Stephen Singer explains the ways that technology impedes learning. He is not opposed to technology. He is opposed to its overuse and misuse.
Way #1:
1) It Stops Kids from Reading
I’m a language arts teacher. I want my students to read.
I could simply assign readings and hope students do them, but that’s not practical in today’s fast-paced world. When kids are bombarded by untold promises of instant gratification, a ream of paper bordered by cardboard doesn’t hold much of a claim on their attentions.
So like many teachers, I bring reading into the classroom, itself. I usually set aside class time every other day for students to read self-selected books for about 15 minutes. Students have access to the school library and a classroom library filled with books usually popular with kids their age or popular with my previous students. They can pick something from outside these boundaries, but if they haven’t already done so, I have them covered.
In the days before every student had an iPad, this worked fairly well. Students often had books with them they wanted to read or would quickly select one from my collection and give it a try.
Sometimes when there was down time in class, when they had finished assignments or tests early, they would even pick up their self-selected books and read a little.
What a different world it was!
Now that every student has an omnipresent technological device, this has become increasingly impossible. I still set aside 15 minutes, but students often waste the time looking for an eBook on-line and end up reading just the first chapter or two since they’re free. Others read nothing but the digital equivalent of magazine articles or look up disparate facts. And still others try to hide that they’re not reading at all but playing video games or watching YouTube videos.
Even under the best of circumstances, the act of reading on a device is different than reading a printed page.
The act of reading traditional books is slower, closer and more linear. It’s the way teachers really want kids to read and which will most increase comprehension.
Reading on a screen is a product of social media. We scroll or scan through, seeking specific information and clicking on hyperlinks.
The old style of reading was transformative, absorbing and a much deeper and richer experience. The newer style is more superficial, mechanical and extrinsic. (And, Yes, I’m aware of which style of reading you’re engaged in now!)
To be fair, some students actually prefer reading eBooks on devices and may even experience the richness of the original style. But they are few and far between. Usually students use the devices to escape from the deeper kind of reading because they’ve never really done it before and don’t understand what it really is. And when they have this choice, they may never find out.

Link to article is broken.
LikeLike
Here’s the link: https://gadflyonthewallblog.com/2019/07/31/top-7-ways-technology-stifles-student-learning-in-my-classroom/
LikeLike
Thanks for the link, Bob.
LikeLike
A brother who produced engineering drawings on a computer explained why he could not proof these properly unless he could look a printout.
Here is an article that addresses a related problem and suggests why paper beats computer screens.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/
LikeLike
Laura: thank you so much for this link. It is a wonder to me how you always come up with the most interesting things to read. Especially tantalizing to me was the idea that your mind traces the cursive you read.
It reminds me that I always feel more at home writing in cursive, especially with my grandfather’s old fountain pen.
LikeLike
Laura, I am not sure, this one is referenced in the article https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269692668_Mangen_A_Kuiken_D_2014_Lost_in_an_iPad_Narrative_engagement_on_paper_and_tablet
LikeLike
The infusion of computer assisted instruction has taken a toll on reading and writing as well. My grandson is visiting me this week. He will be entering 4th grade later this month in Texas. My daughter is concerned with the STAAR tests that are administered annually. Starting in 4th grade, students are required to take a writing test. My grandson managed to pass the reading and math STAAR test this year, but I doubt he will pass the writing test next year. I got a writing sample from him yesterday. His writing was about on a beginning second grade level. He is bright, and there is no excuse for his writing to be this low. Writing is best taught along with reading as they compliment each other. Reading is a receptive process, but writing is a productive one. Both reading and writing require lots of practice in order to be mastered. Emphasis on testing narrows the curricula, and students suffer the consequences.
Computers are useful tools. However, schools should not be adopting computer assisted instruction as a replacement to real learning guided by a professional teacher. There is no doubt that the school will try to make up for loss time in writing this year because students needs to pass the “big test.” Perhaps if students closed the Chromebooks in K-2 and spent time learning to write as a natural progression from reading, students would not be so far behind.
