Here is a pathetic contrast that says a whole lot about the politics of education, not only in Texas but across the nation. The latest ethics report in Texas shows that “Texans for Education Reform,” a spinoff of Democrats for Education Reform, has hired 15 lobbyists to work the legislature this session. Most will be paid between $50,000-100,000, some less, some more. One will be paid between $150,000-200,000. This group would not call itself “Democrats for Education Reform” in Texas, because the Democratic Party is out of favor; the constituency this group appeals to would not want to be affiliated with any organization that called itself “Democrats.” The name may be helpful in fooling people in liberal states, but it would be a stigma in Texas.
Here is the contrast: the main anti-testing group is led by parents. It is called Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment (known to fans as Moms Against Drunk Testing). TAMSA has hired one lobbyist, who will be paid less than $10,000.
The lesson: People who are super-rich are pouring big money into politics to kill off public education and replace it with high-stakes testing, charters and vouchers. They don’t care that there is now substantial evidence that most charters do not have higher test scores than similar public schools. They don’t care that voucher schools don’t outperform public schools. What drives them? They say it’s all about the kids but it seems more likely that they just don’t like public education and want to starve it of resources.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
How tragic!!! Kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Money becomes the bottom line, not the welfare of our children and the people. How long can this go on? In education and in so many other areas our country and indeed the world suffers catastrophe because of this myopic, greedy, philosophy.
LikeLike
It will go on until educators and parents grow a spine and stand up and fight for the right to educate children properly.
LikeLike
This scenario is being played out in many communities. In addition to the fact they resent paying for public education, they can exploit opportunities to profit from establishing schools. As long as we have laws that promote the development of charters, more charters will be springing up. If we change some of the laws that are partial to charters or seek to regulate them, we may be able to reduce interest in them. Changing the laws would be difficult in a climate where money buys access. If the public starts using some of the tactics of the “hedge clippers,” we may be able to shame some representatives into action.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on aureliomontemayor and commented:
It’s only money, honey!
LikeLike
If you really want to be appalled, find out how many of the lobbyists on that list once worked in government.
I looked at one ed reform lobbying group in Pennsylvania and 8 of the 9 executives went directly FROM state government TO lobbying state government.
I know of 4 Obama Administration officials who went directly from the US Department of Education to ed reform groups that work to privatize public schools.
These two groups- government and the ed reform “movement” – are the same freaking people. It’s complete and utter capture.
LikeLike
The demolition of public education is not limited to charters, vouchers, and testing. The mantra on behalf of “disruptive innovation” is evident in the lobbies that want access to student data, and more generally, the acceptance of computers as cost efficient “innovative” and essential for 21st century learning.
This is from Politico today, April 2. from Caitlin Emma With help from Eliza Collins, Allie Grasgreen, Nirvi Shah and Stephanie Simon.
“DATA PRIVACY BILL IN LIMBO: The bipartisan team of Reps. Jared Polis and Luke Messer had planned [http://politi.co/1bPWdPY ] to introduce a student data privacy bill last week, but their draft drew fierce criticism from both parent activists (who deemed it too weak) and ed-tech lobbyists (who viewed it as too tough). The duo quickly pulled back the bill for a rewrite. It now looks like it could be mid-April before the new version emerges. Staffers have been talking with privacy experts who weren’t consulted before the first draft was released, including Fordham Law Professor Joel Reidenberg. He told Morning Education he spent an hour going over key issues with a staffer and was encouraged by the conversation. “They seemed to be going in a very positive direction,” Reidenberg said.”
“Industry isn’t so happy. Carl Szabo, policy counsel for the trade association NetChoice, said the top priority for ed-tech firms is to get a federal bill that preempts state data privacy legislation. But from what he’s heard, Polis and Messer aren’t interested in creating a national standard. On the contrary, they’ve described their bill as a floor and invited states to craft tougher laws if citizens demand more privacy protection. “We need a ceiling, not a floor,” Szabo said. “A federal law should be a solution to the patchwork of state laws… not add to the confusion.”
“Rep. Todd Rokita has been mulling a separate bill to update the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. Privacy activists will be watching closely to see if Rokita expands the definition of “educational record” to extend FERPA’s privacy protections to all the data children shed when they’re using educational apps, e-textbooks and other online tools.”
“he National Association of State Boards of Education is out with a new policy brief on the topic of student data privacy. Its subtitle: “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” The brief warns state lawmakers to be careful not to squash innovation with over-regulation. It cites West Virginia and Alabama as states that have found the proper balance. The brief: http://bit.ly/1G5Mamw”
Watch out for students “shedding data” !!!!
Watch out for the DANGER of “squashing innovation” (as if innovation is always a virtue).
Watch the scenerio unfold: Testing times are reduced (according to the PR) because students are being “assessed” non-stop by the data-hoarding feature of computer-based instruction. There is no testing window. It is closed. Testing is all the time students use the computers and variants.
