Archives for the month of: March, 2013

How great is the Providence Student Union? The students persuaded 50 accomplished professionals to take a test made up of released items from the math test.

60% of these brave and successful people would have failed to get a high school diploma if they were high school students.

The Providence Student Union made a video of the event. It is less than three minutes. See it here.

Next time you hear elected officials or advocates say they want more tests, ask them if they are willing to take the high school graduation test themselves. Ask Michelle. Ask Bill. Ask Arne. Ask Joel. Ask Bobby. Ask Andrew.

In Chicago, the corporate reformers who claim to be leading “the civil rights movement of our time” are closing down schools in black communities. How this enhances the civil rights of the children is a mystery known only to the elites.

This is a news bulletin from the Chicago Teachers Union about tomorrow’s protest demonstration:

NEWS RELEASE

March 26, 2013

StephanieGadlin@ctulocal1.com

Secret Memo: CPS warns principals about possible civil disobedience in response to massive school closings

School officials asked to spy on demonstrators, take note of media

CHICAGO – The day before educators from the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) intend to join with parents, students, clergy, community leaders, civil rights activists and the rank-and-file members of SEIU Local 1 and Unite HERE Local 1; the union released a confidential memo sent to the city’s public school principals warning them of potential civil disobedience actions in protest of school closings. Mayor Rahm Emanuel will seek to shutter more than 50 neighborhood schools in the African American community by the end of this school year.

Thousands of parents, students, teachers, paraprofessionals and school clinicians attended various hearings across the city where they presented evidence that their schools were not being “underutilized” and begged for them not to be closed. Despite the outcry, the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) chief executive listened instead to a politically-connected, ad-hoc commission she created and has since recommended 61 school actions, including the closings. Should the Board approve, this will be the largest closing of schools in a single school district in the nation’s history.

CPS’s announcement was met with shock, outrage, disbelief and defiance. While many of those impacted have vowed to fight until the end to save their neighborhood school from closure, others plan to rally downtown on Wednesday, March 27th, to illustrate their demand for education justice. People will gather at 4 p.m. at Daley Plaza where they will proceed to City Hall and to Board of Education headquarters.

Preparing for what could be the spark of 21st century Civil Rights Movement in Chicago, the school district recently instructed principals to prepare for the worst. “Be approachable and supportive to feelings of unrest, anxiety or dissatisfaction” the secret memo read. “Observe and report all information regarding possible protestors, locations, dates and times… Is the media present? Which news outlet(s)?”

The CTU obtained the memorandum from a source who has requested anonymity for fear of repercussions. “They’ve asked us to do a lot of things that I’m not happy with, but some of this is going too far,” the person said.

CTU President Karen Lewis, “Why are they asking principals to work as agents of this administration when they are the ones who have created a climate of chaos? Civil disobedience is a direct response to unjust policies and practices. We intend to use whatever nonviolence protest actions we have in this fight for education justice.

“The bottom line is the schools targeted for closure are based on the racial makeup of those schools and their zip codes,” Lewis said. “We will continue to plead our cause, fight in the courts and in the streets for what is right for our students and our communities. They can start with a moratorium on all school actions now.”

###
The Chicago Teachers Union represents 30,000 teachers and educational support personnel working in the Chicago Public Schools, and by extension, the more than 400,000 students and families they serve. The CTU is an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers and the Illinois Federation of Teachers and is the third largest teachers local in the United States and the largest local union in Illinois. For more information please visit CTU’s website at http://www.ctunet.com .
SG:oteg-743-tr

Several weeks ago, a Chicago website reported that the Chicago Tribune, the Joyce Foundation, and the University of Chicago were engaging in “push polling.” This is a telephone poll that literally “pushes” the listener in a certain direction, with questions designed to have pre-determined conclusions.

Read the transcript. Do you think this was a push poll?

This just in, and don’t forget tomorrow’s big rally at Daley Plaza to protest the closing of more than 50 public schools:

 

 

 

 

CReATE has a petition that we are asking university researchers and education professors to sign on to.  After reading our brief on School Closings (url below), they can go to

createchicago@gmail.com and put SIGN SCHOOL CLOSING PETITION in subject line.  In your message, include your name, university affiliation, and an email address where you can be contacted (this will not be included on the petition).

DEADLINE –  MONDAY, APRIL 1ST at NOON. The signatures will be brought to a Chicago school closings press conference on April 2nd.

Thank you,
Stephanie Farmer and the school closures working group

JOIN CHICAGO AREA EDUCATION RESEARCHERS TO DEMAND THE CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION REJECT CLOSING 54 SCHOOLS

We, the undersigned, call upon the Chicago Board of Education to reject the closing of 54 schools at their May meeting, and instead, to implement reforms that are guided by solid research and by a vision of public education that offers every child the very best that our city has to offer.  We also urge consulting with the professors in CReATE, who bring both scholarly and practical expertise on these issues.