LikeLike
Texas is among the states that are requiring students to learn cursive writing.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/12/us/cursive-is-coming-back-trnd/index.html
LikeLike
My grandson does not know cursive at this time. In New York cursive was introduced in 3rd grade. I don’t know when they plan to introduce it in Texas, but my grandson is entering 4th. Cursive is just another form of handwriting.
My concern is that students do not know how to get ideas down on paper coherently. In 4th students will be evaluated on writing, and the students are not prepared because the emphasis has been on preparing for bubble tests. I am sure the so-called writing test will be something that lends itself to a computer format.
LikeLike
retired teacher, so agree re: writing. I suggest this has less to do w/high-tech in classroom per se – it’s mainly consequent to NCLB et al use of stdzd testing scores to evaluate teachers and schools. I think we can all agree there’s no way to assess writing quality via stdzd test even when tests are delivered on ppr (not computer). Therefore writing is not tested, therefore writing is not taught.
This is a crucially important issue, & deserves media trumpeting. Interviews of college profs teaching freshmen at comm coll & 4-yr colleges, as well as employers of entry-level employees will reveal a serious decline in writing ability over the last 15-20 yrs.
This alone should give pause to all govt actors who’ve been buying into US DofEd/ Congressional-mandated ed-accountability systems since 2001.
LikeLike
You might not need to worry. If the writing levels in Utah from the tests are any indication, students don’t need to be able to write coherently in order to “pass.” Teach him a few really big words that he can include in the writing, and teach him to write longer sentences, even if they don’t make sense. If a computer is grading them, that’s all he needs.
LikeLike
When you buy a paper book there are no hidden costs. You can’t say that when you buy the tablet; buy the router and the wi-fi; agree to all the contracts you didn’t read, and that students and parents never even see when they use a school device; set up your passwords with your birthday, your mother’s maiden name, your favorite ice cream flavor, how many times a week you like to lick your elbow… there’s the loss of rights in agreeing to contracts, the loss of private personal information for sale, and the loss of so much money that could be better spent. There’s the time lost looking up pictures of shoes and videos of complete strangers playing Fortnite. When will Fortnite end? O when will Fortnite go away? Do you have any idea how many of my students come to class looking haggard and complaining of being tired? They took their phones to bed and played Fortnite. So, the loss of sleep. “It’s alright, Mister, I’m gonna be a YouTube celebrity one day. I don’t have to read.”
LikeLike
LOL. I wish I had a dollar for every student who has told me that he or she is going to become rich as a) a Youtube celebrity or Instagram influencer or b) testing games for game manufacturers.
LikeLike
ME: You know, Erwin Tech is run by the county. It has great programs in welding and pharmacy tech and cosmetology and auto repair. You could do that.
STUDENT: Mr. Shepherd, I can earn a LOT more than that as a game tester. Millions.
ME: Uh, no. Not really.
STUDENT: Shows what you know. There’s this guy. . . .
LikeLike
Yes, multiple students in different classes have said exactly the same things to me. Given the ubiquity of it, I’d say those videos portraying famous and supposedly rich, I’m going to call them professional product consumers are part of the social networks’ successful corporate propaganda campaign to cause harmful addiction to their products.
Fortnite, which is as much a fantasy world social network as a video game, just held a contest and gave out some monetary prizes. Too many of my students spent real world money buying cyber weapons and cyber clothes for their avatars in the contest. In May and June, they would not stop playing unless their phones were taken from them. When their phones are in the principal’s office, they obsess about getting them back as soon as possible. My school district has a responsible use policy for all school devices like iPads. I would argue that addiction and distraction are more powerful than admitted, and that there’s no such thing as responsible use of technology by students in school.
LikeLike
Sorry for the tense shift. I’m writing on a screen.
