Milwaukee is the original laboratory of corporate reform. Since 1990, it has had a thriving charter sector and a thriving voucher sector. Competition was supposed to lift all boats, but it didn’t. All three sectors are doing poorly. Neither the voucher schools nor the charter schools outperform the public schools. The public schools have far more students eith disabilities than the other sectors, which don’t want them. On NAEP, Milwaukee is one of the nation’s lowest performing urban districts.
So what do reformers want now? To set in motion a process to turn all of Milwaukee into a privately-managed system, all charters and vouchers. Failure never deters them from more privatization.
Larry Miller is a member of the Milwaukee public school board. In this post, he describes the current proposal to cripple and destroy the Milwaukee public school system, offered by two suburban Republicans.
The plan, sponsored by Republicans Rep. Dale Kooyega and Sen. Alberta Darling, allows a single unelected official to turn five low-scoring schools over to a charter operator or a voucher school every year.
Miller writes:
“For one, the plan places authority over these schools, dubbed “opportunity schools,” in a single commissioner, appointed by Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele. Theoretically, Abele could provide some oversight of that person, and to a certain extent that commissioner will have to follow state and federal laws.
“But unlike in MPS, there is no democratically-elected governance board; the proposal does not allow the elected Milwaukee County Board any oversight, despite putting the commissioner directly under the county executive (who is elected only once every four years; there are school board—and county board—elections every two years). All power to evaluate and close failing MPS schools lies with this one individual, as does the power to authorize, fund, and monitor the success or failure of these new opportunity schools.
“Let me repeat part of that again: A single, unelected, unknown “commissioner” will absolutely have the authority to close public schools operated by the democratically-elected Milwaukee Board of School Directors, confiscate the buildings, material, and students (maybe? see below) within those schools, and turn them over to private, possibly religious, possibly for-profit operators.
“The proposal suggests in at least two ways that the problem with failing schools is teachers, though thinking only about teachers is stupidly reductive. Any staff in the schools selected to be closed and handed off can reapply for their jobs, but they have to sign a contract that they will not seek representation by a union. Teachers unions, of course, had their authority gutted by 2011’s Act 10, so I am unsure why Kooyenga and Darling fear unions in their “opportunity schools.”
“They also seem to fear fully licensed teachers. The plan allows the commissioner to grant licenses to whoever wants one to teach in these schools. Let’s be clear: the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction makes no provision for such a thing to happen. The federal law governing schools makes no provision for such a thing to happen.
“There are well-established emergency licenses and even alternative certification programs available, sure. But this power, residing in a single individual with, potentially, no expertise or qualification in education, to unilaterally grant licenses to any random person is unprecedented. A quick googling turns up no other program anywhere in the country—even in the “recovery zones” in New Orleans or Detroit on which this program is modeled—that allows a commissioner like this one to license teachers on his own.
“And, really, does anyone believe that the problem in these schools is that the teachers there are licensed and represented by the union? If that is the problem, then why are the top schools in the state full of licensed, qualified teachers? Would Kooyenga and Darling have the nerve to walk into MPS’s Reagan or Fernwood Montessori, or for that matter, Brookfield East or Maple Dale in their home districts, and demand they discharge all the licensed teachers in their employ? Of course not.”
Both legislators stressed their admiration for the current Milwaukee public school superintendent.
“Kooyenga said they are not trying to undermine MPS Superintendent Darienne Driver, but help her by allowing other parties to try something radically different in the district’s most challenged programs.
“Darling added that she thought highly of Driver, and that she would like to see her be considered for the role of commissioner — as long as the school board isn’t involved in the turnaround schools.”
However, Superintendent Druver said that a change of governance would not address the children’s problems.
She said:
“Driver said the impact of poverty on low test scores would not be alleviated by a change in school governance. She also pointed to the fact that private voucher schools have no better performance record overall than the city’s public schools.
“We can’t go to the quick fix,” she said Monday during an education conference at Marquette University. “I just beg everyone: Don’t go to what sounds sexy. Let’s go to the data.”
“Driver said any new plan to address low-performing schools in Milwaukee should also address chronically underperforming voucher and charter schools — not just district schools. She also highlighted programs already in place at some of the district’s lowest-performing schools that have started to show signs of improvement.”
The plan got poor reviews from the state superintendent and the head of the Milwaukee teachers’ union:
“Bob Peterson, president of the Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association union, said the plan was “an insult” to the Milwaukee community and part of a larger plan to privatize schools throughout the state.
“For two white suburban legislators to propose that the white county executive appoint a ‘Commissioner’ who will have ‘parallel authority’ to the democratically elected school board is a racist attack on the democratic rights of the citizens of Milwaukee, the majority of whom are black and brown,” Peterson said in a statement.
“State Superintendent Tony Evers said Monday at the Marquette conference that improving schools doesn’t hinge on changing governance but on hard work and adequate resources.
“Looking for a silver bullet is a fool’s errand,” he said.”

This insanity is typical of those who think they can improve education by simply changing the name of the school. They are suggesting nothing radically different. The Milwaukee School system, where I spent close to 30 years as a teacher and school administrator, has a history of innovation. In 1995, my school, the Milwaukee Village Schools, as well as Larry Miller’s school were brought in as full public schools, union and all.
This was back when innovation was allowed. I remember Larry’s students making film productions that allowed for 1st class, whole child achievement while my school partnered with Will Allen’s Growing Power to assure academic education had meaning.