Chicagoland Researchers and Advocates for Transformative Education (CReATE), a network of over 100 professors from numerous Chicago-area universities who specialize in educational research, has reviewed the literature on school closures and conducted an analysis of newly released data to critically assess Chicago Public Schools arguments to justify school closures and to gain a better understanding of what Chicago residents can expect from massive school closures.  The history of previous school closures and school actions reveal that closures negatively impact academic performance and create more hardship for communities already suffering from social abandonment.  Our findings do not support CPS’ arguments for closing schools and we conclude that school closures will contribute to a separate and unequal educational system in Chicago.  To access the research brief, go to:tinyurl.com/cm9l7jd

1. Stephanie Farmer, Roosevelt University
2. Isaura Pulido, Northeastern Illinois University
3. Pamela Konkol, Concordia University Chicago
4. Kate Phillippo, Loyola University
5. David Stovall, University of Illinois at Chicago
6. Michael Klonsky, DePaul University
7. William Ayers, University of Illinois at Chicago
8. Erica Meiners, Northeastern Illinois University
9. Leslie Bloom, Roosevelt University
10. Therese Quinn, University of Illinois at Chicago
11. Sumi Cho, DePaul University
12. Federico Waitoller, University of Illinois at Chicago
13. Crystal Laura, Chicago State University
14. Diane Horwitz, DePaul University
15. Kevin Kumashiro, University of Illinois at Chicago
16. Isabel Nuñez, Concordia University Chicago
17. Horace Hall, DePaul University
18. Amira Proweller, DePaul University
19. Noah W. Sobe, Loyola U

This is funny. Bobby Jindal and John White have ruled the state education system with an iron hand since Jindal won control of the state board of education. They have pushed vouchers and charters on the theory that parents need “choice” and the public schools should have no priority.

Now a Republican legislator has proposed that the voters should choose their state superintendent.

Let’s see how Jindal and White feel about that choice.

Matt Di Carlo examines the latest data about the availability of school nurses, and it is disturbing.

For many children, the school nurse is the only medical care they will get.

Only 41% of schools have a RN on staff.

The data are none too new. They are from 2006, before the economic collapse. Very likely, the number with full-time nurses is even less now.

Now here is a job for the Gates Foundation. Place a Gates nurse in every school in every low-income district. That will raise test scores even more than MET or VAM.

The first organization out of the box to salute today’s Indiana court decision endorsing vouchers is the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, which exists to support vouchers.

As you learned in an earlier post today, vouchers in Sweden have been concurrent with growing social stratification (in the U.S., we would call it growing segregation by race and class), lower test scores on international assessments since 1995, and growing profits for vendors of educational services.

So if vouchers spread, we can expect resegregation of U.S. schools, even worse than what already exists; we can expect public funds to flow to church schools that teach creationism; we can expect growing inequality; and we can expect no improvement whatever in education.

Milwaukee has had vouchers since 1990 and is today one of the nation’s lowest performing school districts.

This is an ominous trend, which will hurt our democracy, our schools, and our children:

From the Friedman Foundation:

For release March 26, 2013

The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice

Indiana Supreme Court Rules School Vouchers Constitutional

INDIANAPOLIS — The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice hailed today’s ruling from the Indiana Supreme Court, which declared the state’s school voucher program constitutional. The announcement ends a nearly two-year-long review of the nation’s largest voucher initiative, for which more than half of the state’s student population qualifies.
The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the program by a vote of 5-0, ruling “the voucher program expenditures do not directly benefit religious schools but rather directly benefit lower-income families with school-children by providing an opportunity for such children to attend non-public schools if desired.”
Following the enactment of the Choice Scholarship Program in May 2011, a group of Indiana taxpayers represented by the National Education Association filed suit, claiming vouchers improperly benefited private religious schools. Parents who intervened in the case, represented by the Institute for Justice, argued the true beneficiaries of the program were the families.
“Kids and parents won today,” said Robert Enlow, president and CEO of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. “With this announcement, Indiana should move immediately to make this opportunity available to more families, and other states should look at this victory and see that the education establishment’s ability to obstruct families’ freedom to choose is waning.”
The Meredith v. Daniels lawsuit moved to the state Supreme Court after a Marion County Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the program in January 2012. Judge Michael Keele rejected the plaintiffs’ argument the Choice Scholarship Program violated the Indiana Constitution’s Blaine Amendment, which prohibits state treasury money from being used explicitly for the benefit of religious or theological institutions.
Judge Keele noted that scholarship recipients can “choose to use the funding for education at a public, secular private, or religious private school.” Such was the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002, when it upheld the constitutionality of Cleveland’s school voucher program.
“School choice continues to prove its successes nationwide,” Enlow added, “whether that’s in schools, homes, legislatures, or courtrooms. The issue is about giving families the right to find the best educational setting for their kids, pure and simple. Protectors of the status quo should stop standing in the way of kids and rather work to increase the availability of high-quality educational options.”
Indiana’s legislature currently is reviewing a proposal to expand the Choice Scholarship Program. In the program’s second year, 9,324 low- and middle-income families are participating. The expansion would allow siblings of voucher recipients, children with special needs, kids in foster care, and K-12 dependents of military members to qualify for vouchers. It also would increase the cap on the individual voucher amount to $6,500 from its current $4,500.
Currently, 22 states and Washington, D.C., have some type of private school choice measure. In voucher programs specifically, there are 104,000 participants in 12 states and Washington, D.C.
About the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, solely dedicated to advancing Milton and Rose Friedman’s vision of school choice for all children. First established as the Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation in 1996, the Foundation continues to promote school choice as the most effective and equitable way to improve the quality of K-12 education in America. The Foundation is dedicated to research, education, and outreach on the vital issues and implications related to choice and competition in K-12 education.
Contact
Jeff Reed
Communications Director
Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
E-Mail: jeff@edchoice.org
Phone: 317-681-0745

I have tried to stay informed about what was happening to Venice High School in Los Angeles.