LikeLike
As an upper elementary teacher for 19 years I saw dramatic changes in students over that span, particularly since the introduction of tablets and smartphones, including: decreased attention spans, greater need for instant gratification and more impulsivity. The students most affected were those that spent the most time on screens. When schools add required computer time, whether in class or at home, we are making it even more difficult for parents to protect their children from the effects of excess exposure to digital devices. This not only harms their ability to learn, but can also have serious effects on physical and mental health. And still, there is no real evidence that all this time on screens improves learning outcomes. If you are interested in taking action about the overuse of screens in schools, please get in touch with like-minded parents and teachers at the Children’s Screen Time Action Network: https://screentimenetwork.org/
LikeLike
When my kids were little (early ’90’s), we foolishly bought them the hand-held videogame devices all their friends had, & swiftly recognized symptoms of addiction. We had to take them away [very painful cold turkey]. We replaced w/a home-computer network w/ed games [thanks to computer-techie husband] ( & still had to monitor what went on at friends’ houses, collaborate w/ parents, preach against violent & “brain-mush” games etc.). Interactive screen-delivered format was simply too stimulating, even if just ed-games. We’d have to ration it, & yank them away from it for outdoor play or homework.
In our case we were very lucky to have spawned budding musicians, & by age 10, IRL face-to-face musical interaction took over. But what if we had been in a district like so many today, where warped budget priorities eliminate 4th-gr instr lessons/ band, while flooding classrooms w/screen devices??
LikeLike
The other thing I am finding as a junior high teacher is that FAR more students fall asleep in my classes. They’re spending too much time, too late at night, watching movies or Youtube videos or gaming.
And when I tell parents about it, they say, “Well he/she has a computer, TV, phone, tablet, whatever in their room. Maybe I should stop that.” But they never do. And the kid fails the class because they’re never awake enough to do the work.
LikeLike
Yup, totally! Our 3 had to negotiate time at the livrm computer (where we could monitor their usage), & only got their own laptops as hisch grad presents to use in college. If I were doing it today, I think—if I had to give them each a laptop—I’d require them to be located on the main floor, not in their bedrooms.
LikeLike
And no smartphones!
LikeLike
I’ll have to check out this group.
Yeah, it seems like much of our culture has shifted. And, it’s not just the kids.
I used to think about going to live in the woods after retiring….to escape. We’ve got lots of forest here. But then I start thinking about ticks…and my need to have my wonderful dentist and hygienist check out my teeth on a regular basis. Ha, ha. I don’t think I’d make it as a hermit more than a week or so.. I like iced coffee drinks too much. (You can take the boy out of the suburbs but etc…etc….)
Though, you know, not having a smart phone, I’m sort of feeling like I’ve suddenly become a hermit…a digital hermit. The future has somehow passed me by. Funny thing is, my focus during conversations with many people these days is pre-whatever-era-we’re-living-in-now. I mean when I’m listening to you, I might be distracted or daydreaming or…. but I’m not looking at the internet or thinking about looking at the internet. It’s hard to describe but things have changed… It’s a bit of a Rip Van Winkle feeling. (A long ago neighbor of mine here in the Catskill Mountains.)
I don’t know…a machine in some hospital could save my life one of these years. And, I wouldn’t want to take my chances if I could travel back and live in the world prior to the advent of antibiotics.
But it’s good to question technology.
One of the first 1960s era protests was about the nuclear arms race. And, those weapons are still out there. And, then there’s the destruction that technology has inflicted on our global environment…climate change.
These sorts of questions are not always welcome, especially (Ironically) in schools!
So, thanks Mr, Singer and everyone for your comments.
LikeLike
Oh, and vote, too. Wherever I end up, in 2020 and beyond, I would drag myself across hot coals for miles to vote. And, get others to vote, too. Hell ya.
LikeLike
John, I too have no smartphone, & no plans to get one.
It makes sense in many businesses. My husband’s engrg work is deadline-oriented, & smartphone facilitates both quick communications & access to corporate documents. One son has used the apps successfully for gig work [Door-Dash, Uber] that supplements his music teaching. But I can get away w/o it, because I free-lance for PreK’s, a rather low-tech world: they don’t use wifi/ laptops in classroom cuz there’s so much age-inappropriate stuff that would have to be blocked, & they have PA system/ house phones for communications/ alerts. The agency I work for follows suit: communications are via email, & same- or next-day response is OK.
