Archives for the month of: June, 2013

North Carolina’s SB 337 has been revised to add just a few limits to charter autonomy. There will not be a separate charter-friendly board to authorize charters; that responsibility will remain with the state board, which will likely be tilted towards charters anyway.

The original bill would have allowed all charter teachers to be uncertified. Currently, 75% of charter teachers in K-5 must be certified. The new bill drops that to 50%, instead of zero.

Charter teachers will be subject to criminal background checks. That’s a relief. And charters will be expected to reflect the racial diversity of their area.

Educators were less than thrilled with the low standards for charter teachers. One said, “Standards only seem to matter if you teach in a traditional public school system.” Another said, “A license is an assurance to the public, just like when I go to the doctor and look for his license to practice medicine…Do we want electricians and pharmacists to not have licenses? Do we want to create a professional system in which professionals are unlicensed?”

– See more at: http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2013/06/25/mixed-signals-on-charter-schools/#sthash.vsshLO2t.dpuf

The Wisconsin legislature allocated $1million to pay Teach for America to send 70 we teachers to Wisconsin schools.

It gets tiresome to say this again and again: Teach for America is a wealthy organization that sends ill-trained recruits to teach in under-resourced districts. These poorly trained young people, with no experience as teachers and no commitment to stay beyond two years, are expected to work wonders. They don’t.

Why does TFA charge districts anything? It has $300 million in assets. Is it renting out the kids? Selling them? Auctioning them off?

A teacher comments:

Arne Duncan cannot be taken at his word.

I sometimes teach things in Pre-K that I taught in K against what I know is right. My administrators want to see graphs, charts, accountable talk and levels of depth of knowledge.

When I hear the K teachers giving lessons on nouns and pronouns, verbs and adjectives (yes using that vocabulary), I cringe.

Also my school ordered desks a few weekas ago to replace the kindergarten tables. And the teachers, who are good, defend this saying, “Well they need room for all their books.” No painting easel, few blocks, hardly any dramatic play or manipulatives.. It’s a wonder the state still gives an early childhood license (birth to 2nd grade.)

Angela Danovi’s mother taught in the Memphis public schools for 29 years. She just retired.

Angela knows how many lives her mother changed, how many daily acts of kindness shaped her students.

And she knows that William Sanders, the statistician who invented value-added modeling or VAM, has never been able to create a measure that would accurately reflect what her mother accomplished.

This is what she sent me:

Dear Diane,

My mother retired today. I am both sad and pleased. Yesterday, I wrote the following piece on my facebook page as the daughter of a single parent who taught school in Memphis City Schools. I wanted to share my post with you.

This evening, my mom will be retired from Memphis City Schools after 29 consecutive years. She also taught in Arkansas and Mississippi as well as worked as a daycare director prior to working for MCS. Yes, I’m going to go political now. As you can imagine, I have found the “ed reform” movement highly and personally offensive. The paycheck she brought home financed me to do ballet, play sports, go to camp, go to UT (University of Tennessee). In turn, I have assisted in teaching ballet, assisted in coaching sports, had the opportunity to walk on as a shot put thrower at UT, worked for 8 summers as a camp counselor, and ended up receiving 2 degrees in the environmental sciences and now serve as a projects manager for a nonprofit. Yet, somehow being the daughter of a single parent teacher has in many people’s minds disqualified me from having a credible opinion or legitimate argument on the matter. I just want to say, I have read the original paper on the Tennessee Value Added Assessment Model that was originally written in 1984 and unabashedly touted from my alma mater! The authors were statisticians, not educators, and their original model was applied to three elementary schools in East Tennessee, which is a very very different scenario from an urban high school setting! Yet, even in the original model each teacher’s “value added score” was based on at least 6 different variables per student, resulting in over 180 variables to determine the “value” a single teacher in a single classroom in a given year added to those students’ experience. Over the last 30 years this model has been expanded and increased in complexity to include every conceivable educational environment including special ed and high schools where teachers see their students less than 1 hour per day or less than 1/24th of their day or less than 4% of each day in a student’s life! Yet this model has been applied towards firing and destroying the lives and families of professional educators. Meanwhile, numerous articles have been published statistically and scientifically demonstrating the inherent flaws, misuse, and abuse of this model. I have argued that the variables that are input for climate and weather models are less complex and rely on fewer and more stable variables to predict or measure outcomes than what has been inputted into the value added education models!

