Raymond Gerson of Austin Community College sent this article, which expresses a growing recognition across the nation that federal and state education policies are ruining children’s lives and crushing the love of learning.
Gerson writes:
Scarcity of Humane Values in Educational Policies
By Raymond Gerson
Frequent high stakes testing, hours of test prep drills, large classes and reduction or elimination of art, music and P.E. are taking their toll on both students and teachers. School counselors have reported an increase in A.D.H.D., anxiety, depression and other psychological problems among students. Parents have reported that as early as elementary school their children are starting to hate school and are turning off. Many students are bored and stressed out from the constant pressure to perform on high stakes bubble tests.
Children begin school with a natural curiosity and intrinsic motivation to learn. Learning should be an enjoyable process which stimulates student imagination, creativity, ability to think for oneself and the ability to solve problems that have more than one right answer. This type of learning experience will prepare students to become well-informed and productive members of society and to work in good careers in the future. Many current educational environments are breaking the spirits of students and teachers and are turning off intrinsic motivation to learn and teach.
Many wealthy and powerful individuals (and organizations) with little or no teaching experience are influencing educational policies which are destructive. They are in favor of frequent high stakes testing, large classes, closing public schools and reducing courses in the arts except when it comes to their own children. Their children usually attend private schools with small classes, health support services, plenty of courses in the arts and little or no frequent high stakes standardized tests with hours of test prep drills. This is hypocritical and inhumane.
Children need to be emotionally healthy to live successful and fulfilling lives as adults. Development of their emotional and social intelligence are important if they are to grow into fully functioning adults with humane values. Values such as kindness, caring for others, love, integrity and compassion make us good human beings. Students will learn these values from the example of adults and by the way adults treat them. The way many students are being treated is lowering their sense of self-worth, diminishing their creativity, blocking their potential and teaching them to be less compassionate and empathetic.
Teachers should be allowed to teach and create their own lesson plans based on the curriculum that they are teaching. They need time to teach students to think for themselves instead of spending hours doing test prep. They also need time to collaborate with other teachers.
There are schools which are excellent models of education such as the one in Finland. Instead of modeling our education system after successful ones, the U.S. is following in the footsteps of educational systems like the one in Chile which is a “free market” disaster.
The changes that are needed for a great education system will not come from the top down until there is enough action and pressure from the bottom up. Students, parents, teachers and school administrators will need to protest in large numbers before the PTB will make necessary changes. An example of this occurred recently in Texas. Mothers who were angry about all of the high stakes testing convinced the state politicians to take action. They voted to reduce the amount of yearly standardized tests from fifteen to five.
Let’s reawaken a love of learning in our students, treat them with humane values and give our teachers opportunities to teach students to think for themselves.

You have effectively described what we do in a Montessori classroom: “Learning should be an enjoyable process which stimulates student imagination, creativity, ability to think for oneself and the ability to solve problems that have more than one right answer. This type of learning experience will prepare students to become well-informed and productive members of society and to work in good careers in the future.”
Dr. Maria Montessori created her system without any preconceived notions about education but rather, developed her method scientifically through observation, testing, and recording outcomes. She adapted the materials, procedures, and classroom environment to fit the needs of the child. It is a multi-sensory approach to learning where the children learn by doing because that is the way human beings are meant to learn; it is how we are wired.
She developed her method of education as she worked with the disadvantaged and poor children of Italy but soon became well-known because these children were outperforming their so-called “normal” peers. She had the wisdom and most importantly, the humility, to create her reform based on what worked with children even though it meant that she had to change what she had initially planned. This is first step for the “reform” leaders; it is time for you to recognize that your ideas are not working. It is time for you to listen, re-educate yourself, and acknowledge that perhaps, you are wrong. Here is a step in the right direction: http://youtu.be/faYco1b-IJI
LikeLike
” hours of test prep drills”
I just went to do an observation on a student at another school. When I got there, the class was taking a “stamina test.” Apparently, every Friday they take a 60 minute timed reading test to build up stamina for the real deal. When you’re looking at the trees, it makes some sort of sense, but when you look at the forest, the whole thing is just sad.
LikeLike
Stamina tests to prepare for the tests.
The insanity deepens.
