The latest research studies from Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child demonstrate how “toxic stress” can severely damage children’s minds.
Everyone needs to learn to deal with adversity, says Dr. Jack Shonkoff of the Harvard Center, and some stress is a good learning experience.
But the conditions associated with living in poverty harms children’s development.
“The same brain flexibility, called plasticity, that makes children open to learning in their early years also makes them particularly vulnerable to damage from the toxic stressors that often accompany poverty: high mobility and homelessness; hunger and food instability; parents who are in jail or absent; domestic violence; drug abuse; and other problems, according to Pat Levitt, a developmental neuroscientist at the University of Southern California and the director of the Keck School of Medicine Center on the Developing Child in Los Angeles.
“Good experiences, like nurturing parents and rich early-child-care environments, help build and reinforce neural connections in areas such as language development and self-control, while adversity weakens those connections.”
This should be a required reading assignment for all those corporate-style reformers who insist that poverty is no excuse for low test scores, or that anyone who refers to poverty is making excuses for bad teachers.
Thus, when someone from TFA points to one school and says, “See, poverty doesn’t matter. High expectations are all it takes to overcome poverty,” tell them to read the work of Shonkoff and the Harvard Center on the Developing Child. Some children survive the most extreme adversity, but far more do not. Why should so many children in the richest society in the world be subjected to extreme adversity and toxic stress? The claim that charter schools can redress the harm done by living in deep poverty is shameful.
Poverty really does have an adverse impact on children’s development.

I don’t think this is accurate because I heard Michelle Rhee and others say No excuses. She is the greatest thing to ever come to D.C. too I heard that from Chris Matthews a few weeks ago. Plus Joel Klein’s middle class version of poverty didn’t stop him from succeeding in the lucrative privatization world. And when Randi Weingarten and Chris Christie were belly bumping on Morning Joe neither of them mentioned this so it’s probably not accurate.
LikeLike
And then there’s this 2008 study that found “certain brain functions of some low-income 9- and 10-year-olds pale in comparison with those of wealthy children and that the difference is almost equivalent to the damage from a stroke… children need ‘incredibly intensive interventions to overcome this kind of difficulty,’ says Susan Neuman, an education professor at the University of Michigan.”
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-12-07-childrens-brains_N.htm
Good grief, what’s wrong with those supposedly-intelligent people who say poverty doesn’t matter?
LikeLike
More evidence is, of course, always good, and perhaps there’s some new nuggets in this research. But it’s not like we haven’t known at least the basics of this for decades now. I worked at a theraputic residential school in the early nineties when the study of brain effects of trauma, especially in infants and children, was really starting to take off. Anyone who would deny such effects is just willfully ignorant and it’s unlikely they’ll be convinced by research.
LikeLike
This is the result of why we have a class and ethics gap. As long as we have rich people with power along and agenda of their own, they will continue to ignore people in dire situation and blaming them for their own demise. However, this is a self destructive attitude as we know it.
LikeLike
Many of the “reformers” have little knowledge of what real poverty is. Joel Klein talked about his “impoverished” childhood of living in modest housing and having a father who worked for the Post Office. Of course, that description would probably apply to half of all Americans except maybe our fathers worked for the railroad, the police department, Sears or construction. His mother was a bookkeeper, probably an excellent job during the Depression. But most important of all, Mr. Klein’s parents valued education and were ambitious for him. No, he was definitely not a disadvantaged child. In fact, we could probably make a strong case for the fact that he was, like many American children, very fortunate indeed.
Teachers know that being on a limited income does not constitute “poverty.” In fact, many (most?) low income parents, like Joel Stein’s, are good parents who find ways to provide the basics for their children. Like my own mother, they might travel into the big city to get free medical care or visit Grandma’s house for dinner, but they always find a way. Their fathers might work extra jobs to pay for a mortgage on a tiny house, as my father did.
In sharp contrast, the truly poor children might not have a home or a dad. Their mother could be addicted to drugs and there might not be any dinner at all. These children might live in daily fear that mom or dad will get drunk and become abusive.
