I always hold out hope that Mike Petrilli will be the conservative who one day leaves behind his brethren and realizes that the punitive policies of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top were a huge and costly mistake. Why do I hold out hope for Mike? I know him, and I know he is a good man. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He has young children, and he will soon see how the testing monster will try to devour them and destroy their love of learning.
In his last exchange with Deborah Meier at “Bridging Differences” at Education Week, I see the glimmer of hope that I have been waiting for. Mike describes himself as a “Whole Foods Republican,” and then asserts that we are helpless to do much about poverty because we don’t know what to do. That is not a glimmer of hope, as I think we can forge poverty-reduction policies that work, as other nations have. We should not give up trying.
What gives me hope is not Mike’s sense of futility about poverty, but his proposal that states should have the authority to allow schools to opt out of the soul-deadening testing-and-accountability regime if they can show that their metrics are better than those of the federal and state governments.
Thus, he would give his consent to the New York Performance Standards Consortium, which has documented its success in graduation rates, college admission rates, and persistence in college rates. Granted, it took time to get that data. A group of schools needs a decade or more to generate the results of their program.
But think of the creativity and innovation that would be unleashed if schools were offered the freedom to opt out and select different ways to measure their success.
Good job, Mike.

I respect Mike because he at least is straightforward, at least with his take on charter schools not educating the same children.
http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/flypaper/2013/the-charter-expulsion-flap-who-speaks-for-the-strivers.html
Although many readers will not agree with his comments in his blog post, at least he doesn’t do what many charter proponents claim, such as “100% college attendance rates for our high expectations no excuses school!” (when perhaps 40-50% of their students leave the school during the process)
When we’re honest about what is and is not happening in schools, whether traditional public, private, charter, voucher, online, etc….then we can figure out what is best.
LikeLike
Diane,
I agree. Mike Petrilli is a good, thoughtful man who is working to improve education. Thank you for your interesting comments.
Jim Herman
LikeLike
“…and then asserts that we are helpless to do much about poverty because we don’t know what to do.”
More neoliberal fatalism. The point is to generate a sense of hopelessness and defeatism. We can’t stop globalism, so we might as well not bother to try. It’s the mask that allows people to continue to live comfortably without confronting the evils of the world and our own participation therein.
LikeLike
I agree with Dienne—more than words can convey!
This “Sorry, but that problem is absolutely impossible to do anything about!” is a hoary and often deliberately deceptive excuse for keeping things the way they are and acting as if it’s a “natural” occurrence, beyond anyone’s ability to even influence or mitigate, like an earthquake or flood.
It’s more often just an unwillingness to do anything, while hoping that this 21st century version of “Hey, uh…God’s Will, don’t blame me, I just work here.” will sound more “moderate” and “respectable” than the Randian/Libertarian sociopathy or belligerent neo-Lester Maddox rantings of most haters of community, nation and our government.
This obtuse and mendacious drivel became very pronounced by Jimmy Carter, almost immediately after his inauguration. His became the “We can’t administration”; Carter spent more time fighting the members of his own party than his opponents and his refusal to develop desperately needed laws and programs coupled with his rhetorical bashing of what he called “Big Government” set the stage for Ronald Reagan and all of the toxicity that has followed since.
LikeLike
A “Whole Foods Republican?”
Well, if that means that Mr. Petrilli shares even a sliver of Whole Foods’ founder John Mackey’s virulent anti-unionism and free market fundamentalism, then we might be waiting a long time time for that Paul-on-the-road-to-Damascus moment.
LikeLike
I appreciate your comments about Mike Petrilli, because the great divide between improved teaching and learning and the top-down reform campaign is not captured by the conservative vs liberal or progressive model of politics.
In September 2010, in the midst of the campaign by Rhee and Fenty to reelect Fenty (the Fordham Foundation/Institute was a supporter of Rhee’s policies), Mike consented to posting on Fordham’s Education Gadfly e-letter my criticism of Rhee’s credit recovery program, titled “’A for Effort’ Shouldn’t Count”: http://tinyurl.com/czcbufr
He expressed his disagreement with a policy of giving credit for shortcut courses that bypass mastery of course standards, which is, by the way, another position that cuts across the left-right stereotype.
LikeLike
If the only motivating force for Petrilli to “come around” is the fact that his own kids are entering school soon… this is not enough of a reason to believe he will do right by title one students. He needs to understand the harm done to our nations’ neediest children under NCLB and RTTT. Obama “understands” this while his kids are in the top private school in the country and he promotes policies of “non-understanding”! A man who “comes around” just because he has soon-to-be school aged children I am skeptical of.
LikeLike
I have yet to agree with anything of his I’ve read….but I will try to keep an open mind.
But only because you respect him.
LikeLike
If it helps, Mike Petrilli is under fire from almost all the talking heads of DC, shocked at his proposal to let educators make decisions without tight supervision
LikeLike
So are a lot of actual teachers in classrooms. I can try re-reading some of his posts and maybe allow that people come across differently in print than IRL, but even though he lives probably less than 10 miles from me, i don’t know that he and i could be further apart philosophically. LOL
LikeLike
” we are helpless to do much about poverty because we don’t know what to do.” Sorry, but this is a bald faced and cowardly lie. Remember Johnson’s Great Society program? We know why generational poverty exists but are too stupid to formulate a solution? With all of the amazing things this nation has achieved we somehow are brought to our knees by the “impossibility” of addressing and curing poverty? REALLY??? When other nations have succeeded at this? This is a diversion, using the lie of intractable poverty as an excuse for cutting the bottom part of the ladder off or some other such nonsense. The only thing America lacks is politicians and a small sector of the public who don’t have the will to admit the nature of the problem and to implement some rather obvious solutions. What else do you expect in a nation and from a media controlled by those who would cut SNAP and other services for the least among us while preserving corporate loopholes in our tax code?
LikeLike
What are the obvious solutions, please?
LikeLike
The obvious solution is jobs that pay a living wage, a greater percentage of the national income going to labor instead of capital, and removal of barriers to unionization.
LikeLike
You advance a possible answer. In any enterprise what percentage of the added value arises from the capital inputs and what part from the labor inputs?
LikeLike