Remember all the times that “reformers” like Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, Wendy Kopp, and Joel Klein have said that the answer to poverty is to “fix” schools first? Remember their claims that school reform (more testing, more charters, more inexperienced teachers, larger classes, more technology) would vanquish poverty? For the past decade, our society has followed their advice, pouring billions into the pockets of the testing industry, consultants, and technology companies, as well as Teach for America, the over-hyped charter industry, and the multi-billion search for a surefire metric to evaluate teachers.
But what if they are wrong? What if all those billions were wasted on their pet projects, ambitions, and hunches, while child poverty kept growing?
The latest study, reported by Lyndsey Layton of the Washington Post, shows a staggering increase in child poverty across the nation. The majority of public school students in the South and the West now qualify for free or reduced price lunch. By federal standards, that means they are poor.
The United States has a greater proportion of children living in poverty than any other advanced nation in the world. We are #1 in child poverty. This is shameful.
The late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan once remarked on the phenomenon of “feeding the horses to feed the sparrows.” In this case, the horses are the educational industrial complex. They are gobbling up federal, state, and local funding while children and families go hungry, lacking the medical care, economic security, and essential services they need. Instead of helping their families to become self-sufficient, we are fattening the testing industry. Instead of assuring that their schools have the guidance counselors, social workers, psychologists, and librarians the children need, our states are stripping their schools to the bare walls. Instead of supplying the arts and physical education that children need to nourish body and soul, we let them eat tests.
Every dollar that fattens the educational industrial complex–not only the testing industry and the inexperienced, ill-trained Teach for America but the corporations now collecting hundreds of millions of dollars to tell schools what to do–is a dollar diverted from what should be done now to address directly the pressing needs of our nation’s most vulnerable children, whose numbers continue to escalate, demonstrating the utter futility and self-serving nature of what is currently and deceptively called “reform.”
Once these futile programs have collapsed, once they have been exposed as hollow (though lucrative) gestures, we will look back with sorrow at the lives wasted, the billions squandered, the incalculable damage to our children and our society.
Someday we will say, as we should be saying now, that we cannot tolerate the loss of so many young lives. We cannot continue to blame teachers, principals, and schools for our collective abandonment of so many children. We cannot allow, and should no longer permit, the income inequality that protects the billionaires while neglecting the growth of a massive underclass. The age of the Robber Barons has returned. Good for them, but bad, very bad, for America.
The South and the West. Hmmm. Tea Party states. Naah, there can’t be a connection….
What does that mean?
As long as people keep trying to put labels on this disgraceful movement, the truth will not be seen in full, and all the idiots pushing this through will not go away….there will always be half of them in there.
We need to look closely at what ALL politicians say and do, and vote out and remove everyone no matter what label they wear to get rid of this destruction.
Good piece on how for profit tutoring companies have been stealing from poor districts and kids in Texas for more than a decade under NCLB.
Local school officials complained for years but were ignored. Federal funds were withheld from high-poverty schools and re-directed to for profit tutors.
Read the cast of characters in this tragedy. It’s the same old roster of national reformers.
The program has been scrapped, but the tutoring company lobbyists are out on force, attempting to turn the spigot of education funds on again.
Incidentally, the Texas Tribune broke the original story. They’re a non profit media source.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/education/after-misuse-a-push-for-tutoring.html?pagewanted=2
Why did it take a decade to stop this program? Local public school leaders told reformers it was a rip-off, money sink. Why were they ignored?
Would this be called neglect? As in a criminal offense? Who would be responsible? Governors and legislators that failed to adequately fund programs that feed and support children? Could a legal case be made for this?
From Wikipedia:
There are many different types of neglect but they all have consequences whether it be physically or mentally. Neglect can affect the body physically by affecting a child’s development which can lead to chronic medical problems. Children experiencing neglect often suffer from malnutrition, which causes abnormal patterns for development. When not given the proper nutrients at certain growth periods it can result in stunted growth, and inadequate bone and muscle growth. Brain functioning and information processing may also be affected by neglect. This may lead to difficulty in understanding directions, poor understanding of social relationships, or the inability to complete academic tasks without assistance. Neglected children or adults can have physical injuries like fractures or severe burns that go untreated, or infections, lice or other signs of lack of care. Not being treated for health problems can lead to chronic disorders when children get older. There are many physical effects neglect can have on a person.
