Veteran teacher John Thompson says that it is time for the billionaires to step back and recognize the damage that they are doing to American education. They assume that because they are so successful, they know it all.
Shocked to discover that poverty actually exists, they decided that the best way to save poor kids was to destroy the school system.
___________________
In this thoughtful and provocative essay, Thompson writes:
“So, with the best of intentions, these novices assumed the mantle of “accountability.” Market-driven “reformers” set out to destroy education schools, teachers’ due process, and local systems of governance. These accountability hawks had great political success, but educationally they failed. Corporate “reformers” never understood why it is easier to kick down a barn than to build one. So, tens of billions of dollars has been wasted on their data-driven theories. And since so much had been invested in the macho theme of “accountability,” someone has to pay.”……,,,
Being true believers in data, “reformers” had always loved testing. As test-driven accountability backfired, however, standardized testing became a method of stomping down teachers, our unions, and our professional values. They even adopted a system, known as “value-added,” that could not conceivably be a tool for building better schools. It began as a kick upside the head to get our attention, so that educators would comply with top-down mandates. But now, the purpose of these statistical models is shaming and destroying individual schools and educators.
Then, the data-driven crowd tripped over students. Since these ideologues were in the dark and blissfully unaware of teaching and learning, they were not intentionally kicking kids as they struck out at their adult enemies. Having stumbled into a world they did not understand, “reformers” did not necessarily know that the system would respond to their mandates with nonstop test prep and narrowing the curriculum. But, now, high-stakes testing has even been pushed down into primary grades and into art classes……
“Sarah Carr, in Hope Against Hope, describes New Orleans as an example of school “reform.” Hurricane Katrina did the dirty work of wiping the old system. This created a “technocrat’s dream.” They were free to build the system they visualized, “run by graduates of the nation’s most elite institutions, steeped in data, always seeking precision, divorced from the messiness — and the checks and balances — of democracy.”
“In Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Washington D.C., N.Y.C, and elsewhere, “reformers” have adopted the Katrina method and doubled down on their gamble to destroy the status quo. Once, they might have thought that closing schools might save money or even be a step towards improving educational outcomes. By now, however, we have too much evidence to the contrary. The purpose of school closures, it is now clear, is kicking out veteran educators who have not seen the beauty of their theories of Big Data unleashing creative destruction.
“So, corporate “reformers” are now stumbling over the families of the children who they had wanted to lift up. As Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis explains, parents understand that “reformers” benefit from “one set of schools for children being taught to rule the world.” Whether they understand it or not, the elites’ testing regimes are producing another “set of schools for children being taught to be [Wal-Mart] greeters.”
“It is only a matter of time before urban parents join their children and educators, and become the next dog to be kicked in anger. After all, parents (like the teachers and employees of targeted schools) are workers too. And, the unions that “reformers” are kicking have long been essential to political coalitions working for children and families.
“But, we can’t expect “reformers” to stumble over that realization. They are too busy kicking schools and educators who they blame for the failure of their once-beautiful dream.”

Diane,
Something is wrong with the link.
LikeLike
No, they did everything that they did intentionally. Blunting the force of what needs to be said doesn’t help anyone. Good intentions? I don’t think so.
LikeLike
I completely agree with you, Wilbert: when their personal and class interests are so perfectly aligned with their policies, it’s impossible to take their claims of altruism seriously.
LikeLike
Demonizing whole groups of people, shaming them, and depriving them of their means of making a living as a way to address a nation’s economic and educational problems has been tried before. But those who tried it have usually gone down in ignominy.
LikeLike
At this point, the status quo is high-stakes testing. So I’m definitely against the status quo. The longer that the reformers get their way, the more they must accept that their way is becoming the status quo.
LikeLike
EXCELLENT point and one that I have made before. As much as possible, we should be phrasing corporate education reform’s methods as “the status quo”, because that is exactly what they have become.
LikeLike
They push kids out of school because they don’t score high enough on an artificial test to suit their elitist back sides. Proficiency is not only scoring within a range on these tests but all doing it at the same time the test is given. That’s ignorant.
Someone must educate those geniuses that kids blossom at different times and in different ways. It is not when they learn thats most important, it’s that they learn. A real solution is to abandon artificial tests in lieu of real learning/assessment and take kids from where they are.
Their solutions, private, choice, charter and chance schools are still doing what the traditional public schools are forced to do, teach to the test and accomplish nothing other than sorting and ranking kids in the classroom by how fast they learn. If they push out non proficient kids, then all kids will appear to be proficient. Immoral!
The problem is that means systemic change and few have the guts for that. Another concern to those whose goal is to maintain the subclass is, the last might well become first and that scares the devil out of the “haves”
LikeLike
Ben Carson
April 24, 2013 at 6:00 pm
Want crazy, try this out!!
The Texas Legislature has taken an interest in approving or disapproving of the lessons that thousands of Texas teachers use on a daily basis in Language Arts, Science, Math, and Social Studies. Good deeds never go unpunished, so it is with CScope. If your not familiar with CScope, it was developed by education service centers (a coop was created) in response to the midsize and small district need for curriculum. This alone saves our district about $200K a year (I’m being conservative). It is being attacked by the TEA Party and others ( a former teacher who writes curriculum and can’t sell it to some districts because they are satisfied with CScope) . Politicians, being politicians, don’t miss many chances for center stage and some have joined the fray. Clearly unimportant to them is the law of unintended consequence, it will collectively cost districts (read tax payers) millions of dollars to replace this product. The opponents want to throw the baby out with the bath water, reasonable people might say lets correct questionable lessons and inevitable editing errors. I suppose that wouldn’t make good headlines.
