a full year, putting them so far behind that they can never catch up. Never again should we move kids ahead without learning. This isn’t just unethical, it is immoral.
It is time to provide a chane to pass demonstrated learning many times throughout the year, when the students are ready, not just one time and not just with an artificial test.
Be prepared, the time is coming soon. http://savingstudents-caplee.blogspot.com/2013/12/is-stumbling-and-bumbling-good-thing.html
LikeLike
Cap, it looks like you’re on board for the hoax of the century.
Pearson and K12inc are all over the country with that line, passing ALEC’s legislation to deprive working-class children of their right to a flesh-and-blood, brick and mortar and playground public education.
Human children come together in human groups, with other children, and with caring adults, in classes in their own communities. There is no need to fail any kids for the year, and real education reformers already work to create teaching and learning environments that reach every child where she is.
Your proposal is really to “humanize” the CC$$ by trapping children in front of delivery screens and force-feeding them your shallow programmed learning products until they respond as your algorithm demands.
LikeLike
Sorry Cap, but you really sound like an apologist for the privatizers, the corporatists and the so called reformers. Much of your argument is based on your assumption that our schools are failing the kids and so something must be done, so we should just grit our teeth and learn to adapt to and improve upon CC. I don’t agree with your assumption about American public schools.
LikeLike
Cap calls Dr. Ben Carson “gifted,” a “genius.”
Ben Carson.
The same Ben Carson who said about running for the presidency as an arch-conservative, “If the Lord grabbed me by the collar and made me do it, I would.”
The same Ben Carson. a physician, who said, “I don’t believe in evolution ….”
The Ben Carson who said the Affordable Care Act was “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”
LikeLike
Cap, what the heck does “until then we must stop the artificial failure of students leading to the white flight of today” mean?
LikeLike
When the power and money if the NRA is more important thN the lives of our children, it shows just how low we have gone. Special interests own and run this country.
LikeLike
“The widespread abuse…is a virtually foolproof indication that politicians are trying to impose a system – whether political , religious or economic – that is rejected by large numbers of the people they are ruling…an indicator of a regime that is engaged in a deeply anti-democratic project, even if that regime happens to have come to power through elections.”
― Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
LikeLike
This.
I strongly encourage anyone who has not done so already to read Ms Klein .
Here is a short primer. Clips from a talk she gave about the book.
LikeLike
Yes, all should read Klein’s work!
Unfortunately we in K12 public education are living through it now.
LikeLike
“Unfortunately we in K12 public education are living through it now.”
Agree!
LikeLike
Klein’s ideas reduced to a most basic form: It’s the bizarre sense of ultra entitlement of the totally out of touch .1% buttressed by the simplistic but true explanation of “How Shit Happens” http://ogun.stanford.edu/~bnayfeh/plan.html Or, if you prefer, “It’s like a tree full of monkeys. Those at the top look down and see only smiling faces while those looking up from below see only assholes.” The destructiveness of all the disjointed, self-balkanized plutocratic policies can only last till the feces finds the fan. These days, we’re getting a powerful whiff of what’s coming.
LikeLike
Intentional destruction? Perhaps not. But it all serves the same purpose: eliminate the only real threat- the middle class. Once they are relegated to poverty the elite can get on with their globalization scheme, as explained by United Nations Agenda 21. Warning: this is scary stuff. If you have young children you may want to bury your head in the sand and tell yourself “everything is going to be OK.”
LikeLike
I love teaching my young children about the economy of happiness. It is anti-globalization…..spread the word
http://theeconomicsofhappiness.wordpress.com
LikeLike
If you actually read Agenda 21, instead of listening to conspiracy theorists like Glenn Beck and the Tea Party, you will be hard pressed to find in it what they claim it says: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
LikeLike
The Agenda 21 fear-mongering is so FoxNews. Agenda 21 is not even a legally binding agreement. See, “Agenda 21: Just the Facts”
http://www.betterworldcampaign.org/news-room/web-articles/agenda-21.html
LikeLike
Government should protect PEOPLE, and regulate corporations rather than protecting corporations and regulating people.
LikeLike
I think the claim that no one else can afford a college education is exaggerated. Full tuition for in state students at my university is a little under $10,000 a year. There are a variety of ways to reduce that number including need based grants and academically based scholarships. As a result, a majority of our students graduate without any student loan debt.
LikeLike
Then your students are lucky. I can’t afford to help my boys pay for college (my husband and I are both teachers), it’s hard to work enough hours to pay for it, and grants are not nearly as plentiful as they used to be. Even academic scholarships are MUCH harder to earn than they used to be. I do NOT want my sons taking out loans to pay for college, so it’s probably not going to happen for my sons. Sad, since I’m a fourth-generation college graduate, and it will probably end with me.