What I find utterly annoying is the tendency for friends/ social acquaintances to allow the urgency of smartphone-biz to bleed into what should be the more desultory goings-on of chit-chat et al book-club, chorale-group etc doings. All of a sudden it’s OK to call off/ make changes at last minute cuz it’s assumed we’re all wired into the hive & humming. Not me! I’m out in the back yard or maybe on the john- will get back to you when I check my flip-phone, which is charging somewhere out of earshot!
LikeLike
John, I too have no smartphone, & no plans to get one.
It makes sense in many businesses. My husband’s engrg work is deadline-oriented, & smartphone facilitates both.quick communications & access to corporate documents. One son has used the apps successfully for gig work [Door-Dash, Uber] that supplements his music teaching. But I can get away w/o it, because I free-lance for PreK’s, a rather low-tech world: they don’t use wifi/ laptops in classroom cuz there’s so much age-inappropriate stuff that would have to be blocked, & they have PA system/ house phones for communications/ alerts. The agency I work for follows suit: communications are via email, & same- or next-day response is OK.
What I find utterly annoying is the tendency for friends/ social acquaintances to allow the urgency of smartphone-biz to bleed into what should be the more desultory goings-on of chit-chat et al book-club, chorale-group etc doings. All of a sudden it’s OK to call off/ make changes at last minute cuz it’s assumed we’re all wired into the hive & humming. Not me! I’m out in the back yard or maybe on the john- will get back to you when I check my flip-phone, which is charging somewhere out of earshot!
LikeLike
Yes, the good ‘ole flip phone. Once in a while, in school, I’ll say to some students hanging around with me, “If you work hard, really hard, and save your money, maybe if you are lucky, and the cards go your way, you can get one of these some day….”
Then, I take out my flip phone, dramatically, and snap it open, springing it to life (or life circa 2004.)
Always good for a laugh.
Take care.
LikeLike
This is just about #1, “It Stops Kids from Reading.” My post relates to my kids’ pubsch ed 1992-2010 & results.
I’d like to keep a close eye on these studies comparing book-reading to screen-reading. My instinct is to be skeptical. Yet I find the 2nd link persuasive: it says screen-reading provides comparatively more neural stimulation, which results in more skimming & darting around, less sustained concentration. I teach conversational Spanish to PreK, so don’t have the opportunity to make this comparison– but it synchs up w/my experience as Mom to 3 sons.
All 3 related better to music than the printed page, so had some issues w/academics. But only middle guy was LD-free: he took naturally to print/ book-reading.
The eldest had a big gap between [hi] IQ & processing speed– ChildStudyTeam figured that out his sr yr; since young it was thought he had ADD. In later teens he turned out to be bipolar [ADD symptoms are common in bipolars when young but that was not then understood]. He was a computer nerd, & did a tremendous amount of [mostly nonfiction] reading online. Books remained difficult for him to plough through.
The youngest was ‘classic’ ADHD: reading books was a terrific struggle which he gradually overcame to a certain point. He found (& still finds) pleasure in sci-fi genre reads, but will never be a bookworm. Interestingly, he shares w/middle son a great interest in narrative & character-devpt, which he indulges via televised drama series. He’ll rewind & re-watch segments to confirm insights, much the way I do w/ books.
Middle [non-LD] son turns to books periodically for philosophy, poetry, & a piece of lit recommended by a friend. Most creative spare time is devoted to music, & he teaches it PT. But he has to drive Uber 2nd gig, & has added a huge amount of non-fiction “reading” via podcast. I’m not sure I could do this: I think he takes to it due to strong audio skills.
Bottom line: hi-tech screen-reading was a terrific assist to one of my LD kids, & the other gains literary depth [narrative, character devpt] thro the vast # of hi-qual drama series available thro an explosion of video tech. Their neural systems were differently-wired, not amenable to the deep-reading of books. And the 3rd tho not LD has little time for reading, but his audio skills enable him to “read” while driving for $. So hurrah for hi-tech. No question pubsch should be focusing on book-reading, as the majority will gain greatly from that, & should not be sidetracked into screen- or audio-substitutes – except AS WARRANTED. If you’ve got kids who continue to struggle w/reading books, even tho they can read, they may be differently-wired, & should be offered different, techy versions of those books if possible.
