A faithful reader sent the following quotation from Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations:
Merchants and master manufacturers are, in this order, the two classes of people who commonly employ the largest capitals, and who by their wealth draw to themselves the greatest share of the public consideration. As during their whole lives they are engaged in plans and projects, they have frequently more acuteness of understanding than the greater part of country gentlemen. As their thoughts, however, are commonly exercised rather about the interest of their own particular branch of business, than about that of the society, their judgment, even when given with the greatest candour (which it has not been upon every occasion) is much more to be depended upon with regard to the former of those two objects than with regard to the latter. Their superiority over the country gentleman is not so much in their knowledge of the public interest, as in their having a better knowledge of their own interest than he has of his. It is by this superior knowledge of their own interest that they have frequently imposed upon his generosity, and persuaded him to give up both his own interest and that of the public, from a very simple but honest conviction that their interest, and not his, was the interest of the public. The interest of the dealers, however, in any particular branch of trade or manufactures, is always in some respects different from, and even opposite to, that of the public. To widen the market and to narrow the competition, is always the interest of the dealers. To widen the market may frequently be agreeable enough to the interest of the public; but to narrow the competition must always be against it, and can serve only to enable the dealers, by raising their profits above what they naturally would be, to levy, for their own benefit, an absurd tax upon the rest of their fellow-citizens. The proposal of any new law or regulation of commerce which comes from this order ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and ought never to be adopted till after having been long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous, but with the most suspicious attention. It comes from an order of men whose interest is never exactly the same with that of the public, who have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public, and who accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and oppressed it.
Yeah, ya gotta keep an eye on those Invisible Sharp Elbows.
…Free market theory caters to self-interested desires and profit to the detriment of other peoples’ lives, all the while promising “freedom and prosperity.” Free market principles advocate that the rich and poor should be taxed at the same flat rate, despite creating a vast inequity; that, for example, education, health care, retirement pensions, national parks (and most any function intrinsic to essential governing) become privatized; that publicly-owned companies, services and their assets be auctioned off to private investors; and that besides allocating vast amounts of wealth and resources from public to private ownership, that in the free market the transfer of private debts to the public sector while public ownership is systematically dismantled ironically continue…
http://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2011/08/global-free-market-perspective-and.html
Wealth of Nations is holy scripture to its True Believers, and like all good holy books it has something for everyone — if you dig hard enough and interpret creatively enough you can find rationalizations for any prejudice you wanted to believe before you opened the book.
But more than anything else, belief in the Invisible Hand serves the same function as numerous other fundamentally irrational beliefs — it saves the True Believer from the discomfort of having to think about the real problems of maintaining a civil society, much less do anything about them.
Reblogged this on tressiemc and commented:
This reminds me of the time I read Smith in a grad seminar. I mention the reading offhandedly to my mentor, the economist. His response: Do they know the REAL Adam Smith?
That’s a good question for us all. Do we know the real Adam Smith?
That final section sums up so much of why we as a country are where we are.
Additional readings and discussion at The Wikipedia Review, an independent forum for social media criticism —
• Worshippers Of The Unseen Butterfingers
For readers interested in higher ed, let me also recommend the following paper —
• Susan M. Awbrey (2003), “Making the ‘Invisible Hand’ Visible : The Case for Dialogue About Academic Capitalism”
There are many great passages in both books.
I think this passage should be understood that people who stand to gain from any law and regulation or policy change in education, be they employees of private schools or public schools, have their own interests that are not necessarily the same as that of the students being taught. All should be examined carefully.
Not to mention examination entrepreneurs, hedge-fund hawkers, media moguls, and software syndicates —
Oh wait, you didn’t mention examination entrepreneurs, hedge-fund hawkers, media moguls, and software syndicates —
So you’re saying that that the prospect of gaining or losing a financial incentive skews a person’s beliefs and thus a person’s decisions in the direction of self-interest and at the expense of public interests.
Hold that thought —
We may need to examine who gets skewed the most …
Indeed, there are many others to worry about. When it comes to your own pay, I don’t think anyone can be assumed to be on the side of the angels.
So naturally it’s the mud-guppies at the bottom of the trickle-down dam that we have to worry about the most.
I worry about them all.
Maybe public schools should be run by those working in the district and those living in the community??
Instead we now have bureaucrats and Bill Gates running the show.
Adam Smith….what a wise man!! 🙂
I suppose that might be a good idea, depending on who lives in your community. My wife was sent to the principles office many mornings because she would not stand and recite the Lords Prayer as it was read over the public high school intercom. The school was just following community values.