Mitchell Robinson, a professor of music at Michigan State University, has figured out how the reform/privatization agenda works.
Robinson writes:
The typical reform agenda goes something like this:
*demoralize the teachers
*defund the unions
*dismantle the schools
*privatize public education
We see evidence of this approach in places like New Orleans with its “Recovery School District,” and Detroit, where Gov. Snyder’s Frankenstein-like “Education Achievement Authority” continues to deprive the students and citizens of local control of their schools. The reformers’ tactics are brutal and unforgiving: create a public perception that the schools are failing, the teachers are lazy, the unions are greedy, and the only solutions are to close schools, expand choice, provide vouchers and valorize charters.
However, one of the more subtle, yet damaging, weapons in the reformers’ playbook is simultaneously less visible to the uninformed eye and more insidious in its ability to accomplish the reformers’ ultimate goal: the destabilization of public education by an intentional, purposeful strategy of near-constant turnover and turmoil in the leadership and teaching force in the schools…..
Detroit is a textbook case of the reform strategy for destroying public education.
An especially egregious example of this sort of intentional destabilization can be seen in the Detroit Public Schools, which has been under state control for most of the previous 15 years (1999-2005, 2009-2016). Under the Snyder administration, Detroit’s schools have suffered from a systematic defunding of facilities and equipment, sub-standard working conditions, safety concerns, drastic curriculum narrowing, and poor teacher morale as a result of the state’s takeover. Recent estimates are that fewer than 30% of Detroit’s children have access to school music classes, and only 40% have an art teacher. In 2014, Renaissance High School, long considered a bastion of high quality arts programming in the city, suffered devastating cuts to its music program, signaling a troubling trend in priorities from Detroit’s educational leaders.
Detroit Public Schools has had four leaders in the past four years.
It’s hard to understand how a school system can make any sort of sustained progress with a veritable revolving door of administrative transition occurring in the central offices–and this is certainly the case in Detroit: “Under emergency managers Robert Bobb, Roy Roberts and Martin, DPS has shed tens of thousands of students, closed dozens of schools and struggled with persistent deficits…Last fall’s (2014) preliminary enrollment was 47,238, less than half of the 96,000 students attending DPS when Bobb was appointed.”
It’s beyond time to declare Gov. Snyder’s approach to education reform in Detroit a resounding failure. The state has had 15 years to “fix” the problems they created through a massive disinvestment of public education in Michigan, and Detroit’s children and teachers have paid the price as a seemingly endless parade of highly paid “experts” have failed to turn the ship around.
State control is not only NOT a panacea; it is a manifest failure.
Robinson says it is past time to turn the public schools back to the people of Detroit. They might make mistakes but they are more trustworthy with their children than Governor Snyder and his appointees.

So true: “Detroit is a textbook case of the reform strategy for destroying public education.” Sad that this country has sunk this low. It’s gross.
LikeLike
I thought the “New Orleans Miracle” was the texbook case of educational malpractice, i.e., “reform strajedy*”
“strajedy = strategy and tragedy. In other words a strategic tragedy.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
I have been writing here, and in articles, for some years about economist Schumpeter and his theory of “creative destruction” …so am glad to read that an MSU music professor agrees with a California public policy professor. However, with industry, such as the horse and buggy, being demolished in order to institute the automobile, there was a valid reason to use this ‘burn to the ground’ methodology in the name of progress, and the cost (investment) of this industrial revolution was borne by industrial leaders who created the new industry.
In the case of the privatizing of public education, it is a unique and a completely self-serving destruction of universal free public education, to primarily benefit Wall Street investors through a scheme to use public money for their own vast enrichment.
The overwhelming difference here is that the cost is borne by the tax paying public-at -large through taxation without representation. It is the greatest free market scam foisted on the taxpayers since ‘capitalism’ was created and was/is touted as being for the greater good.
We who understand the economics of this scam, are skeptics…and we must continue to educate the public as to how they are being robbed by these billionaires in their goal of redistributing ALL wealth and power upward, to only themselves.
LikeLike
Ellen, that’s a great point! As a former colleague of mine (John Kratus) pointed out recently, when digital photography replaced film (for instance), we were left with an arguably better product–although thousands of jobs were lost in the process, and entire corporations (Kodak) disrupted.
In education, all of this creative destruction comes at an incredible cost–and with nothing better left as a result of all of this turmoil.
Thanks for emphasizing just how ludicrous this reform agenda really is from a public policy perspective.
LikeLike
Thanks Mitchell for this comment.
As an educator, I view life and politics from a perspective of public policy, the codified laws of the land, and I tend to look closely into the economics of the issues. It is so destructive that our naive American populace only skims the surface without looking into the principle of ‘follow the money.’
The key factor here is that the giants of innovation such as Henry Ford, developed their products (although on the bodies of the earlier transportation industries) by using their own investment capital and that capital which was generated by selling shares in their companies. Even the Robber Barons, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, et al, used their own and investors capital to build their banks and railroads.
This new huge education scam, however, which is indeed fooling the preponderance of the ignorant and lazy-thinking public, is doing something unique in this era of creative destruction.
They are using, in perpetuity, the public’s cash (taxation) to establish a free market industry they don’t have to pay for (invest in), and which by donations to their own foundations, actually use as a ‘write off’ (to lower) their own tax obligations. What a win win situation for Eli Broad and his partners in crime. How clever, how immoral.
It is a pure scam as definitive as the pyramid schemes of Bernie Madoff, Ivan Boesky, and Michael Milken. Join it with Citizen’s United, McCutcheon, Vergara, Parent Empowerment, and the many decisions to the benefit of the ultra wealthy, and we see the demise of all democratic values.
I am amazed each day at how the public does not catch on to it.
LikeLike
Plenty destruction… As for creation (except for monetized students and increased profit-making opportunities), not so much…
LikeLike
Creative destruction is a farce. A more accurate term might be enlightened evolution. The horse and buggy industry simply evolved into automobiles. Technology from buggies moved into cars through a process of improvement. Sure , we no longer hitch horses, but we still use wheels, springs, roads, and brag about our engine’s horsepower. Whether horse and buggy or car, they both solve the same problem – moving humans from one place to another.
LikeLike
And, didn’t the reformers get exactly what they wanted? Detroit is a ghost town with empty houses that no one wants to live in no matter what the financial incentive. Who wants to live in a ghost town with no schools and no jobs?
LikeLike
I have a slight disagreement. Detroit schools were broken long before “reform” or Snyder. Yes they are now worse. The problem then and the problem now is poverty and segregated schools.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lifelong Quest.
LikeLike