LikeLike
The least expensive route to a college degree in my state is to go to a community college for a couple of years and transfer the credits over to a four year state school. Community colleges charge around $100 an hour, so a student can pay $3,000 for a year of courses that would cost a little less than $10,000 at my four year institution. That may be possible in Utah as well.
LikeLike
And the drop-out rates for Community Colleges are astronomical. But you’re right–and that’s a route we are looking at.
LikeLike
I think the drop out rates are more a statement about the students attending the community colleges than a statement about the institutions. If your student would not drop out of a four year institution, I would think it unlikely that he or she would drop out of a two year institution.
LikeLike
Could Christie be the dark horse savior?
LikeLike
I live in NJ, please rest assured that Christie is not the savior of anything, especially education. He’s doing his best to destroy one of the better state school systems in the country. He might be the savior of the one percenters but they already have enough “saviors.”
LikeLike
Could the Green Party save earth and humans?
1. GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY
Every human being deserves a say in the decisions that affect their lives and not be subject to the will of another. Therefore, we will work to increase public participation at every level of government and to ensure that our public representatives are fully accountable to the people who elect them. We will also work to create new types of political organizations which expand the process of participatory democracy by directly including citizens in the decision-making process.
2. SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
All persons should have the rights and opportunity to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment. We must consciously confront in ourselves, our organizations, and society at large, barriers such as racism and class oppression, sexism and homophobia, ageism and disability, which act to deny fair treatment and equal justice under the law.
3. ECOLOGICAL WISDOM
Human societies must operate with the understanding that we are part of nature, not separate from nature. We must maintain an ecological balance and live within the ecological and resource limits of our communities and our planet. We support a sustainable society which utilizes resources in such a way that future generations will benefit and not suffer from the practices of our generation. To this end we must practice agriculture which replenishes the soil; move to an energy efficient economy; and live in ways that respect the integrity of natural systems.
4. NON-VIOLENCE
It is essential that we develop effective alternatives to society’s current patterns of violence. We will work to demilitarize, and eliminate weapons of mass destruction, without being naive about the intentions of other governments. We recognize the need for self-defense and the defense of others who are in helpless situations. We promote non-violent methods to oppose practices and policies with which we disagree, and will guide our actions toward lasting personal, community and global peace.
5. DECENTRALIZATION
Centralization of wealth and power contributes to social and economic injustice, environmental destruction, and militarization. Therefore, we support a restructuring of social, political and economic institutions away from a system which is controlled by and mostly benefits the powerful few, to a democratic, less bureaucratic system. Decision-making should, as much as possible, remain at the individual and local level, while assuring that civil rights are protected for all citizens.
6. COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE
We recognize it is essential to create a vibrant and sustainable economic system, one that can create jobs and provide a decent standard of living for all people while maintaining a healthy ecological balance. A successful economic system will offer meaningful work with dignity, while paying a “living wage” which reflects the real value of a person’s work.
Local communities must look to economic development that assures protection of the environment and workers’ rights; broad citizen participation in planning; and enhancement of our “quality of life.” We support independently owned and operated companies which are socially responsible, as well as co-operatives and public enterprises that distribute resources and control to more people through democratic participation.
7. FEMINISM AND GENDER EQUITY
We have inherited a social system based on male domination of politics and economics. We call for the replacement of the cultural ethics of domination and control with more cooperative ways of interacting that respect differences of opinion and gender. Human values such as equity between the sexes, interpersonal responsibility, and honesty must be developed with moral conscience. We should remember that the process that determines our decisions and actions is just as important as achieving the outcome we want.
8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY
We believe it is important to value cultural, ethnic, racial, sexual, religious and spiritual diversity, and to promote the development of respectful relationships across these lines.
We believe that the many diverse elements of society should be reflected in our organizations and decision-making bodies, and we support the leadership of people who have been traditionally closed out of leadership roles. We acknowledge and encourage respect for other life forms than our own and the preservation of biodiversity.
9. PERSONAL AND GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY
We encourage individuals to act to improve their personal well-being and, at the same time, to enhance ecological balance and social harmony. We seek to join with people and organizations around the world to foster peace, economic justice, and the health of the planet.
10. FUTURE FOCUS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Our actions and policies should be motivated by long-term goals. We seek to protect valuable natural resources, safely disposing of or “unmaking” all waste we create, while developing a sustainable economics that does not depend on continual expansion for survival. We must counterbalance the drive for short-term profits by assuring that economic development, new technologies, and fiscal policies are responsible to future generations who will inherit the results of our actions.
