Paul Thomas has a surprising and unusual habit of thinking. He doesn’t follow the crowd or the latest fashion. In this post, he notices how organizations are falling into line on the Common Core, even though they know that schools and teachers and children are not ready. Thomas taught English in high school for nearly twenty years; he now is a professor at Furman University. In his post cited here, he examines the issue of choice and inevitability.
Come to think of it, it’s interesting that the same people who insist that everyone needs to have a choice of schools (like Jeb Bush and Joel Klein), also insist that when it comes to Common Core, there should be no choice at all. Just fall in line. It is inevitable. Everyone must comply. If, as Jeb Bush puts it, choosing a school should be like choosing what kind of milk you want (1%, 2%, skim, chocolate, whole, buttermilk?), why only one curriculum for the whole nation? Why not choice there too?
A few weeks ago, Randi Weingarten called for a moratorium on Common Core assessments and on the accountability attached to them (aka, punishments). Randi pointed out that it made no sense to hold students and teachers accountable when there has been little or no curriculum, professional development or other preparation for the new standards and tests.
Aside from widespread predictions that the proficiency rates will drop by 30% or more, no one knows how the standards and tests will work because they are new and have never gotten a real trial. They may or may not lead to higher achievement. They may widen the achievement gaps, or not. No one knows.
However, Alice Johnson Cain, Vice President of the Gates-funded AstroTurf group Teach Plus, opposes a moratorium. Cain previously worked as an aide for many years for California Congressman George Miller, the senior Democrat on the House education committee. Miller was one of the authors of No Child Left Behind and is a favorite of Democrats for Education Reform (DFER), the Wall Street hedge fund managers’ group that supports high-stakes testing and charters. DFER has raised large sums for Miller, who seldom has any opposition in his safe district.
Randi was right in this respect. If the Common Core is imposed without any adjustments and tested without preparation, it will fail. It will be a footnote in educational history. It will be studied in the future along with Life Adjustment education and other “movements” that had their day and disappeared.

It is the hidden agendas of experimentation on the children of this country and the world that makes reading this blog and others so painful. Just like depression has unseen levels of pain, watching a child put their head down on a desk and feel like nothing and worthless is painful for the child, teacher, and parent. What has happend in the name of progress is a sham and a shame!!!
LikeLike
Good Post
LikeLike
The “inevitable”, there is no alternative (TINA) messaging is part of neoliberalism. We all must sacrifice our salaries, benefits, the Commons, etc. in the name of globalism. There is no other choice. Get used to it. Resistance is futile. Which also happens to be the mantra of the Borg.
LikeLike
You may sacrifice. but I choose to fight!
LikeLike
A question about Common Core: What rough percentage of overall school curriculum is it intended to cover? I would have assumed that the “core” would try to give the “basics” that every school should cover while allowing time and space for schools to do their own thing outside of the “core”. I’d particularly appreciate answers to this question that contain links to Common Core documents as evidence of intent. Perhaps, though, this issue is not addressed at all.
LikeLike
CCSS ELA:
Click to access CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
LikeLike
CCSS Math:
Click to access CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
LikeLike
Well, considering that there are only ELA and Math, that would comprise about 2/7 at most of the curriculum. Unfortunately because of the high stakes nature of the associated tests, that 2/7 of the curriculum drives all else. Insanity defined in my book.
LikeLike
Does it feel like there is a deliberate recognition that this will fail and that the intent is to saboutage the educational establishment in favor of privatization? It is absurd to test anyone on anything for which there has been preparation. That kind of test can only, by definition, be diagnostic! Diagnostic tests cannot be used punitively since they measure what you need to know. The last 7 years of my teaching were concerned with trying to second guess the types of things that are likely to be on the tests. We had endless pseudo-professional development segments that hinted at the changes but never defined them because they are ever-changing. As we often commented, we were aiming at a moving target while wearing blindfolds.
LikeLike
The CORE is the supposedly the center and all things are built around the core…..Does not work that way at all.
And though the idea sound good…teachers have been using these Graphic Organizers for years and have been teaching core…a “new name for BASICS” for years..
The CCSS folks created one of the most chaotic curricula ever …and it is beyond chaotic..