LikeLike
Someone help me understand about #2, Distraction: does your school allow smartphones [/cellphones] in class? (They have to be left in lockers in my town’s district schools.) Or is Singer talking about what happens in district schools where admin has forced Google Chromebooks & the like on classrooms? Does that mean the class has to be connected to the “world wide web”? Isn’t there a way to limit to school network & those programs being used in the classroom?
LikeLike
In my school, they’re allowed to use them in passing periods, so the phones are EVERYWHERE! I require them to put them away in a sleeve, but I still catch kids texting, Instragramming, and watching YouTube when they’re not supposed to. This year, I’m going to require that they stay on top, face down, of their desks. I have to be hard-nosed about seeing them elsewhere.
LikeLike
Absolutely,& hope that works. But your admin should get a clue & support teaching/learning [supporting you] by requiring them to be stowed in lockers, never brought into classrooms.
LikeLike
My school allows phones in class, but only if they’re turned off and out of sight. If we see them, we have punitive consequences including confiscating them briefly. Students and parents get very upset when punished for phone use, especially when personal property is taken away; and unlike weapons or drugs, phones are seen by many as a right. Many parents call and text their children during class expecting an answer. It’s a constant struggle we debate in faculty meetings regularly. I personally try to be tolerant of phone use, but there are obvious pitfalls either way.
The use of Chromebooks to engage in online schoolwork is widespread at my school. The tablets are viewed by many educators as a shiny panacea, and used by many as a shiny pacifier. Not in my classroom! The occasional student benefits from using word processing on Chromebooks instead of pens and paper, so I let them, but that’s rare. Once every classroom had wi-fi installed in every classroom, the constant use of the web during school came to be accepted by many teachers, students, and parents as a given. It is reckless, in my opinion. To answer your question, I see no way to limit it without constant tension. Pandora’s Box is open.
LikeLike
“…. phones are seen by many as a right… Many parents call and text their children during class expecting an answer.”
O.M.G. That is just so… wrong! I looked at our town’s hisch handbook, but the ‘strictly verboten” policy appears to be left over from days when cell phones on kids (and beepers and pagers) meant drug trade LOL. I’ll have to ask a real live hisch parent to see what goes on now — re: www as well. Chromebooks – and cell phones – add layers to the complexities of classroom mgt – kudos to you for finding a workable balance.
LikeLike
The Pandora’s Box is indeed open. I don’t think there is any going back. A 2018 Pew study shows that 95 percent of American teens now have a smartphone or regular access to one. 85 percent use YouTube; 72 percent, Instagram; 69 percent, Snapchat; and 51 percent, Facebook. 45 percent say that they are online “constantly.”
Other teachers will confirm, I think, my experience of this. Teens use social media to keep in extremely frequent contact with friends and family and to share memes and music. They also go online to answer any question that comes up. In class, I use this. If we’re talking about Stephen Crane’s short story “A Mystery of Heroism,” and a question comes up about how many people died in the American Civil War, I don’t simply tell the kids (though I happen to know the answers, there). I say, “OK. Someone, grab your phone. Find us the answer.”
I don’t think there’s any going back, short of some sort of global cataclysm. And I don’t think that living online is making students dumber. In fact, I am continually surprised, in my interactions with teens, how broadly knowledgeable they are. From all that online gleaning, they tend to know a little about a lot more than kids did in the past. Kids will often mention to me some weird thing they’ve learned on Buzzfeed–sea cucumbers dump a whole lot of their insides when they are attacked by predators, another galaxy slammed into the Milky Way in the distant past. I think we’re seeing the emergence of a new kind of shallow but extremely broad digi-literacy. And, my experience of teens has been that they tend to be extremely tolerant and supportive of human diversity generally, which I attribute to social sanction in social media groups. When someone makes an offensive homophobic, sexist, or racist remark, others tend to pile on, and they learn better than to do that.