LikeLike
It is madness, yet so many adults act as if it is just fine.
LikeLike
But when I heard math teachers say students need to build stamina, it made sense.
LikeLike
Are they running a marathon? Or learning to have a better understanding of mathematical concepts. Creating and learning takes time even for the best minds. We did not go to the moon a month after we started the process, so why do we always want to place a time limit on learning? Who benefits? Children? Adults? Corporations? Each of us works and learns to the beat of a different drummer. We are all unique and we need to adjust our thinking to this fact. For 44 years, I have tried to make this point with Administrators, School Board Members, Teachers, Parents, and Students with little success because we are all so conditioned to believe everyone needs to be at a certain place each moment of their lives and if they are not, then they have failed and now we must find the reason for their failure and who is to blame. We seem to never notice that every once in a while a person comes along who is very very successful but does it at their own rate and they violate the “Normal” time line, but somehow they overcame the idea of being a failure. When did Einstein start to talk or read? If he were in an American Pre- School, he would have been labeled a slow learner and who knows what would have happened after that for Einstein’s future and therein, our future? How many Einsteins have we discouraged with our learning timelines and now one size of common standards fits all students in the whole country for Public School children. Sad day for those who do not follow this timeline!
LikeLike
John, they need to build wonder. They need to build love. They need to build a sense of self-empowerment. They need to learn that learning a) is not something that is DONE TO YOU, that it b) is something that you choose to do for a reason that is meaningful to you. Everything we do in school teaches one or the other of these.
LikeLike
OMG…this is toally RIDICULOUS. STAMINA TEST? OY. What a waste of time and effort. How to make kids hate learning in two easy steps…have ridiculous standards (as if kids are cars off the assmbly line) and test (quality control) them to death —the FACTORY MODEL.
LikeLike
I’m a supporter of Montessori methods. However, the reformers do not support Montessori or other proven instructional methods because profits and kickbacks are generated through high-stakes corporate testing, iPad electronic worksheets and “curriculum”, for-profit charters, TFA, scripted kits, inBloom databases, etc.
Reformers First like Duncan, Murdoch, Klein, Rhee, Bush, and King place Pearson, Chiefs of Change, Teachscape, Amplify, inBloom, Wireless Generation, K-12 Inc., PA Cyber, Green Dot, Common Core, etc. before proven instructional methods and before the emotional and educational needs of children. That’s why parents and educators must stand up by contacting all state legislators to register concerns with documentation. Follow the money!
LikeLike
We should have learned from the “great Japanese schools”. Many of us remember all too well when we were to emulate these paragons of success. The Japanese learned to their horror that pushing academics to the extreme produced two unwelcome results. 1. The kids had learned how to pass tests. They had not learned the content, only the ‘”correct” answers to questions and worse: 2. To hate schools and learning.
As George Bernard Shaw once said: The only thing man has learned from history is that man has learned nothing from history.
Sadly, that seems to be the case in so many things lately and school reform is one of those things.
I am old enough to remember when “reform school” was a pejorative term. The “bad” kids were sent there. Oh well, time passes and language changes – as well as ideas. I remember – way back when – it was said of school sports: It is not whether you win or lose, it is how you play the game. How many coaches would keep their job if a present day coach followed that philosophy. This really dates me but when I played high school football, the coach could NOT send in plays. If a substitute was sent in, the referee put his head into the circle and the substitute player was not allowed to say one word. The students “played the game”. How times have changed.
LikeLike
“We should have learned from the “great Japanese schools”.”
I’m in a book club with public school parents and we were laughing about this.
“Russia is beating us!” 1950’s, 1960’s.
Then, “Japan is beating us!” 70s and 80s.
Now it’s Obama/Duncan and whatever CEO they’re standing next to: “Finland is beating us!”
I read a piece by Wendy Kopp which was basically 500 words to say “everyone is beating us!”
The most amusing part is, they think this is NEW. My ENTIRE life I have heard variations on this theme, as has every other American who attended a public school.
Maybe that’s it: none of them attended public schools, which is why they think it’s new.
LikeLike
“. . . as has every other American who attended a public school. Maybe that’s it: none of them attended public schools, which is why they think it’s new.”