Now a bunch of dim wits think that if they bust the union, they will achieve success. They achieve nothing but their agenda of power, ego and control. Back in the day, Milwaukee Public Schools had charter schools under the watchful eye of the school board as fully public schools.
Since then, although there are a few good charters, most are just a scam designed to screen kids so they appear to be better than the rest.
If Milwaukee really wants to improve the quality of schools, begin with the Collins amendment to ESEA and prepare to move from the testing fiasco to whole child assessment. No more phony agendas, no more game playing with the lives of Milwaukee’s children. Radical change is not changing the name, it is allowing the school system to develop whole child achievement. Radical change is not having every child at the same place at the same time, like the Stepford kids. It is taking all children from where they are, celebrating individual gains that are real. Radical change is not tromping on kids for adult agendas.
LikeLike
This is the Rick Snyder plan for the Detroit Public School system as well. They are going to be paid well when they leave office for their destruction of the public school systems. Follow the money.
LikeLike
Disinterest and apathy enables this, also big bucks.
LikeLike
” but they have to sign a contract that they will not seek representation by a union.”
But saying this is driven by animus to labor unions is a “conspiracy theory”
What I take from that is ed reformers must be worried about charter school employees joining unions. If Wisconsin is like a lot of other states charter school employees are private sector, so now ed reformers also object to private sector unions in addition to public sector unions? Can we just cut to the chase and say they object to labor unions across the board? That would be more honest.
LikeLike
Scott Walker said at a Club for Growth gathering that the most significant foreign policy decision in his lifetime was Reagan’s 1981 firing of 11,000 air traffic controllers and busting the union. I had to look that one up. He and Jeb Bush are favorites? Walker, like Kasich, Christie, Scott, on and on, see nothing better than silencing teachers.
LikeLike
Because teaching is a profession that is 84% women. What better way to stomp on women.
LikeLike
By the time Walker is finished with Wussconsin no one will want to live there anyhow.
LikeLike
My daughter has already moved.
LikeLike
I have also moved. Not just Walker but the reality that so many voted for the fool
LikeLike
THIS isn’t “political” at all, no sir:
“In January, Kooyenga and Darling released a shiny booklet (pdf) about their plan, called “New Opportunities for Milwaukee.” The book opened with an outright lie, claiming in its opening paragraph that the “War on Poverty” launched by President Johnson in 1964 resulted in “little, if any, progress,” in their words.”
Gosh, I hope no one is “playing politics” with public schools or has an ideological agenda. Heaven forbid. 🙂
LikeLike
Surely this idea is dead in the water. You would have to be an idiot (or a paid hack) to endorse such a plan. Then again, I could say similar things about Cuomo’s recent actions which were voted into law by the NYS Legislature. An education law whose demands are literally impossible to meet.
Ellen #SeekingCommonSenseFindingStupidity
LikeLike
Walker is already showing his lack of education and ignorance. When he does not know an answer to a question, he passes.
LikeLike
The answer is actually quite elementary. The taxpayer cannot support three different
choices for public school taxpayer dollars, simply because of the infrastructure and basic utility costs of existing public schools.
LikeLike
You are watching the vamguard [sic] of a movement, spearheaded by ALEC, to convert U.S. public education into a 19th century British model, with genteel educations for the ruling class and the well-to-do and everyone else tracked into service, the trades, or prison labour.
LikeLike
Cross posted Submitted on Monday, May 18, 2015 at 12:37:49 PM
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/How-Long-Will-Public-Educa-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Politicians_Public-Education_Public-Schools_Schools-150518-34.html#comment545513
with this comment:
Go to my series 15,880/50, and see how many legislatures are taking over public education… now that the oligarchs invented failing schools so they could privatize them.
Just saw an old George Carlin riff which explains this perfectly:
Says Carlin: “I’ll tell you what they don’t want. They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they’re getting f…ked by a system that threw them overboard 30 f..king years ago.”
Exactly George, and these billionaires are winning!
LikeLike
Milwaukee and how many other places, including our state of Indiana.
LikeLike
Do you have facts to support your statement, “Neither the [Milwaukee] voucher schools nor the charter schools outperform the public schools”? My daughter and son-in-law work in two highly successful Milwaukee voucher schools. The fact that they have waiting lists for entry belies your statement.
LikeLike
of course. Check the footnotes of my book “Reign of Error” and you will find citations to news sources in the Wisconsin State Journal, as well as an evaluation by the pro-choice University of Arkansas. Voucher schools in Milwaukee did not get better results on tests than public schools. Some did, most didn’t. On average, no difference.
LikeLike
The Milwaukee choice schools serve only poor black kids. When we use the test to determine whether or not students achieve, it is dead wrong whatever side it supports. The test is merely 2nd class achievement and only shows who the best test takers are.
To use that as a guide whenever it is to our advantage is not wise. Either we are for the test or against it as a singular means of determining “achievement”.
LikeLike
Waiting lists at vouchers and charters often are an indication of one or both of two things that don’t have much to do with student achievement: (1) Heavy recruiting among those who the school knows will never get in, and (2) Failure to backfill from the waiting list when the low performers are “counseled out”.
LikeLike
Sucessful…define it by real rubrics, not popularity. So few people actually grasp what real learning looks like, which was the subject of the real national standards, the Pew study of THE 8 PRINCIPLES OF LEARNING. DISAPPEARED!
The reality is that public schools could be successful if given the funding they need, and they serve everyone.
LikeLike