The Randolph County Board of Education voted 5-2 to ban “Invisible Man” by Ralph Ellison from the shelves of Randolph County Schools libraries.
All copies of the book will be removed from school libraries.
This action followed the complaint of a parent.
Committees at both the school and district levels recommended it not be removed.
The book, originally published in 1952, addresses many of the social and intellectual issues facing African-Americans in the first half of the 20th century.
It was one of three books from which rising Randleman High School juniors could choose for summer reading for the 2013-14 school year. The others on the list were “Black Like Me” by John Howard Griffin and “Passing” by Nella Larsen; honors students had to choose two books.
There was little discussion after the board was presented with the Central Services Committee recommendation concerning the parent’s complaint about the book. All board members had been supplied with copies of the book last month to read.
McDonald [a board member] asked if everyone had read the book, stating, “It was a hard read.”
Mason [a board member] said, “I didn’t find any literary value.” He also objected to the language in the book. “I’m for not allowing it to be available.”
Cutler [a board member who opposed the resolution] asked if there were other options to which Catherine Berry, assistant superintendent of curriculum and instruction, replied that there were other choices. She also explained that the book is on the N.C. Department of Public Instruction’s list of suggested supplemental works for high school students.
It was at this point that Cutler made the original motion which was defeated. Lambeth then made the motion to ban the book which passed.
The board action was prompted by a complaint about the book from Kimiyutta Parson, mother of an RHS 11th-grader. She submitted a request for reconsideration of instructional media form, which detailed, in a 12-page supplemental document, her reasons for the book’s removal.
She stated, in part, “The narrator writes in the first person, emphasizing his individual experiences and his feelings about the events portrayed in his life. This novel is not so innocent; instead, this book is filthier, too much for teenagers. You must respect all religions and point of views when it comes to the parents and what they feel is age appropriate for their young children to read, without their knowledge. This book is freely in your library for them to read.”
Parson also objected to the type of language used in the book and its sexual content.
A school-based, six-member media advisory committee met, according to board policy, and recommended it not be removed from the library.
A 10-member District Media Advisory Committee also met, agreeing with the school-level group’s decision. According to its recommendation, “the committee appreciated the parent’s concern for their child and the interest taken in their education. The District Media Advisory committee unanimously agreed that the book does relate directly to curriculum and RCS should keep the book on the shelf and as a literature piece for instruction.”

Wow..we have become the United Stasi.
LikeLike
My suggestion is that we all write to the Randolf County Board complaining about random works of literature:
The Illyad and Oddyssy (please misspell for greater effect) Paganism and extra-marital sex
Bible, particularly Old Testament (same as above) Also, incoherent story
Don Quixote (boring, no literary value, also Mexican, Puerto Rican or something) (please include that part to show sophistication)
Shakespeare (all works) hard to understand funny British English)
Huckleberry Finn (bad example, communist), but of course that one gets banned all the time, right.
LikeLike
I love the “please misspell for greater effect”
LikeLike
How will folks understand my Quixotic Quest Bandwagon if we go banning Don Quijote de la Mancha???
LikeLike
Next stop: Salem Book Trials.
LikeLike
What a shame.
In the history of the AP Literature and Composition exam, Ellison’s _Invisible Man_ has been listed as a writing option for the free response question more than any other work of literature. (The link below includes titles listed between 1970 and 2010. For perspective, Wuthering Heights_ is second, with 18 citations, and _Great Expectations_ is third, with 16.)
The “Most Frequently Cited” list appears toward the end of this document:
https://wikis.engrade.com/juniorap/aplitbooks
LikeLike
What a sad day.
LikeLike
Has no one learned anything from history?
LikeLike
Good. Now tell all the students loudly and frequently that this book is banned because it’s too dirty. What better way to get them all to read it?
LikeLike
When Chicago Public Schools banned PERSEPOLIS, students at several schools held read-ins specifically reading that book. I would like to see the same happen here. And, if nothing else, it’s a push for me to finally get around to reading it.
LikeLike
The book-reading sit-ins are a GREAT idea!
LikeLike
It’s a hard read, Dienne. Pre-civil-rights. Black incest. Pretty radical. OMG, Existentialist!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
My thoughts exactly. Banning is the best thing you can do to boost interest in a book.
LikeLike
Corey, Dienne & Alan: it is no coincidence that Mark Twain’s HUCKLEBERRY FINN was mentioned on this thread.
