Valerie Strauss posted the full transcript of Hillary’s remarks. It is important to see the context of what she said, which was not to bash schools or to advocate closing them.
Here is the relevant section of her comments:
I’m also going to do everything I can to defend education, and to make it clear that the best way to improve elementary and secondary education is to actually listen to the teachers and educators who are in the classrooms with our students and not scapegoat them and treat them like they don’t have any contribution to make.
And I wanna say a word about small rural schools like this one. Because I know that was the original reason that you all got so excited and why you were stalking presidential candidates. [laughter] And I don’t blame you. And I actually looked up some numbers.
Y’know Iowa has one of the best education systems in the country and has had for a long time. And I believe [applause] — Since I grew up in Illinois, we used to take a test they called the Iowa Basic Test, we used to take that test all the time. I wasn’t happy about it. But we did it because your education system was viewed as one of the best in the country. And your students have I think the second-highest ACT scores in the country. And I looked at the average of what Iowa students have, which is higher than the national average. This school’s students are higher than the Iowa average. [applause]
And so for the life of me, I don’t understand why your state government — and I know Governor Brandstad vetoed the money that would’ve come to help this school, and it was a bipartisan agreement. Y’know those are hard to come by these days. You had a bipartisan agreement in your legislature for more one-time student funding to help deal with some of the financial challenges that districts like this one have.
And Governor Brandstad vetoed it. Yet at the same time you have these laws which require if you have a deficit you may not be able to be a school district. It doesn’t make sense to me. When you- When you- Something is not broke, don’t break it. Right?
And this school district and these schools throughout Iowa are doing a better-than-average job. Now, I wouldn’t keep any school open that wasn’t doing a better-than-average job. If a school’s not doing a good job, then, y’know, that may not be good for the kids. But when you have a district that is doing a good job, it seems kinda counterproductive to impose financial burdens on it.
So the federal government doesn’t have a whole lot to do with this, this is mostly state and local decision-making. Very little, less than 10 percent I think maybe 7 percent or so of the money that’s used to run schools in Iowa comes from the federal government. So therefore this is primarily a state issue.
But as president what I’m looking for are schools that exceed expectations. And I don’t care whether they’re urban, suburban, or rural. And where there are small districts like this one, I know you’ve got online opportunities, and maybe there should be exploration about how you can also share teachers and all the rest of it.
But I am very partial toward districts that are doing well. And from everything I can tell, this one is.
And so I hope that you’re able to work through whatever your financial and political challenges are with the state government, and at least have a fighting chance to keep providing the quality of education that produces students like these three young women. I meet a lot of students and you can be very proud of not only them but I’m sure so many others for the way they present themselves, the way they conduct themselves, and how effective they have been in making their case.
So when we talk about rural development, you’ve gotta also talk about rural education. And I think we’ve gotta go hand in hand, and maybe Tom [Vilsack] will have something more to say about this. Because if we’re gonna diversify the rural economy, we wanna make sure that we have the best possible schools in order to produce the students and the adults that are going be part of that new economy, particularly when it comes to clean energy in Iowa.
I also believe we need to do more on early childhood education. A lot of kids are not prepared when they come to school and they never catch up. So I would like to see us try to help, starting with the most disadvantaged kids, to give them a better early head start, a better universal kindergarten experience so that they can be successful.
And then on the other end we’ve gotta make college affordable, which it isn’t right now for a lot of hardworking families. And I have a whole plan about how to do that. I want to make tuition debt-free so you don’t have to borrow money if you go to a public college or university, and I wanna help anybody who has debt — anybody here have some student debt? yep — I wanna help you refinance that student debt the way you can with a mortgage or a car payment. Right now you can’t, and we oughta be able to get the cost down. [applause] You can save thousands of dollars if we do that for you.
And I personally don’t think the federal government should be making money off of lending money to students and families for kids to go to college and get their education. So we’re gonna change a lot of what is now the kind of challenges that people face when it comes to getting enough funding to go to college.