For those “reformers” who truly want to help children, this is what I suggest:
Learn what real poverty is. Read “The Invisible Thread” (Laura Schroff) or view the documentary “Stevie” (Steve James, director) and ask yourself, “How can we help children such as these?” If you are honest with yourself, you will know instinctively that merit pay, charter schools, and test prep will not help these children, but social, medical supports and preschool will, especially during the crucial first years of life.
Of course, if you are a “reformer” whose true goal is to privatize the schools for personal gain, then you are on the right track. But be aware that the American public is catching on, and it’s only a matter of time before you are exposed.
LikeLike
I’m currently reading Paul Tough’s new book _How Children Succeed_ and it addresses this issue in the introduction and the first chapter. I’m only about halfway through chapter 2 of 6 so I can only say that so far I would recommend this book to others but since I haven’t read the whole thing I may change my mind after reading more.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Kmareka.com and commented:
Important new research on how poverty and stress impact children — often these two factors can result in a child presenting as having ADHD…we have to work on the environmental stuff that drives a child’s inattentive behavior.
LikeLike
What, then, Diane, is your remedy for the toxic stress of poverty? My impression is that “poverty” is a euphemism for negligent parenting. Will giving irresponsible parents more money solve the characteroligical problem? We used to call such parents “sinful.” In the old vocabulary the only remedy for sin was repentence. How are destructive parents, “toxic parents” in the title of one popular psychology book, to be detoxified? “We” can’t take the children away from them just because they don’t know how to promote early childhood growth, can we? It is parental abuse in the larger moral sense, but not bad enough to qualify as legal abuse. What’s the answer to this problem, prenatal counseling, and early, early, early childhood education? Doesn’t the home trump everything a society can do? I would be interested to hear your assumptions on this.
LikeLike
Mr. Falstaff, if you are an intellectually honest person, please read this post and also the comments that follow it:
I think it might help you understand just what it is about poverty that is stressful, if you are sincerely looking for an answer to that question.
LikeLike
falstaff35–I think you might have to reconsider your assumptions on poverty (“My impression is that “poverty” is a euphemism for negligent parenting.”) Blaming these families is not solution, but unfortunately that is why poverty exist.
It is society’s issue (yours and mine). If your grandkids were born into poverty, your instinct would be to clothe them, provide shelter, food, help them with their homework, and most of all love and reassurance (making sure that they feel safe, you will always be there–you will do whatever it takes.
Money can provide shelter, food, & clothing. But it certainly cannot buy love or the kind of education we have today for kids who experience “toxic stress”. If your grandchild was experiencing toxic stress, accompanied by poverty, you would probably want the best counselor, doctor, and school. Well you can forget about school because the system isn’t set up to accommodate children with “toxic stress”, in fact it will exacerbate your grandchild’s condition .
Hence, I return to why poverty is society’s problem. Our education system is part of that problem. It is a problem because people who dictate our ed system and other social systems have ignored it for so long that it is a huge issue. This is due to the way we view poverty. The cycle of poverty cannot be broken just by giving a person food, clothing, and shelter.
LikeLike
You are right about my basic instincts if my grandchildren were neglected and suffering. They aren’t because my daughter and her husband are making what amounts to a total sacrifice of their lives and freedom to keep those kids housed, fed, and in addition educated, and in the public school systems too. They love their kids. Poverty began to be considered under Lyndon Johnson with his Great Society. It is not the lifetime of the nation, but it was a good 50 years ago. Russia had a similar problem with the serfs. What is YOUR solution, if it is society’s problem rather than the parents’ problem?
LikeLike
The solution to poverty is a combination of government and faith based programs that enable parents to get the education and skills training they need for marketable skills that pay considerably more than minimum wage, if the parent is bright enough to handle it. A good many poor parents are actually mildly retarded, learning disabled, or semi-illiterate. These need special programs to bring them to a maximum functional level and subsidies if they cannot learn a skilled, living wage trade. The parents who go to school need to be mentored and tutored to maintain a good GPA and then assisted in finding a good job and mentoring to keep it. Meanwhile they need full social support—housing subsidies, birth control, medical care, daycare, food stamps, welfare, so they can focus on their education and not on paying the bills.