The last few years I was deeply concerned that my mother was one tweaked evaluation formula and one set of tweaked test scores away from being named a “lemon” and on her way out the door. Teachers, especially teachers who have worked in the settings in which my mom has worked, have become demonized as moochers, takers, and a boil of society turning out products useless for today’s economy. However, I have been with my mom when meeting her former students who were working for Memphis Police, Memphis fire, construction, professional managers for Starbucks, workers in dry cleaners, workers in Walgreens, and others in a myriad of locations and professions earning paychecks, contributing to the tax base, and making the Memphis and Shelby County area businesses and organizations run every day. When you hear Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Michelle Rhee, Oprah, representatives of the Walton Family Foundation, and others talk about “ineffective” teachers or having only “highly effective” teachers in the classroom what those people are really saying is career educators are not worthy to be in the classroom today. They are saying people who are educators and their families are not worthy of a stable paycheck, health insurance, sick leave, or a retirement in their personal and professional lives. To be clear, these issues, along with due process, are what teachers’ “unions” (which if you can’t strike it’s hardly a union) and professional associations were fighting for. This uncertainty coupled with constant professional attack is not a way for any individual or family to have to live.

My mother was lucky, in this emerging Ed Reform movement, to have landed at a school that tested well. She could have easily been at a different school in a different part of town working with an entirely different population of students who came from even far more adverse backgrounds, and she could have just as easily been “evaluated” at the bottom rather than top. She definitely taught in those schools, just not at a time when those kids were being tested and those scores being perversely used against the teacher in the classroom, or in other words, likely the only person in those students’ lives who had educationally accomplished what the ed reformers say we are expecting and demanding all students to accomplish regardless of any other circumstances.

I am proud of what my mother accomplished in her time in teaching in Memphis City Schools. I saw her teach to classrooms filled with the urban youth of Memphis. I listened to her tell stories of teaching girls in high schools who have escaped from countries of war and famine to hold a pencil for the first time and try to navigate the high school educational system when they had never before been to school. A statistician such as William Sanders, one of the originators of the Value Added Model, may not find a very high value in the body of work or the thousands of students my mother taught based on those students’ ultimate educational attainment or their paychecks or the paychecks of their children, but she has certainly had a profound an immense impact (for many years in un airconditioned classrooms) on the city of Memphis and the students of Memphis.

Thanks,
Angela Danovi

http://www.angeladanovi.com

A reader posted this comment:

 

I am a teacher in TN. I have 6 years of experience and a masters degree, and I don’t make even 40k a year. Our district already has a performance incentive program – the top level of merit pay, which I did earn last year, was $2,000 – about $1600 after taxes. Insulting. In fact, many teachers earned it. So what are they doing for this year? Raising the qualifications to make it harder for teachers to earn it because they didn’t want to give out so much $$.

Yesterday I received an email from Huffman – I think it was sent to all educators in TN through a listserve. I was so, very, very very very very tempted to reply to it and say just what someone said above – “Dear Mr. Huffman, I think it’s only fair that you too tie your salary to a measurement of our evaluation of your performance in office, and not receive any further raises unless warranted.”
But I didn’t, because I value my job. Unlike him.

Dennis Hong has written an essay that is spreading like wildfire across the Internet.

It is called “The Hardest Job Everyone Thinks They Can Do.”

He used to be a molecular biologist. When he told his friends about his frustration with a failed experiment, no one told him how to do it right.

Then he became a teacher.

Now everyone knows his job–or thinks they do–better than he does.

Everyone offers advice.

When he switched from “doing” science to teaching science, he was annoyed that he had to earn a teaching credential. Then he found out what it means to teach.

Here are just a few of his lessons:

“Teaching isn’t just “making it fun” for the kids. Teaching isn’t just academic content.

Teaching is understanding how the human brain processes information and preparing lessons with this understanding in mind.”