Yes, there are issues. Students today are gleaners, and they glean a lot, but their knowledge tends to be extremely superficial. yes, it’s fairly rare to find one is a frequent reader, but that has always been the case, and the pushing out of good curricula in English class (e.g., reading great novels) by test prep isn’t helping there. However, here’s another phenomenon that I’ve noticed that results from our students’ living their lives online: When one of them discovers an enthusiasm–Electronic Digital Music, drawing anime characters, heavy metal music, motorcycles, making YouTube videos about makeup tips, or whatever–he or she tends to spend a LOT of time online pursuing that online and rapidly develops considerable expertise. So, there’s a LOT of independent learning going on. It’s just not learning about whatever we’re teaching. I suspect that they are learning something really, really important there–that the Internet is a resource for developing expertise. We read a LOT of Internet horror stories in the media–about the teen texting suicide instructions to a depressed friend; the kid radicalized by some online hate group–but we don’t read about a lot of the good stuff–about online communities of breast cancer survivors encouraging others who have just been diagnosed or folks who are passionate about everything from macrame to Greek cooking.
Our kids freak out when their phones are taken from them. There are reasons for that. Without the phone, they aren’t connected to what they love–other people they care about, stuff they are enthusiastic about. And they’ve grown used to and get a lot out of those connections.
It will be interesting to see how all this plays out. I suspect that the 40 year old who grew up mastering creation of EDM online will put what he or she learned, back then, to some productive and valuable uses. It’s not all Fortnite, folks.
My take: the kids may not ALL be all right, but a LOT of them are. And we should assist them in learning about how to use the web wisely. In particular, we should hold up to them instructive examples of the dangers of isolating oneself on some online Galapagos where extremity evolves, and we should teach them to distinguish between reputable and not-so-reputable sources of information.
LikeLike
Not all tech is harmful. As mentioned above, medical advances are good. Getting information off the web independently is better for students than watching Bugs Bunny cartoons. Having students who are aware of social and environmental issues is progress. What I abhor is sometimes how the web is used by students, but always how the web is used by tech moguls.
The founders of Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google, etc. attack and privatize public schools. They invade public schools. Whether my students benefit more from having a good school library/book room or from having ebooks becomes a moot point when a Broad superintendent tries to spend a billion dollars on iPads and lays off the librarians, and then signs an MOU with Bill Gates agreeing to online testing all year long. Every time we use their websites, we give the CEO/investor class more money and power. We surrender more than our privacy online.
Pandora’s Box is open. That doesn’t just mean there’s a screen in front of nearly every young face; it means that Mark Zuckerberg determines what’s on those screens, and that he has all the money in the world to keep it that way. I don’t trust him. I’ll consider lightening up on my proud Luddism when we break up all the big web companies. Bust the trust.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally, LeftCoastTeacher, hear you on this. Sickening. Evil. Just to say Gates’s name, I have to stifle the reflex to throw up a bit in my mouth.
LikeLike
“when a Broad superintendent tries to spend a billion dollars on iPads and lays off the librarians, and then signs an MOU with Bill Gates agreeing to online testing all year long. ” There are no words fit for how obscene this is!!!!
#&#&^@#*()!!!!!
And there is really something to be said for wandering in a library and pulling random wonders off the shelves. . . .
LikeLike
I agree. Bust the trust.
LikeLike
I want to have students learn to use the web as a tool, like any other. Lord save us from depersonalized education software. It’s crap. Irredeemable crap. But we have a responsibility to teach kids how to wield this astonishing tool that’s available to them. Years ago, before the Internet, I used an online service called Dialog (if I remember correctly) that gave me access to academic publications and message boards. Then, the Mosaic browser. Then the day came that I sat down with my first commercial browser, from Netscape. I play classical and jazz guitar. That first day, I was able to download from a place in Australia sheet music for a guitar transcription of Carolan’s Draught, by the 17th-century Irish harpist Turlough O’Carolan. I thought, “Wow. I’m going to love this.”
Years ago, I edited, typeset, and did illustrations for a physics textbook by Uri Haber-Schaim, who had worked with Fermi in Chicago. Uri told me about how, when television was just becoming a thing in the U.S., he was on a federal government committee driven by the idea of using this new medium to bring the best teachers in the world into every classroom in the country. “Now look at it!” he said. “Look at what it’s become!” There were tears in his eyes. He was distraught and dismayed and horrified at all that loss and broken promise.