Could someone in the audience acquaint the Randolph County BOE with American cultural history?
“There is a charm about the forbidden that makes it unspeakably desirable.”
Although perhaps they didn’t realize that Twain put on paper what they say to each other in private:
“Out of all the things I have lost, I miss my mind the most.”
Education reform, anyone?
🙂
LikeLike
exactly!
LikeLike
Maybe it should be replaced with Fahrenheit 451
LikeLike
Very unfortunate decision.
LikeLike
Sigh. IM is perhaps my favorite book to teach (and re-read) each year; it generates endless discourse among students.
“Every serious novel is, beyond its immediate thematic preoccupations, a discussion of the craft, a conquest of the form, a conflict with its difficulties and a pursuit of its felicities and beauty.” – Ralph Ellison, ‘Society, Morality, and the Novel’ in GOING TO THE TERRITORY, 1986.
LikeLike
: )
LikeLike
“The narrator writes in the first person” Yes, that should be banned.???
“this book is filthier” Un, that what?
How’s the Huckleberry Finn book rate with the Kimiyutta / Randolph County brain trust?
LikeLike
One of the best books I read in high school. What a sad day in America.
LikeLike
Years ago, when I was teaching high-school English, I would occasionally give my students a list, on the board, of books that they should stay away from because they were WAY too controversial, would be upsetting to their parents, etc.
Worked like a charm.
LikeLike
lol, that’s pretty funny. Out of curiosity, what books did you put on your list?
LikeLike
I’m sorry, Cynewulf, but it’s been a while. I remember that Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle was on that list, and Huxley’s Brave New World. But it would be fun to come up with the list again.
Hey, kids, “Do NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES read INVISIBLE MAN by Ralph Ellison.”
hee hee
LikeLike
I vividly remember reading Brave New World. It was a required text, and we were given some time in class to read it, so there was no escaping it. I was sure that I was going to be bored to tears. It didn’t take long before I was hooked and had to reassess my thoughts on the merits of required reading. That book made a lasting impression on me. Unfortunately, I can’t boast of having read Cat’s Cradle. I might have to add that to my list (the one that continually grows longer no matter how many books I read).
That would be fun to come up with such a list. Maybe Dr. Ravitch will see fit to start a post on that, the “Do not under any circumstances read” list…
LikeLike
Like. A lot.
LikeLike
I support local schools/districts making local decisions. I don’t have to agree with their decision to support them in making it. One district bans one book and we’re in imminent danger of the goosestep becoming the preferred method of ambulation. I know, I know, “first they came for the…” Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m guessing the book is still available in the public library and bookstores everywhere. If we had more local control, we’d have less reform nonsense.
Oh, and if anyone needs a free on-line version: http://bpi.edu/ourpages/auto/2010/5/11/36901472/Ralph%20Ellison%20-%20Invisible%20Man%20v3_0.pdf
LikeLike
Sorry, I don’t agree. In general, it is good for local schools to make local decisions, but sometimes that should be trumped by other considerations. Think Little Rock. Local districts should not be free to set up segregated schools. Or to ban students with disabilities. Or to promote Christianity or any other religion. Removing a book from the school library on the basis of one complaint from one parent is outrageous. It is small consolation that it may still be available elsewhere. For many of my students, the school library is the only place they can easily obtain books.
LikeLike
The Feds have a right to step in when basic civil rights are being violated, but in general, we need site-based management again in our schools. We’ve seen the horror that comes of top-down, bureaucratic meddling from state departments and from the federal DOE (otherwise known as the Common Curriculum Commissariat and Ministry of Truth).
That meddling is done in the name of meritocracy but always gives us, instead, mediocrity.
Innovation flows from the bottom up. You know what flows from the top down.
LikeLike
There’s a good old Saxon word for what flows from the top down.
LikeLike
Excellent points. There are limits to what a local board should be allowed to decide.
LikeLike
Yes, the feds can come in when local control violates basic civil rights. Yes, local control is the best option and produces the best results in almost every type of decision. But…there are times when it is appropriate to look to other places for guidance. Professional organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of English and the American Library Association come to mind.
My principal once considered banning a young adult series from our school library due to a parent’s complaint about a sexual reference. I asked the principal to look at the American Library Association’s statements on banned books and access to information. He did so, and was able to provide a rationale for why the series should not be removed.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that there is more at stake than federal vs. local control. If a local school board had come up with a curriculum similar to the CCSS (sic) would that make it okay? Wouldn’t it still have other problems due to the fact that it envisions ELA solely as a set of skills?