As for the kids they need quality schools with small classes of under 15 students taught by the most skilled teachers that can be attracted, preferably with a Masters degree or higher and at least one of those degrees in Education and most should have 3 or more years of experience and teach in their area of certification. The schools should be run by teachers. Teach for Americas would be good paraprofessionals. The curriculum should allow the teachers to start where the children are and take them where they need to be, not where the “experts” say they should be and recognize that some children learn faster than others and start at a different place. Therefore, there should be “catch-up” grades with diagnostic-prescriptive education for those who are behind that focus on the things they need to know for their previous grade as well as the essentials for the promotional grade. This should keep most students from becoming overaged. Those with learning or cognitive disabiliites should be tested and placed in special education and educated at their level by the most skilled teachers, in the environment most suited to their needs—regular, resource or self-contained and not with a paraprofessional teaching them in the back of a regular class or a co-teacher who is treated like a para but who really knows a whole lot more than the regular teacher does. It costs more to educate children properly and to bring families out of poverty. We are only a 2 generations out of segregation. I grew up in segregated schools and I am only 62. Children are America’s greatest resource and professional teachers and public schools the way to access that resource.
The problem is society’s and the government that has chosen to place its priorities in the wrong place. It is the job of the parents to get the child to school ready to learn, on time and every day. If they are able they should help with homework, read to him or her and assist when needed. If not, they should at least provide a place to study and supervision. The budget for education should be right up there with Defense or even higher because education is a great defense and helps prevent bellicose conservatism. Dictators don’t take over countries with high literacy rates and good schools. They take over places like Afghanistan and Haiti where literacy is low and large portions of the population or deprived of it.
The communists killed as many educated people and teachers as they could when they took over in Asia. The slaveowners passed laws forbidding the slaves to learn to read because they knew the power of literacy and wanted to keep their workers ignorant.. Some former slaves actually paid for tutors because they knew literacy was the key to freedom. History shows that quality education not only reduces poverty, but it also protects a country from evils such as slavery and communism.
I hope I answered you questions.
LikeLike
falstaff35. I suggest you live among the poor to develop empathy and advoacy. YOU might then be able to answer your questions.
LikeLike
Apparently you haven’t read Falstaff’s other posts. There is nothing about him that is sincere.
LikeLike
Yes, I haven’t been able to visit here for a while, just getting back so I have missed his other posts. No harm I suppose in innocently trying to meet someone halfway but I won’t feed this troll again. Thanks for the heads up.
LikeLike
It is always puzzling to me when posters who are unable to answer my questions retreat to finding me lacking in compassion or a troll rather than someone who wishes truly to arrive at a workable policy solution. Dienne’s morally superior smugness is characteristically dismissive. If the solution to the toxic stress of poverty is to give every parent a sufficient income to provide a safe standard of living, I would consider that. If that is what you truly advocate that the society should do, just say so. No need to wish God punish me here or in the afterlife. It is NOT a policy answer Dienne, to say, in effect, “go to Hell.” Jesus did in fact have a lot to say about poverty. How do we NOW translate such a vision into government policy? That’s a legitimate question. Why not answer it straightforwardly and explicitly? If you think I’m a troll, just trying to stir up trouble, ignore me. If you have a genuine answer, give it. Don’t diminish your own credibility by name calling and sarcasm, which are not arguments.
LikeLike
Oh, here we go with the wounded cry of the injured right-winger. You start a conversation with a blatant, ignorant, offensive insult to millions of poor people, and then you expect people to engage you seriously and you cry “boo-hoo” when you get “name calling” in response. So typical. And then you act like I’m the one who lacks credibilty. Puh-leaze.
No, I won’t engage you or offer solutions. If you were halfway sincere, you would have done enough reading to understand what poverty is and that vast gallons of ink and pixels have been spilled offering solutions, all of which are ignored by people like you.