It was confusing.

The community, with no notice, was offered a choice: take Steve Barr’s pilot school or you will get a charter school. Remember Barr, the founder of the Green Do charters, an entrepreneur, not an educator.

Who was making the decisions?

Why no consultation?

Why the haste?

A parent at VHS explains the back story here.

It is a fascinating story involving Superintendent John Deasey, newly re-elected board member Steve Zimmer, and other players. It seems the re-election of Zimmer upset a lot of apple carts.

LA Times reporter Teresa Watanabe gives a good accounting of what happened at Venice High School in Los Angeles.

The LAUSD board approved an “incubator school” to teach middle school students how to start their own business. How cool is that!?

However, the Venice community–parents and students–reacted negatively and the business school for pre-teens may have to go elsewhere.

Ah, innovation. What will they think of next? Day trading in kindergarten?

A friend who works for a major education association attended the EdWeek sponsored event about the Common Core express in Indianapolis (you know, get on it now before it leaves the station). He was aware of my concern that Education Week, which is supposed to be a nonpartisan source of news and information, has become a cheerleader for Common Core and has failed to give equal time to those who have doubts about its wisdom or efficacy. To be sure, Education Week has some excellent reporters, who maintain the highest standards of journalistic integrity, but the corporate entity is on board the corporate reform train.
He sent this report from Indianapolis:
I can now say without reservation that EdWeek is not neutral.  In fact, the entire event was dripping with subtle yet unmistakable references to pro-corporate reform propaganda.  Below is a list of references to corporate reform that I noticed as the day unfolded:
  1. The event was sponsored by Wireless Generation, a division of Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify.  The backdrop of the stage was literally covered in the logos of EdWeek and Wireless Generation.
  2. Cari Miller, policy advisor for Jeb Bush’s FEE, was in the audience.  Several TFA’ers also were on the roster.
  3. The Superintendent from Hillsboro County Schools in FL, MaryEllen Elia, was one of the keynote speakers. During her presentation,During another discussion, there was heavy promotion of A-F grading and the parent trigger in OH being tied to CCSS.  I didn’t make the connection between CCSS and those two issues, but the fact that it was discussed was puzzling to me.
    1. She devoted a significant portion of her talk to the ways they have incorporated CCSS into their teacher evaluation system, including the upcoming assessments.
    2. She bragged about recruiting parents to promote pro-CCSS materials to the PTAs within the district.  Brainwashing parents through “moles” among PTAs.
    3. She said that she discourages teachers from advancing to administration so that they can become “teacher leaders” while staying in the classroom.  And while I appreciate the sentiment, my cynicism lead me to believe that this discouragement was based on a desire to leave room in administration for Broad-trained folks.
    4. She bragged about her ability to get the business community in her county (corporate involvement) to stand behind CCSS.  “If business supports the CCSS, it takes the pressure of educators…”
    5. In response to a question from the audience regarding teacher training, she openly criticized teacher ed programs saying (paraphrase), “I question if higher ed is where it needs to be.  Professors simply aren’t engaged in what is happening in schools.  FL is putting stress on grading the Depts of Education in our state.
  4. During another discussion, there was heavy promotion of A-F grading and the parent trigger in OH being tied to CCSS.  I didn’t make the connection between CCSS and those two issues, but the fact that it was discussed was puzzling to me.
  5. There was promotion of personalized learning from a RTTT-d winner in the audience.  I don’t disagree with personalized learning per se, but in the context of corporate reform, it almost always means the promotion of digital education.
  6. During a lunch discussion, a renegade school administrator spoke out against CCSS during a Q&A session.  As she bemoaned decades of “the latest and greatest innovation,” the EdWeek staffers looked panicked.  It tells you something when those who are putting on an event become concerned when someone shares candid remarks.
  7. Virginia Edwards, EdWeek’s editor, lost all credibility with me as she wrapped up the lunchtime Q&A.  She spoke in reference to the “renegade” I just wrote about and said to the audience (paraphrasing), “I’m not trying to be a supporter of the CCSS, but if you’re not going to support CCSS now, then when?  Journalism had to change or we would have died.  In the same way, teachers have to get hip or die…but I still remain agnostic toward the CCSS.”
Diane, I had to leave after that.  I couldn’t take it anymore.  It was so blatantly pro-corporate reform that I had to get out.  I have made the decision that I will no longer renew my membership to EdWeek.  My hope is that your new Network for Public Ed will develop a strong enough voice to counteract the forces driving this corporate agenda.