Not only is neglect associated with physical problems; it also has an effect on a person mentally, ranging from poor peer relationships to violent behavior. Not only is behavior affected, but the way a person looks at themselves, which can lead to low self-esteem and the feeling of not being wanted. Neglect is more severe in younger children when it comes to psychological consequences. Parental detachment can harm the child’s development of bonding and attachment to the parents, causing the child’s expectations to be the same when they get older (like an unending cycle). Too little parental availability can result in difficulties in problem solving, coping with stressful situations and social relationships. Studies of neglected children show heighten levels of depression and hopelessness, and higher incidents of suicide attempts.
We ARE in mourning, full of sorrow and witnessing the full-scale damage but now the Tea Party Paradigm plague is spreading. It is infiltrating less-impoverished communities where parental attachment still functions as it should and those adults refuse to tolerate any of it. Mr. Duncan is in too deep to admit failure and subversion by the corporate plutocrats and the NY Regent can write all she wants about winning back hearts and minds to Common Core. It won’t be happening because the pathological essence is in full view. Impose this psychologically detached, mean-spirited, de-skilled, test inflamed, budget-gutted mentality upon desperately poor children and watch the worst we can be take form. The Texas Tribune and the Washington Post don’t have enough reporters to cover the stories we have to tell.
Common Core is working fine. Education Today reports that sales are up a great deal for books and materials to teach the CC. Charter School companies are making a killing in the start of new charters and vouchers and E-schools. So what is the argument. Money is being made. Isn’t that the purpose of this.
Many, many years ago I did a report on Education in Japan that focused on their system of high stakes education and testing. At the time, there was a problem with school violence in the country and my report focused on research that linked pressure at school and violence. I remember reading a story about an adolescent male who beheaded a classmate and put his head on the fence outside of the school. At the time I couldn’t imagine anything like that happening here because schools were safe places for students. Places where they could explore, innovate and create to become the best version of themselves they could be.
Shortly after I wrote that brief report, the Columbine shooting occurred. Fast-forward nearly twenty years and I’m haunted by the words I wrote in a small report that should be long forgotten. I wouldn’t dare jump to a link between our testing system and school-violence here in the US because I don’t have the research to back it up but I can’t help but wonder if there is a link. Of course I’m writing this response on the heals of two school tragedies, one in Nevada and one here in Danvers, Massachusetts. I just can’t help but wonder what happened to that safe place. Is it also a case of neglect? Are we missing what’s happening now because we’re so worried about what’s going to happen next (i.e. test scores). I’ll say it again although I’ve said it many times – the real danger is in ignoring the human element of education. Test scores, data, frameworks, standards, regulations…what about the heart and the soul? Two of education’s most valuable attributes.
Ellen Murray: school violence and woefully inadequate—or as I can attest personally, immoral and improper—responses to it by any type of school system, are issues that must be dealt with much more openly and fairly if we are to ensure a “better education for all.”
I would add: whenever the ed rheephorm crowd crows about Japanese schools (“Just look at those high test scores!”), remember that it is generally acknowledged in Japanese society that many schools have a severe bullying problem.
Thank you for your posting.
I had a student who desperately wanted to stay in this country and never return to Japan. He had been badly bullied before his father was transferred to the U.S. and could not separate that experience from feelings about his country. Luckily, he had very wise parents.
Thank you for your posting. I’m Japanese, born and raised in the suburb of Tokyo. I’m currently doing research on Japan’s education system. In my home country, child poverty is not proliferating as much as the US, but socio-economic inequity is getting increasingly visible today. Educational achievement gap is widening among schools and across prefectures (equivalent to state), as there is a growing number of working poor families nationwide due to a long-time economic deflation and the government’s zero-rate fiscal monetary policy. One of my concerns on Japan’s public education is the mandatory standardized testing for 6th and 9th grades on an annual basis, which began since 2007. The education ministry discloses the result of ranking on test scores every year. Today, now politicians and critics are calling for disclosing the names of schools (and even the name of school principal) for possible punitive accountability. I found that one local governor (in Shizuoka prefecture) just recently did exactly the same thing like an outgoing NY mayor Michael Bloomberg or LA Times did in the past. He even stated that he would not hesitate to fire teachers who failed to boost student test scores in the future.