Worse that putting a new name on something that has been done for years..they added a bunch of nonsense standards that will not ever help any person get to the top of this Crazed Race..
And even worse all students should perform the same on all tests otherwise you are a failure..
Said the fish to the instructor..’I tried to climb that tree….have you ever thought about putting it in a BODY of water so I could AT LEAST get to the top?”
The RTTT instructor replies…
“Oh No …I am not allowed to do that….Everyone of you….the elephant..the alligator..the turtle..the monkey must have the exact same tree in the exact same spot and climb to the exact same spot on the top..
OTHERWISE YOU FAIL MY END OF COURSE EXAM AND YOUR TEACHER IS FIRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
History question: My impression is that the original impulse behind Common Core was as a way of dealing with the fact that some states dumbed down their proficiency standards in response to NCLB. So imposing a curriculum geared to the higher achieving states would force the others to improve — which in a sense, was saying that we’ll make the South catch up to the North. Obviously it’s taken on a life of its own as it blended with the evaluation and other “reform” agendas. But is that an accurate view of how it started? I recall that Diane was initially optimistic about the idea before seeing how it was shaping up in practice. Thanks.
LikeLike
The Common Corporate Standards originated in the advocacy mills of Achieve, Inc. and The Diploma Project, which are funded and governed by you-know-who.
They have little told with education as most of us think of it, and are a vehicle for testing-as-curriculum.
LikeLike
YUP, TESTING as CURRICULUM….simply DUMB, but makes money for the yahoos, and money for campaign contributions.
LikeLike
Sorry for the poor proof reading: that should be “They have little to do with…”
LikeLike
Interesting to note that Massachusetts has included additional standards to their adoption of the Common Core. (MA. – top scores in math on International testing). It’s not just underachieving states who are trying to figure out how these standards fit in with their educational goals. Why they adopted them, I don’t know.
LikeLike
My take is more capitalistic. Pearson, McGraw-Hill see the disruption that e-book readers are bringing to their textbook business. They need to changeover their businesses, and a new set of national standards makes it much more efficient and profitable for them to create the same products to sell nationwide, like tests and curricular materials. CC has standardized education, and the products can scale nationwide, maybe worldwide. Silicon Valley sees the profit in selling ed technology (sometimes of questionable quality) under long-term contracts to school districts. Wall Street, well represented by DFER and its board which is comprised only of hedge fund managers, see the profit in charters’ tax exempt bonds and in other tech companies. It is ALEC who create the legislation and the politicians who pass the laws and rule changes which carve out market niches for theses players. Politicians drastic cuts in ed funding starves the schools of teachers, aides, nurses, and social workers, scores drop, and the ‘rationale’ for a charter appears. The charters by and large do not outperform the traditional public school, but the tax-payer dollars are now funneled to higher salaries for the charter principals and CEOs, for the payment of interest on charter school bonds, for the payment of rent on district school buildings to the publicly traded charter management operator.
It is a scam like the mortgage-backed securities scam, in that its success depends on a steady turnover of traditional public schools into charters, as increasing charter enrollment pays the interest and capital. If charters stop growing enrollment, then Wall Street’s investors won’t get paid, and that would be a big problem for our politicians.
LikeLike
They are IN IT for MONEY and CONTROL. Control and students by brainwashing them and it’s home free for the DEFORMERS.
LikeLike
Moratorium: “We’ll drink the milk Jeb Bush gives us without choice, we just don’t want to drink it now.”
Lame.
LikeLike
Gates isn’t the only one who needs to realize that teachers are not dumb.
LikeLike
“. . . no one knows how the standards and tests will work . . .”
Yes, we do. They won’t work because they contain so many errors in the construction, giving and disseminating of the results as to render any conclusions/results completely and irrevocably invalid. So no need to even worry about “how the standards and tests will work” because that is secondary to completely ridding our teaching and learning processes of these abominable educational malpractices that continue to cause great harm to many students. Until all involved, but especially the teachers and administrators, realize the above mentioned facts* and grow some cojones this nonsense will continue unabatedly.
*See N. Wilson’s “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
LikeLike
An article about: The RttT Scheme
http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=2039
LikeLike
Randi has made so many missteps, taking money from Gates, no experience in the classroom, thinking that education is a “lesson plan”.
LikeLike