This just in from a teacher in Nebraska. The state did not get any Race to the Top funding, and therefore didn’t “win” money that would cost them more to implement than they “won.” It is taking a “wait and see” approach to Common Core standards. It doesn’t want the U.S. Department of Education to tell Nebraskans what to do. It doesn’t have any charters.
The state is trying to do what is best for children. Imagine that! The public schools are supported by the public.
Is Nebraska still part of the United States? How did we overlook the amazing common sense that still exists there? Good luck to Nebraska in keeping the privatizers at bay.
I realized when I read this letter that Nebraska belongs on our honor roll as a champion of public education. It supports its public schools. It lets teachers teach. It has not rushed to do the latest thing. It has thus far ignored the privatizers.
Welcome to the honor roll, Nebraska! Stay strong!
Come to Nebraska. A state led by a common sense dept. of education and a smart, reasonable teachers’ union. We don’t rush to jump on every new educational bandwagon (Nope, we didn’t get any Race to the Top money and the verdict’s still out on Common Core–we’re one of the few ‘wait and see’ hold out states) and try to comply with mandatory standards while doing the least amount of damage to our kids. We aren’t averse to change–indeed, we’re always looking to be on that cutting edge, however, if we’re going to spend hard earned tax dollars, it had better be worth it. I’m a high school special education teacher and co-teach algebra and geometry. I work with a tough population and my school isn’t perfect. Lots of hard work. But the difference is that public education is supported in our state. We have no charter schools. I feel appreciated by my students, my co-workers, parents and administration just about every single day. Now, it’s not a Shangra-la…I DO work with teenagers, many with behavior dsorders, and don’t always agree with administration or co-workers. Our state legislature passed a law and implented a state-wide test many educators aren’t crazy about. We are under the same gun to improve test scores as any other state and that can be stressful. However, we are encouraged and celebrated whenever we infuse creativity, active learning, and technology into our classrooms. In a nutshell, we’re held accountable, the state testing is a pain and possibly a waste of time, but overall I feel the higher ups try to stay out of our way as best as they can. The biggest threat to our educational system here is out of state money with an agenda to privatize education and run it like a business–a fate experienced by other states. I only hope we can fight them off and maintain what we have.

Bravo, Diane!!
LikeLike
I too teach in Nebraska. I agree with a lot of what she says in her letter, however, we also know that when the winds of change move in the NATION, so does Nebraska (thus the reason we finally were forced to implement a statewide test). My other concern though is that in my district there are administrators who are freaking out that we are not adopting Common Core because they think it is “putting us way behind”.
LikeLike
Well, my sister in law and I, with six school children between us, keep joking about moving to Finland…maybe we just need to head west to Nebraska. Georgia is wearing us out!
LikeLike
Indiana has moved to Common Core Standards & the Indiana Standards we had in place were more relevant and rigorous. It makes me sick to be forced to align my services to students (speech-language) to these standards. Hang in there, Nebraska!
LikeLike
I’d be much more interested in reading about how Nebraska specifically supports public education, not what they have chosen to NOT do. It’s far too easy to get caught up in being against things that sometimes we forget what strategies we’re going to put in place to actually make improvements. I don’t think NOT doing something qualifies a state to be on an honor roll, any more than not getting an F qualifies a high school student to be on an honor roll.
LikeLike
I disagree. When everybody else is jumping through hoops to pursue federal money, when everyone else is eagerly doing things that hurt children and educators (like misusing test scores), it takes wisdom and courage to say no.
LikeLike
I can certainly appreciate the difficulty of the wisdom and courage to go against something when there’s a lot of pressure. I should have phrased my comments differently – rather than saying I’m uninterested in the “saying no” part, I should have said that I would appreciate a “next step” being included. For example: “Nebraska said ‘no’ to CCSS/RTT, and instead is doing ______.” Maybe I’ve missed that second part of the discussion about Nebraska elsewhere?
My larger point is that simply being against certain initiatives is not a comprehensive reform stance. We are not in a situation in our country in which our schools were functioning at 100%, then destroyed by federal initiatives. Certainly with all due respect to you and your experience with federal-level reform, many federal initiatives are attempts to fix a problem or make an improvement, as ill-conceived as those ideas may be. I’ve always found it helpful, whether teaching kids social skills or engaging in systems to change, to follow a “don’t do this” with an alternative or positive solution, which gives folks a direction to turn next.
I realize this post/thread isn’t a complete appraisal of reform efforts in Nebraska, so I understand that it may be beyond the scope of the post to talk about alternative solutions Nebraska is pursuing, but I have noticed a problem in the education discussion surrounding many controversial topics today, from teacher accountability to CCSS, which is a tendency to simply be against ideas without proposing alternatives. This is fine every now and then, but if an individual or school builds it’s entire reform platform around what it’s NOT going to do, and implies that it was doing just fine before (when it wasn’t), that becomes problematic.