It’s very ridiculous because there’s not much gap in average test scores between top ranked prefectures and lowest rank prefectures, and the tests are designed as a typical value-added model (just like TAKS or STAAR tests in Texas or equivalent), which I usually label ‘bad social science.’ And this has nothing to do with school admission purpose whatsoever. Students still need to sit out for school entrance examinations for high school/college admission, as usual. It only drives them to meaningless scoring competition across prefecture, and government authorities are beginning to take the whip on assessment of academic achievement– for naming and shaming practice on schools and teachers for lower scores and ranking. I am now wondering Japan will follow the same step with the US in the future.
While Columbine was shocking because of its scale, the fact that there were two perpetrators, and 24/7 cable TV coverage, the US had a long, sordid history of school violence before that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
I taught at that school several years later. It is in Kobe, correct? If you are interested in communication, I will leave my email.
Ah, yes. That’s where the gruesome incidents occurred. Two elementary school kids were brutally murdered by a 14-year-old boy on March 16 and May 27, 1997. In 2004, Japan’s Ministry of Justice was planning to release him on a parole, despite the public criticism. He was released from jail in March 11, 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_child_murders
It was stunning to me that in the midst of the Great Recession when thousands of teachers were laid off, class sizes dramatically increased and programs were cut, not once did anyone in power ever suggest that we cut testing. What message did we send to our kids that tests were more important than they are?
From the Post piece: “Policymakers, politicians and educators should reconsider the $500 billion [edit: it’s actually about $600 billion; how does it make any sense to leave out capital expenses and debt?] the nation spends annually on K-12 education, with an eye toward smarter investments to help poor children, Suitts said.
This sort of discussion was conspicuously absent from “Reign.” We have increased education spending by an enormous amount in the US in the past 20 years, and the overwhelming majority of the increase and the amount we spend overall goes to teacher, admin, and support staff salaries and fringe benefits.
The conversation needs to be a lot more difficult than simply saying we need to spend more money, period, and it is inextricably linked to the even more difficult conversation about segregation. Any meaningful solution to educating kids affected by poverty is going to seriously step on a lot of people’s toes.
Tim, has your salary gone up in the last few years? Why shouldn’t the salaries of educators go up as well. We keep hearing folks complain about the increases needed to cover salaries for teachers and administrators in public education while they fail to say that they are experiencing salary gains in their professions. Education is a profession. It requires professions to educate our children as the failure of the charters who hire un-certified, untrained teachers had repeatedly demonstrated. Has our population increased? That also needs more teachers and administrators. It is amazing to me how politicians keep saying money doesn’t impact the quality of education we offer. How do they know since they have never tried putting more money in education instead of the bare minimum they do every session. Secondly why is it that the amount of money one spends determines the quality of everything from the type of house you live in, they car you drive, the shoes you wear, the food you eat….and yet has no impact on the type of education you receive? If that is indeed the case why do we still have elite colleges and universities who charge what they do (and people pay what they do) to get a degree from there which is supposedly better because of what you paid to achieve it? This same old argument is old and if you have been in education for very long, you see through it every time!
The hundreds of comments on the thread at the WaPo article are chilling. They underscore something Tavis Smiley has been exploring this week in interviews with Patrick McCarthy (Annie E Casey Foundation) and Greg Kaufmann (The Nation’s poverty blog): reporting on poverty today in the US is miniscule, and that’s because people don’t want to hear it. People are covering their ears going ‘la la la anybody can make a decent living if they just work hard and follow the rules.’
If I didn’t know better I’d think that all the talk out of Washington about ‘fixing failing schools so we can compete globally’ was designed as a giant distraction so the public won’t notice 40 years of gov’t leadership failing to meet the challenge– instead, throwing their hands up & releasing the shrinking pie to be stripped by the money mgrs.