I attended K-12 Catholic schools and thoroughly realize the idiocies such as what you say. Not attending public schools does not necessarily handicap one’s world view in the way you suggest. (But then again I learned a lot from the unplanned/unspoken curriculum-a lot learned from that dirty three letter word “why?”.)
LikeLike
Preaching to the choir will not change anything. Tell everyone you see who have children to OPT OUT! Stop doing business with Exxon-Mobile, Wallmart, or any other business supporting this testing, privatizing movement! This must happen to make a change because they want to make money from this movement! Period!
LikeLike
Well said, Mr. Gerson!
LikeLike
“They voted to reduce the amount of yearly standardized tests from fifteen to five.”
That’s still FIVE TOO MANY!!
LikeLike
Yes..the great state of Texas has reduced the test from 15-5 but it has been so long since there has been any authentic learning past test taking that it will take years to recover.
LikeLike
Let’s see…NCLB has been in effect for at least 10 years. Does it have any correlation to our young adults who come to school to shoot to kill, and the recent 23-yr-old who went to the LA airport to open fire? One has to wonder if RttT, NCLB, and now CCS have and will suck the humanity out of our kids. Poverty and now mental illness should be priority. However, reformers are looking for profit and to destroy whatever/whoever stands in the way. Bill Gates a philantropist. That’s the biggest load of hypocrisy.
LikeLike
No, you’ve got it all wrong.
Bill Gates is a villainthropist . . . . to quote a fellow writer.
LikeLike
When we deny children the time to play together in the school yard (and yes this includes elementary age children of high stakes testing age too), we do not allow them to learn social skills. When we micro manage their every movement, they get angry but have nowhere to vent. When they are tested and prepped for testing and have their names posted on decorative racetracks to indicate where they are in terms of testing proficiency (yes this is done), they are humiliated. They know that failure means teacher firings and school closings. This produces long-term stress. They continually try but fail or perform poorly year after year and just give up. They learn to hate this false concept of learning! This creates a low sense of self esteem. And RTTT makes it all into a competition of winners and losers so students feel hopeless. Students needs are ignored and they are treated disgracefully and the public wonders why there are so many misbehaviors. In addition to this, many students have challenging home lives and are not exactly learning coping skills on the home front either. A nation of very angry citizens who have spent years feeling disrespected at school and at home and lack skills to be self-sufficient will soon (if not already) enter adulthood. I shudder to think about this.. really and truly. I often wonder what kind of person I would be if I had a horrible home life and then went to school by state mandate and school was equally bad – not a place of safety but a place of stress. I do not think for one second that my adulthood would under these circumstances be a happy one.
LikeLike
Although your observations are meaningful, they are nothing new. Read any of E.D. Hirsch’s books.
LikeLike
The United States used to have “dumb” fourth graders but the most innovative adults in the world. Now that we’re joining other testing meritocracies, we can expect to see our adult productivity drop to the same level as these other countries.
LikeLike
From what I’ve read about the development (Thanks, Bill (think dollar) Gates) and promotion of the CC$$ (Thanks, Arne), the whole point is to create technocrats devoid of empathy and authentic critical thinking. The “rigor” and “critical thinking” David Coleman et al are pushing (think drugs) are actually antithetical to deep comprehension and a recognition of the connectedness of people toward each other and the natural world, and toward the goal of a more humane and just society. Public schools are not supposed to be “reform schools.” Learning should not be stressful and punitive. That “stamina,” grit, tenacity, and perseverance approach is truly horrifying. Of course anything worth learning requires perseverance, but sticking with mind-numbing decontextualized readings and responding via bubbles is not worthy of perseverance. This madness is about destroying cognitive potential and self-actualization in the service of the corporate-state.
LikeLike
There is a theme here that I’ve heard frequently at this site viz. that despite better academic performance by students in East Asian, Finland or wherever, nevertheless the US economy has outperformed many of these countries. But if it is indeed true that high academic performance is not as important for economic productivity as many believe then perhaps we can reduce public spending on education.
Of course when the matter of how much spending should be allocated to education is the question the educational establishment insists that high academic performance is of the utmost importance for economic performance. But when US students perform below the level of students in other countries the educational establishment says that academics performance is not that important for economic performance.