Clinton should not have made that comment. Period.
LikeLike
It was a punitive comment, not one of support for schools but of NCLB-tinged “accountability” mindset. She missed the opportunity to consistently support schools in her speech.
LikeLike
I think everyone but the few hundred of us who have obsessively worked on this issue for the past few years have a NCLB-tinged vocabulary. It is good to respond and push back but I think that attacking those who are in the best position to help our cause, and who have said a lot to show they will, is counterproductive. I find it strange, too, that activists have been so forgiving of Bernie Sanders both for failing to articulate support for public schools and also for voting for more testing. This is what campaigns are about: candidate’s statement, public responds and hopefully shapes candidate’s position.
LikeLike
Karen,
“. . . I think that attacking those who are in the best position to help our cause. . . ”
Clinton is not helping “our cause”. She would be as bad as Obama, if not worse which puts her on the same level as Georgie the Least Bushie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If Clinton becomes president, she will appoint the next US secretary of education. She needs to feel the public backlash from her clueless statements. As it is, she is taking funding from the likes of Eli Broad, who as of Dec 17 in the WSJ is satisfied to compare her to an up-and-coming Arne Duncan. I am only a potential vote for Hillary, but Broad is (and has been) a fat purse.
Not sure where you consider the line between “pushing back” and “attacking,” but I am short on varnish, and I can’t seem to find my go-soft-on-corporate-Dems, gentle-stroke brush.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are right…it was a Freudian slip in the punitive approach
LikeLike
deutsch29: “It was a punitive comment, not one of support for schools but of NCLB-tinged ‘accountability’ mindset. She missed the opportunity to consistently support schools in her speech.”
While ultimately actions speak louder than words, words count. A lot. And, IMHO, your observations are simply a sober and fair assessment of her remarks.
That said, I welcome all responses to this posting.
In that spirit, I sincerely thank everyone for contributing to the discussion here and on previous relevant postings.
😎
LikeLike
Mercedes is absolutely right. Clinton revealed her NCLB bias in her spontaneous advocacy for closing public schools “below average,” a ridiculous, uninformed policy statement. The rush of corporate media, media handlers, campaign staffers, and bloggers to rescue Hillary and spin it into oblivion only shows that Hillary has nothing to offer our terribly beleaguered public schools under attack for so long now. Ms. Wolfe’s attempt below to change the subject by critiquing Bernie Sanders is a rhetorical ploy that won’t work b/c Bernie did not get the carte blanche rushed endorsement of both teacher union chiefs, Randi and Lily, so Hillary has certainly a higher standard to meet, given her taking huge donations from the biggest enemy of public education, Eli Broad.
LikeLike
“Reformian Slip”
Reformian slip
Is what she made
A thoughtless rip
For which she paid
LikeLike
Read the whole text of what Hillary said. How did she get from the Iowa tests were great to the government shouldn’t be making money off of student loans? She is a classic politician. She will will advocate for online testing and the funding issues will continue with those unfunded mandated costs and related privacy issues.
Hey, if she brings back the paper and pencil Iowa test she has my vote!
LikeLike
Thank you! And why are people trying to defend her? I don’t understand the energy being put into defending her. We really believe any candidate will be good for public education.
LikeLike
Thank you, Mercedes.
Karen wolf, it’s just a howling lie that Bernie Sanders hasn’t articulated a strong position on public education. Please stop repeating it, even after people post links and citations.
Here’s my personal favorite, Oct 3 at the MTA Bargaining Summit.
LikeLike
this changes nothing for me
LikeLike
Obama has a terrible record on education, manifested by the presence of Arne Duncan and Bill Gates. Since criticism from republicans has been so light, there is a temptation to simply ignore the issue, particularly as it pertains to charter schools. Doing so would be a sin of omission by Hillary…She should weigh carefully whether she is being pragmatic against just how serious a sin it is to take for granted teachers who teach in public schools.