It’s our job to teach our kids how to see the web as a tool and how not to be mastered by it. I don’t think we’ve thought enough about how to do that. But ever since one of the Ptolemies created the Library of Alexandria, people have dreamed of the creation of a universal library–a repository of all knowledge. Well, here we are. A student today can go on sacred-texts.com and get immediate access to the wisdom literary of the world, from throughout history. Amazing wealth!!!!
How do we teach them to harness that kind of thing, to become masters instead of the mastered, and, yes, how do we wrest control of the universal library from the oligarchical borg? Profound, important questions, those.
And, ofc, we must resist, resist, resist depersonalized education software–Behaviorist programmed learning in new graphical bottles. That crap always runs a predictable course. First comes the hype. Then, initially, the kids are sort of interested because it’s something new. And then, a week or two in, the kids would rather have a root canal than be forced to work in it. It’s easy to figure out what the Gates’s of the world love this stuff, though. It’s conditioning for Prole children to sit down, shut up, and attend gritfully to whatever inane task the machine hands them in exchange for tokens of approval–training for the servile underclass of the future.
LikeLike
cx: Gateses
LikeLike
I agree, but…. How do we wrest control of a universal library? We don’t. A universal library is by definition a monopoly of information. Someone has to be the universal publisher and universal librarian in control, or the information is as untrustworthy as Wikipedia or Russian hacked social media. There should be, instead of a universal library, universal access to libraries. Unthinkable, I know: Why would we want to deny Google all that personal data to sell? Why would we want Bezos and Musk to pay for brick and mortar libraries instead of the carbon-based rocket fuel to blast Tesla cars into outer space? I say the tech-lash is a long time coming and needs to grow. I’m going to go read a nonfiction paperback now, and fantasize about knowing how to farm. The book I’m reading is about how Thomas Jefferson knew in the 1780s that an industrial society eventually makes lords of manufacturers and serfs of laborers.
LikeLike
The Net, Leftcoast, belongs to everyone. Google is just one of a great many browsers. Aggregators like sacred-texts.com or Project Gutenberg or the Internet Archive or Perseus compile in one place, for easy access, texts in the public domain, but they don’t own them. You can access them for free, download them, do as you wish with them. There are ways to change things so that a few large companies don’t have too much power. One thing we need to do, ofc, is to dump Trump and Ajit Pai and pass strong laws protecting Net Neutrality.
LikeLike
Google’s search algorithms don’t matter?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on and commented:
Important observations about reading actual books and different ways the brain responds to devices.
LikeLike
On the other end of the spectrum is each school, nay, each teacher creating his own curriculum. Why Ms. Ravitch did not report on the recent decision of Chicago public schools to develop their own curriculum despite that other options exist, even free ones like EngageNY. CPS says that its curriculum will take into account the differences of Chicago students — what differences? Do they have two heads or three arms? Every state, district, school and individual teachers spend tons of money for re-inventing the wheel. Unless public schools of all the states in the Union figure out how to come up with a national curriculum, they will be taken over by electronic “individualized learning”.
LikeLike
Many teachers in NY hate Engage, which is Common Core-aligned.
I once was a proponent of a national curriculum. No more. Common Core proved that it is pointless.
No one seems to care that private schools have their own curriculum.
LikeLike
Dunce Me, we must talk of both curriculum and pedagogy. Most curriculum outlines incorporate pedagogical biases. OK, that said, it is extraordinarily important for people to be able to tailor curricula and pedagogy to particular student and teacher needs and interests and for people to be able to introduce innovations in curricula. In the 1970s, to give an example, many middle-school and high-school English teachers in the U.S. subscribed to the English Journal. The pages of this publication were full of suggestions for teaching English from academic specialists, researchers, and classroom practitioners, and often, these were of enormous value. So, for example, one article might be about using sentence combining and extension methods to teach, without the burden of excessive grammatical terminology, syntactic fluency, which is key to reading complex, adult texts (look at the syntax of the first couple lines of the Declaration of Independence–being able to follow the syntax is key to being able to read it). Another article might be about teaching the narrative arcs or structures of folktales, which present, in simplified form, the same sort of arcs and structures that one finds in more sophisticated works like novels. Yet another might present a curated and annotated reading list of great dystopian fictions. Another might describe a structuralist technique for approaching a literary analysis–looking at key binaries (young/old, rule-following/rebellious, rich/poor) in a text and methods for challenging, or deconstructing these (e.g., recognition that the binary exists on a continuum, that there are other alternatives, that there are similarities between the supposed binaries, that the one typically privileged should not be, etc). Another might present research suggesting that memorization and recitation of portions of texts can increase vocabulary and syntactic fluency. Another might present research on presentation of new vocabulary in semantically related domain groupings and in use when studying a particular content domain. Another might explain the ubiquity of so-called “dead metaphor” and the dividends that learning about these can pay in increased sensitivity to nuance in language. Another might describe the artificiality of division of writing into distinct modes (narrative, expository, argumentative, persuasive) and present the case for classification of rhetorical types, in composition classes, into structural types instead of modal types. Another might explain how to do a classic French explication de texte. Another might present research on the connection between socioeconomic class and breadth of vocabulary and syntax encountered by kids prior to going to school and argue for remedial oral language activity. My point is that any particular field–English, mathematics, history, art, science, etc., is not written in stone–there are numerous ways to approach teaching it, and one can approach the content in various ways, as well. It’s entirely possible, for example, to teach most K-12 mathematics from the deck of a sailboat, using nothing but sailing-related problems. There are, literally, hundreds of ways in and out of works of literature (it’s not all David Coleman’s puerile New Criticism Lite)–differing critical schools. The best K-12 math instructor I ever had was one who happened to have a personal interest in logic, set theory, and the foundations of mathematics, and she spent a lot of time straying from the stuff in the textbook and into those areas. We learned a LOT of real mathematics from her. See any Vi Hart video for examples of what I mean by real mathematics, as opposed to the moronic symbol pushing of K-12 mathematics textbooks.
We need, in our classrooms, the ability to innovate in curricula and pedagogy based on personal interests, the needs of particular students, and new insights from research in the fields in which we teach. THE LAST THING WE NEED IS SOME FREAKING FEDERAL OR STATE THOUGHT POLICE. You want to tell me what and how I can teach? Well, I have a response to that, but it involves language that Diane does not allow on her blog.
LikeLike
LikeLike
When some Vichy collaborator with Ed Deform decides that he or she wants to dictate curricula and pedagogy to me, I feel an overwhelming desire to go all zazou on him or her. Vive la résistance!
LikeLike
I often think about how, in the past, when darkness came, people gathered and told stories. And then came print, and they gathered and listened to stories read aloud. And then came radio and they gathered and listened to stories performed by actors. And those all required sustained attention and imagination and were powerfully transporting. The frenetic nature of life online must being having a dramatic cost there. I really would like to see us introduce meditation as a regular discipline in our schools. So many potential benefits from that!!! I tried to do this in my classes once and had parents calling the Assistant Principal to say that Mr. Shepherd was doing some sort of witchcraft or something. LMAO. I love Florida, but it is one very strange and primitive place. . . .
LikeLike
Technology is driving human communication back to the days of cave men.
We are quickly headed back to the days of cave men when people communicated with grunts.
I think I will start an online platform called “Grunter” which allows people to exchange grunts on the topic of the day..
LikeLike
So called “personalized learning” is actually based on a common curriculum.
Twitter is the written version of Grunter
LikeLike
Common Core has us looking at short snippets of reading selections without context. Tech communication becomes shorter and shorter until everything we write is a bird-brained tweet and everything we say is a retrogressive grunt. Soon, no one will be able to say or spell ‘laughter’ — only LOL. Emojis signal the end of human evolution.
LikeLike
Devolution
If Twitter were ’round
When humans evolved
We all would have found
That humans DE-volved
LikeLike
“Virtual Scam”
Virtual English
Virtual math
Virtual things which
Virtual hath
Virtual teacher
Virtual school
Virtual leech here
Virtual tool
LikeLike