If you are sincere, come back here when you have a sincere argument to make that doesn’t involve calling poor people sinners.
BTW, your God has a lot to say about judging too.
LikeLike
I am sorry, Dienne, that you find me insincere because uninformed. You seem to imply you have pigeon- holed me as some kind of Christian fundamentalist fanatic. I am not, but their position that individual moral responsibility is essential for a happy life has its attractions. You are correct that at one point Jesus says “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” A very sensible reminder. I shall endeavor to meet these issues a little less judgmentally in future.
LikeLike
“My impression is that “poverty” is a euphemism for negligent parenting.”
Your compassion is truly stunning. I hope your God justly rewards you for it. I thnk, in fact, He had something to say about poverty.
LikeLike
No Falstaff, poverty is not a euphemism for negligent parenting. Some impoverished and even homeless parents take their children to the parks and library and talk to them about birds and plants. It may start off as something to do between the closing of school and the opening of the homeless shelter, but it works. Middle class and even wealthy parents can be negligent, especially of a child’s emotional needs. But poverty creates lack of experiences and the normal things that kids need to learn— like going on vacation, swimming, or to the zoo. When I first started teaching in a rural area only one of my children had plumbing and it was common for first graders (there was no kindergarten) to wet themselves during the first week of the school year because they had never seen a toilet! In an urban school they had never seen people of another race and thought that groceries were bought at the “rolling store”, a truck that came through the project selling a variety of groceries. In New Orleans they had never seen a hill and a lot of people did not want to evacuate for Hurricane Katrina because they had never left the city limits before and were afraid. This went back for generations. Sometimes the grandparents had never been out of the city! (And New Orleans is not very big so they were much more isolated than if they had been in Atlanta or Houston.) One little girl was amazed that the school where she evacuated to had a playground with swings. She was so happy! This is not negligence. The parents did the best they could with what they had, but that was very limited because they also had to pay the bills and some worked two jobs on a split shift. Poverty makes children tough, resilient, independent, and great problem solvers, but do you really want a 10 year old to take care of her younger brother and sister until 10PM while mama works, especially one who cannot read even though she can dictate a good story at grade level? I guess I will always remember little Yolanda. She taught me how smart and sensitive a child can be. Her mama was poor but far from neglectful. She was doing the best she could with what she had.
LikeLike
Both of your posts twinkie1cat have been more helpful than anything so far, including even Diane’s. Thank you for taking me seriously. You give me policy objectives to investigate at least at the state level. Detroit faces all of the problems you describe but political forces here and nationally totally derail any reasonable effort. Conservatives think Democrats want an ignorant populace so they can buy their votes with favors or appeals to identity. That’s why I think vouchers and charters have a crucial role to play. The public schools will never reform themselves, and while they won’t taxpayers will no longer fund them properly. Even Diane has been caught up in anti-capitalist posturing. Her remedies, I see, are yours, but her flaying of the source of money in the society and her support of the feckless Obama/Duncan establishment will only alienate those like myself who do want to see every kid provided with the remedies you propose.
LikeLike
Here are a few references relevant to the effect of poverty on children’s education:
Berliner, D. 2013. “Sorting out the effects of inequality and poverty, teachers and schooling, on America’s youth” online as a 193 kB pdf at http://bit.ly/T8zmTs.
Hake, R.R. 2011. “Re: Economic Inequality: The Real Cause of Urban School Problems #2,” online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/ozuZEn. Post of 11 Oct 2011 19:59:34-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post were transmitted to various discussion lists and are also on my blog “Hake’sEdStuff” at http://bit.ly/nOFgXx.
Hake, R.R. 2011. “The Overriding Influence of Poverty on Children’s Educational Achievement” online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/tUU65W. Post of 14 Dec 2011 09:56:02 -0800 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are also on my blog “Hake’sEdStuff” at http://bit.ly/tBZEY4 with a provision for comments.