Spanish & French freelancer: I earnestly elite e that the 1% invests in “school reform” because it is not only tax-deductible for them, allows them to play the part of kind-hearted colonialists, and changes the subject. If they didn’t change the subject, we might be talking about restoring the tax rates of about 1960, when the super-rich paid high marginal taxes. This is indeed The Great Distraction.
Diane, this is off subject but I heard someone on NPR (Michigan) promoting something called “DOORS”. It stands for Digital One Room Schoolhouse. I couldn’t believe it when I heard it. Could you or someone you know look into this. It sounded like the most ridiculous scam. The man talking claimed that the days of One Room schoolhouses were better, not the current “factory model”. He claimed in DOORS there would be thirty kids in a classroom of all different grade levels. It sounded like they would be using a computer for instruction. I honestly couldn’t believe it when I heard it. This is supposed to be a legitimate education model. Unreal.
Dee Dee–
I think that fits right in with folks who have jumped on the edupeneur train (with lots of Gates money)–and I am not painting with a broad brush, I am simply calling a spade a spade. I have chatted with folks who are in this type of business. I think they are wowed by the notions of innovation, technology and a “digital, global age.” Fine. But we are still people. And schools still need to be set up for such and as such. I know for a fact that those who have stood for what they think is good for lots of people (like, I have heard edupeneurs talk about how backwards it is to have a card catalogue) think they are helping and bringing the newest and greatest thing along (and they happen to get Gates money for doing so, while they are doing it). While it certainly is more efficient to have a library file on computer, I don’t think that if a school has a card catalogue, that means they need a digital one room schoolhouse to come in instead. It’s a matter of finding where what they have to offer can benefit the schools, but instead what they are really looking for is a way to have it benefit them and they become blind to the real issues. They have the mentality of missionaries, but without the vow of poverty (so it becomes about them and they resort to buzz words like “global,” “innovation,” “digital,” and probably apply for Gates money and boom, they get it and off they go to start their edubusiness, justifying the need over that of teachers and the personal aspects of schooling.
One thing I’ve tried to do so that I can keep perspective is compare Gates money for these type things to Ford Foundation money back in the 60s (I learned a lot about this when I read a biography of Obama’s mother—because she was funded to study as an anthropologist in Indonesia with this type funding). People are looking for projects. They want to contribute. They want to leave their mark. But really if you wave a bunch of money in their face, they want that more. So they are trying to do both. Payment for services rendered is the way business ought to work. (And there is no fault in expecting that). Instead, everything is flipped upside right now where people who expect payment for services rendered (teachers) are being faulted (like Rhee saying they are riding a gravy train) and people who are not really rendering a service that is entirely necessary (technology is a 1st world issue, really—and it is definitely a reality, but if it becomes the focus, then the real value of education for people is lost) are demanding payment, up front, in full and lots of it.
I think in time things will get sorted out, where we can push technology back to being something that supports teachers and students, not the end itself. And a more balanced approach to who gets money for what in education (hopefully, for true services rendered that MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO BE MEASURED with a score).
Afterall, can you measure which of your parents loved you more? And would you ever want to replace them with a computer?
Yet again: Don’t confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up. Don’t ever let the facts get in the way of my making money no matter the consequences.
Did you read the article about Shanghai schools in the NYTimes? It was another tribute to Wendy which seems to be the norm at the Times lately to write about studies by organizations that have an agenda. And notice how the media just uses the words “critics” when someone disagrees with the Reformers, but refuse to report on the evidence the “critics” have.
Diane—If you haven’t already, please read this….
Here is more on King and the new Pearson-controlled NYS certification. Read what King says about teachers and parents….it’s disgusting.
Then there’s his analogy comparing CC to a badly cooked restaurant meal. His solution: You still eat it and don’t complain.
Teachers will be jumping through hoops just to get certified that colleges are being forced to teach to the certification test. Yet TFA gets 5-weeks of training and a law saying they are above all other teachers. King will use these tests as a weapon to hire TFA over those who have been called to teaching.
http://oa4pe.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/mission-creep-teacher-educators-join-the-ranks-of-the-walking-wounded/
Looks like another post for Diane. it’s hard to believe that John King is still in his position. It’s time to spit him out; he is impossible to digest.
