This is a strange but true story.

As you know, I have a new book coming out in mid-September, and I plan to visit several cities on the west coast.

A reader of the blog reached out to see if the Los Angeles World Affairs Council would host me to speak at a luncheon.

I will be in Los Angeles October 1 and 2. I am speaking at Cal State-Northridge on the evening of October 2. So I thought it would be a good idea to speak to LAWAC at lunch on October 2 or in the evening of October 1.

LAWAC has previously hosted Michelle Rhee, who was introduced by Eli Broad, the billionaire philanthropist.

The initial response from LAWAC was that it would be delighted to present me, that its members are very interested in education issues, and that we could work out the details.

I conveyed this information to my lecture agent, who is coordinating my travel arrangements. She asked for a fee, as is customary (I don’t know what she asked for). The response came back that LAWAC does not pay speaker fees.

I responded immediately, directly to the executive director of LAWAC and wrote that I would gladly speak for free. He replied that LAWAC does not pay speakers’ fees.

I thought maybe he missed my previous email, so I wrote again and said, clearly and in caps, I will speak for FREE, I require no fee, nothing at all, not even expenses. I am willing to speak for no fee. No fee, no fee, no fee. Do I make myself clear? No fee. Free.

Again came back the response. “LAWAC does not pay speakers’ fees.”

I think the message is: LAWAC does not want to hear anyone who disagrees with Michelle Rhee and Eli Broad. Or maybe LAWAC is no longer interested in hearing about education as it is no longer an important issue. But it cannot be about fees.

What do you think?