LikeLike
Again, here’s why the “context” doesn’t make it any better: http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2015/12/speedy-defense-of-clinton-no-defense-at.html#comment-form
She said what she said. She’s a seasoned politician, she knew what she was doing. She can walk it back, contextualize it, justify it all she wants, but it doesn’t change what she said. It frightens me that educators – who have experience 7 years of “liberal” Obama after all his education promises – are so willing to give Hillary a pass when she has made her agenda blatantly clear (much clearer than Obama ever made his). So go ahead, defend her, vote for her, whatever, but just don’t complain about her after the election.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad she isn’t running for any state legislative seat where she would have the chance to close below-average schools. Thank goodness that if she becomes president, she won’t be able to have such a detrimental effect on schools.
#heavysarcasmalert
LikeLike
It’s completely unsurprising to me to find that, in the context of the whole speech, the single sentence that has been highlighted was a kind of weird gaff.
It’s still a gaff, and it’s still something she shouldn’t have said, because it was a flatly stupid thing to say.
The gaff itself isn’t something I took too seriously before reading the whole transcript, and so reading the whole transcript doesn’t really change my opinion (in that I wasn’t rage-filled about what was obviously a dumb gaff, in the first place).
So, thanks for providing the full text. It doesn’t provide any defense for the gaff, but for those who thought that sentence was somehow the whole point of Clinton’s speech, it at least dispels that notion…
LikeLike
The website Truthout, has “words” about Hillary and Black Rock, which is the whale, among asset management firms. The Truthout article reports Black Rock is the major shareholder in 40% of publicly traded U.S. companies. It is one of the top shareholders in all major U.S. banks.
LikeLike
A former Black Rock vice-president is the Director of the Charter School Institute at SUNY. She was an Education Pioneer Fellow and is a graduate of the Rockefeller College at the University of Albany.
The first name listed, in the “Lead National” support (funding tab) for “Pioneers” is the Waltons. A press release, at the Gates Foundation webpage, announced, on Sept, 2015, a grant of $7.6 million to “…Pioneers”. A “…Pioneers” webpage is titled, “Gates Alumni Consultancy”. Other “…Pioneers” ‘ webpages describe “collaboration with the Broad Center and with the Strategic Data Project, at Harvard”. The founder of “…Pioneers” is a Stanford Law School graduate.
IMO, the only “pioneering” connection there is, involving public education’s takeover by America’s richest 0.2%, is the Donner Party. The financial sector and, imagination-limited tech moguls, cannibalize the children of the 99%, in other words, put them in a “human capital pipeline” that they designed. But, the privatizers and corporatizers, are worse than the Donner Party, because their bellies are already full, from robbing labor of its rewards, from productivity gains.
Where Clinton stands on the issue will determine whether she is an American, who believes in democracy or, an oligarch.
LikeLike
And I’ll say it again. Two words: Bernie Sanders.
LikeLike
It almost sounds like she is advocating for merit funding.
LikeLike
“What I’m looking for are schools that exceed expectations.”
Whose expectations?
Who gets to decide?
To me, this sounds just like the same old mindset that brings us stack ratings of anything that can be measured, a mindless use of “effective” (about 250 uses in ESSA) and “high quality” this or that and so on.
LikeLike
I prefer Bernie Sanders. If Sanders who attended public schools can’t even give a nod of endorsement to public education, we are in deep trouble. As for Hillary, she is the total political package. She wants to please all the people all the time, and that may be why she flip flops so much. She can’t be worse than Obama! While we have no way to know what she will do, I do know as a state senator she made no hostile moves against public schools.
LikeLike
As usual, Bernie’s just not getting the media attention he deserves (similar to teacher’s voices, not so coincidentally). But here’s a snippet:
The billionaires aren’t giving away their campaign contributions for nothing. They expect a return. Campaign Finance Reform is the most important political and social issue of our time, imo.
LikeLike
I just worry that the focus on the federal level is not as effective as a focus on the state level.