LikeLike
Jim, I anticipate that if you or anyone else did some research, you would find that a lot of education spending in the US is going to consultants, not to classrooms, not to arts, not to teachers, not to class size reduction.
I also, just a wild guess, assume that you were never a teacher. More spending is necessary to produce schools that are in good physical condition, to provide school nurses so that children can get help when they need it, so hire school psychologists and social workers because so many students and families are in terrible trouble. I don’t know if those things raise test scores. But they are necessary. I hope you noted that Japan has higher test scores than we do, but a stagnant economy.
LikeLike
Our education system was created to have a well educated populace so people could freely debate ideas with some understanding of the ideas being debated in the public arena. We wanted to be more like the early Greek society and not like many European countries where the average person had no voice and was told what to do and not do. This was one of the primary reasons we revolted against English rule. No taxation without representation. Read Thomas Jeffersons thoughts for why a free public education was necessary to our New Republic. So, our system was never meant to only to create jobs for corporations, but to have a well informed public so they could be active participants in any discussion about topics of interest to them. This is why people argue about the importance of a good public educational system and a good educational system creates divergent thinking so we have individuals who continue to create new products and come up with new ideas to solve problems and create new frontiers for future generations to explore. The idea of Common Standards for all 8th graders for example is going to create a society of convergent thinkers whose goal is to do well on one test for all 8th graders and if this were such a great goal, then ALL private school parents would be demanding this goal for their children! We are hearing just the opposite. I am a Grandparent and I am so glad that we are now allowing Public Tax dollars to help me pay for my Grandchildren’s Private School Education. People like myself have helped Public Schools with their over crowded problems so they do not have to pay for new expensive schools by paying for our Grandchildren to attend Private Schools, so we deserve public tax dollars to assist with the high cost of Private Schooling. Thank you for your donation.
LikeLike
“So, our system was never meant to only to create jobs for corporations, but to have a well informed public so they could be active participants in any discussion about topics of interest to them.”
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding! Give that Man/Woman (sorry Mark Twainfive I don’t know your gender) a Prize!
LikeLike
Let me help you Jim. The main theme of this site is that America’s public schools are NOT failing. This idea is the focal point of Reign of Error; why don’t you give it a read. However, no one would argue that there isn’t a crisis in the inner city/urban areas (and even many rural areas as well) of this country. But it is not a crisis in education; it is a societal and cultural crisis that is a direct product of poverty, dysfunctional family life, teen age pregnancy, dependency, drugs, crime, and hopelessness. It is the undeniable legacy of 250 years of racial discrimination and social injustice. Even moderately affluent school districts are not failing. Parents in those districts know it and are in the process of revolting against tests that were designed to promote the lie. In fact America’s schools are the envy of the world. Immigrants that flock to this country come here for one reason – the best educational opportunities in the world. Look at the finest universities on the planet -Princeton, Harvard, Yale, Stamford, MIT, Cambridge, and Oxford. These universities are teeming with students educated in the US. Another theme here also revolves around the clandestine effort of corporate powers to undermine our public schools. Many of us are calling for increases in spending because in recent years (coinciding with the great recession) school budgets have been stripped bare in countless districts, teachers let go in droves (Cuomo here in NY was directly responsible for the release of 20,000 teachers state wide), and class sizes have ballooned into unmanageable numbers. So Jim why don’t you get back to us when you know what you’re talking about.
LikeLike
Agree, American schools are NOT failing. So here is the plan to save taxpayers billions of dollars. Write you elected local, state and federal officials today and tell them to end the failed policies of standardized testing. We can save billions on standardized test, test prep, remediation, curriculum, VAM, vouchers, charters, InBloom, data-mining from going to corporate America. These tax dollars can be used for their original purpose to improve our public schools not to corporate America who are profiting off the backs of our innocent children. We have the best students, the best teachers, the best schools, in the best country in the world. It is time we let our elected officials know this and put an end to these mandates that are harming public education.
LikeLike
Well said, NY teacher!!!
LikeLike
Amen!!1
LikeLike
I taught in a Japanese high school. It’s more of a middle class country, so no social problems, and the kids study more; but I didn’t see any large gap in knowledge base between the two countries when adjusted for socioeconomic background.
