Dr. Terri Reid-Schuster writes:
I was disgusted by my IEA President, Cinda Klickna’s, response regarding the low scores soon to be released in Illinois. I sent her the following:
Dear Cinda Klickna,
I was very disturbed to read your recent response to the news that Illinois students’ recent PARCC score test release. You characterized it as something that will improve as teachers get better at the standards and students get more experienced with the test. You could not be more wrong.
First, I am a career Illinois teacher with more than 20 years of experience. I have a doctorate in developmental literacy and currently work as a reading specialist in Oregon, IL. I have been active in my union and am currently serving as OEA president. I vote democrat, and have always been a proud union member. However, now I am doubting whether IEA/NEA really has the best interests of children and teachers at heart. Your recent response has confirmed that.
Here is what you SHOULD have said:
The PARCC test is a capstone of corporate reform efforts to discredit hard-working teachers and school districts. It is a natural progression of developmentally inappropriate and unvalidated Common Core Standards that were written almost exclusively by test publishers whose intentions are to create a market for their “new and improved” curriculum materials, assessments, remedial programs and expensive consulting deals.
The test itself is written several years above the average student’s reading level, it is to be given on unfamiliar computer technology, contains intentionally vague and poorly designed questions with opaque directions, and is excessive in length. Additionally, cut scores were set outrageously high–ostensibly to align with NAEP proficiency levels and completely disregarding the fact that a rating of “proficient” on the NAEP means the equivalent of “A” level work in the classroom.
This is the new and impossible standard Illinois students have “failed” to reach. This is by design, it is absolutely the intention of companies like Pearson who stand to make billions off the misery the CCSS and PARCC are creating. Now politicians can “prove” teachers are lazy and incompetent and point to PARCC scores as evidence, then hand over public dollars to their business cronies and donors for charter schools. Your statement helps that process along by promoting the fantasy that it is possible to improve these test scores if only we numbskull public school teachers would just get up to speed on these dandy new standards.
Please, if you are going to take our money and purport to represent teachers collectively in Illinois, it is incumbent upon you to educate yourself about the reality of the monumental bamboozle that is corporate reform. I recommend Diane Ravitch’s book Reign of Error for starters, and her blog is a daily format for exposing the damaging effects of the move to privatize and profitize education. Todd Farley’s book Making the Grades is an insider’s expose of Pearson’s shoddy test design process and and standardized test-grading mills.
Additionally, I am requesting that IEA not accept funding from Bill Gates or Pearson or any other entity that seeks to destroy public education. Doing so ensures our demise as a profession, and will hasten the dismantling of democracy itself.
Democracy works best when we prepare students to be critical thinkers who are creative problem solvers and question authority–CCSS are preparing students to be obedient worker bees. Ask yourself why students at elite private schools aren’t being subjected to CCSS or PARCC testing? If these standards and tests are so essential to a great education, wealthy parents would be clamoring to have them for their own children. In fact, exactly the opposite is happening. CCSS and unfair, rigged exams like the PARCC are for the unwashed, undeserving poor and middle class.
Cinda, you disappoint me. I am beginning to believe my dues to the IEA and NEA are not money well spent. Please educate yourself and become an advocate for children and teachers in this state. Call out corporate reform for what it is: a blatant profit-making scheme. Stop falling for the slick marketing. Talk to real teachers about their struggles under this brutal and demoralizing test-and-punish regime. STOP looking to “have a seat at the table.” Don’t collaborate and cooperate with those who will destroy the education profession.
If you need real teachers to talk to, I volunteer myself and my colleagues. Thank you for your attention in this matter. It is critical teachers have the informed support of our biggest professional organization.

This is the type of letter that should be sent to our National Union Presidents and the Democratic Presidential nominees.
LikeLike
EXACTLY!
LikeLike
Great letter- a must read for every union leader!
LikeLike
Beautiful Powerful Words!
LikeLike
What is pitiful is that she trying to wake up the sleeping giant, her union!
LikeLike
When what were then being called “exit tests” were being considered on the state level, our school corporation wanted to get the jump on the idea with our administration thinking we would look very forward thinking if we created our own test. They also thought having our own test would give us more control over it. I was appointed to the committee that would write and grade the test. It was to consist of both multiple-choice questions and an essay question. Passing it would not be a graduation requirement but would give parents more information and make our corporation look great. Teachers didn’t see the need for it, but determined to give it an honest try.
That is, until we were told that 99 percent of the student’s should pass it. This is a small example off how the tests can be manipulated. Only now it’s become big business with extraordinarily high stakes and the manipulation is to make fewer students pass. Shame on us for letting it get this far. We must stop it now-better late than later. And the voting booths and courtrooms are the only places we can accomplish that.
