The Chicago Teachers Union issued a report on segregation in the Chicago public schools:
New Report Unravels the Sordid History of Racial Segregation in Chicago Public Schools
On anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, “Still Separate, Still Unequal” examines continued acceptance of de facto segregation and injustices in district schools
CHICAGO—On was is the 59th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) today released a report on the history of disruptive actions against communities of color by Chicago Public Schools (CPS), exemplified by school closings that intensify the harmful effects of segregated schools and neighborhoods. The study, titled Still Separate, Still Unequal, acknowledges the deep segregation that exists in Chicago, but states that segregation is exacerbated by flawed education reform policies and assaults on communities that have long borne the brunt of its harmful effects.
The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision was one of the most successful victories of the modern Civil Rights Movement. The ruling declared segregation in U.S. public schools unconstitutional, saying it violated the “equal protection under the law” clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Now, nearly six decades later, parents of Chicago’s African-American and special education needs students are also seeking court protection against Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s plan to shutter 53 elementary schools. On Wednesday they filed two federal lawsuits seeking a halt closures because these actions are discriminatory and will cause undue harm to their children.
“The mayor and his CPS administration are barreling through the largest round of school closings ever—actions that will once again disproportionately harm students and communities of color,” said CTU President Karen Lewis. “What they’re proposing will set us back to the time before Brown v. Board of Education. This report shows that we are still living in an era of education apartheid and we must do all we can to resist the destruction of our schools and the harming of our vulnerable population.”
Over the past decade, one out of every four intensely segregated African-American schools—schools with a more than 90 percent African-American student population—has been closed, phased out or turned around. Yet segregation has increased and African-American students are now more segregated by race and class than in 1989. At the same time there are far more schools with virtually no Black teachers and no Black students. Schools with fewer than 10 percent African-American students and teachers now make up 28 percent of CPS schools, up from 10 percent in 2001. In CPS, integration has been abandoned as policy and segregation accepted as the norm, rather than as the deliberate and systematic construction that it is. The report addresses, specifically:
- · Intense segregation in CPS
- · Segregation across CPS and the city of Chicago
- · What segregation means for CPS students of color
- · The reproduction of segregation and inequity
- · Segregated access to experienced teachers
- · The increasing segregation of black teachers
- · The segregated harm of school closings
- · Integration and equity, not choice and competition
“CPS seems committed only to deepening the harms of segregation, rather than moving towards an integrated school system,” said Still Separate, Still Unequal author, Pavlyn Jankov. “Segregation has increased, and the associated policies of disinvestment and destabilization are more acute than ever.”
Still Separate, Still Unequal calls for an end to the segregated harm of failed school closings and turnarounds, and a halt to the rapid expansion of private charter operators and other aberrations of “choice” that increase segregation.
###

And those like Arne Duncan, who call education “the civil rights issue of our time,” are actually responsible for perpetuating the inequities and spreading the affliction across our nation.
So sad for my city, our children and our country.
LikeLike
This shows all the racism and steps backwards we have taken.
The poorest get the most punished and their services are starved, while privatization is hailed as the new “fulfiller of civil rights”.
The teachers in the CPS may become an extinct species.
Karen Lewis has more integrity than most large education union leaders.
It will be pivotal to see how the two lawsuits launched against the CPS with regard to the mass closings plays out.
Take a look:
http://thetruthoneducationreform.blogspot.com/2013/01/chicago-teachers-hill-that-well-die-on.html?view=snapshot
LikeLike
Yes, Robert, your third sentence is exactly what they are trying to do. Many feel that a part of this is retribution for the teachers’ strike, and retaliation for the strengthening and the resistance of the union.
Not long ago, Clark County, in Nevada (a right-to-work-state), came to Chicago to recruit teachers. They specifically aimed their advertisement to CHICAGO Public School teachers (even though, as we all know, many other Illinois teachers will be job hunting, not to mention new graduates)
As in, “We KNOW that you’re going to be losing your jobs in droves! Come to our sunny state and enjoy the weather, as compared to the brutal Chicago winters! Teach in already air conditioned schools! Enjoy your leisure time contributing to our economy by gambling your paltry salaries away in Las Vegas!