Asian students, Japanese especially, were notoriously shy and non-creative, e.g. most students would have trouble writing a simple comparative essay, such as vanilla ice cream vs. chocolate. What Westerners don’t understand about E. Asian culture is that the school system is more a tool for social conformity than education, the former being paramount for such societies. Just teaching them for a year was a joy to see the transference of ideas from myself to them.
LikeLike
Diane – I was a TA in grad school. I ran problem sessions, graded homework and exams and kept office hours to help students who came in for assistance. Many people where I work have told me that I am good at explaining things and it is pretty common for my coworkers to come to my office to ask questions or seek advice about work-related matters.
LikeLike
Sorry, but TAing a bunch of adult students who voluntarily shell out big bucks for their education is completely different than being in a classroom all day with children who are compelled to be there.
LikeLike
It is different, Dienne, but certainly what Jim is doing is teaching.
That’s the whole point, and one of the many, many reasons why these “reforms” are so deforming. There are many types of teaching, many ways to be a good teachers, many different kinds of learning that can and should be done by different kinds of kids. One size does not fit all.
And Jim, the notion that our schools are failing is a crock. Complete propaganda. Correct the international test scores for the socioeconomic status of the kids taking the tests, and our kids score at the top or very near it. But it serves a totalitarian agenda and business plan to make people think that the goons need to be sent in to straighten out the mess.
There is a mess, of course, in some schools, or around them, rather. And it’s called poverty. This is pretty basic stuff, which even a complete noneducator like, say, Arne Duncan should be familiar with: the hierarchy of needs.
LikeLike
Whatever anybody did in the past to win a “place at the table” where this attack on human childhood is being dealt out and strategized, it’s time to own up that you were wrong.
It’s not just more of the same old opportunism. The harm done to living children does outweigh whatever business or career advantage you thought you were buying.
Randi Weingarten has another whining defense of the indefensible Common Core up this morning, on Huffpost: She claims the brutality parents have witnessed during the rollout is just a procedural error, due to hasty implementation.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/randi-weingarten/will-states-fail-the-comm_b_4206013.html
Here’s my comment, which still hasn’t appeared online:
“President Weingarten, the AFT does not support the Common Core. The AFT is composed of its members, the teachers in America’s public schools, and you know you don’t speak for them in this.
“No, we don’t “wonder why so many people think they should play an important role in American education.” It’s because you made a deal for your yourself, thinking you were getting “a place at the table” of a pack of wealthy and arrogant cheats, liars, and frauds.
“The Common Core has nothing whatsoever to do with critical thinking or creativity or even teaching and learning. It promotes double-speak and gibberish formulaic essays for machine scoring. It’s a battering ram for intrusive, continuous “data-driven” control of American children and teachers.
“All over the country, the real AFT are calling on our members to stand together with our communities and fight the imposition of profit-driven corporate control on American children.”
“Due to the potentially sensitive nature of this article, your comment may take longer to appear publicly.”
LikeLike
It is my feeling that Common Core may become a blessing in disguise because it might provide the tipping point for a massive revolt against high stakes testing mania and inhumane educational policies. What are your thoughts?
LikeLike
Raymond, I agree with you. As long as the corporate reformers claimed that they wanted only to control the big cities, the big power bases in the suburbs could sleep well at night. These shenanigans didn’t touch their kids, and they didn’t care. But the Common Core and the Common Core testing is a disaster that touches everyone, including the suburban parents, and they are now energized. I met a woman the other day who told me that her son–a high-performing adolescent who loves school and always does well–had “failed” the Common Core test. She will join the fight. Twenty years from now, more or less, Common Core will be a trivia question.
LikeLike
Diane,
What you said reminds me of the difference between the massive number of people who protested the Viet Nam war in comparison to the few who have protested the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. People could be drafted during the war in Viet Nam which affected the children of many people, including those who had some degree of influence. There were other factors that influenced the large protests, but I wonder if it would have happened without a draft?
In Texas it was middle and upper class angry mothers who got the attention of the state politicians when they protested against all of the standardized tests being given to their children.