People in Louisiana would know more about this than I do (I’m in Ohio) but didn’t the new Louisiana governor run on supporting public schools? That’s what local media said- the guy ran on support for public education. Not “ed reform”. A positive agenda for existing systems of public education.
Jindal hid behind Duncan when Jindal/Duncan agenda and practice became both obvious and unpopular, but the state candidate who won didn’t do that- he said “I will support public schools” and he won.
That seems like something to pay attention to – if there’s a disconnect between DC and the states, if DC and the “national movement” love ed reform much more than people in states who actually rely on public schools love ed reform then that’s a good indicator for public schools. So far it’s Louisiana and Pennsylvania- two governors who ran on pro-active, positive SUPPORT for public schools. Could there be more state level ed reformers who are vulnerable on these issues?
LikeLike
Union leaders perpetually ask us to dwell on the empty words of politicians they support. It’s pretty remarkable they now ask us to ignore these.
LikeLike
Arthur, that’s because unions – ours – have been in business for themselves.
Say hello to Christopher Powers for me . . .
LikeLike
1984- Hilary Clinton was an ed-reformer in Arkansas punishing teachers and schools based on test scores… and her husband passed the highest tax increase on the people during that time to pay for it… read more here… 1/2 way down… http://weaponsofmassdeception.org/1-drill-and-kill-fake-tests/1-2-rise-of-the-toxic-test-scammers
LikeLike
When Bill Clinton was governor in Arkansas, ed reform led to the closing of 50 small rural districts. This was the equivalent of closing neighborhood schools in urban areas today. The poorest and least powerful have their one public asset, the heart of their community taken away. Democratic control fades and rural resentment festers. http://www.fayobserver.com/archives/first-lady-s-last-project-brought-school-changes/article_2a919f16-4f44-50df-8576-22e74fc4985a.html
LikeLike
Let’s not forget it was Bill Clinton that signed the New Market Tax Credits law in 2000. This law drives much of the reckless for profit charters. Without this law there would be a lot less speculation in charters.
LikeLike
The plan…. from years and years ago. Thanks Hillary! Yes, we really believe you have students and teachers and respect in mind! Marc Tucker was her good friend. http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/marc_tucker/marc_tucker_letter.html
LikeLike
Sorry, this changes nothing for me. It is time to hold politicians and union leaders accountable for the mess public education has become, and Randi and Hillary are right up there with Obama, Arne, Rahm, Corey, and the rest of the neoliberals who have their hands in the pockets of Wall Street and are behind the privatization/profiteering of public education..
If anyone from Hillary’s campaign is listening, hear me now: I will NOT vote for HRC simply because she isn’t as bad as the Republicans. You do NOT have my vote because “what are you going to do, vote for the other guys?” isn’t going to scare you my vote anymore. I would rather sit this one out and watch the Republicans run everything into the ground than to hold my nose and vote for someone who won’t be as bad.
And I vote every election cycle. Primaries and general. I have also taken part in Get Out the Vote movements. No more. Not for neolibs and Republican-lites.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
What did Hillary Clinton really say about closing public schools?
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders. Period.
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
Bernie has my vote!
LikeLike
It didn’t take me very far into the ‘complete speech’ to see that she equated educational ‘success’ with standardized test scores. No more reading was necessary.
LikeLike
As someone who has lived/taught in a small, rural district the past four years, I believe that there has to be some balance in these discussions of closure. While the situations may parallel the closure of “neighborhood schools” in major cities, in many situations the closure of a small, rural district signals the end of an entire town and community.
In Arkansas, you can drive through towns that have lost districts, and the aesthetic alone is alarming. Many of these school districts serve as the largest employer; therefore, consolidating districts quickly swallows up whole townships.
These areas are diminishing due to economic forces, though, and the school districts are often the last vestige of an already-depleted employment landscape. Consolidation often provides more resources to schools and students, also, as resources can be focused and produce a wider effect.