LikeLike
Here is the problem with the mass email strategy followed by Moveon.org, Daily Kos, Diane Ravitch et al. You are preaching to your choir and wearing them out. Although many of the issues you cover are important to me I find myself deleting before I read because it is too much. The conservative portion of the political divide has been winning for over two decades for two simple reasons. They control access and they control the message. Like conservatives, progressive operatives suffer from the same malady because they believe the electorate to be simpletons. Here’s a proposal: Quit spending valuable time and money filling up the inboxes of other progressives. Begin developing a campaign of making the electorate aware of whom the politicians are. You don’t even have to take a side. Simply send mass emails that introduce local and state representatives, what they do for a living and who contributes the most to their campaigns. Put billboards up that tell the electorate who their state representatives are. This by itself would create doubt among these politicians and cause them to move much more cautiously with legislation. Simply bring them into the light. Stop sending me mass emails about the evils of the political opposition. These mass emails will not change the political momentum. Provide information.
Paul Bonner
LikeLike
Paul Bonner,
Why don’t you do that?
I do what I know how to do. I have written two national best selling books chock full of facts. I have met with governors, senators, and members of Congress. I have lectured across the country.
You can unsubscribe if you want. You don’t have to read my blog. Go ahead and build a movement on your own.
Diane Ravitch
LikeLike
I think many of us forward these messages to people who disagree and post them on social media for all there to see. It’s helpful to get ideas even from those with similar views to forward to officials and candidates. Different areas of the country are in different stages with this and can use info to be prepared. And don’t forget, we need to encourage each other.
LikeLike
dianeravitch:
What you said.
😎
LikeLike
It is because of the constant exposure public education advocates like Dr. Ravitch, Peter Greene, and many others that the dialogue is beginning to change.
What lends the anti-privatization movement credibility is that we have people like Dr. Ravitch who once championed the ed reform movement who have now seen the destruction it has wrought.
Keep flooding my inbox, I’ll keep reading AND forwarding them on to public school teachers and supporters.
Thanks for what you are doing.
LikeLike
Agreed. I’ll keep cross posting on other site to drive people that care about public schools to this blog, a reliable source of information. We need parents on our side, and this blog can help get them there. Even though I am no longer teaching, I feel obliged to fight for public schools because I know they stand the best chance of helping all students. When I feel like my head will explode, I walk away, and take my dogs for a walk. It’s like the Holocaust; you just can’t do nothing at all.
LikeLike
Here’s a suggestion: if you don’t want your inbox filled up, unsubscribe to the feed. Then bookmark the actual blog so you can come here when you’re not so fatigued. Diane makes the information and the arguments available. What you or anyone else chooses do with it is not within Diane’s control.
LikeLike
So, Paul Bonner, what are you doing to help?
How many mass emails to your local and state reps have you sent? How many billboards have you put up?
Get back to us when you have some solid accomplishments of your own to brag about.
Instead of whining about what others may or may not be doing, put up or shut up.
LikeLike
Wow! What a GREAT post. Terri is right on! Thank you Terri.
LikeLike
Outstanding response
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1253985 – award winning film makers reveal how big business is dismantling our public school system. This is just one example of a more effective means to fight back – We have to reframe the debate especially in the media. It seems lately (fortunately) that we get more press and action from the spouses of teachers, bloggers, parents, students, Diane R, Valerie S, reporters, administrators and teachers themselves (lawyers and film-makers) than from some of our unions. We need to examine and take action on how national union leaders are “elected” -Currently, there seems to be a loss of faith in the leadership. When good teachers lose their jobs, students suffer from poor curriculum, “meaningless” tests, takeover of their schools, union contracts nullified etc- There should be a unified booming thunder of response not the scattered showers of wagging a finger, sending an e-mail, and some rallies. There have been great pockets of union led resistance such as in Chicago and Seattle (and others) but a large growing population of teachers have been greatly disappointed with their state unions and UFT and AFT. Local unions need to distribute the Illinois letter – signed by their members to their state and national leaders as a warning – then let the newly designed elections begin!
LikeLike
Outstanding post, hits the nail on the head for me. I forwarded this link to our local union president and shared it on Facebook. Our local, state, and national unions need to say no to corporate handouts (Gates, for example) and start standing up for public education and for teachers.
LikeLike
The words you speak are ON POINT and should be the words spoken by our union presidents! And if the tests aren’t bad enough…just who is the “rocket scientist” who thought that our merging readers and writers can focus on these two objectives while trying to navigate the unfamiliarities of expressing then typing thoughts via a computer without the requisite typing experience and under deadlines to boot!The answer can only be someone whose goal is student failure on these tests.
