William Doyle is living in Finland as a scholar-in-residence at the University of Eastern Finland.
In this post, he describes what Betsy DeVos would learn if she visited Finland.
He writes:
Donald Trump is promoting “school choice” as he vows to improve the American education system. To achieve this vision, he should start by putting his incoming Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos on a plane to world education superpower Finland to see what school choice means in its most powerful form — the choice from among numerous, great, neighborhood schools anywhere in the country.
Just ranked by the World Economic Forum as the No. 1 primary school system globally Finland shows us, that true educational choice means holding politicians accountable to provide families the choice between safe, well-resourced, high-quality local schools, especially in high-poverty areas, schools run by teachers trained at the highest levels of professionalism and supported by a national culture of teacher and school collaboration and respect for families and teachers.
We need to make the teaching profession respected enough to attract and retain the most highly qualified, motivated and passionate young people…and many of the teachers already in America’s schools.
The classroom scene in Finland is strikingly different from prevailing atmosphere reported in many classrooms in America, the U.K. and elsewhere, where teachers are routinely under-trained, micro-managed, surveilled, data-shamed, punished, overworked, disrespected and stressed to the breaking point by politicians, bureaucrats and non-educators….
We must not base our entire system of education on the staggeringly expensive, relentless standardized testing of children by faceless data collectors – make test design, administration and evaluation the job of the real experts – the classroom teachers who know our children best….
For example, Finland has discovered a crucial secret of education: Instead of flooding classrooms with graduates of unaccredited “alternative certifications” or six-week summer training courses as we do in the United States, teaching should be treated much more seriously, like an actual profession that’s critical to our nation’s future. Teaching requires rigorous, graduate-level training in both research and classroom practice.
It is a fantasy to believe, as the newly enacted federal Every Student Succeeds Act proposes, that we can improve our schools by requiring America’s teacher training universities to be evaluated by the standardized test scores of the children who are taught by their graduates. No high-performing school system does things this way.

No, keep her away from Finland. With her wealth, power and influence, she would work to destroy the Finnish school system. The Finns are a very hardy people who stood up to their giant neighbor, the USSR. But DeVos is more insidious, more treacherous than a mere superpower like the former USSR. She is incapable of learning from the Finnish example, her mind is closed, she has her agenda and nothing will change it. If she ever stepped into a Finnish classroom, she would immediately burst into flames and collapse into a heap of smoldering ashes.
LikeLike
Love the “she would immediately burst into flames and collapse into a heap of smoldering ashes…” Perhaps Herr Drumpf’s other appointees could join her?
LikeLike
A one way ticket, please.
LikeLike
But if Finnish education is so great, why do they do such a poor job with kids who are different? Meeting the learning needs of diverse students is a key need in US schools, but it one that Finland struggles with.
LikeLike
Tim, do you have a source for this problem?
LikeLike
DeVos sold her agenda as “improving public education in Michigan”
She hasn’t done that:
“Despite two decades of charter-school growth, the state’s overall academic progress has failed to keep pace with other states: Michigan ranks near the bottom for fourth- and eighth-grade math and fourth-grade reading on a nationally representative test, nicknamed the “Nation’s Report Card.” Notably, the state’s charter schools scored worse on that test than their traditional public-school counterparts, according to an analysis of federal data.
Critics say Michigan’s laissez-faire attitude about charter-school regulation has led to marginal and, in some cases, terrible schools in the state’s poorest communities as part of a system dominated by for-profit operators. Charter-school growth has also weakened the finances and enrollment of traditional public-school districts like Detroit’s, at a time when many communities are still recovering from the economic downturn that hit Michigan’s auto industry particularly hard.”
It isn’t just about opening charter schools. It’s about what happens to public schools in states where ed reformers have dominated for 2 decades now, states like Michigan and Ohio.
They didn’t sell this to the public as “we’ll open a lot of charter schools and hand out vouchers”. They sold this to the public as “improving public education” That’s the measure they should be held accountable on.
I want one of my elected reps in DC to ask DeVos about how PUBLIC schools fared under her agenda. She should not be permitted to limit this to charters and vouchers. That ignores 90% of students in the country.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/betsy-devos-michigan-school-experiment-232399
LikeLike
“Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Education Department, Betsy DeVos, has spent two decades successfully pushing “school choice” in her home state of Michigan — a policy that she and her husband vowed in 1999 would “fundamentally improve education.”
Except the track record in that state shows that it hasn’t.
Despite two decades of charter-school growth, the state’s overall academic progress has failed to keep pace with other states: Michigan ranks near the bottom for fourth- and eighth-grade math and fourth-grade reading on a nationally representative test, nicknamed the “Nation’s Report Card.” Notably, the state’s charter schools scored worse on that test than their traditional public-school counterparts, according to an analysis of federal data.”
Ed reformers promised people in Michigan that if the privatization agenda was followed it would “improve education”. All they’ve done in that state is cut funding and “flood the market” with charter schools. No Michigan kids are better off- not kids in charters and not kids in public schools.
DeVos needs to be asked whether she improved public education in Michigan, NOT how many charters she opened or how many vouchers she plans to hand out.
That’s how ed reformers sold this to the public 2 decades ago and that’s the measure we should use to hold them accountable.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/betsy-devos-michigan-school-experiment-232399
LikeLike
” . . . teaching should be treated much more seriously, like an actual profession that’s critical to our nation’s future.”
LikeLike
Sadly the teaching profession in America is hobbled by self-inflicted wounds. Almost no one here questions progressive education. We are in lockstep with this deeply flawed ideology. The profession is wedded to ideas that do not work well, and that exacerbate the achievement gap. I fear Finland has caught the American progressive-ed contagion. Scores there are dropping. I suspect Finland’s glory days were the result of residual allegiance to old-fashioned ideas about transmitting knowledge that have now given way to the anti-knowledge, child-centrism of the American school of education.
