Last week, Wendy Lecker wrote an article in the Stamford Advocate saying that she was in search of one superintendent in the state of Connecticut who was doing the right thing for kids, teachers, and the community. Wendy had read here about the courage of Joshua Starr of Montgomery County, Maryland, and Heath Morrison of Charlotte-Mecklenburg, two superintendents who bravely have spoken the truth about the corrosive effects of the misuse of testing.
Was there one such stand-up superintendent in Connecticut?
I posted her plea and that very same day, I was able to identify Tom Scarice, superintendent of Madison, Connecticut, as the one. He brought together his community, parents, and teachers, examined research, and reached agreement on the best path forward for Madison.
I named Superintendent Scarice to the honor roll as a champion of public education.
Wendy Lecker investigated, and she agreed: Tom is the real deal!
She writes here about his leadership, which involved collaboration, not dictatorship or coercion:
“The district sought volunteer educators and administrators to develop a teacher evaluation plan that adhered to the core principles of the recent state legislation. But one component of the state’s proposed teacher evaluation plan is Value Added Measurement (VAM), a highly controversial system that uses student test scores in part to rate teachers’ effectiveness. The 45-member advisory council studied three areas: the efficacy of VAM, the impact of VAM on teachers and students and the impact of VAM on the quality of education. The overarching guiding principle was the goal of preparing Madison’s students to succeed in our complex world.
“After reviewing extensive research, the council concluded that VAM is unstable, unreliable and of questionable validity. To the council, “[s]tudent learning is too central to our beliefs to rely on unreliable data when making decisions.” This conclusion is consistent with the vast body of research on VAM. Just last month, the American Institute of Research joined the growing chorus of educational experts in advising against using VAM in any high-stakes situation precisely because of its many flaws.
“The council found that VAM has a destructive effect on both students and teachers. The narrow focus on standardized test scores heightens anxiety and leads to children who are less creative, expressive and excited to learn. VAM also negatively impacts two essential components of effective instruction: teacher collaboration, and the ability to meet individual students’ needs. Furthermore, the council determined from the research that VAM’s focus on test scores is detrimental to a quality education because it narrows the curriculum and marginalizes the development of the skills Madison decided were vital to successful life outcomes, such as critical thinking, problem solving and ethical decision-making.”

So refreshing to read!
LikeLike
Well done Madison, CT! Your superintendent has the vision and openess to recognize truth and question things that are being fed to us through media and initiatives that may seek other ends. It seems that he is willing to look at what is going on with a critical eye and he and you have the willingness to zoom in on facts. I think you are fortunate that your district has the population that will support your findings.
LikeLike
“critical thinking, problem solving and ethical decision-making.”
Hmmm. How about reading, writing, arithmetic?? Do the above take the place of those??
LikeLike
“Do the above take the place of those??”
Why are you taking such a divisive stance, Terry, on this particular post?
LikeLike
By necessity the 3Rs come before the former three.
LikeLike
“Johnny, since you can’t actually read and you are in the 5th grade, we are going to give you oral exams sceptin we will give you the questions to take home to have your mother read to you. The answers are on the back … but we expect you to be ethical, thinking critically AND we want you to make some decisions. Now go on outside for study recess where you can practice what the video showed you the last three hours!”
LikeLike
Wow Terry! Such thoughtfulness. Are you a teacher? Could it be possible to teach all of those important skills within the content of reading, writing, math, social studies, etc…?
LikeLike
critical thinking, problem solving, and ethical decision-making is needed to do good in reading, writing and arithmatic. Those are a few of the things that seperate the children who do well in school with the ones that don’t.
LikeLike
It’s wonderful to read about another Superintendent with common sense courage.
LikeLike
Let’s honor those with insight and in search of the truth. How interesting is that?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.
LikeLike
I believe that this position paper does not exclude Madison Public Schools from using the state-mandated VAM percentage on teacher evaluations. It is a step in the right direction, but I do not see a Garfield High School Moment happening any time soon in the Land of Steady Habits.
LikeLike
Oh but we are revolutionary or revolting.r
LikeLike
I’d said DINO Dan Malloy is revolting!
LikeLike
Correct me if I’m wrong…
I understand that CT is not going with VAM, but with student growth indexes, which are slightly different. My assumption is that VAM is next.
LikeLike
From the Connecticut Post:
“In May, the Legislature approved a sweeping education reform package aimed at attacking the nation’s largest student achievement gap with a number of initiatives, including changes in teacher evaluations. Changes in how teachers are evaluated were part of the promise Connecticut made to the federal government in order to win a waiver of the No Child Left Behind Act. Other states made the same promise to win federal Race to the Top dollars.
The formula agreed to here will make student achievement account for 45 percent of a teacher’s evaluation — half based on standardized test scores and half on some other measure of student achievement. Another 40 percent will be based on observations of teacher practice, 10 percent on parent or peer feedback and 5 percent on whole school performance or student feedback. Using the formula, teachers are to be rated as exemplary, proficient, developing or below standard. Those below proficient will receive advice and mentoring. Those who don’t improve can be dismissed.”
Unless I am mistaken, if this is not VAM, it is a very close cousin.
LikeLike
The assumption coming from the fact that our state has bought into the MET project and Gates. We all know where that will bring us.
LikeLike
If the Madison plan is approved, it is only for Madison, correct? This really isn’t going to be a fair evaluation system for one state if each town and district can create their own version.
Some get screwed by test scores and some do not. To me it looks like CEA kicked the can and now it is survival of the fittest.
Those who had great test scores will fair better…that doesn’t seem fair to urban teachers. Class action lawsuit? Not with CEA or AFT help!
LikeLike