I think that the very deep pocket ed-tech firms will enable them to “get a federal bill that preempts state data privacy legislation.” The bill is likely to weaken FERPA — the privacy bill that Duncan et al already modified to permit some commercial use of student data). ALEC will continue to push for state legislation that calls for more “personalized” online, computer-based instruction, backpacks and so on with state subsidies.
The short-life of hardware and software will cause a regular churn for upgrades and infrastructure, including hires for data management.
Tech companies will profit if this snake oil is not just sold, but hardwired into federal legislation.
The management of data under the banner of guaranteeing “super security” of information is well underway in many districts.
If you believe that school data is secure, you have not been in the loop of a real loss of your privacy, or the sales pitches from security companies, or the news of security breeches, or news of the value of “data” for all manner of personalized marketing.
LikeLike
It still shocks me how reckless they are. It’s one thing apply laissez-faire dogma to adults but extending it to children is a new frontier.
We’ve always extended additional protections to children in the US. Always. The idea that kids who are mandated to use this stuff in public schools will get no more regulatory protections than adults do is shocking to me. Kids are no more “choosing” ed tech than they are “choosing” to go to school. We can’t even give them some protections for these mandated programs they’re using?
LikeLike
Kids are no more “choosing” ed tech than they are “choosing” to go to school. We can’t even give them some protections for these mandated programs they’re using?
Agree. And I think there is NO due-diligence at the district level on privacy. That is where the Ohio State Department of Education wants it to be–not their problem other than offering guidance and forcing data into their computer system. In no small measure the Gates funded Student Teacher Data Link killed privacy, and that system has been elaborated with the USDE longitudinal data link grants. USDE puts the problem of privacy on the door-step of state officials.
Incidentally, if you want to register any complaints on privacy, the current persons responsible for receiving these complaints at USDE are here, with brief bios.
Kathleen Styles Chief Privacy Officer Email: kathleen.styles@ed.gov Kathleen Styles is the Department of Education’s first Chief Privacy Officer where she serves as the senior advisor to the Secretary on Departmental policies and programs related to privacy and confidentiality. She is a frequent speaker on issues related to student privacy, and she coordinates technical assistance to states, districts, and schools related to privacy best practices and compliance. She heads a new division dedicated to advancing the responsible stewardship, collection, use, maintenance and disclosure of information at the national level within the Education Department. Kathleen is responsible for the Department’s operations relating to the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA), the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), records management, information collection clearance, departmental directives, privacy safeguards, and disclosure avoidance. Kathleen is an attorney, licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia, and she is CIPP-G certified in government information privacy.
Michael Hawes Statistical Privacy Advisor Email: michael.hawes@ed.gov He advises the Department of Education’s Chief Privacy Officer and senior leadership on issues relating to data release, data management, and disclosure avoidance, and oversees the Department’s Privacy Technical Assistance Center (PTAC), which provides technical assistance on privacy and data security issues to state and local education agencies and to institutions of higher education. Michael also chairs the Department of Education’s Disclosure Review Board, the Department-wide board responsible for reviewing the disclosure avoidance methodologies used to protect privacy in the Department’s public data releases.
The preceding from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/pirms/leadership.html
“PTAC, supported through a government contract, provides technical assistance to education stakeholders through a range of materials and activities.”
(I COULD NOT FIND THIS CONTRACT. Citizens should know who has the contract, for how much, how long, and so on.)
“The Department’s contractor is working under the guidance of the Chief Privacy Officer and in close collaboration with the FERPA Working Group, which consists of representatives of the Office of Management, the Family Policy Compliance Office, and the Office of General Counsel, to produce and review privacy technical assistance products. PTAC also regularly consults with the Department’s Privacy Advisory Committee, whose members include Chief Statistician of NCES, SLDS program officer, and representatives from the office of Federal Student Aid, the Office of Civil Rights, and the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, among others, on the privacy issues of broad importance.
PTAC APPROACH PTAC engages national experts from a variety of industries and federal agencies with experience on technological issues regarding data security; legal issues regarding data sharing, access, and use; policy issues regarding data governance processes; and statistical issues regarding the reporting and publishing of aggregate performance data.” Key phrase” Privacy Technical Assistance Center (PTAC)” will get you more information,
LikeLike
It is important to realize, to never forget that the money being used against us was once ours. All of the various scams associated with income inequality being ramped up made that wealth possible, and we are seeing it used to leverage a situation where the extraction of our remaining, more closely held wealth is being implemented such that our education tax dollars are being misused and diverted out of our schools. It is not so much about their immediate “greed” as it is about their desire to impoverish us, control us and treat us as commodities based on the absurd idea that we can’t run our ownb lives if given a fair, unobstructed chance.
LikeLike
You are being kind … You wrote, “They say it’s all about the kids but it seems more likely that they just don’t like public education and want to starve it of resources….”
I would write…
“They say it’s all about the kids but it seems more likely it is all about THEIR profit and they want to starve public education of its resources in the name of profit not children”.
