Many people with liberal causes have used change.org to launch petition drives.
In its founding, change.org declared its dedication to progressive values.
Many people were upset when change.org allowed Michelle Rhee to surreptitiously gather signatures on its site. You might sign a petition saying you want great teachers or you think teachers should be paid more, and without your knowledge or consent, you were a member of StudentsFirst. You would never get a notice informing that you had unknowingly “joined.” But you would be counted as a member.
Many were also upset that change.org hosted Stand for Children, which is anti-union, anti-teacher, anti-public education, and pro-corporate.
We thought those lapses were aberrations. But now we find that change.org is opening its doors to anti-union, anti-abortion, pro-corporate advertising. Its progressive veneer has simply disappeared. On October 24, the new policy will take effect. The news was leaked to Jeff Bryant, who wrote about it here.
Of course, that is their right. But beware. Don’t sign any petitions on that site. You never will find out what cause or group has just added your name to its membership rolls.
Just be aware that when they ask you if you support puppies and kittens, you might be signing a petition to give away public lands or to outsource American jobs or to bust a union or to support ALEC.

Thanks for the heads up! Very disappointing but not unexpected, unfortunately. Anything for a buck these days.
LikeLike
Diane, what about starting a petition site here or have one of the bloggers do it. That way we can be assured there is no automatic sigh up for Students First or any other program linked to ALEC, Koch Bros, Broad or Gates.
LikeLike
Thanks for the heads-up …
LikeLike
Thank you for passing on this information. I used to spend time on change.org, and loved Clay Burrell’s education posts. I don’t spend time there any more. (I still follow Clay, through his blogs.)
I have just canceled my account.
LikeLike
Sounds like change.org just embraced the culture of the invisible hand of the natural force of Milton Freedman’s free market.
I am sure they will rep ever growing profits.
LikeLike
I don’t know about that (the profit-reaping). Change.org was built from a core of progressive activist types (like me). If we all quit, they may be a bit hollow. I hope someone else starts a change-for-the-better site.
LikeLike
Staging a walkout is simple. Use this link to close your account: https://www.change.org/account_settings
LikeLike
Sadly, this is inaccurate. Change.org has never stated that it was a lefty organization. It is, after all, a for-profit.
LikeLike
Not true. Change.org stated a long time ago that it was created as a site for progressive values.
LikeLike
This post is inaccurate. You don’t just end up on someone’s list. Change.org’s platform has always been to have petitions accessible to everyone. People (users) decide what is a popular petition. They still have an anti-discriminatory/hate petition policy. Should only lefties be allowed to have petitions?
LikeLike
No, the post is not inaccurate. Change.org began with the intention of hosting a site for leftwing, progressive causes.
It has changed course.
And yes, you can be tricked into signing a petition, as I was.
I signed a petition saying that I support teachers and unwittingly became a member of Rhee’s StudentsFirst.
I was deceived.
Rightwingers have petition sites too, although generally they don’t need to petition because they now own so many states as well as the U.S. Department of Education.
LikeLike
Please read the article that Ben Rattray wrote in response to Ryan’s article. Again, the post in inaccurate. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-rattray/the-case-for-change_b_2018554.html
LikeLike
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-rattray/the-case-for-change_b_2018554.html
LikeLike
Sure, Ben Ratrray is going to give it to you straight. No way the guy who has got so much to gain financially is going to deceive you. #pathetic
LikeLike
akgrab is absolutely right. The founder himself of Change.org wrote in the Huffpo piece the following, “One of the reasons that so many campaigns are able to win is because we’ve built an open platform that gives anyone the space to tell their own authentic stories without being viewed through a partisan lens…If we weren’t open to everyone, and if we limited access based on a set of political viewpoints, we would undercut the power of our petition creators and users.”
That proves that Change.org didn’t sell out. From the beginning it was meant to give a voice to everyone. Even, heaven forbid, those who are pro-life.
LikeLike
Your point and akgrab’s point are correct but immaterial. There are leftists who are in favor from equality and democracy (I suppose) and leftist who are against. You have encountered the “against” and they are unmoved.
LikeLike