Money does not make you right, or smarter, or better…it just gives you the ability to get people around you to say you are.
wow The newspaper series on poverty
broke my heart.
I just reread this post and was struck by Moynihan’s quip. Think about what those sparrows were eating. Shall we continue developing the analogy?
Diane, I work in a Newark, NJ school where all of the students are poverty level. All one must do is compare the achievement levels of children in schools like Millburn, Livingston, Chatham, etc. with Paterson, Camden, Newark, etc. to see the connection between income and educational achievement. I strongly believe that the reasons we in Newark do not succeed the way the wealthier communities do are multi-faceted. But I do want to ask you this: If poverty determines so much, how can we attack the poverty problem effectively without irresponsibly throwing more money at inner-city families? The money has to come from somewhere…and it’s running very, very low.
Again, I would be open to a contrarian point of view if the author could draw a direct correlation between the investment in ed reform and the increase in poverty rates. It’s this type of shenanigans that makes collaboration on education reform impossible in the United States. This is just a purely slanderous, accusatory post by all accounts. Civic Debate 101: if you are going to propose an alternative hypothesis, you best be able to support it through factual, empirical evidence instead of 100% conjecture.
If you will remember R_E, the reform position was that their program could trump the effects of poverty in the classroom. Hasn’t happened. The only people “enriched” by their ideas are those who are marketing them. Is the rise in poverty caused by poor educational policy? Don’t be disingenuous. Posters are also disgusted by economic policies that continue to enrich the already wealthy at the expense of people lower on the socioeconomic ladder. That should be a concern of all Americans. We cannot have a healthy democratic society when a tiny percentage of the population can control government policy because of their extreme wealth.
That is a function of our Republic form of government. But again, where is the empirical evidence that says that the ed reformers are enriching the wealthy? Where is the evidence that says that government policy is being CONTROLLED by these folks? And where is the evidence that says the education policy is poor or ineffective? You’re simply providing outlier, anecdotal evidence that is more your opinion that empirical fact. I can show you how social and emotional learning programs are quite successful, and it’s the kids being enriched by the ideas, not those marketing them.
Only a choreography of community investment and education reform will poverty be eradicated. Not one or the other. So again, show me a specific example where a reformer said that their program would trump the effects of poverty in the classroom. While not saying in publicly, it’s clear that “El Sistema” is trumping the effects of poverty. Curious to see what you come up with.
“Only a choreography of community investment and education reform will poverty be eradicated.” Which means…I might agree with some of what you outline…where’s the outline?
“…show me a specific example where a reformer said that their program would trump the effects of poverty in the classroom.” Have you not heard the expression “no excuses?”
Read the research yourself. You will find little that supports teachers with limited training, high stakes standardized testing used to assess students and teachers, no limits on class sizes, standardized curriculum (one size fits all) on which all students must demonstrate proficiency,… I can go on but so can you if you choose to do so. I will look forward (not really) to how you twist my words to fit your understanding of my thinking.
@Reinvent_Ed
>the investment in ed reform and the increase in poverty rates.
Nice try. What the author discusses in her new book is the effect of private investment in education reform on the improvement of student academic achievement and closing its gap across race and socio-economic income. None of those are happening. What’s worse, many private investors and big corporations are throwing billions of dollars into the choice-oriented programs (i.e., charters, vouchers, cyber-schools, or equivalent) that turn out to be utterly ineffective for dismally low-performing academic achievement than many under-performing public schools.(What a waste!) Increase in poverty rates? I think you mean increase in a widening socio-economic inequality. Not surprising because so many businesses and private institutions are seeing public education as the concession for goldmines. If the state keeps inviting these private reformers and creates the market by bankrolling taxpayers’ money to replace public school for its eradication, I’m sure you will end up seeing millions of kids becoming education refugees around the nation.
Doesn’t it bother anyone that COMMON CORE completely relegates History to the ELA discipline?
So what you say?
Read this about 2nd Graders being taught “COMMON CORE”
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/23/second-graders-taught-labor-politics-in-core-curriculum-aligned-lesson-plan/?intcmp=obnetwork
Common Core Curriculum Planning (CCCP?) anyone
LOL, Jim! Exactly!