LikeLike
Ponderosa: Though there are nuances of truth in what you say, when understood with all of the other issues involved in education over the years, not much; and “nuanced,” but not really explanatory–sort of like picking one bad orange in a field or orange trees that are at various bloom-to-fruit stages. You could say relatively the same sorts of things about “conservative forces.”
Certainly, an interesting discussion, but not suited for this blog. Also, the treatment of such arguments must be in terms of both development and dialectic–and again (as I mentioned in another note here), the political context of any educational system must be taken into account if a depth of understanding is to be had. Nice try, however.
The oligarchic overreach and encroachment into public education, in which DeVos is but one prime and apparently metastatic example, is the main thing at present; and if DeVos were open to it, a visit to any other kind of school system would probably be an eye-opener–the key variable is: “openness,” which is unfortunately in this case, not a given.
LikeLike
Catherine,
There are basic assumptions, often unquestioned, that teachers operate upon. In the USA, these basic assumptions are “in the air” and also reinforced by education schools which are almost universally, dyed-in-the-wool progressive ed institutions. That is, they preach the idea that lecture is bad, that transmission of knowledge is not a major function of school, that kids are naturally little packages of wonder that must be helped to develop or unfold –not be loaded with stultifying burdens of knowledge that must be learned by heart. Knowledge can be picked up on an ad hoc basis as one gains the real educational gold: thinking, reading and writing skills. This is the progressive ideology, rooted deep in European Romanticism.
This has led to bad outcomes: ignorance about the world we live in. Poor reading ability. Poor writing ability. These bad outcomes are masked at the higher SES levels because upper-class parents transmit knowledge to their kids in myriad ways, compensating for the failures of the schools. But progressive ed mires lower-class kids in ignorance.
Many Old World countries resisted this new-fangled ideology. East Asia has persisted in transmitting knowledge. Ergo, their citizens are less ignorant. France resisted until 1989, when it was infected with American progressivism with the passage of the loi Jospin. Test scores plummeted and the achievement gap, predictably, widened (because professionals’ kids still learned stuff at home, whereas the poors’ kids learned less). The French joined America’s ignorance bandwagon.
I am not an expert on Finland’s curriculum. I would like to know more. But what I’ve read from Pasi Sahlberg and others suggests that they’ve drunk the progressive ed Kool Aid and that they’re about to reap the inevitable result: a more ignorant populace, and a wider achievement gap. Perhaps someone who knows more about Finland’s curriculum can tell me how much meaty content has been in its curriculum in the past and how it has changed over the past two decades.
LikeLike
Ponderosa: Two very brief comments: First, I’ve done no poll in teachers’ colleges, but I taught mostly K-12 teachers returning for their masters degrees in the department of education in a California university for 7 years (and taught in a 4-year college in Va., philosophy and ethics for 5 years and other stints) and none of what you say about teacher education departments was present in my teaching or in the general curricula or suggested texts given by the department. I don’t know what you want to take from that, but there it is.
Second, in my view much of the problems you see in an uneducated public (as a VERY general analysis) is related to the reduction of the whole idea of education to fit naive positivist assumptions (coming forward in the testing mania, an over-focus on “hard” sciences, and a one-size-fits-all ideas flowing from statistical analyses as godlike); and then the systematic elimination of liberal arts, humanities, and history from k-12 curricula–if you cannot see it, it must not be real. Also,from my own experience of it, many of the problems in education, including some related to what you mention, were often resisted by the teachers I worked with over the years, though it didn’t make much different most of the time. Other resistance was about overly top-down controls and lockstep curricula that was sometimes out of developmental order, both of the children and of the curricula. It’s well known in the profession that many teachers leave the profession for such recalcitrant problems. In all of my experience in communication with teachers, I found that virtually all love teaching and they know when a child is learning, and when they are not, and revel in the former.
But again, to much and too nuanced to discuss further here. Let’s move on.
LikeLike
Sending her to Finland would do no good . A one way ticket to the antarctic might solve two problems one being Glacial melt.
LikeLike
But, first DeVos has to listen! Thus, sending her to Finland would do NO GOOD. DeVos would spend that time eating caviar and drinking champagne.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Why Finland has one of the best education systems in the world, and corporate school choice in the United States and the U.K. is a scam run by con artists who are just like Donald Trump.
LikeLike
Sadly I don’t think sending her or any of the Deformers to Finland or any place else that is “really” concerned about educating kids. They care for other things that they want in the whole mess. Things like money, prestige, and their ideology. It’s not about kids.
LikeLike
The danger of sending a Betsy DeVos to Finland is that she might buy the country to squelch the evidence that her ideology is wrong.
LikeLike
What a great idea! In reality, I doubt she’d get it. Too many dollars signs before her eyes to see what’s truly good,
LikeLike
In all seriousness, though, I think a comparative look at the different political situations is called for–the ones that each educational institution “sits” in, in each country/culture? Capitalism, as is particularly practiced and (mal-practiced) in the US (at least), is prone to problems that are of little or no concern to other forms of government. To look at just education is really an exercise in abstraction and, though it can reveal good insights, still, those insights might come into a completely different light when understood in the overall political climate in any concrete culture/country.
LikeLike
For All Those Offering Advice To The Beast —
☞ What Ariadne Said To Theseus
LikeLike
When an company or industry needs to improve its product it DOES not come up with better ways to test the product, but to make the product. If GM wants to improve the quality of the Corvette it does not go out and first build a new test track. No, it first looks at the assembly line and the quality of the manufacturing process, changing methods and procedures as needed to improve quality. Testing a Corvette, that has not first had significant changes in its construction, on a new test-track is the height of folly!!!!
LikeLike