And more:

“Teaching is being both a role model and a mentor to someone who may have neither at home, and may not be looking for either.

Teaching is not easy. Teaching is not intuitive. Teaching is notsomething that anyone can figure out on their own. Education researchers spend lifetimes developing effective new teaching methods. Teaching takes hard work and constant training. I understand now.”

That is why we should invite all the legislators and policymakers to teach for a week before they make policy. At least a week.

 

The Colorado Virtual Academy, one of K12 Inc.’s biggest schools, has severed its association with the publicly traded corporation. They may continue to use its curriculum but not its management services, starting in 2014.

“The Colorado school has been criticized for its low graduation rates (22 percent in 2011-12, according to state education statistics) and a discovery by state auditors that the school had overcharged $800,000 for 120 students who never attended, weren’t Colorado residents or whose enrollments couldn’t be verified, according to an in-depth 2011 New York Times article.”

But K12 isn’t finished in Colorado. Another online school won approval, and it will engage the corporation.

CREDO, the organization at Stanford University that analyzes charter performance, released the results of its latest national study.

Its earlier report (2009) showed disappointing results for charter schools, with only 17% outperforming traditional public schools. This was especially disappointing for the Walton Family Foundation, one of the main backers of CREDO.

The new study shows that charters are doing better than in 2009. They typically get about the same results as public schools, with some performing better, others performing worse.

I will do my own analysis later but meanwhile this is the best review I have seen, by Stephanie Simon of Reuters.

Key quote: “25 percent of charters outperformed nearby schools at teaching reading, while 19 percent did worse, and 56 percent were about the same. In math, 29 percent of charters did better, 31 percent did worse, and 40 percent were on par.”

The report raises many questions, implicitly, to a critical reader. Why is it that charter schools are not vastly outperforming public schools? They have the ability to skim and exclude. They have the benefit of “peer effects,” since they can expel troublesome students and send them back to their public school. Nearly 90% are non-union. They can fire teachers at any time and offer performance bonuses if they wish. They do everything that “reformers” dream of, yet they are hardly different in test scores overall from public schools, which typically must take all children and do not have the support of the Obama administration, major corporations, big media, big foundations, and hedge fund managers. The fact that charters serve large numbers of black, Hispanic, and poor students does not mean they serve a representative sample of students with disabilities and English language learners (they don’t). To compare a school that can select its student body with one that cannot is inherently unfair. The fact that the public schools do as well as the charter schools, despite their advantages, is remarkable.

Conservative groups are hoping to cripple teachers’ unions by urging members to “opt out.”

According to the Wall Street Journal blog, “A coalition of 60 groups in 35 states has begun a national campaign to tell workers they have the right to opt out of a labor union, and are providing instructions on how and when to do it.

“The campaign, which launched Sunday, is the brainchild of the Nevada Policy Research Institute, libertarian think tank. The group last year ran a local campaign informing teachers in the Las Vegas area how and when to opt out of the Clark County Education Association, a union affiliate of the larger National Education Association. To opt out, members had to submit a written notice during a two-week window in July, which many did, campaign leaders say.”

A union official in Nevada said: “The real intent of right-wing organizations like NPRI is to strip teachers of their bargaining rights as well as their organization’s political advocacy for public education,” Ms. Elias said.”

Will it improve education if teachers’ unions are destroyed?

Well, let’s see, the nation’s highest performing states–Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Connecticut–are highly unionized. Without the collective voice of teachers, it is easy to cut education spending, eliminate the arts, and increase class sizes. Rendering teachers voiceless in their working conditions is not good for students or teachers.

Veronica Vasquez found a letter that her 12-year-old daughter Paula wrote.

Paula is a student in a Chicago public school that Mayor Rahm Emanuel is closing.

““I have one question to ask,” it begins, in Paula’s girlish printing.

“Do you have any idea what your doing to us … our school … even to me? We all have tried and tried everything to keep our school open. How can people like you have no mercy on us?”

“Paula wrote that she is heartbroken. She called CPS decision-makers “cold hearted,” and their decision “barbaric.” And she closed the letter by writing, “I just don’t get it, I don’t get it at all.”