My entire teaching career [which is admittedly young] has taken place at schools on the verge of closure, in communities fretting the consequences of this final domino. It is important that these discussions take place knowing the severity of these decisions, and how detrimental closures would be to entire communities. Yet consideration also must be placed in the resources and opportunities made available to students, especially with an eye towards preparing them for the future.
More than anything, though, these discussions should be grounded in compassion and complexity, as the “right” decision may be only 50.1% good. There are arguments to be made on both sides, and we should create a space for discussion in which all voices are considered. “School closure” can be good and bad [I would definitely lean towards bad in the current culture of education reform and charter replacement], so our rhetoric should match that reality.
LikeLike
Marcus Luther: thank you for contributing to this thread.
😎
LikeLike
Agreed, Marcus. Which brings us to what supports public education: The public. Tax dollars.
This election is also about the outsourcing of jobs and the offshore tax havens of mega rich corporations. It’s about using tax dollars wisely (e.g.; what’s so great about spending billions on testing?).
LikeLike
Downright incredible, how people parse every sentence a candidate utters, using the old subject-verb-predicate approach, and then complain because candidates aren’t “nuanced” in their comments. Everything political has to be formulated in binary mode — black/white, yes/no, up/down, right/left. Otherwise, you just don’t get it.
As a policy objective, “close under-performing schools” is completely unremarkable. What — you’re advocating keeping under-performing schools open? Why? Some kind of full-employment program for under-performing teachers and administrators? Really didn’t think that one through, did you?
A shame that so many people are so locked into the binary mode of comprehension, that they’ve become incapable of thinking about a candidate,and a candidate’s statements, in any way other than the way presented to them by their media of choice. Hillary Clinton worked in various venues of child advocacy for 30 years before becoming a legislator. She literally wrote some of the case law for children’s rights. Perhaps, among you, one, or even two, might find that to be relevant information. For the rest,well — I say that relying on headlines and first-paragraph summaries as the basis of your political decisions is unbecoming.
LikeLike
Maybe if you could define “underperforming schools”…? And what’s your argument against improving said “underperforming schools” rather than closing them? Why disrupt students, parents, teachers, etc. like that?
LikeLike
Dienne: what you said.
😎
LikeLike
Couldn’t have said it better, Dienne. The mechanisms of measuring “school performance” are severely flawed [as evidenced and exacerbated by the frequent changes they have undergone recently], and improvement seems to be an empowering gesture, rather than a disempowering one.
LikeLike
To put Hillary Clinton in context, look at who funds her. Also look at Bernie’s platform in comparison: virtually every decent Hillary proposal is a “weak tea” version of Bernie’s policy points.
Bernie: Free higher public ed
Hillary: Let’s make college somewhat cheaper
Bernie: Universal Healthcare, and regulate pharmaceutical industry
Hillary: Get more people on private insurance
Bernie: Break up the big banks
Hillary: Tell Wall Street to “cut it out” (quoting first debate)
Bernie: Attack structural racism and completely reform police departments
Hillary: ??? tell people to stop being racist and for victims to wait around for things to improve (search for video of her meeting with BLM)
Bernie: Spoke out and acted in support of LGBT for decades
Hillary: Completely changed her mind a few years ago (that gay people deserve to get married too)
Bernie: Let’s guarantee several weeks of paid family and medical leave
Hillary: Unclear, but implied on debate night that a $1/week tax raise is not worth these benefits
Bernie: Wants to “lead the world” in reversing climate change and transforming energy system. Gives clear and continuous NO” about Keystone pipeline.
Hillary: Was “undecided” on Keystone XL until the last minute, or arguably a supporter of the effort (depending on your sources/perspective)
Bernie: Only go to war as a last resort. Support Arab efforts in Middle East. We aren’t the world police.
Hillary: Voted for the pointless Iraq war on little evidence. Send in heavier military forces today and establish dangerous no fly zones.