Ten Key Values of state and local Greens
There is no authoritative version of the Ten Key Values of the Greens. The Ten Key Values are guiding principles that are adapted and defined to fit each state and local chapter.
Taken from http://www.gp.org/tenkey.php
LikeLike
Chris Christie?
Savior? Of what?
No.
LikeLike
OMG, Chris Christie who calls schools “failure factories,” when those in NJ are amongst the 3 best states in the country, and who told a teacher “I’m tired of you people”? http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/11/exclusive-govchristie-to-teacher-i-am.html
Christie has made a hobby out of bullying teachers.
LikeLike
I’ve been in public education for 40 years…at the local as well as the university level…and this is the worst my colleagues and I have seen. It truly is an attempt by the 1% to ravage the system for everything it’s worth. I don’t think they are purposefully attempting to eliminate the middle class but their actions are doing this. I tell my college students “politics will always trump pedagogy.” When I see the likes of Gov. Scott Walker or Gov. Mike Pence being held up as heroes, you know that something is wrong. While I’m pessimistic about the long-term effects that we are seeing, I think there is a slow grass-roots rebellion brewing. Whether it will be enough to overcome the monied interests, I don’t know. But…we have to try.
LikeLike
In the 20’s corporate power was unchallenged. Unions were suspected of being anti-American front groups for communists and anarchists. All of the forces of society were arrayed against workers. But, the powers that be will never reach their goal, they will never stop trying to wring ever more profit, it is what they do. As this continues their rhetoric will become ever more hollow. Freedom for them from government will become freedom for workers to lose their homes, their jobs, their food and their dignity. This all changed in the 30’s.
As those who once occupied the middle class continue to fall out their loss will become the organizing force behind a resurgent union movement. As those in the middle class see their security threatened they will turn from the propaganda to the truth. The great corporatist John D. Rockefeller was the greatest union organizer in history. The worse he made things for workers the greater their desire to organize. History, wash, rinse, repeat.
LikeLike
But how do demographics play into this? I’m Gen X and my friends and I are finding out that our parents are becoming more conservative with age and voting and acting in ways that are directly opposed to their children’s and grandchildren’s interests. They fear downward mobility because they lived in a time when it was all looking up, up, up. Our generation: we accept downward mobility as a fact and are either are resigned to it or are looking to make changes. However, we do so in the face of this huge demographic that votes and makes purchasing decisions against us. And, moreover, they simply KNOW they are right whereas we’re just a bunch of young whippersnappers who will figure it out someday.
LikeLike
Having been born in 55, I can say that not all us old farts have turned conservative. Most of my friends were that way from the start having been “indoctrinated” through the Catholic schools in St. Louis. But some of us do fight “the machine”, “the man”, the reactionary forces that wish to take us back to some imaginary golden age all the while spouting that it is the wave of the future, you know, ipads, ibooks, blended learning, standards, edumetrics, etc. . . .
Come join us Emmy, you might be surprised at the depth of knowledge and bits of wisdom that those who were born quite a bit before you have to share. Reach out to all us old farts, even conservatives and reactionaries for even they do have some things to say that are valuable. I would hope you don’t agree with all you hear but listen first and then question, especially those who claim authority through social position. The old bumper sticker still holds true: Question Authority.
And as far as I’m concerned, I wish I was still a “young whippersnapper” but I have to settle on being an iconoclastic old fart high school Spanish teacher who still has the heart and attitude of you “young whippersnappers”. But to bring in one final thought from one who came before me and who I clashed with (usually in a good way), my mom (RIP 1919-2013): “Don’t get too full of yourself”. Tis wise advice.
LikeLike
Demographics…I think when parents see their children getting hurt, not being able to get a decent job, moving from job to job, having an education priced out of their reach, they will see the common ground. As to accepting downward mobility, downward mobility is anti-American and we should never accept it. What is all of this for if only to become wage slaves for someone else’s benefit? The wealthy-want-mores never seem to get that shared prosperity lifts all boats including theirs.
LikeLike
I didn’t mean to paint with a broad brush. Since it is the holiday season and all, many of my friends have been commenting on how they have to get their parents to turn off FOX News when they go home. Their parents are worried about their retirement savings (or lack thereof) and generally seem to act as if something has been stolen from them. I partly understand because compared to our generation they had it pretty good – rising middle class wages, affordable college, rising home equity, etc. It looked to them that they would be better off than their parents. For many people this long held assumption has not panned out. They are looking for someone to blame and they come up with a Romney-esque 47% explanation. So, they are in favor of “not throwing any more money at the public schools” and reneging on pensions and things like that. They are pissed about what has happened to them but don’t stop to think that some of their choices only do more to strip away public goods and place even more risk on individuals. And those individuals happen to be their children.