LikeLike
It is my feeling that Common Core could become a blessing in disguise because it might provide the tipping point for a massive revolt against high stakes testing mania and inhumane educational policies. What are your thoughts?
LikeLike
“Collegereadinesstrainer”?! Yes, there will be a revolt, and people will opt their children out, and the data-driven profit beast is looking for a new costume for the next round.
My thought is that the real revolt has already tipped, ever so slightly, and is against the domination of all human interactions by the 1% and their hired enablers.
My thought is that the battle for public education is at the fulcrum of our fight for democracy itself. The Common Core has highlighted the emptiness of disingenuous slogans and promises (like “college readiness”) that cloak intolerable attacks on actual children It distracts us from the urgent need for opportunity paths for our children, who have only this time to move forward into their own lives.
But, no, it isn’t a blessing of any kind. Tomorrow morning I’ll be back in my classroom, with 64 of those children. They’d be much better off if the testing mania and inhumane educational policies of the past decade had never happened to them. They’ve had to grow up under a reign of lies, bullying, and public cowardice. For this cohort, the decade of damage needs to be undone, and doors of opportunity flung open.
LikeLike
Well-said.
LikeLike
Chemtchr
Well stated. Both leaderships for AFT and NEA are not speaking for the vast majority of teachers. We need a NEW organization that keeps in better touch with the every day classroom teacher and focuses on their thoughts and positions for what is the best direction and best practices for OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL CHILDREN!!! This is our mission and all else needs to be consistent and aligned to this mission. We need to be totally focused on this mission at this time and all other issues need to be set aside until this issue has been settled to our satisfaction. We are the Professionals in this arena and we need to start to behave in as net that demonstrates this fact! When we begin to start a NEW organization that speaks for us, then we will finally be on the correct pathway to doing what is in the best interest of the children.
LikeLike
It all reminds me of the documentary BlackFish…
They keep doing the same wrong things that hurt humans and the whales for their own greed and political gain.
LikeLike
Given that the public is becoming increasingly aware of the harm being done to our children, how much longer can our state and national leaders get by with pushing this agenda? In addition to parents, students, and educators speaking up from the trenches, we now have the hard data to prove that Americans are being fed a lie about public education, and that the current reform movement will do MUCH greater harm than good to our nation’s future. We now have doctors, psychotherapists, and other respected professionals coming forward and speaking up about the damage the high-stakes standardized testing is doing to our children.
In the face of this knowledge, how long can people still stand up and say that the current methods of educational reform are necessary and that they are going to continue? I’m in Tennessee, where there is some resistance but not to the degree seen in other states. We are very much in the thick of this, and preparing to roll full-force ahead with the whole implementation. Don’t even get me started on our new Response to Intervention plan….which, despite it’s supposed intent, is NOT going to helping close achievement gaps, and IS looking to be one more set of data-collection guidelines and students being pigeon-holed. But, I digress.
So…those of you that are from Tennessee, or those of you from states like New York where parents have had enough….how much longer will we have to wait until this nightmare ends?
LikeLike
BW23,
“is NOT going to helping close achievement gaps,”
On another post you asked for suggestions on how to counteract, to fight against the edudeformers and the educational malpractices that they promote. One of the first things to do (and I don’t believe I mentioned this in my response to you) is to quit using the edudeformers language. We have to turn their words around and use them to beat them.
I couldn’t care less about “helping close achievement gaps” and rail against that concept as it implies that the teaching and learning process is measurable (it isn’t) as a “gap” by definition is a distance (supposedly measurable) and that “achievement” focuses on an end product, usually a standardized test score, that has nothing to do with the actual teaching and learning process.
When we focus on the wrong things and attempt to “improve” them we are: “Doing the Wrong Thing Righter”
The proliferation of educational assessments, evaluations and canned programs belongs in the category of what systems theorist Russ Ackoff describes as “doing the wrong thing righter. The righter we do the wrong thing,” he explains, “the wronger we become. When we make a mistake doing the wrong thing and correct it, we become wronger. When we make a mistake doing the right thing and correct it, we become righter. Therefore, it is better to do the right thing wrong than the wrong thing right.”
Our current neglect of instructional issues are the result of assessment policies that waste resources to do the wrong things, e.g., canned curriculum and standardized testing, right. Instructional central planning and student control doesn’t – can’t – work. But, that never stops people trying.