However–in exchange for all of this–you’ll NEVER be able to bargain ANYTHING again! Union? What union–we don’t have no stinkin’ unions!” (Quotes are mine–none of this was actually said.
I do wish that I’d kept the advertisement.)
THAT’LL teach those Chicago teachers!!
LikeLike
The good news is that nothing in our nation’s Constitution says that we are a capitalist country. Our lives do not have to revolve around the almighty dollar. That’s the neo-liberal agenda, but the 1% cannot reign forever.
Try to have faith in our numbers and rally our troops, even when there appear to be set-backs. Uniting the 99% is critical, and democracy will be our saving grace.
LikeLike
I wholeheartedly agree, Chi-Town, & that’s why I keep saying here,
yes, WE can! (And we WILL!)
LikeLike
Congratulations to Karen Lewis on her re-election victory!! And good luck with the 3-day protest in Chicago.
LikeLike
I watched the Chicago CTU rally this winter on a live stream. It was absolutely inspiring.
I’m not quite sure how I found it, can anyone provide that information?
LikeLike
Why does choice increase racial segregation?
LikeLike
Choice always increases stratification.
That’s why the southern states that did not want to comply with the Brown decision adopted choice plans. They knew that white schools would remain white, black schools would remain black. The OECD published a paper in 2011 (sorry, I don’t have link, I am in a taxi right now) warning that choice plans in every nation promote stratification.
LikeLike
But why does it have that effect?
LikeLike
Because people are brought up in ignorance and through ignorance prejudice thrives.
LikeLike
Duane: Are there no rational reasons why a parent might choose to send their children to schools mainly populated by students from higher income, higher “class” families?
LikeLike
Flerper…this is a different kind of choice. The schools pick and choose who they want…not the other way around. We know you like to harp on the private schools for the wealthy and throw that in Diane’s face, but that’s not the “choice” available under the new privatization scheme orchestrated by the Gates USDOE. So I don’t see your point because I don’t think that’s where you’re going.
LikeLike
Linda, it’s not at all clear to me why choice programs increase segregation. Some (like Duane) say that it’s because choice facilitates non-minority parents’ ability to send their send their children to schools with fewer minority students. Others (like you in your post here) say it’s because the schools themselves choose to segregate. I assume many others might say both reasons are factors, if only to cover their bases. Frankly, I think Duane’s explanation makes most sense, at least on a surface level.
LikeLike
Choice increases segregation
Read reports of UCLA Civil Rights Project
LikeLike
Diane, you keep saying that, and I haven’t disagreed. I’m asking *why* choice increases segregation.
LikeLike
I’m sure there are many “rational” reasons why a parent would choose so. Now whether those reasons are logical and/or just is another question.
LikeLike
Let me ask a provocative question: should integration of races be the overriding goal? This has been a very controversial issue in higher education, where universities have been sued over admission standards and high performing Asian Americans have gone to some lengths to try to disguise their ethnicity. There are also a number of traditionally African American colleges and universities. Are they part of the problem as well?
LikeLike
It’s amusing that question could be considered “provocative” in the context of a post that’s ostensibly condemning segregation. But it turns out it is, because nobody has the stomach to actually say anything on the topic beyond noting that segregation is bad. I certainly don’t see much interest in actually eliminating segregation — just reducing it marginally to the extent that doesn’t interfere with the speaker’s ability to choose what kind of education their own children will have, and especially to the extent it would reverse education policies that threaten the speaker’s own livelihood.
From what I can tell, the dominant view here is probably that segregation is bad, but that it’s not so bad that eliminating it is worth infringing on parents’ rights to choose where to send their children to school, as long as that choice is expressed through parents’ checkbooks. In other words, the current situation, with some tweaking on charter school and voucher policy, pretty much strikes the right balance.
LikeLike
Sorry to seem picky but the first sentence is wonky.
LikeLike