Jim Arnold is a retired educator. He explains why the people of Mississippi should vote for Act 42. And he shows how politicians in the state legislature have conspired to confuse voters with a similarly-named copy-cat initiative that protects the status quo. He notes that Georgia has been playing the same game with the public: pushing to privatize the public schools while starving them of necessary resources.
He writes:
Propositional Situations
I am a native of Mississippi, and credit Mrs. Moore from Raines ES in Jackson with instilling an interest in learning and reading that continues to this day. I was fortunate enough to attend Raines ES, Hardy Jr. High School, Provine HS, and Ole Miss. Mrs. Moore was my 6th grade teacher, and believed in me to the point that meeting her expectations became one of the driving forces in my life. Mr. Bickley at HJHS and Mr. Kenney at Provine taught me about music and about life, and Mrs. Mrs. McBride at Provine told me I would never be a mathematician but she was pretty sure I had learned enough Algebra II not to hurt myself. My brothers and I all attended public schools in Mississippi, my nephews and niece are graduates of Mississippi public schools and there are more relatives than I can count that can all attribute at least part of what they have achieved in life to public education in the Magnolia state. All of us are thankful for the opportunities that public education provided.
I served in public education as a Band Director for 20 years, the majority of my teaching career spent in Alabama and Georgia. I am now a recovering school administrator, and retired in 2013 after an additional 19 years as a high school Principal and Superintendent of Schools in Georgia. I believe strongly in public education, and you can read some of my writings on a variety of educational topics at http://www.drjamesarnold.com.
In reading about Initiative 42 currently before Mississippi voters I noticed some similarities about the debate concerning public education in Mississippi and in Georgia. Legislators in both states insist on attempting to legislate excellence in education without the advice of teachers. They consistently advance ideas to “fix” public education in the mistaken and misguided belief that 1) public education is irreparably broken, 2) privatization is preferable to local control of schools and 3) that the only expertise needed to solving educational issues is that found in their own school experience. Public education is and has been succeeding at a far greater rate and to a far greater degree than state legislatures and ALEC would have you believe. The National Center for Education Statistics reports that the high school graduation rate for 2012 was 80% nationwide. Yes there are disparities in graduation rates in places, and no, not everyone is achieving at high levels. The idiocy of “college and career ready” expectations for all students flies in the face of human nature and ignores the obstacles of life – poverty, illness, family, addiction and too many others to name – that confront students of all ages at every level. If any other profession achieved anywhere close to 80% of anything there would be dancing in the streets and proclamations honoring those that helped achieve that goal. Teachers, on the other hand, have suffered underfunding, privatization, higher expectations and blame for not reaching the remaining 20%. Of course there are improvements that can be made, and of course there are schools that do not come close to that 80% level, but taken as a whole the notion that success can only mean 100% of anything is foolish and counter-intuitive.
Initiative 42, initiated by the Better Schools, Better Jobs group in Mississippi, collected almost 200,000 signatures from Mississippians in every county to place the initiative on the ballot for November 3. The language of the initiative is straightforward and simple, and calls for the Mississippi Legislature to follow the law it enacted in 1997 under the Mississippi Adequate Education Program to fund public education. Since the passage of that law, the Legislature has seen fit to follow its own rules only twice, and since 2009 has underfunded public education and the legislature’s own law by over 1.5 billion dollars. Folks in Georgia can relate to that. Since 2003, Georgia Governors Perdue and Deal have underfunded their own public educational system to the tune of over 8 billion dollars in spite of the funding levels supposedly required by the Georgia Quality Basic Education formula. The primary difference is that Georgia calls these reductions Austerity Cuts. These cuts have continued on an annual basis even though the Governor touts a resurgence of the state economy and tax collections. Imagine that…expecting politicians to follow the laws that other politicians have passed. One Mississippi Legislator even commented “it’s not fair to expect the Legislature to follow laws that other legislatures passed years ago.” Try using that argument when you figure up your state taxes in January. While it’s true that money does not guarantee success, one Mississippi legislator noted “the absence of money just about guarantees failure.” He’s right. People – and Legislators – put money in what they believe in. If everything else comes before educational funding then everything else comes before education. Like Momma said “cheap only looks good once.”