The result is that each effort to control the uncontrollable does further damage, provoking more efforts to get things in order. So the function of management/administration becomes control rather than creation of resources. When Peter Drucker lamented that so much of management consists in making it difficult for people to work, he meant it literally. Inherent in obsessive command and control is the assumption that human beings can’t be trusted on their own to do what’s needed. Hierarchy and tight supervision are required to tell them what to do. So, fear-driven, hierarchical organizations turn people into untrustworthy opportunists. Doing the right thing instructionally requires less centralized assessment, less emphasis on evaluation and less fussy interference, not more. The way to improve controls is to eliminate most and reduce all.
Former Green Beret Master Sergeant Donald Duncan (Viet Nam) did when he noted in Sir! No Sir! that:
“I was doing it right but I wasn’t doing right.”
And from one of America’s premier writers:
“The mass of men [and women] serves the state [education powers that be] thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailors, constables, posse comitatus, [administrators and teachers], etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt.”- Henry David Thoreau [1817-1862], American author and philosopher
LikeLike
Duane
Great Points! If a large enough group OPT OUT then we can get everyone focused on understanding how people learn and how best to assist each individual so they may reach their potential. Hopefully we will talk about learning theories, current brain research and appropriate teaching strategies for each individual student. Thank you.
LikeLike
The righter we do the wrong thing,” he explains, “the wronger we become.
Amen! Thanks for this – I have never thought of it all in these terms, but how true! You are right, you know. The whole achievement-gap business is a mess…we’re trying to measure things that can’t be measured, instead of looking at what is right in our face! Nothing drives me crazier than to know (just based on my professional-knowledge and common sense, how about that?!) what a child needs, but to be limited in my freedom to provide that because “the data” and “the manual” have dictated that something different be done, Then after following the script and collecting data for a few weeks (during which time the students could have been receiving and engaged in good instruction instead) – having to answer questions about why students don’t seem to be making the progress expected….it’s enough to make a teacher want to lock herself/himself in the custodian’s closet and never come out!
LikeLike
BW23,
Please pass any and all of these thoughts along to others. That is one way you can help begin to fight these educational malpractices.
This stuff really isn’t rocket science, most is common sense but what some consider common sense, i.e., unconditional acceptance of the status quo and historical practices without a critical eye to the damages that are done to the most innocent of society, children, I consider insanities.
I can’t seem to find a brief writing about “Critical Enquiry”. I will look tomorrow some more but I think you will find the concepts quite interesting.
Duane
LikeLike
BW 23,
Here is the Critical Enquiry info.
What is Critical Enquiry?
The capital “C” in Critical emphasizes social criticism at the most fundamental level of what ought to constitute an ideal just social structure. Enquiry emphasizes the self-conscious use of all forms of analysis and interpretation of actions and discourses that create, maintain, and justify social structures. To this end:
• Critical Enquiry is suspicious of al “isms” offered as The ideal social structure because like all “isms” they purport to transcend human subjectivity, that they are constituted in nature, outside the boundaries of human consciousness. [I would add ideologies]
• Critical Enquiry fully recognizes the political nature of social structures, and seeks to reveal the power embedded in all forms of historically contextualized discourses to condition popular thought to accept a particular ideology, an “ism,” as natural and inevitable. Of particular concern are those “isms” that attempt to justify socioeconomic power differentials as inevitable, as normal.
• Critical Enquiry works dialectically in an unremitting search for contradictions between existing social arrangements and the Enlightenment ideals of natural rights, such as those embodied in the Founding Documents of the United States.
• Critical Enquiry is particularly concerned with those contradictions which systematically exclude individuals and groups from sociopolitical power or from the free access to information that is used to both condition and justify the status quo.
• Critical Enquiry is based on the belief that emancipation comes only to individuals that increase their understanding and self-reflective analysis of their social conditions. Such an analysis depends on the free and open exchange of knowledge and information uncontaminated by authoritative privilege and sanctions. Only after meeting these conditions regarding knowledge can citizens in a democratic society be sufficiently prepared to make ethical and moral judgments. (emphasis in original)
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike