Archives for the month of: September, 2012

Read this glowing report about how TFA alums have taken over leadership roles across Indiana, with 11 working in the State Education Department.

This is a state where the Republican Governor and Legislature have passed voucher legislation, encouraged the proliferation of charter schools, and welcomed for-profit schooling. It is the full rightwing agenda, exceeded perhaps in scope and ambition only by Bobby Jindal’s privatization agenda (which is led by TFA alum John White).

Near the end of the article, the reporter finds an experienced educator or two to wonder whether five weeks of training is sufficient, but the rest of the piece glows with adulation for the kids who are reshaping the state along the lines of corporate-style reform.

A reader writes in response to the question of whether teaching is harder than rocket science:

I am not quite a rocket scientist, but I do have degrees in nuclear engineering. And now I am National Board Certified Teacher and have been full time in the classroom for almost 20 years. I started out exactly like this reader with volunteering in classrooms. And then I decided to take the plunge into full time teaching. Teaching has a lot in common with engineering. Both require creative solutions to problems where you begin with basic theories and then look at your constraints to design workable solutions. However, teaching is much tougher because the variables are constantly changing. We know a lot about how people learn and what we know tells us that learning is contextual. No situation is ever the same, not year to year, not day to day and some days not even class period to class period. Physics assumes that the basic causal models apply regardless of context. Neutrons do not have days where their parents let them stay up all night. They do not fight with their best friend right before my class. Neutrons do not have hopes and dreams and fears. Teaching is incredibly dynamic and complex. It is so much more intellectually and emotionally challenging than simple observation and test scores can reveal.

This reader sees ominous signs as his school complies with the demands of Race to the Top:

Race to the Top is diverting teacher know-how, skill, talent, passion, etc to numbers crunching and reporting. taking valuable time away from figuring out how to teach well. We are heading rapidly to where the only people who will be able to get a deep enough education to be capable of being in charge of anything in the world will be those who can go to private schools.

Race to the Top is a misnomer – it is Crawl off the Bottom because it does not allocate any”measurable” value to AP classes, college credit offerings. art or music. Our numbers are measured by scores on academic tests. To comply with Race to the Top, we have to give our students a “pre-test” at the beginning of our classes this September, a test designed for students to fail because it is similar to what they will take as final exams at the end of the year. the point being to show improvement, but it means students all over NYS are starting off their year by massively taking tests they will fail miserably on, per requirement of NyS’ compliance with RTT.Every teacher I know learned in their earliest classes & experiences, that testing to show failures is VERY bad pedagogy.

And to keep things in perspective, 60% of the federal budget goes to war & defense, compared to 2% to education. The rest of the cost of public schooling is carried by state & local governments. is that the kind of support that will allow this generation to run the country any better? I don’t think so.

Sharon Higgins, parent activist in Oakland, writes:

sharonrhiggins@yahoo.com

http://charterschoolscandals.blogspot.com/

Comment Mass incarceration is the huge elephant in the room that arrived AFTER Lyndon Johnson was trying to address the harmful effects of poverty in 1965. Its effects must be added to the mix of what public school teachers have to deal with.

Back in 1972, the U.S. had 300,000 people in jails and prisons. In 2008 that number was up to 2.3 million, with an additional 5 million on probation and parole. The astronomical increase was largely due to “drug war” policies.

Get this: the U.S. ranks #1 with imprisonment of its citizens at 715 prisoners per 100,000. To put this in perspective, Russia is #2 at 584, and Belarus is #3 at 554. Finland is #113 at 71. http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_pri_per_cap-crime-prisoners-per-capita

The mass incarceration being carried out in the U.S. has disproportionately affected people of color. In 2004, the Kirwan Institute reported that the number of incarcerated African Americans increased 800% since the 1950s. From a Sentencing Project report: “The rapid growth of incarceration has had profoundly disruptive effects that radiate into other spheres of society.

The persistent removal of persons from the community to prison and their eventual return has a destabilizing effect that has been demonstrated to fray family and community bonds…” In other words, it is damaging to kids. http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/inc_iandc_complex.pdf (865 KB) It is a national disgrace that politicians and ed reformers in our “land of the free” won’t bother to acknowledge our grotesquely ugly mass incarceration problem, not to mention our child poverty rate.

The impact of mass incarceration on children is just one of our many societal ills heaped on public school teachers’ plates. Michelle Alexander and Bryan Stevenson talk about mass incarceration with Bill Moyers here: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04022010/watch.html .

The New York City Department of Education decided to kill John Dewey High School in Brooklyn a few years ago. John Dewey (ironic name, no?) had long been considered one of the city’s best non-selective high schools.

When the city began creating small schools and closing large schools, it had to find a place to dump low-performing students so that the small schools would appear successful. So John Dewey became a dumping ground for students unwanted by the new small high schools, which the Bloomberg administration treated as the jewel in its crown.

As more students were assigned to Dewey who were far behind their grade level in basic skills or who have special needs, Dewey’s scores began dropping. Soon Dewey was classified as a failing school.

The teachers fought to protect the school, but it was a losing battle. In this article, read how the city has stripped the school of AP courses, electives, foreign languages, etc., and the graduation rate dropped. As the school was picked apart, enrollment fell, and teachers were laid off. This is a death spiral created by the NYC Department of Education. This year’s school opening was marked by scheduling confusion, not only at Dewey, but other so-called “turnaround” schools that are locked in a legal battle over when and if they will get the “turnaround” treatment (meaning, will the staff be fired and the school closed).

It is a war of attrition, and the administration will win.

Next time you hear a story about the “success” of New York City’s small high schools, remember John Dewey High School.

This teacher read Alex Kotlowitz’s article in the New York Times about how teachers can’t solve poverty all by themselves and this was her reaction:

Alex Kotlowitz says about solving poverty, “teachers can’t do it alone.” I say, we can’t do it all, and I’m sick of being even imagined to be able to do it. I teach, that’s it, I TEACH.

Think of it. If she teaches chemistry, is she solving poverty? If she teaches art, is she solving poverty? Some would say yes, others would say that the best way to solve poverty is to create jobs. This teacher says, just let me teach.

Is she wrong?

When students begin to understand and talk about the conditions in which they live and work, the national conversation will change.

Here is a column written by a Chicago student and published in Anthony Cody’s great blog, Living in Dialogue.

She asks a simple question: Why are certain schools given preferential treatment and others (like hers) shunned and neglected?

This post was sent by a reader in Chicago.

For the graphics, open the original posting.

Education Apartheid: The Racism Behind Chicago’s School “Reform”
by OCTRIB_ADMIN • SEP 12, 2012 • PRINT-FRIENDLY

Teachers, parents, students and other allies rally downtown in Chicago on September 10, Day 1 of the Chicago Teachers Union Strike. (Photo by Ryan L Williams, used with permission.)
Dyett High School students are not allowed to enter the front door of their school. Instead, the more than 170 students at the Southside high school enter through the back. From there, they must spend their day pushing through other students in the one open hallway, after half of the building was placed off limits.

“Just imagine, all these students in one hallway trying to get to where they’re going … everyone’s just trying to get through each other,” says Keshaundra Neal, a junior at Dyett and a student organizer for the Kenwood Oakland Community Organization (KOCO).

The phasing out of Dyett, one of 17 schools that the Board of Education voted to close or turn around last winter, highlights a process being played out across Chicago—the dismantling of neighborhood public schools, the ushering in of corporate-controlled charters and, in many cases, the gentrification of predominately African-American and Latino neighborhoods. Closing schools, like tearing down public housing, has proved an effective way for Chicago’s rich and powerful to push out and further segregate people of color.

The “global city” that Chicago’s elite have been crafting for decades is a racially and economically segregated city—gleaming downtown office towers for the upwardly mobile, and blighted neighborhoods of low-wage or would-be laborers, tucked away, out of sight. A 2012 study of census data by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research found that Chicago is the most racially segregated city in the United States. And how could it not be? While corporations receive TIF money to subsidize their largesse, and billionaires like the Board of Education’s own Penny Pritzker evade paying their full share of property taxes, the seeds of the city’s inequality are re-sown every year in our segregated school system.

A Corporate Renaissance

In Bronzeville alone, where Dyett is located, 19 schools have been closed or turned around since 2001, often replaced by charter and selective-enrollment schools that admit students from anywhere in the city, further displacing neighborhood students.

Renaissance 2010 institutionalized the idea that closing public schools and pushing their students into selective-enrollment or charter schools would solve the problems afflicting urban education. The 2004 project, started by then-mayor Richard J. Daley and CPS CEO Arne Duncan, planned to close up to 70 of the worst performing schools in the city and reopen 100 new schools, with two-thirds as charters or contract schools.

Renaissance 2010 was called “perhaps the most significant experiment in the US to reinvent an urban public school system on neoliberal lines,” by education academic Pauline Lipman. She places the education changes in the context of Chicago’s push to become a Global City: “Ren2010 is a market-based approach that involves a high level partnership with the most powerful financial and corporate interests in the city.”

Eight years after Renaissance 2010 was launched, Chicago has 96 charter schools, 27 turnaround schools, and a record summer of gun violence under its belt.

The numbers show a stratified society. More than two-thirds of all African-American students in Chicago, and more than 40 percent of Latino students, attend schools where more than 90 percent of all students are of the same ethnicity.

These schools are the first to be closed or turned around, and the last in line to receive extra resources. Of the 160 schools in Chicago without a library, 140 are south of North Avenue. Predominately white and affluent schools receive the majority of capital improvements. Often, as with Herzl Elementary School this past year, students at underserved schools see sorely needed construction begin only after CPS has decided to give away the building to a charter network or AUSL.

With black and Latino communities facing the brunt of the recession, and the poorest residents among them living in a state of permanent depression, students from these communities bear the results of economic segregation. In 188 schools in predominately black neighborhoods, 95 percent or more of students qualify for free and reduced lunch. One-third of Latino students go to schools where more than 90 percent of students qualify. Only 3 percent of white students can say the same.

The racial inequalities in school funding affect teachers as well as students—school closures and turnarounds, where a targeted school’s entire staff is fired, have been forcing African-American teachers out of their jobs. In the schools closed this year, 65 percent of their teachers were African American. Since the era of reform accelerated, the number of African-American teachers has declined by 10 percent, while that of white teachers has increased 5 percent.

The quality of education that Chicago students receive varies greatly by which school they attend, and on the resources provided to those schools. Here’s a breakdown of two very different, but typical, school environments:

Fighting Back in Rahm’s Austerity Fiefdom

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has thrust austerity upon other public services, primarily targeting those used by the poorest Chicagoans. He cut library hours in early 2012, and closed half the city’s mental health clinics. The projected savings of the clinic closures was only $3 million dollars—a paltry sum compared to the estimated $55 million spent on the three-day NATO summit.

The fight over education in Chicago contains these same glaring disparities—while 675 schools are forced to share 205 social workers, psychologists, and school-based counselors, $29.5 million in Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) money is granted to build a West Loop office building. In total, this year’s TIF intake is estimated to be worth $454 million, according to Cook County Clerk David Orr. That’s money that, if Emanuel had different priorities, could be spent on education and other social services.

Community groups, activists, and organizers have come out strongly against such unequal policies. Students at Dyett High School, after witnessing CPS set up their school to fail, have taken their fight against this broken agenda to Washington D.C.

As Dyett students and KOCO student organizers Pierre Williams, Diamond McCullough, and Keshaundra Neal tell the story of their school, the city has been disinvesting from it for years in preparation for closing it down. After then-CPS CEO Paul Vallas turned it from an elementary school to a high school in 1999, he didn’t give the “money or resources necessary for a high school—no library, no AP classes, no honors classes,” says Neal. That same year, “King was turned into a selective enrollment school, and given $25 million, so they knew how to make good schools,” added McCullough.

After CPS closed Englewood High School in 2005, “they sent most of their students to Dyett,” says Williams. “So our violence increased, scores dropped, and a lot more things happened that changed the environment at our school. During our sophomore year [last year-ed.], that’s when we heard the news that they were trying to phase out our school.”

Williams, McCullough, and Neal joined other classmates and community members to testify against closing Dyett at this winter’s school board hearings, staged a four-day sit-in outside Mayor Emanuel’s office at City Hall, and helped to shut down board meetings in protest. The board didn’t listen. But these students didn’t let up.

“After all that, other states and cities found out what we were doing,” says Neal. “So we hooked up with 16 states and we filed a civil rights complaint, because we realized our rights were being violated by CPS and no one cares.” Neal met with officials at the Department of Education along with other education organizers and student leaders from across the country.

They came with a list of demands—including a moratorium on all school closings nationally, a meeting with the president, tours of their schools, and a sustainable school model, in which school boards would be required to work more closely with a school’s community before taking actions against it.

Although the DOE didn’t agree to the moratoriums, nor grant a meeting with the president, they did agree to tour the schools and look into the sustainable school model. But most significantly, the DOE’s Assistant Secretary of Civil Rights Russlynn Ali told the students the department has listened to their original civil rights complaint, and has opened an investigation into the racial discrimination of school closings.

In 2008, Dyett had one of the highest rates of college-bound graduates among CPS schools and was recognized nationally for its restorative justice program. Just three years later, the college-bound rate was below CPS average, and the restorative justice program was defunded.

As the teachers’ strike loomed, Michael Brunson, recording secretary for the Chicago Teachers Union, told supporters that a socially just school system may be visionary, but it’s attainable.

“To imagine that is not to create something new,” he said. “It’s to take back what was lost.”

By Joel Handley and Rosa Trakhtensky

It became commonplace in he media to say over and over that the average salary for Chicago teachers is $71,000-$76,000.

I heard this and didn’t question it. I didn’t think it was inappropriate or extravagant as compensation for a professional.

But it seems the number is hugely inflated.

According to this post, the actual average salary for teachers in the Chicago metropolitan area is $56,720.

Maybe this will make the teachers’ cause somewhat more tolerable to the pundits in the media who can barely get by on four times that much.

This blogger wondered who was appointed to the Florida state board. This is a powerful board that selects the state commissioner of education and sets policy for the children, teachers, and schools of the state. The board has given the green light to charters, vouchers, online schools, for-profit schools, any alternative that anyone can dream of.

Who are these people? Read the post and you will understand.

Read it and you will see how Florida became a Mecca for privatization.