Hake, R.R. 2012. “Re: The Word Not Mentioned in the Debate: Poverty,” online on the OPEN AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/QJWvds. Post of 4 Oct 2012 12:56:14-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. An abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists, and are also on my blog “Hake’sEdStuff” at http://bit.ly/QJYYVh with a provision for comments. This was stimulated an entry of the same title in Diane’s blog.
LikeLike
All those factors plus parents who tell the child to “shut up” when they ask questions and ignore the gestures of little toddlers trying to let them know what they want, carrying switches, involving them in adult situations around people they should not be near, such as drunks and drug addicts and people having sex, and not bringing some story books, color books and crayons when they are going to be sitting in a clinic or emergency room for hours because it is so difficult to get medical care and its not necessarily the child who is sick but mama does not have any place to take them so they have to come with her. Then they expect the child to be still. No school, charter or public, can fix things like that, but at least real teachers know that it happens and might be able to help the child advocate for himself and stick something to do in his pocket. And maybe when they come for a conference the teacher can put some ideas in their heads. It doesn’t take that much.
LikeLike
You, at least, twinkie1cat, are honest. Toxic parents is not so far off. Toxic because ignorant. Ignorant because of segregation. Segregated because of the holdover of racism from slavery. Who were the slave holding, Jim Crow racists? The Democrat south and Democrat cities. Who do the ignorant continue to vote for? Democrats. Now that is a mind boggling pathology, which I see may take more generations to heal than I thought. Democrats will never do it. Another reason for disassociating myself from them. Thank you again. You restore my faith in rationality, and teach me historical patience.
LikeLike
So, Mr. Falstaff, you suggest that those concerned about the lingering effects of racism should oppose the party that passed every piece f civil rights legislation for the past 60 years? All those “Democrats” who maintained segregation and Jim Crow long ago abandoned the party of Lyndon Johnson, John Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama. I’m sorry to say, but your sense of history is sorely deficient.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina and commented:
Add your thoughts here… (optional)
LikeLike
Play is embedded into us by Mother Nature as a survival drive to foment resiliency and handle stress. Humans are the most playful of all species, and intelligence and evolution are linked to the capacity of an animal to play. Look at a snake vs a dolphin and their resiliency to adapt.
People who are play deprived and rigid can “pop off” or experience compensations like depression, obsessive-compulsive disorders, addictions, road rage, Bullying and domination, etc. What does the future look like with a play deprived generation?
PLAY is a civil rights issue and more. Do we deprive children of another survival drive, sleep, and ask them to perform cognitively? Sleep deprivation is a torture technique.
Perhaps play deprivation is child abuse?
If we use the science we now have on this we can make a case.
We collectively need to think outside the box. Maybe the best defense is an offense.
Organize to stand FOR something, not against. We do need to recreate education, so what does THAT look like?
LikeLike
The simple fact is, current reforms exacerbate the harmful conditions of many of our students. We label them and their schools failures and ridicule the few adults in their lives that accept them as they are and encourage them to become something greater. We teachers have limited influence. We seek to do everything humanly possible, but we are human. The Rheeformers have never attained what they expect us to attain, they also have never attained what they claim. It is time for honest discussion on how to help our students. I teach GED classes after school for free to parents, helping the family will help the child. Schools reflect our society.
LikeLike
Referring back to the original post, I find the comments about some folks’ (e.g., TfA folks) response to poverty to misrepresent how many people feel. I’ve yet to meet a reasonable person – part of TfA, Republican party, etc. – who believes that poverty is irrelevant in the educational process. Rather, many folks believe that there are strategies that tend to work better with kids living in poverty. Believing that poverty can be addressed is different from dismissing the importance of it.
Diane, you could quote anyone from TfA or any other organization that believes that poverty is irrelevant in the educational process, or who otherwise believe that poverty is an insignificant hindrance?
LikeLike
Read Kopp’s last book and you will find several examples.
LikeLike
Thanks for the reply Diane – I will do that. I’ve been meaning to for a while and haven’t gotten around to it.
LikeLike