With most moms working these days, there isn’t another worker to put into the mix to compensate for layoffs or declining wages as was done in the late 1970s. The housing bust has significantly affected the wealth of people between 35-45 and some may never recover. There is a reason why the birth rate is declining. Families are bearing more risk than had been the case in at least a generation or two.
LikeLike
No savior, no salvation.
LikeLike
Or has it come down to Diane v Goliath?
LikeLike
Public education does not require a “savior.”
Nor does it need to be “saved.”
It needs a recommitment to democratic citizenship, rather than being the playground for corporate nonsense.
LikeLike
Democracy,
I really like most of your comments and have turned a few into stand-alone posts.
But I disagree when you say that public education does not need to be saved and does not need a savior.
Maybe that’s the wrong choice of words.
But let me put it this way. There is a well-funded, coordinated effort to privatize public education and turn it into a free-market of choices. Some see public education as an emerging market, with big profits for the smart entrepreneur. This is not a conspiracy. It is out in the open for all to see.
We need national leadership o repulse this vandalism. When someone is trying to destroy a precious public institution, you need help to stop them. And yes, you need leadership.
LikeLike
Public education needs to be saved from the corporate assault discussed daily on this blog. The malpractice being perpetrated is on scale previously unimagined. My choice of the word savior was meant to be hyperbolic. The word leader however did not seem strong enough. We need an MLK, Gandhi, Churchill, Mandela, or Roosevelt.
We need iconic intervention because I am at the point where I truly believe the powers that be will win out. Did you here NPR this morning? CCSS has its tentacles wrapped around the entire system. Read the names of the posters here. The several dozen of us are not enough to stem the tide. Parental outrage in NY has been diffused. The opt movement will be quelled as well. The cause is not lost yet, but my optimism is waning.
LikeLike
Well, if anyone here thinks there is no malfeasance going on from 1%ers, think again. It turns out that the people behind the Third Way’s attacks on Elizabeth Warren and Social Security expansion are from Wall Street: http://act.boldprogressives.org/survey/third_way_petition_v2/
I really hope Warren has changed her 2003 position supporting school vouchers.
LikeLike
Maybe Joe Biden could be THE ONE?
LikeLike
Can’t think of one national, political figure who is on our side.
LikeLike
Joe Biden’s brother Frank runs a for-profit charter chain in Florida called Mavericks.
LikeLike
Well, if Sanders doesn’t think that Dems/leftists are part of the problem, then she has her blinders on. Patrick Walsh was correct; teachers are politically orphaned.
See: https://dianeravitch.net/2013/12/15/i-love-this-review-of-reign-of-error/
LikeLike
I think a political candidate can finally emerge in the present climate. A lot has changed, as voters’ own children became unwilling pawns in the corporate core hustle. The overreaching overclass has radicalized the teachers, and reunited civil servants with the urban poor we serve, in solidarity at last, for a living wage. And (much to my surprise), the Pope is on our side.
Two years ago, anybody who stuck his/her head up against corporate reform would have been vaporized, so we don’t have any politicians just lying around who haven’t compromised themselves. Some I know of personally have now got their own offspring a few rungs up on reform’s carefully tended nepotism ladder. It’s fine for the lowly to speak truth to power, we’ll just wind up going hungry. But if any politicians did it, they’re probably out of office. That was then, though. This is now.
We need to leave folks like Warren room to wiggle over to the right side on as many issues as possible, but not let her define it. Let the call go up, meanwhile, that the people are actively looking for leaders who will follow us. There’s nothing wrong with that.
LikeLike
This issue could be just what Joe Biden needs.
LikeLike
Common Candidate v Common Core
LikeLike
Joe Biden, whose wife JIll teaches college, came out against the cost of higher education last year and he said absolutely nothing about the fact that 75% of college professors are now low paid contingent faculty, working with no job security from semester to semester and no benefits. This is not a secret and, since Jill has been teaching college for decades, she would know this very well. I would never trust Biden on education or labor issues.
LikeLike
Kirsten Gillibrand? From an old-school democratic machine
LikeLike
Watch Bill de Blasio.
LikeLike
Agreed. A true maverick?
LikeLike
It will be interesting to watch him navigate out of Bloomberg’s maze.
LikeLike
In the past I have defended the right of the people to engage in armed struggle. I did so because there was no alternative for those who would not bend the knee, or turn a blind eye to oppression.
Gerry Adams
LikeLike