Bernie: Doesn’t take big money, unswayed by lobbyists.
Hillary: Among the richest politicians due to big money donations. Only “says” that their money will not sway her.
Bernie: writes and compromises on legislation that supports veterans
Hillary: ??? occasionally says she supports veterans (fill me in here, she rarely talks about it)
Bernie: Openly opposes bad free trade deals that sends jobs abroad.
Hillary: Undecided on TPP until the last minute. Answer would have been clear all along to someone who supports environmental efforts over profit or political favors.
Bernie: Denounces efforts at privacy intrusion and censorship. Votes against recent bill that includes massive loopholes for corporations and government to invade privacy and anonymity, and sell personal information.
Hillary: Calls for “manhattan-like project” for govt/tech to work together on… what problem exactly??? Do a search for Edward Snowden’s thoughts on Hillary’s comment on internet privacy at the 3rd debate.
Bernie: Close tax loopholes, end corporate welfare.
Hillary: Doesn’t talk about this much, her past actions and campaign contributers do not support the same.
Bernie: Virtually ignored, if not negatively spun, by mainstream media.
Hillary: Lots of good words coming from the mainstream media about Hillary.
Bernie: Always educating people on the issues.
Hillary: Assures people that she is smart enough to handle it.
Bernie: Always called himself a progressive.
Hillary: Says she is a centrist or a progressive (depending on when you ask her)
Bernie: Wants a political revolution, calls on us to all stand up and become engaged in the political process.
Hillary: Simply wants you to vote for her. She’ll take it from there… just like Obama did.
Do we want to change this country, or tweak the little stuff and maybe get lucky? If you want fundamental change that will benefit for the vast majority of our people, context makes the choice more clear.
The last word is BERNIE!
LikeLike
“Answer would have been clear all along to someone who supports environmental efforts over profit or political favors.”
-meant to put this in the section with Keystone, though exchange terms “environmental” with “worker rights and wages” and same applies for TPP.
LikeLike
Yep. This one’s key:
“Bernie: Virtually ignored, if not negatively spun, by mainstream media.
Hillary: Lots of good words coming from the mainstream media about Hillary.”
The billionaires (who own the media) don’t like Bernie. They don’t own him.
LikeLike
I guess I’m trying to understand the effort being taken to defend her? She will not be good for our children in public education. Just like some proponents are now realizing that essa is a bad bill, let’s not have buyers remorse here as well.
Let’s promote a people’s movement and not a corrupt political system. Hillary is corrupt and this is NOT about compromise. It’s about those with money making the decisions.
LikeLike
A gaffe, obviously, but still perhaps a telling one. I’m with Mercedes on this, and the many commenters who point out that unlike Sanders she is taking a lot of money from a lot of very rich people, and she and her husband have a long record of what I see as bad decisions. (Also, much less significantly, while I really want to vote for a woman for president, I also really wish that our first woman president weren’t going to be a previous president’s wife (I really, really wish Warren were running!))
LikeLike
After Obama’s flip flop, how are we to believe any politician? Hillary has fudged the truth many times…..remember how she recalled being shot at while visiting a war zone. Maybe she shares Brian Williams flawed memories.
I think that sound byte is important because there’s meaning behind it and must be fully explained. The fact that some Right-wing thrash blog reported it and spun it out of control doesn’t negate the statement.
Her ties to Randi who herself is a Reformer pretending to be a union leader sends chills up my spine.
Bernie may seem better for education, but so did deBlasio. What a disappointment he turned out to be. Too bad education was not a major discussion during the debate.
LikeLike
“…And this school district and these schools throughout Iowa are doing a better-than-average job. Now, I wouldn’t keep any school open that wasn’t doing a better-than-average job. If a school’s not doing a good job, then, y’know, that may not be good for the kids. But when you have a district that is doing a good job, it seems kinda counterproductive to impose financial burdens on it.”