So rather than allow the voters to decide on the success or failure of Initiative 42 on its own merits, the Mississippi Legislature came up with its own alternative to that plan and placed it on the same ballot for voters. The name of that plan, interestingly enough, is Initiative 42a. Simply put, it exempts the Legislature from following its own law if they really don’t want to. And they don’t. What politicians fail to prevent, they obfuscate. Voters, in order to vote for either plan, have to answer in the affirmative to an initial question about whether or not they would like to vote “yes” or “no” on an initiative. Then, if they vote yes, they get to decide whether vote for Initiative 42 – the one supported by 200,000 signatures – or Initiative 42a – the one stuck in at the last minute by politicians determined to do whatever they think is best, and the public ought to keep its nose out of what they consider to be their business. Let me say it again in case you missed it the first time – what politicians fail to prevent, they obfuscate. Georgia Legislators are pretty good at that, too. The Gov has proposed a plan to allow the state to “take over” schools that he determines are failing, place them under the control of an administrator that he appoints that reports directly to him, set up at untold cost a new and separate school district run by him and his cronies and guaranteed to remove the local control of those schools from the communities that surround them.
Quick – name a state or Federal program that’s a model of success, financial efficiency and achievement…how about the DMV? No, wait a minute – how about the state tax code or the IRS? No, how about…nevermind. You see the dilemma. Like the President and Arne Duncan proposing national solutions for public education when their kids go to private school or the US Congress deciding ACA is a great idea for you but they would rather not be subject to it, solutions on a state and national scale to what is essentially a local concern have never worked and will never succeed but politicians always try to convince us THEY know the One True Answer that will guarantee success for all. That such a thing as allowing communities to solve their own problems for their own kids that never seems to enter the minds of politicians. They talk about it and give it lip service and issue thousands of sound bytes and position papers but really don’t trust you – or me – to make decisions about what’s best for our kids in our communities because they think they know what’s best for us, and what’s best for us is to shut up and do what they say.
I hope the voters in Mississippi are smart enough to see that, in spite of the rhetoric, their Legislators are more concerned with their own influence and power than they are about the education of your kids. I hope the same thing when Georgians go to vote on the Governor’s attempt to change the Georgia Constitution to set up his own little school district without the interference of those pesky teachers and voters. Politicians have never let the truth stand in the way of getting what they want. (“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan” ring a bell?) The Legislature’s insistence on accountability for everyone except themselves would be laughable if the consequences were not so severe for students, teachers and schools working diligently every day to overcome the effects of poverty. They continue to enact, through a series of proscriptive laws and budgetary manipulations, a process that is designed to dismantle the system that offers hope for many in the name of using public money to pay for the education of the privileged few as if public schools and students were only there to allow someone the opportunity to make a gigantic profit. Their abandonment of public education will only serve to keep those dependent upon public education as a traditional lifeline as uneducated as possible for as long as possible.
Once again, teachers and public education are not the problem, they are the solution. Sooner or later even legislators must see it’s not about race, it’s about poverty; it’s not about a test score, it’s about student achievement; it’s not about a standardized curriculum, it’s about good teaching; it’s not about the business model, it’s about personalization; it’s not about competition, it’s about cooperation. Sadly, we voted these people into office. Perhaps it’s time we began to rectify that mistake.

Mississippi seems to be perennial contender for the dubious honor of having the worst schools in the country. I wish it were otherwise.
LikeLike
Excellent! I absolutely love your last paragraph. Thank you for you insights.
LikeLike
Mr. Arnold, my career path is nearly parallel to yours but in NY State. I have also been a band director, principal, superintendent and am now retired. You have written perhaps the most erudite assessment of the educational issues teachers, administrators, students and parents are facing in this tragic time for public education.
Yes, poverty is the greatest threat to students’ ability to access those programs being made available to them by the wonderful providers who struggle with inadequate funding and misguided policies. NYS is better funded but we were also penalized by the GEA (Gap Elimination Adjustment) through which the state budget shortfall was adjusted by reducing school aid. The money has never been restored. We also struggle with the impact of charter schools on our funding, enrollments and results.
In my 38 years as an educator, I have never seen the likes of what we are now facing. Your words are a powerful message to those who have the ability to stop the hemmoraging, but only if the voters heed them. For the sake of the children, I pray that they do.
LikeLike
“I was fortunate enough to attend Raines ES, Hardy Jr. High School, Provine HS, and Ole Miss. Mrs. Moore was my 6th grade teacher, and believed in me to the point that meeting her expectations became one of the driving forces in my life.”
I don’t think I’ll ever understand people who attended public schools as children (which were obviously paid for by the adults at the time) who don’t feel they have to pay for public schools for the next generation. I just assumed when I reached adulthood it would be my turn. My school was paid for by a group of adults, hence I would be paying when I was an adult. That’s the deal.