If teachers are not being denigrated enough by these ridiculous tests (but they are) they are equally denigrated by being forced to prove their “allegiance” to the holy grail of “data style accountability” and proving “student growth” in the most egregious ways via student “learning” objectives. And let’s not forget the time and money wasted on forced PD’s and endless meetings to learn all about the buffoonery of how to amass and sort this nonsensical data. : X
LikeLike
“emerging readers and writers”
LikeLike
Vote…her…OUT. I am delighted by our local union president, but the things that fly out of the mouths of our national leaders often angers me. I am glad you wrote to her and reposted in Diane’s blog. That might get her attention.
LikeLike
At my school, we have two weeks to give the PALs test. Next week being the second week, however, we also have to give the MAP test to 2nd and up. I haven’t done much teaching at all. The whole thing is absurd. Our kindergarteners don’t go outside until 12:55. I am ready to strike. We are in DANGER OF LOSING OUR CHILDREN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Amen Dr. Reid-Schuster, amen!
LikeLike
Brilliant!!!
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
The IEA also refused to support the opt out bill HB306 here in Illinois. morethanascorechicago.org/2015/02/20/hb-306-opt-out-bill-in-illinois/
Both of the other big unions here, the CTU and IFT, supported parents working to change the law in Illinois so that the state board of ed could no longer bully districts and families about parents exercising their conscience when it comes to high-stakes standardized testing.
Read more from Fred Klonsky’s blog here: https://preaprez.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/cinda-klickna-on-ieas-neutrality-on-hb306-parent-opt-out-rights/
I hope IEA members are organizing among themselves to either change their leaders minds or change their leaders on testing policy.
LikeLike
I agree that companies creating the assessments and curriculum vs our brightest and most talented teachers was not wise and in fact a major problem. We need to focus on the solutions that supports progressive change. We need to stop making the NYS assessment the priority by focusing on it and only it. We need to focus on creating excellent k-12 systems that puts every child first. Leaders in all districts need to make it clear that the state test will not be the priority but that individual student growth on various indicators will be the priority.
LikeLike
The folks with the moneybags know how to subvert leaders and organizations supposedly “professional” with what I would call hush money. Example: invitations to speak or serve on boards that pay a “salary” . Some of the money we can follow and some of it may be hidden, but our “leaders” are not silent because of ignorance of the issues. Same thing occurs with NPR coverage of issues in education. Bill and Melinda pony up the money and we get “fair and balanced” coverage is issues in public education.
LikeLike
Yes, the appetite for Volvos, fine dining and Restoration Hardware makes a lot of thought leaders quietly shift to the dark side. Virtue requires Kia-level appetites. Justice Stephen Breyer still drives a little old Toyota. I admire that.
LikeLike
“Empty R”
“Read between the radio waves”
To fathom NPR
Gates Foundation pays their ways
And keeps them in a jar
LikeLike
Dr. Terri Reid-Schuster is a brave teacher and if more would speak out, this madness regarding testing would end.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads.
LikeLike
Why is this still up for debate that the NEA is not on the side of children or teachers? It is Rockefeller funded (besides all of the dues.) David Rockefeller has admitted on page 405 of his Memoirs that he is proud of his family’s legacy of working against the best interests of the United States. Read history and weep for our country.
In 1952, Congressman Eugene E. Cox headed up a committee that for the first time tried to uncover the Rockefeller’s (and other’s) foundations’ activities. For some reason, Cox encountered stiff opposition everywhere against his committee’s investigation, and the Congressman for some reason got sick and died. One member of the committee, Congressman Carroll Reese, and his Counsel Rene Wormser attempted to continue the investigation. Rockefeller’s henchmen and newspapers did their best to destroy Congressman Reese. The Reese investigation was given only the barest minimum of time and little resources for their investigation. However, they were still able to uncover that beginning in the 1930s vast sums of money were spent in Education by the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations. This money went to promote John Dewey, Marxism, a One-World-Government agenda, and Socialism. The foundations (principally the Rockefeller and Carnegie) stimulated two-thirds of the total endowment funding of all institutions of higher learning in America during the first third of this 20th century.
The NEA (National Education Association was largely financed by the Rockefeller/Carnegie foundations. A 1934 NEA report advised, “A dying laissez-faire must be completely destroyed and all of us, including the ‘owners’, must be subjected to a large degree of social control.” Reece Committee Counsel Rene Wormser wrote of the investigation, “…leads one to the conclusion that there was, indeed, something in the nature of an actual conspiracy among certain leading educators in the United States to bring about socialism through the use of our school systems…” They discovered that the Rockefeller foundation was the primary culprit behind the teaching of socialism in America’s schools and universities and also behind the NEA’s policies. Rene Wormser, Counsel for the Reece Committee reported, “A very powerful complex of foundations and allied organizations has developed over the years to exercise a high degree of control over education. Part of this complex, and ultimately responsible for it, are the Rockefeller and Carnegie groups of foundations.” This was the situation in the 1950s when the Reece Committee briefly investigated. The Rockefeller-Carnegie groups have continued basically unopposed for the next 40 years in controlling education. One of the educational book producers is Grolier, Inc. Avery Rockefeller, Jr. sits on Grolier, Inc. board meetings. Another interesting board member is Theodore Wailer who is the director of Grolier, Inc. He was a member of the International Book Committee of UNESCO. The Rockefellers maintain great influence in the United Nations.