Yes she did say her powers are limited…but there’s no getting around the quoted statement. Right down to the “…impose financial burdens on it.” at the end. Those below average schools are a burden on the economy. Close ’em down!!!
Btw: we ALL took those Iowa Achiement tests, throughout the nation. Once a year. Not “all the time”…which is what is happening with testing nowadays. And we were told not to take them too seriously, which really disappointed me, as I’d ranked in the top 99th percentile. 😦
LikeLike
Are the Hillary supporters say it was ok for her to say schools should be saved from this governor if they are performing well? This is in-context and horrible. The schools that are not performing well need MORE help than the others. And how does she measure performance? Tests.
So Hillary is clearly running on Test-and-Punish but is also doing what she always does, pandering. She was working the crowd by saying you guys are extra-special because your test scores are high.
This is why the Bernie approach is long overdue. Bernie believes ALL schools will benefit if we correct basic economic inequity. Perhaps even more important than this is Bernie’s fight to end corporate influence in our politics. Hillary meanwhile is feeding at the trough.
To the commenter who believes Bernie voted for tests, you should read the statement by his spokesman Phil Fiermonte. Bernie not only objected to the accountability part of the Murphy amendment, he co-sponsored a bipartisan bill to replace testing with alternative assessments in a 7-state pilot. His website has said since April he wants to do away will bubble tests, and the only reason more people don’t know about this is because the media is biased and run by corrupt corporations.
LikeLike
Hear, hear!!!
With you all the way on all four paragraphs, Jake.
Vote Bernie Sanders!
LikeLike
“To the commenter who believes Bernie voted for tests, you should read the statement by his spokesman Phil Fiermonte. Bernie not only objected to the accountability part of the Murphy amendment, he co-sponsored a bipartisan bill to replace testing with alternative assessments in a 7-state pilot.”
Got a link to this?
I’ve heard similar from Bernie, and yet we’ve had some teacher-bloggers spreading panic that Bernie “voted for the Murphy amendment.”
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren both voted for the Murphy Amendment, which would have preserved the punishments for schools and teachers tied to test scores. I wrote a few posts about this at the time (July 16). The Democrats believed that they were supporting accountability by preserving the George W. Bush legacy. They were responding to a statement by civil rights groups that defended high stakes testing and accountability. I expect that if Hillary had been in the Senate, she would have voted for the Murphy amendment too. The Democratic Party lost its education agenda when Obama and Duncan shaped Race to the Top and their policies became the same as the GOP.
LikeLike
On the Murphy amendment: Almost all its supporters were Democrats. It represented the worst of NCLB. How did Democrats become convinced that teachers needed to be threatened to do their jobs? I am convinced that both Democrats and the civil rights leaders were hoodwinked.
Here is the roll call vote:
LikeLike
I agree with Ed that we shouldn’t focus on this one issue of the Murphy Amendment. The fact that Bernie isn’t taking in the funding from the billionaires and super PACs while Hillary is, tells me all I need to know.
I keep coming back to that little quip concerning taking the Iowa Achievement tests “all the time”. Think of how things have changed. We only took that test once a year and were told that it was meaningless to us, as students. That’s the only test we took. And we did well.
Compare that to what’s happening, now.
LikeLike
Here’s one, Ed. I read that gadflyonthewall article, as well, and found this link:
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-panel-advances-education-bill
LikeLike
They did vote for Murphy and I remember those posts. I believe there is more to it than that, and getting hyper-focused on that vote would be misleading. There is a strong level of deception coming from the ed “reform” agenda and Bernie has not been immune (or there are likely factors contributing to this vote we do not know about). Regardless, teachers must see the big picture in the Hillary vs Bernie battle, on education and otherwise.
It’s hard to take a break, isn’t it Diane? Not when you feel you must fight. I know the feeling.
LikeLike
Thanks. I’ll keep looking for details. In the meantime, I have no doubt that Bernie would make a better education president than Hillary: http://ed-detective.org/bernie-sanders/
LikeLike