LikeLike
As a retired teacher in Nebraska, I say hooray to the state board of education! Common Core Standards will be the death of true public education in America.
LikeLike
Diane, Can you post and rank all of the cities/states that are resisting reform? Are Catholic & Private schools going to reform soon?
LikeLike
CCSS ( Cash Cow Subsidized by States) one size fits all approach to education makes no sense academically or economically except for the plethora of Common Core test designers, specialists, consultants, associates, sales reps, product managers and others with “skin in the game” who seem to be more motivated by money, than mastery of content.
Perhaps CCSS was originally intended to increase student achievement, individualize instruction, and improve career and college readiness, but those noble goals have since been derailed and hijacked by corporate pirates and standardized testing advocates who have masterminded the ultimate “bait and switch” in education history.
It is fanciful to suggest that a standardized test can provide an accurate, comprehensive, and reliable assessment of a student’s mastery of the Common Core and simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of a teacher when the impact and importance of the most vigorous and vibrant qualities of the Common Core… constructivism, media literacy, technology integration, project based learning, and performance assessment, are diminished and devalued because they don’t conform to the boilerplate format of a standardized test….
http://blogs.slj.com/connect-the-pop/2012/08/media-literacy/guest-post-by-john-chase-character-education-the-secret-benefit-of-edtech-and-media-literacy/
Even PARCC’s recent disclaimer (pgs 2-3) acknowledges the limitations of the student data that will be generated by the Common Core assessments they are creating. These tests will be administered exclusively online, forcing many schools to reallocate scarce resources in order to upgrade technology and expand infrastructure by the 2014 rollout of the assessments…
“It must be noted that the academic knowledge, skills, and practices defined by the PARCC CCR Determinations in ELA/literacy and mathematics are an essential part of students’ readiness for college and careers, but do not encompass the full range of knowledge, skills, and practices students need for success in postsecondary programs and careers. For example, Conley (2012) includes learning skills and techniques such as persistence, motivation, and time management as critical elements of college and career readiness…Since these non-academic factors are so important, PARCC College- and Career-Ready Determinations can only provide an estimate of the likelihood that students who earn them have the academic preparation necessary to succeed in entry-level, credit-bearing courses.”
Click to access PARCCCCRDPolicyandPLDs_FINAL.pdf
Wonder how many schools around the country are shifting funds or eliminating altogether, the critical programs and services that address those important non-academic factors in order to ready their computer labs for the PARCC assessment?
Regardless, as the education reform fog slowly lifts and the Shared Learning Collaborative steps forward into the spotlight, the commercial benefit and byproduct of the individual student data being collected by schools becomes painfully apparent…
http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2012-10-23T11:44:00-04:00&max-results=500&start=5&by-date=false
From the “Marketplace” section of the SLC web site…”Educational publishers can work with data supplied by school districts to customize content to fit students’ needs. Participation in the SLC allows for vendors’ content to become more searchable, more widely accessible and a better fit for curriculum and standards requirements.”
http://slcedu.org/
LikeLike
Just when we thought we had heard it all….the Common Core/ RTT federal funds feeding frenzy spreads to “academics” and SUNY Higher ED…
“Education professors from New York’s public university system gathered in Albany on Thursday to brainstorm how they can better prepare future teachers for classroom demands, particularly several new or upcoming state-mandated requirements…
State University of New York Chancellor Nancy Zimpher addressed the group Thursday morning, calling this time a “crisis point” for teacher education. She said many education professors have lost confidence in their work, while the needs of public schools are not being met by the skill sets of new teachers…
The conference is one piece of a SUNY-wide collaborative effort to improve teacher education, funded by $3.5 million in federal grant funds. Last year, New York was awarded $700 million in a national grant competition, Race To The Top.
Zimpher introduced the concept of creating regional “centers of pedagogy,” where SUNY professors and students would work together with veteran teachers to learn in a more hands-on, “laboratory” setting.
In explaining how students would learn in these centers, she described how today’s doctors and nurses are taught — using human-like simulators that exhibit vital signs and symptoms.
She also showed a video about an initiative at the University of Central Florida, where student-teachers work before a screen that displays computer-generated pupils. The virtual kids, who interact with the teacher and each other, are controlled by professors and digital media students from another room.
She said the centers would be “place(s) where the practitioners in the university and the practitioners in the field can come together to simulate the practice of teaching,”
State Education Commissioner John King, who also spoke at the conference, commended Zimpher’s plans.”
http://www.lohud.com/article/20121117/NEWS05/311170036/SUNY-bolsters-teaching-degree-programs-educators-face-new-demands?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Frontpage|s
Sure makes sense to me…why would college students learn to teach in a school with actual living and breathing students when they could simulate teaching while interacting with virtual students?
…I am pleased to announce that this month’s top education reform idea award or WOZ (Wizard of Oz) award goes to Nancy Zimpher…as Dorothy said; “Toto, I don’t think we are in Kansas any more.”
LikeLike