LikeLike
The NEA that you write about was not a labor union. Most of its members were superintendents and professors of education.
LikeLike
“The Tests are a Frog”
The tests are just a frog
So maybe we should kiss ’em
To help to clear the fog
The princess wouldn’t miss ’em
LikeLike
If the problem with the US economy is “the skills gap” shouldn’t wages be going up?
“From 2007 to 2014, real hourly wages for young college grads fell 6.9%, for high school grads down 9.8%”
Might there be some other reasons for income inequality and flat or falling wages, reasons that might have to do with US private sector/government leadership?
I know it’s easy to blame working people for flat or falling wages, but one would think people would recognize that’s hugely self-serving to people in power. Ya know, The Status Quo.
LikeLike
Just released that corporations operating in the U.S. are sitting on $1.4 trillion in cash. Just think what the economy would be like if that Midas Hoard was circulating in the economy. I’m not a right wing conspiracy nut, but it sure seems like true working Americans are treading water or sinking while productivity and the wealth of a few is going up. Economists just sit around examining their navel while blaming teachers, politicians argue about Muslims and each others looks, politicians in Congress seek to destroy Congress, and Obama fiddles while Rome burns.
LikeLike
GE and Microsoft alone are each holding over $100 billion in cash offshore to avoid taxes (MS has avoided paying about $35 billion on that). And Apple has nearly $200 billion offshore, though (supposedly) the company is “assuring” they will pay taxes on “all but” 70 billion of that. Sure.
How these companies get away with continuing to call themselves “American” companies is a mystery buried in an enigma.
They are multinationals loyal to no country.
LikeLike
Eloquent. A must read. I have sent this to everyone I know in IL so they will know “the other side of the story.”
LikeLike
Spot on. Cindy, you work for us. Don’t forget that. Please resign from your position if you can’t resist the influence of private money!
LikeLike
I’m from one of the towns that Oregon gets it students from, Mount Morris, but at the time I was a student there we were rivals with Oregon.
My graduating class, which did not include me as I was already in college, was 10 or 12% Illinois State Scholars. We include, at least, three ministers, one MD, one lawyer, several Electrical Engineers and any number of teachers. I am a Life Senior Member of IEEE and my work has won a Technical Emmy.
None of us had the advantage of the modern testing regime.
LikeLike
My experience having my kids attend four different state’s schools is Illinios does not keep school districts money inside the districts. Our school district, Pleasant Plains Middle School, is rated high. But my kids work falls FAR below that of Wisconsin AND Virginia schools. They have THREE flipping gym teachers who have achieved saint hood and think they are Tony Little. I appreciate their wanting to turn gym into an “Insanity” work out, but it is not fun when the teachers are yelling at the kids and embarrassing them in front of peers. The math programs are one year behind WI and VA, and there is so much dead time masked as non-course work time periods that the kids usually get their homework done. There are “teachers” (not all) who shouldn’t be called such, who have no ability to explain things in a way that kids understand, and even one that’s behavior towards the kids was affectionately described by a peer teacher who as asked about it, as “dry humor” (picking on kids) (who a lot of other parents don’t find him funny at their kid’s expense but they say nothing because the school protects the teachers above the kids). Public display of affection is tolerated between teachers while in school and I bring this up because it demontrates the disrespect the institution is given, along with teachers who treat their job like someone going into a business they represent and respect. I once worked for a union job (healthcare), where bad behavior was tolerated, and liability increased for the tax payer) because the union blindly defended bad workers. The rest of us HATED working with those people and cringed when we’d see stuff. But “no snitches”- at any cost seemed to be the narrative, (although “snitching” never changed anything anyway). The money needs to go back to the local school boards, then citizens can feel like there will be more accountability. That’s how it’s done in WI and VA. It works. Here, there’s no point to attending anything, cause they get the regurgitated money back and don’t have to be accountable. My son didn’t have trouble with the tests. But he’s gotten all but the last year of his education from Wisconsin Public Schools, Virginia’s, and while in Missouri, Catholic Private Schools (Missouri is as bad as Illinois).
LikeLike
http://www.senategop.state.il.us/Portals/0/Docs/Cost-Shift-FINAL.pdf?timestamp=1409174250732
LikeLike
Unbelievably well said. Educated and articulate and what all Mericsn educators need to read and support. She is on target totally.
LikeLike
Unbelievably well said. Educated and articulate and what all American educators need to read and support. She is on target totally.
LikeLike