Apparently there’s a whole group of adults who think the public schools they attended as children ran on fairy dust or something, because they don’t seem to want to pay now that it’s their turn.
LikeLike
It’s fun to read what Arne Duncan would do with a big bunch of money if he had it:
“Obviously, this isn’t the only way you could redirect funds to attract and keep more great talent in the most challenged schools. Alternatively, you could take just a quarter of the $15 billion and use it to support teacher leadership, creating five positions at each of those high-poverty schools for accomplished teachers who’d mentor their peers—and giving those teachers $25,000 pay increases.”
Wasn’t RttT +/- 5 billion? Why didn’t he just do this when he had the money in 2009 instead of blowing it on the silly VAM and all the experts and consultants?
http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/investing-teachers-instead-prisons
LikeLike
Chiara,
Are you talking about giving merit raises to teachers? I have come to understand by reading this blog that meritocracy is a no no in the teaching profession.
LikeLike
Raj,
Please define meritocracy for us. Who does it include, who does it exclude? And on what metrics is that discrimination among those who are part of a supposed meritocracy based? What is(are) the controlling standard(s) to determine those metrics of meritocracy? Who determines the metrics of meritocracy? How is the pay scale related to the metrics of meritocracy scale? There are many more questions I could ask but let’s just start with those, eh!
TIA,
Duane
LikeLike
I;’m not talking about anything. Arne Duncan is talking about paying teachers who work in challenging districts 25k a year more.
I’m wondering why he didn’t just do that when he had 5 billion dollars. By now he would know if it “worked” and we could have skipped 7 years of competitive grants for 500 different things, none of which were big enough or focused enough to have an impact.
I’m on a school committee and they tell me the single biggest problem for low income students in my district is attendance. He could have spent 5 billion there- how do we get them to school?
He comes up with simple, focused plans now, after he spent 5 billion dollars and has a month left in his term?
LikeLike
Here’s the problem, Raj. How do you define teaching ‘merit’?
A test? (Horsepucky). An administrator’s star of approval? (Horsepucky). In fact, the ‘merit’ of a teacher isn’t evident until many years after the class is taught. AND, Raj, the same teacher that was ‘excellent’ for you might have been a disaster for someone else. No teacher (even me) is great for everyone.
LikeLike
Raj, I would vote for a President who said “all I’m going to do for public schools is this one huge thing: XXXX, but I’m going to do it really, really well”.
Something big- “all I’m going to do is equalize funding between rich and poor districts” or “All I’m going to do is make sure each kids gets to school each day”. Pick one big thing and only do that, for every public school over 4 or 8 years. I would love that focus. I would consider it money and time well spent. Not reinventing the wheel- just genuinely improving one important aspect over a set period of time.
LikeLike
Raj,
How do you suggest measuring a teacher’s merit?
LikeLike
Jim, You hit a home run. THANKS for sharing.
Sent from my iPhone
LikeLike
But wait. Isn’t Mississippi a teacher union free zone? Their scores and student achievement must be awesome! …… Right?
LikeLike
I would like to sit down and have a cup of coffee with him. I love the honesty. His words aren’t wrapped in “educationese.” They are straight forward and accessible to everyone.
LikeLike
Raj, The statement is “to support teacher leadership, creating five positions . . . for accomplished teachers who’d mentor their peers . . .” Having team leaders is not a merit pay plan; not sure how a person would read merit pay into that.
LikeLike
I’ve been reading Drive:The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us by Daniel Pink. It explains many reasons why merit pay doesn’t work. I found a lot of it to be common sense, but a well-written, interesting and fun read.
LikeLike
Mamie, Daniel Pink cites the work of Dan Ariely and Edward Deci. Read their short books. Ariely, “Predictably Irrational,” and Deci, “Why We Do What We Do.”
LikeLike
Ed tech, whether it’s something like what Mark Zuckerberg is piloting in CA Charter Schools which employs input from teachers to devise customized lessons, http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/marketplacek12/2015/09/facebook_moves_into_k-12_arena_through_partnership_with_charter_network.html?cmp=RSS-FEED
or some iteration of this that will soon jump on the bandwagon, Ed Tech WILL eliminate the teaching profession by 2050. Broad and other billionaires are doing everything possible to ensure this and get taxpayers to supplement it too. These billionaires invest in Charter school and Ed Tech so they will eventually own prime real estate currently held by Public Schools. Financial Deprivation is the goal to underpinning Public Ed.
LikeLike