LikeLike
Well, it would be a boring world if we all agreed on everything, though it would be, perhaps, a bit more peaceful. Having said that, I do agree with you that sometimes other considerations should trump local control (which is why I said that there should be more local control, not absolute local control). On the other hand, those things you list have federal laws against them. That’s a bit different from the exclusion of one book.
In addition, there are thousands of books that your library does not have (and that the schools in Randolph County do not have). They are not technically banned, but in effect they are. Yet no one speaks for them.
Let me note again that I disagree with their decision, particularly in light of the fact that there were other book choices available. Before outright banning it, they could have made its check-out dependent on parental consent. However, if the residents of Randolph County feel as i do, they try to have the book reinstated, or, barring that, they can vote for different school board members come election time.
At the end of the day, it should be a great consolation to you that book-burning Nazis are not scouring the countryside for books to burn; instead, our republic still stands and everyone in it is free to get the book in question at a public library or a bookstore or on-line. And while the students in Randolph County that do not have easy access to any of those choices are in a bit of a temporary lurch, the same is true for them of all of the other books that are not in their school library. Perhaps when they are 18, they can find their own way towards acquiring a copy.
LikeLike
” If a local school board had come up with a curriculum similar to the CCSS (sic) would that make it okay? Wouldn’t it still have other problems due to the fact that it envisions ELA solely as a set of skills?”
I would be all for that because if one county wants to experiment with that and see if it works, it’s much better than everyone doing it with no guarantee of success. If it works, great, other counties start adopting it, though most likely putting their own spin on it. If it doesn’t, great; everyone sees that it doesn’t work and is spared from trying it and the county that tried it moves on to bigger and better things. We have to give districts, like people, the freedom to fail if we want them to ultimately succeed. Just like biodiversity, edu-diversity makes us stronger.
LikeLike
How about Evolution? Do you really think we are “modified monkeys”?
LikeLike
I have to say I’m with you on this one. It’s an illusion to think you can raise local consciousness by imposition from the state or fed level. The fact that one lady can blackball a book in her community says more about the community than anything else, but so be it. In my [wealthy & cosmopolitan] suburb such has been assayed & the larger-voiced intelligentsia has prevailed (that’s why I live here!)
Don’t know if It has any resonance, but in my bygone day (late ’60’s), this book as well as Black Like Me (Griffin), Soul on Ice (Cleaver), et al were read by everyone I knew like kindling passing books from one to the next, & nary a one was in our freshman ivy league English syllabus (let alone h.s. reading list!)… can only blame being a Rom Lit major for never having read HFinn in entirety… perhaps we are expecting too much.
On a more hopeful note, the Randolph County Board is meeting again on Sept 25 to reconsider the ban http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/09/north-carolina-school-board-reconsiders-banning-ralph-ellisons-invisible-man.html
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing this update.
LikeLike
“The fact that one lady can blackball a book in her community says more about the community than anything else, but so be it.”
Indeed. And that in response to the one lady, five board members go, “um, okay.”
LikeLike
Nothing new here really:http://www.ala.org/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks
LikeLike
I would agree with TE that this is not a new type situation, silly as it is. I hope they realize that banning books is so cliche a power move that most people just roll their eyes at the thought.
I recall taking students to see Invisible Man performed on stage in Lawrence, KS. And that group of protesters that held signs up at everything in Kansas was there (but they were always protesting everything).
Perhaps they will reconsider the decision.
Everybody wants to feel important. It’s too bad some people choose this type stink to exercise that need. That mama thinks she is doing right.
Two heads are better than one so hopefully this will cool over time. Or be an unenforced ban. How do you enforce a book ban anyway?
LikeLike
I have connections to the spiritual side of the universe and have a message for the Asheboro school board and Kimiyutta Parson, as follows:
“The spiritual side of the universe has a problem with Kimiyutta Parson and her obliterated soul, giving out edicts that should not at all be listened to. Her soul is missing 1 1/2 components and is in the process of being called back. In regard to the board members of the Asheboro School system, 9 out of 11 of them are obliterated souls as well and are in trouble for not being at all spiritual. The school system must put this wonderful exalted book back on its shelves. Ralph Ellison is exalted on the spiritual side of the universe for being an UBER, UBER, UBER, UBER CLEAR SOUL STATUS SOUL who spoke truths and facts about the issues that are relevant to the African-American people.”
LikeLike