Back to the point, sorry. The legislatures response so far has been to assign review of all lessons to the State School Board of Texas (Google them, I dare you ; -). The president of the Board will convene committees to do the reviewing. This Board was stripped of most of its responsibilities for textbook review because of its ridiculous shenanigans several years back (Google that too). Another response is to propose that the Commissioner of Education have final approval over all products and services provided to schools districts by the Education Service Centers. (I know many of you see the potential problems with this arrangement. I predict that the Commissioner will be inundated with offers from your favorite Reformers among others)
The problem that is coming to light is the massive loss of local decision making responsibility. Stay tuned for upset tax payers:-)
I’m sorry, I left off an important bit of information relevant to the expertise of the Texas Commissioner of Education. At a state wide conference of Administrators and School Board Members this man made one of the most uninformed statements about quality instruction I have ever heard. He stated that he was OK with not restoring 300 million dollars to a instructional remediation fund (SSI) because the state was providing two on-line computer programs for districts to use (no cost to us).
Those funds were being used to pay for small group remediation, remediation materials, one to one instruction, etc (aka Person to Person interaction with kids) that educators had apparently mistakenly assumed was more effective than computer programs.
Go figure.
LikeLike
“So, with the best of intentions…”
Best of intentions, my butt. They knew damned well what they were doing. Follow the money!
LikeLike
I think he nailed it. Parents will be the tipping point. I think reformers are aware of it, too.
The NYTimes editorial page hasn’t mentioned the parents of public school students at all in the course of lobbying for market-driven reform. Now they’re begging public school parents to embrace the testing.
LikeLike
The kicking to the curb and attacks against parents and community members is on open display in Chicago. Barbara Byrd Bennett, or BBB, the Broad Toadie that Rahm lemon danced here from her last positions shutting down schools in Cleveland and Detroit has asked where parents have been all these years while so much was not being done in our schools, why are we “suddeny” complaining now?. Rahm made the first comments in that direction some time beforehand. Apparently they are so arrogant and out of touch that they now are pushing the narrative that they have to save children from their own parents. We have been shouting from the roof tops for decades now, since before Arne Duncan’s time, since Daley took over the schools. They still aren’t listening. http://karenfraid.tumblr.com/post/48461553630/heres-where-weve-been-barbara-byrd-bennett
LikeLike
Just as in the financial system you cannot have the destroyers being the repairers. It has never worked and will not now. After 10 years and a billion dollars Gates and the “Broadfather” finally got out of their “Purple Haze” and went “We goofed so let’s go after teachers.” They did this after they already just learned that one of their first foolish games was no good so let’s go ahead with another crazy idea we have the money so why not.
LikeLike
“Today I had the pleasure of discussing the school closings with one of the people bidding for improvements to the receiving schools in this closing fiasco. He’s very much a neutral party in city politics, but he thinks Rahm is crazy. You see, they’ve divided up the receiving schools into 17 biddable jobs by bundling schools together. Some of the bundles may have 2 schools and some may have 6. Each bundle has a budget of $12,000,000. No plans have been drawn up and no estimates have been figured, but CPS is setting a budget of $12,000,000 for each of the bundles and will not go over. The contractors will then have 12 weeks to spend the $12,000,000 completing the upgrades. He basically called it insanity and said that he’s worried he’s going to be on the news if one of the accounts his company is bidding on isn’t finished in time for the start of the school year. Nice to know that teachers aren’t the only ones who think CPS is insane.”
http://cps299.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
Thank you for posting these summaries and links. I am reading them all. Looks like a house of cards just waiting to collapse. Insanity all around us. Shame on BBB…what a sell out she is to children, parents and teachers. I can think of other words for the B’s.
LikeLike
You’re quite welcome. Sorry I don’t have a better source for the absurdity of the bidding process for work on the schools. I’m guessing it will show up in the near future.
LikeLike
I’m weary of Thompson’s tenacious insistence on the “good” intentions of monopolists and profit seekers. Again and again he blathers, “So, with the best of intentions, these novices assumed the mantle of “accountability.”
Gates and other billionaires are showing bad faith in their silly argument that their own profit-seeking is a magic balm that will lift up humanity by freeing market-driven innovation. It’s stupid and cowardly to agree with them.
LikeLike
Someone has hacked this site. Prayers up.
LikeLike
What?
LikeLike
What do you mean by hacked? I’m not seeing anything here. What are you seeing?
LikeLike
What happened to the good old days when the super rich gave their money to the arts?
LikeLike
Or how about Bill and Melinda going back to help third world countries, rather than trying to turn the U.S. into one!
LikeLike
Spare the third world countries – they have enough of their own disasters to deal with without importing more.
LikeLike
Diane, Hope Against Hope by Sarah Carr is on sale today April 25, 2013 for 2.99 at Amazon, Do you recommend it? Thanks, Lynn
LikeLike