LikeLike
These reformers sure don’t mind pissing money away on lobbying and buying elections, but heaven forbid even one of them would get behind fully funding public schools, school libraries, nurses, cutting class size, extracurriculars and wrap around services.
LikeLike
http://www.disdblog.com/2015/02/16/dallas-isd-case-missing-toilet-paper/
LikeLike
That’s over a million dollars they are willing to invest in themselves as they starve our children. Evil personified. Not worthy of one grain of integrity or ethics. A person of conscience could not be bought so cheaply.
LikeLike
As a veteran school counselor in Texas who has observed the steady dysfunctional decline of public education in our state since the 80’s, I can say without a doubt that political corruption has broken our state’s public education system beyond repair.
Even though our elected leaders had help from the delusional DOE, as well as the silent support of a submissive public, the greedy politicians and the Texas Business Association under Bill Hammond’s leadership are the ones most responsible for this travesty.
After observing the hysterical authoritarianism of the “Skinner Nazi Management Style” that took over Austin ISD and most urban schools as a result of the state’s obsession with high stakes testing, many veteran educators and concerned community members tried to expose the dynamics of what was taking place; however, the usual response from TEA and school administrators was and continues to be “kill the messenger”.
The level of chronic traumatic stress and emotional abuse to children and teachers in the Texas schools is now equivalent to “institutional psychological abuse”. As a school counselor who had observed the increasing symptoms of traumatic stress in children and teachers across the state, in Oct 2013 I wrote a professional report to Senator Jane Nelson, Chair of the Texas Health & Human Services Committee, describing the toxic environment and the impact it was having on children. In the report I called it what it is: Institutional Psychological Child Abuse. The HHSC is the state agency that has responsibility for protecting children from abuse; however, not one member of the HHSC or Senator Nelson responded to my professional report.
The neglect and denial of our elected represetatives and their refusal to listen to mental health professionals and recognize the harm that is being done to the children in Texas by their callous aberrant self promotion is the purest form of evil. It is malice with intent to do injury to a child.
It is my professional and personal opinion that since our Texas public school system is too broken to repair, and since it has been taken over by powerful people who abuse their power and are psychologically incapable of fixing it, I suggest that every parent in Texas remove their children from the public state system and find an alternate and healthy method of caring for them. Leaving children incarcerated in this abusive system will cause them to be high risk for mental illness. I would not suggest putting them in charter schools unless they are Montessori, since most Texas charter schools use the same form of authoritarian Behaviorism for management like that used for livestock.
I suggest that Texas parents work together in communities to withdraw their children and organize home school units using the model of Bastrop County, or other similar successful community programs. Even if they cannot organize home schooling with that level of expertise, then most children of working parents would be better off staying with a responsible adult who could supervise them and allow them freedom to play in the parks, work in gardens, do art and music, use their imagination to design and built things, and visit public libraries and museums for regular opportunities to use their own creative talents for self directed education, which is actually the best kind of authentic learning. The children of Texas need to be removed from public schools and provided opportunities for recovery from the abuse they have suffered as a result of political neglect that tolerates institutional abuse to children.
A similar situation happened in 2011 in the Texas Juvenile Justice System when this same political mind blindness led to a scandal of horrific widespread sexual abuse of incarcerated children that had been pervasive for years. Widespread abuse of incarcerated adults in Texas prisons is also increasing and continuing to be overlooked by politicians and business leaders who are profiting from the privatization of the Texas prison system. Psychological abuse is highly destructive to children, but Instead of stopping this bullying to children in Texas schools, politicians are participating in it and perpetuating it.
Many of us are speaking up about the corruption in Austin because we care enough about the children and people of our home state to point out abuse that needs to stop. Intervention is the most profound kind of caring. Aberrant self-promotion is the opposite.
Parents, Opt your children out of STAAR, and then use your parental talent to create a new learning place for them next year that is safe and free from testing or anything related to materials designed by Pearson or their affiliates. Don’t buy their canned junk, make up your own learning activities. The public schools of Texas are not a safe place for children.
LikeLike
Let’s name names. Who’s receiving the campaign donations in Texas? Texas is such a large market that education corporations love it. Surely both Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott have demonstrated their allegiances to profiteers over pupils. Where’s the money going?
LikeLike
Rupert Murdoch, who is majority owner of Fox News, stated years ago that the U.S. public education system was a $500 billion cash cow. With Pearson Publishing having a foothold in most states, especially you can bet all politicians (at least the GOP ones) and groups like the one mentioned in the article are funded by large foundations like Broad, Gates, Walton, etc…. The worst part is that because some of these people own the media they have convinced much of the public that teachers are the villains. They have also convinced the viewers that public schools have more money than they need and they are miss using it. When it comes to public schools Texas is the evil empire.
LikeLike
http://jonathanpelto.com/2013/01/31/when-it-comes-to-k-through-12-education-we-see-a-500-billion-sector-in-the-u-s-rupert-murdoch/
LikeLike